About firedup


Member Since:
June 23, 2006
Last Signed In:
June 19, 2008
Profile Views:
3965
Blog Views:
37564
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Royalty in Bakersfield? Who wudda thunk?
No on Prop. 98, Yes on 99
Re-elect Mayor Harvey Hall
Errea, Mitchell, Brehmer for bench
HOW DO WE JUDGE A JUDGE?
MATHEW "MATT" BRADY - Westra Seat
CHARLES ROBERT "CHIP" BREHMER - Westra Seat
FRANK BUTKIEWICZ - Westra Seat
MICHAEL RALPH GARDINA - Westra Seat
TONY KARL HEIDER - Westra Seat
Archives
June 06
July 06
August 06
September 06
October 06
November 06
December 06
January 07
February 07
March 07
April 07
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
More Archives
June 06
May 06
April 06
March 06
February 06
December 05
November 05
October 05
September 05
August 05
July 05
June 05
May 05
April 05
March 05
February 05

Blog Roll


Ask The Californian
Editorials
Entertainment
Eye of Bakersfield
Faith Forum
Fired Up!
Inside Sports
Neighbors
Right Thinking
Sound Off
Talk of the Town
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


firedup - > Fired Up! -> ‘Golly, we’re sorry' just isn't cutting it anymore
‘Golly, we’re sorry' just isn't cutting it anymore
By DIANNE HARDISTY
Editorial Page Editor

-

Breakfast. My husband was crunching his Cheerios, hogging The Californian. I was flipping through another newspaper, washing down Special K with black coffee, when I spotted the story.

So, Jack, did you get some ballot information from CalPers?

He recalled he had — a mailer in advance of a California Public Employees Retirement System board election.

Do you still have it? Go get it. I want to show you something.

Now? I’m reading. I’m eating.

Yes, I think you will want to see this.

He lumbered off to rummage through a desk in our home office, returning shortly with the mailer sent to about 500,000 retired government workers.

See anything you recognize above the mailing address?

He did. He wasn’t happy. He responded: “Those jerks.”

There for every mail handler and criminal dumpster diver to see was Jack’s Social Security number — a vital piece of everyone’s “financial identity,” a piece law enforcement agencies and banks tell us we must guard. Thieves armed with our Social Security number can rack up bills and clean out our bank accounts.

CalPers plastered retired California government employees’ Social Security numbers across the outside of mailers last week. It was yet another stunning example of bone-headed stupidity, or sheer indifference.

 The reason doesn’t matter. We  have seen reports of government agency laptop computers containing citizen’s Social Security numbers and other critical information going missing. There have been numerous breaches of security at the Veterans Administration, putting active and retired military personnel and their families at risk.

University computers have been entered, targeting students, alumni and faculty. Major department stores have jeopardized customers. And even financial institutions — the very ones who warn us to guard our Social Security numbers — have reported security lapses.

A television commercial shows a scruffy thief pawing through a trash can. We are warned to be vigilant. Shred sensitive documents before discarding them. Heck, why should a thief bother to get his fingers dirty in my trash can when government agencies and businesses are just handing out the information?

CalPers sent out a postcard apology to its members this week. Big deal! The postcard also contained “fraud alert” steps we can take if we “have any concerns.” 

CalPers spokesman Brad Pacheco explained a CalPers data file was given to a vendor who mailed out the election information. A computer accidentally lifted Social Security numbers from the data and added the numbers to the mailing labels.

So, Brad, did anyone get punished for this screw up?

“We’re taking an ‘enterprise strategic view,’” he responded.

Brad, I have no idea what you just said.

 With that, Brad launched into a more convoluted explanation. The bottom line: No one is being punished because so many are to blame. Security will be tightened, he promised, adding that security training has been ordered for the entire staff.

I am sure you would get the same gobblygook explanation from the VA or other agencies after they have jeopardized clients or customers. But this stuff keeps happening. What’s a person to do?

With 8 million identity theft cases reported a year at a cost of $5 billion to those victimized, one of the fastest growing segments of the insurance industry is identity theft coverage. Oddly some of the very agencies or corporations offering  coverage have had their own security breaches.

But while the coverage is relatively inexpensive, many financial experts contend it is a waste — policies are redundant and cover only limited costs.

But since we have less and less control over the security of our financial information, properly crafted identity theft insurance would be a prudent protection.

And like companies offering automobile insurance, identity theft insurance carriers likely would demand increased security steps be taken. The automobile insurance industry constantly lobbies for vehicles and highway travel to be safer. Wouldn’t it be nice if identity theft insurers pressured for increased security measures?

If identity theft insurance today is a consumer rip-off, California’s elected insurance commissioner should clean up the industry’s act.

“Golly, we’re sorry,” just isn’t cutting it anymore.

To respond to Editorial Page Editor Dianne Hardisty, e-mail dhardisty@bakersfield.com.
Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by firedup on Friday, August 31, 2007 at 04:24 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 106 times
5 comments from 5 users

1

posted by antiextremism on Aug 31, 2007 at 05:08 PM
Wow. Monumentally stupid.
posted by JeffHarbin on Aug 31, 2007 at 07:48 PM

Had this occurred in the People's Republic of China, Brad (or Brad's boss, or maybe both of them) would have been lined up against a wall and shot before lunch.  There are days when I think maybe the Chinese are on to something.

posted by samheath on Sep 1, 2007 at 05:35 AM
When no one in government is held accountable, no one is expected to be responsible.
posted by ronmexico on Sep 1, 2007 at 09:01 AM
What is monumentally stupid is allowing the government to be in charge of your retirement...
posted by randomfactor on Sep 1, 2007 at 10:28 AM

Or your sex life, RonM?  How about allowing the government to choose whom you can't marry? 

.

What's monumentally stupid is not realizing that computers--not 9/11--"changed everything."  If your comment were valid, only your retirement would be endangered by this lapse, and not *ALL* your financial data.   

.

The proof is in the final results:  Social Security is the number-one Government success story of the 20th century.   That's not to say that some folks (Many of them with the middle initial "W") can't do their best to schmuck it up.

1

Leave a Comment
Ground Rules for posting comments:
  • No profanity or personal attacks.
  • Please comment on the subject of the post itself.
If you do not follow these rules we will remove your comment. Please keep it civil.

To protect users from spam, please enter the text from the image on the left.
   

Our readers recommend: