About eyeofbakersfield


Member Since:
July 05, 2006
Last Signed In:
May 05, 2008
Profile Views:
5396
Blog Views:
75840
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Relay for Life -- Bakersfield a leader
Lay off the old people, you NFL bruisers
Scratching and rubbing, good feelings
Female-only buses in Mexico City, but not Bakersfield
A $200,000 ride to space, how nice
How healthy are your dogs?
Mother gives up newborn to Bakersfield fire station
A $2,000 puppy stolen in Oildale
How much of a hassle are fog delays?
Fog, the thing I like least about Bakersfield
Archives
July 06
August 06
September 06
October 06
November 06
December 06
January 07
February 07
March 07
April 07
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
More Archives
June 06
May 06
April 06
March 06
February 06
January 06
December 05
November 05
October 05
September 05

Blog Roll


Ask The Californian
Editorials
Entertainment
Eye of Bakersfield
Faith Forum
Fired Up!
Inside Sports
Neighbors
Right Thinking
Sound Off
Talk of the Town
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


eyeofbakersfield - > Eye of Bakersfield -> The IQ level of Wal-mart shoppers
The IQ level of Wal-mart shoppers
My name is Steve Swenson.

I shop at Wal-mart.

Not quite the same thing as being an alcoholic, but I mention that I shop at the retail giant so I can have the right to comment about the next story.

Seems that one of its cashiers was fired for saying on his MySpace page that if bombs were dropped on the stores, the average IQ would go up.

What happened to truth as the best defense?

I'm not saying all Wal-mart shoppers are slow between the ears (though most are slow in the aisles). After all, as I've previously confessed, I shop there (only to buy coffee for our work coffee club). And my brain power is blessedly enormous.

But there are shoppers in Wal-mart whom I believe I've previously seen on the Jerry Springer Show.

I am just appalled that such a friendly corporate giant would fire a cashier, who the story says has won accolades at work, for a little joke on his MySpace page. I thought Wal-mart was bigger than that.

Posted by Steve E. Swenson

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by eyeofbakersfield on Thursday, May 31, 2007 at 07:48 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 260 times
22 comments from 14 users

1

posted by OldBlue56 on May 31, 2007 at 07:56 PM

I went through the 12 step program, and have been Wal-Mart free for darn near 10 years now....

posted by tkozy on May 31, 2007 at 08:09 PM
 

I don't shop at WalMart. But I do go there with friends that do. Sometimes they need help carrying things out to their car.

Just thought I should clear up any confusion.

Any bomb dropped in my vicinity that would lead to my demise. Would have swung the IQ pendulum to disastrous lows.

posted by GrpThink on May 31, 2007 at 08:47 PM
I am just appalled that such a friendly corporate giant

You blew it right there.

Walmart has been sued, successfully, for treating their employees like slaves. They've gone as far as locking the doors to their stores so that employees were forced to work overtime without pay.

Walmart is notorious for extorting tax breaks from local communities and for driving local companies out of business.

The vast majority of the products they sell are from slave shops in China.
posted by NancyII on May 31, 2007 at 08:59 PM

The business of locking employees in and forcing them to work overtime without pay is not common.  I don't doubt it happened in some stores with greedy managers but I can guarantee you it didn't happen in Bakersfield.  We were told that if we worked off the clock we would be fired.  And he meant it.  Most likely he was more cautious of labor laws and suits then some, but he wasn't about to risk it.  If it had happened in any of the other two stores, we would have heard.."associates" love to gossip.

The doors are locked after closing for protection of merchandise and employees.  They are only unlocked by an asst manager for breaks and lunches but if anyone tries to tell you they can't get out then they aren't aware of all the security fire doors all over the place.  You can ALWAYS get out that way in case of an emergency.

Those of us who were closers needed to be out of the store at our designated time and if you were late getting to the door, you had to hunt down the night assistant to get out.  For those who think that's cruel, you've never worked where you were about the only one on the floor with the front doors unlocked.  (they started the locked policy about 3 years after I started there)  It gets pretty creepy knowing anyone could walk in those doors with  most of the staff on break in the back.

I don't defend a lot of WM's practices but I really wish people who have never worked there would realize if you haven't done it yourself, you're just repeating things you heard.  I had a lot to complain about in my 4 years there, but it was first hand experience and I tempered it with the benefits I received.

posted by Jburger on May 31, 2007 at 09:13 PM
Swenson.

If your  brain power is "blessedly enormous" then Bakersfield has mild summers.

(evil grin)

James

P.S. To all of the rest of you: the best thing about working with Steve Swenson is having a never-ending string of opportunities to insult him.
posted by GrpThink on May 31, 2007 at 09:20 PM
you're just repeating things you heard

It's more than just things we've heard, Nancy. As an employee, you should know that.

There are actual lawsuits filed by actual employees in locations all over the country.

www.lieffcabraser.com/walmart%20lawsuit.htm
blog.guerillascience.com/?p=227
www.wal-martlitigation.com/howmany.htm
www.sptimes.com/2005/02/18/Business/Wal_Mart_sued_over_se.shtml

And in Canada, Walmart closed a store rather than let their employees unionize. They threatened to close another store in Georgia if they unionized.
posted by ghostriter on May 31, 2007 at 09:49 PM

"But there are shoppers in Wal-mart whom I believe I've previously seen on the Jerry Springer Show."
Aawww, Steve, I gave you better credit for intelligence. You don't really watch Jerry Springer, do you? ;P

I myself am allergic to WalMart...it makes me break out. Ditto for Jerry Springer.

Fun post, Steve. I enjoyed the humor.

posted by NancyII on May 31, 2007 at 10:07 PM

Grp..I acknowledged that there were stores where there were major problems but I made it clear that the problems are not universal.  Store managers are under the gun to produce major profits at the least cost to the company and some went beyond the line to comply. 

When I worked there, one couple worked the night shift and the guy got caught stealing.  He was fired and the couple called corporate to complain.  Before the dust settled, he was put back to work.  I never understood that.  In my 4 years there, there were people who were given chance after chance ...people that if I had the authority I would have fired on the spot as they made MY work ten times harder.  I've always made it clear that I can't speak for the rest of the country..only for the stores here in Bakersfield.  I also know that there are a lot of people who cry discrimination and unfairness if they are expected to actually work, or to follow rules and dress codes.   Another thing I know is that a lot of people are probably afraid of losing their job but there is no way you can be locked in a store if you want out.  And I, personally , would never work off the clock if I was told I had to do it.  I've done it lots of times on my own in all the jobs I've had because my work ethic wouldn't let me leave until I was finished.  My bosses were not aware of it by the way.

I've read a ton of the suits along the way so I didn't go to your links.  I'm guessing yours don't say anything new.  Again, I'm not saying some of them aren't justified but I stand by what I said about a lot of people just read something like that and all of a sudden it's gospel and every Walmart is in the same evil conspiracy.  I've heard it said that Mr Walton would probably roll over in his grave if he saw what corporate has done to his company...and I would agree on that.

 

posted by steveeswenson on Jun 1, 2007 at 07:43 AM
Anon 10:40,

   I am not a loser. I have  blessedly enormous brain power, which apparently isn't recognized by everyone (no offense, James Patty Melt).  Still, I am not a loser. At least I have a name.
posted by jasonsperber on Jun 1, 2007 at 08:17 AM

Hey, Swenson and Burger, take it outside (or at least keep it in the newsroom)--we're trying to run a respectable website here.  ;)  And anon/10:40, that wasn't very nice, esp. after all the nice things you said on another post last night under your own name...

Anyway, re: Walmart, apparently someone out on the interweb thinks one of ours is a worthwhile tourist attraction...

posted by antiextremism on Jun 1, 2007 at 09:28 AM

I don't mind low IQs as much as bad manners.

Get your freakin' cart outta the middle of the aisle while your kid is flinging products to and fro while having a tantrum, don't blame the cashier because your card is maxed out, and NO you can't have that much money in cash back from your welfare card so you can buy Bud Light!

posted by adampayne on Jun 1, 2007 at 09:36 AM
Steve, you thought Wal-mart was "bigger than that?" It is so big it doesn't even realize who it offends or destroys. Wal-mart has become an entity much like some prehistoric giant, who although very crafty in securing a continual food supply for itself to keep it growing, has planted the very seeds of its demise by obliterating all the creatures that enabled the source of its fuel. It is so large it is oblivious to everything but its own hunger. Communities try to block access, but the giant continues to batter the legal system and with its sheer force of size eventually wears down the opposition. 

Lowered wages, lowered benefits and higher health care costs can all be attributed in a very large measure to Wal-Mart, America's largest employer. The fact that they have achieved these draconian results on the American public while selling itself as a benevolent partner in communities across the land is an amazing feat. Other retailers trying to match the low price points have eliminated long time employees, cut benefits, reduced wages and cut vendors all in the drive to the bottom. The consumer is the ultimate loser with far fewer choices to both shop at, and work for, as the end result. And, for all the wonders of the Internet, don't think that the giant with the biggest bank acount is not already devising tactics to price out and legislate around competitors.

Lowest price at any cost is the true motto.



 
posted by NancyII on Jun 1, 2007 at 09:48 AM
Whooeee Anti..are you sure you didn't work there?  You sure described an average day that associates put up with.
posted by mattloch on Jun 1, 2007 at 10:17 AM
Obviously, if the bombs dropped on it would kill the shoppers to increase the national IQ, that means that the employees would be inside as well, right Nancy?  ;)  (Hey, the guy was dumb enough to post this stuff on his Myspace page, kinda proving this point for me.)

It would also decrease the amount of money the country pays in welfare (again, including employees)....

Of course, to get as many stupid people as possible, you'd have to do it on "Black Friday".
posted by NancyII on Jun 1, 2007 at 10:39 AM

Of course Home Depot and Lowes didn't drive out or close down any local hardware stores or lumber yards.  LumberJack  isn't araound anymore.  I wonder why that is.  Odd that I never hear of them when they abandon big box stores or undercut your local people.  I wonder how Tehachapi Lumber is doing now that Home Depot came to town.

Bash WM all you want..most of what you say is true...but I'd like to see people spread it around to some of the other massive retailers.  You've about beat that old horse to death.

posted by NancyII on Jun 1, 2007 at 10:44 AM

I posted before I read yours Matt..and yeah..I guess some of them would still be in the store when the bomb hit and I'll agree (anonymously of course) that some of the people WM hires aren't the sharpest tools in the shed but that's another story.  I'm not sure if it was meant that the IQ would be raised by getting rid of the associates or the customers.  Was that specified?    :-0

(shock..oh my)

posted by pamg on Jun 1, 2007 at 11:17 AM
Hate WM...always have.  For a lot of the reasons posted above; stupid shoppers, rude shoppers, unhelpful sales staff, I could go on and on, but you get my point that I'm the last person on the planet to defend Wal-Mart.  But I can't help but wonder how many of the lawsuits have had the union behind them, not necessarily because they felt employees were being treated unfairly, but out of revenge.
posted by adampayne on Jun 1, 2007 at 11:19 AM
There's plenty of blame to go around in the big-box world we inhabit today, but brothers HD & Lowe's along with the others have simply modeled their business practices after the Big W. Large cavernous buildings with the most dreadful merchandising imaginable. The controlled purchases of inventory from the central purchasing center at corporate HQ makes these behemoths poster children of bland and banal. The employee has no investment in these places, other than his pretty meager pay stub , which is why everyone witnesses virtually no customer service and extraordinarily high turnover at these pits.  Full time means 20 to 28 hours of work per week to go with the worst vacation and sick day policies in the developed world. If they all went away tomorrow the world would be a much more livable place.
posted by adampayne on Jun 1, 2007 at 11:41 AM
What is it about unions in this neck of the woods? I have never, in all the locations I've been to and lived in, heard so many anti-union comments than here in Backwardsfield, CA. Have you not noticed that the only people remaining with decent wages and benefits belong to unions, unless you're a very lucky entrepeneur. You know, screen actors, screen writers, film directors, firemen, public service employees, policemen, nurses and teachers are the last of dying breed. Even high paying professionals all belong to organizations  and associations  who  lobby and advance their agendas with dues or fees attached. Why do you think you can go alone against conglomerates today and achieve anything of substance in wage and benefit gains? Your anger at wage and benefit plight should not be directed at unions, or their supporters, but at the corporations and their paid henchmen who obliterate living standards over the entire world in the name of record profits for the very few . There is no trickle down, there is only growing substandard living conditions, and Wal-mart is the biggest contributor to this growing trend.
posted by pamg on Jun 1, 2007 at 11:58 AM

adampayne, I'm not saying that unions don't have their place.  They've made huge strides in eliminating unfair, unhealthy and unsafe work practices, as well as ensuring people a living wage.

But they don't always play by the rules, and I don't always feel that the union agenda is about the worker, but rather about the union itself.

posted by anonymous on Jun 1, 2007 at 12:51 PM

Posted by Drummel:

People are money-smart to shop at Walmart. The thing I absolutely hate about Walmart is when the stock people start moving massive amounts of stock into the isles beginning at 7 or 8 pm. That's prime shopping time for me. That and they always seem to be cleaning the men's room when I have to go (from the beer I drink before I shop) which means I have to walk all the way to the other bathroom on the farthest side of the square-mile store. Other than that, I go to WinCo.

posted by any1 on Jun 1, 2007 at 03:04 PM

For every instance of abuse by big bad WM, I could recite you one that would counter it, and 'prove' to you that they can be a better employer than your average retailer. I have worked in some type of retail all of my life and at one time have had 7 family members work for WM in different capacities. Nancy II has come the closest to actually knowing what she is talking about.

I am afraid this is another subject that will never be agreed upon.

The worst part of this is that this fella was fired because of a personal comment on a personal site. If this was not done on company time why should his opinion be censored? It didn't read like a threat to me, more like a comment on what he felt he was dealing with. This is like a company firing you because you were spotted in a bar and that might somehow impact the cost of their health care benefits.

 

1

Leave a Comment
Ground Rules for posting comments:
  • No profanity or personal attacks.
  • Please comment on the subject of the post itself.
If you do not follow these rules we will remove your comment. Please keep it civil.

To protect users from spam, please enter the text from the image on the left.
   

Our readers recommend: