|
Relay for Life -- Bakersfield a leader Lay off the old people, you NFL bruisers Scratching and rubbing, good feelings Female-only buses in Mexico City, but not Bakersfield A $200,000 ride to space, how nice How healthy are your dogs? Mother gives up newborn to Bakersfield fire station A $2,000 puppy stolen in Oildale How much of a hassle are fog delays? Fog, the thing I like least about Bakersfield July 06 August 06 September 06 October 06 November 06 December 06 January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 June 06 May 06 April 06 March 06 February 06 January 06 December 05 November 05 October 05 September 05 Blog RollAsk The Californian Editorials Entertainment Eye of Bakersfield Faith Forum Fired Up! Inside Sports Neighbors Right Thinking Sound Off Talk of the Town
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Birth control pill for men? Ladies are you down with that?
It works for rats. Can men be far behind?
A birth control pill is being developed for men. Studies show it has no side effects and doesn't reduce a man's virility. (That's good because that would be a deal breaker.) Availability is still a few years away, But the question is — would men take it? And would women trust men to take it? Or is abstinence still your favorite form of birth control? Posted by Steve E. Swenson 12 comments from 8 users
1
posted by
tchudilowsky
on Oct 31, 2006 at 09:23 AM
The woman is the one who will carry the baby and be pretty much responsible, so it is the woman's responsibility to prevent it if she doesn't want a baby. posted by
ProgressivePete2
on Oct 31, 2006 at 09:28 AM
posted by
dgrealish
on Oct 31, 2006 at 09:29 AM
Considering men would have control of their procreating rights and no longer at the mercy of "unscrupulous women" ;-) I'm willing to bet birth control for men will be a great success. posted by
TomW
on Oct 31, 2006 at 09:32 AM
posted by
Hardliner4freedom
on Oct 31, 2006 at 09:42 AM
. I see the man's side: Nothing wrong with an extra backstop of safety. Father a child unintentionally, and you're sold into 18 years of state-mandated slavery. posted by
tchudilowsky
on Oct 31, 2006 at 09:54 AM
dgrealish and Hardliner, you are both so right. Men should consider it if they are sure they do not want kids or years of totally unfair child support. posted by
bakoblue
on Oct 31, 2006 at 04:06 PM
And, guys, before you go gettin' all offended, I'd suggest you not trust some woman who tells you she's on the pill. There are a lot of men out there paying child support because they bought that line. posted by
randomfactor
on Oct 31, 2006 at 04:08 PM
. Were it to affect me directly, I'd want *BOTH* of us on the pill. And a condom besides. posted by
TomW
on Oct 31, 2006 at 04:14 PM
posted by
dgrealish
on Oct 31, 2006 at 04:18 PM
posted by
freethinker
on Nov 8, 2006 at 10:18 AM
posted by
randomfactor
on Nov 8, 2006 at 10:30 AM
1
Our readers recommend: |