''Forgive then for they not know what they do''  Jesus Christ when he was being crucified.  I will be voting Yes on 8 because I KNOW it's the right thing to do.  It says so in the book you quoted. 

It says to vote yes on 8?????

sucks.. it also says there will be homosexuals marrying in church right before the end of the world.. I think its messed up because some homosexuals are born with high hormones>? or less testastorone then others but then again it is choice just like some choose to marry their cousins lol but thats something else. Not everybody grows up in the same environment so i think it is discrimatory but we have to protect the rights from those who choose not to marry homosexuals due to their beliefs. So i guess its up to the people to decide on this issue the sad part is the majority votes YES so the majority wins.

Both sides feel discriminated against----one side for their religious beliefs, or their beliefs that homosexuality is a choice, and one side, for their sexual orientation.  It's better not to argue over which side is the bad side.  It's best just to quietly vote.   We all have our reasons to vote the way we vote.  Let's not judge one another for our beliefs concerning this issue.

I'm revolted by sexual perversion. Period. And I'm revolted by perverts attempting to make this a "civil rights" issue. YES ON 8!

Sam I take offense at being called a pervert .......I should just delete you because you would delete me...........Just because I don't support your geriatric way of thinking doesn't make me a pervert.....I am married with  7 children......does that make me a pervert.

No on 8 stop the hate

I just got back from taking my wife to work and some one stole most of these sighs.....I'll be glad when this election ends tomorrow.

" I'm revolted by sexual perversion."
 

That's probably s good thing... But what does that have to do with the idea you have about who other people  may be sleeping with?

And after that, what does it have to with prop. 8?

--virgil

I'm revolted by sexual perversion.

I'm revolted by those who have this attitude over Proposition 8.  Hate, blind, unreasoning hate is fueling this proposition.

I will be voting Yes on 8 because I KNOW it's the right thing to do. 

You know not what you do.  The Romans felt perfectly justified in *THEIR* actions as well.

Hawkica, in this democracy the majority does not win over even the smallest minorities who are protected from discriminatory injustice.

But passage of the discriminatory Proposition 8 amendment of California's constitution might be best, sending the issue to higher courts where it will ultimately be overturned and such discrimination finally outlawed entirely in this nation.

Samheath, too bad you're revolted by homosexuality, but your personal revulsion is not an issue here. The right - yes, the civil right - of committed couples of any gender to marry will eventually be upheld one way or another, like it or not, because its what's fair and just.

Dgrealish, your "book" is thankfully not the law of the land.

But if law was based on the principles of Jesus, the abridgment of the rights of homosexuals to their personal pursuit of happiness would not be tolerated.

" Blind, unreasoning hate."   Now there's an unbiased opinion if I ever saw one.  RF, we've tried explaining it to you so many times that one would think you'd finally get it.

I don't approve of my kids actions all the time, or their lifestyle at times but I don't hate them.

Why is it so hard for you to understand that just because I don't approve of gay marriage it doesn't mean I hate gays?  Where DO you get the right to make such an arrogant and erroneous statement?  What you DON'T get is the right to tell me how I should feel or think.  The pesky little founding fathers paper you guys keep alluding to gives me the right to think and feel any way I choose.   It works both ways and you don't get to tell me how I should interpret it or how to live. 

I am SO sick of being told I HATE, just because I disagree or disapprove of something.  The day you can convince me that if my kids do somethng I don't approve of that I hate them, then maybe what you say will make a little sense.  Do you see that happening?

Why is it so hard for you to understand that just because I don't approve of gay marriage it doesn't mean I hate gays? 

Because you go *BEYOND* disapproval to take away a fundamental civil right.  If you love gays, you have an extremely mean-spirited way of showing it.

.

The pesky little founding fathers paper you guys keep alluding to gives me the right to think and feel any way I choose.

And then you go *BEYOND* it and impose your prejudices on the California Constitution.

.

What you seem unable to grasp, Nancy, is that your *OPINION* is not evidence of the hatred, it's your *ACTIONS*.  It's perfectly possible to hold an opinion opposing same-sex marriage and *NOT* vote yes on 8, just as you can dislike black people as a group and *NOT* try to keep them out of your restaurant.

There is *NO* unrefuted argument in favor of Proposition 8 that does not spring from prejudice.

None.

I can't say Americans used to be better than that.  The history of the US, from the treatment of Native Americans to slavery to Jim Crow laws, says otherwise.  But up until this year I honestly thought the American people were growing up.  Maybe they just found the last identifiable group it's still socially-acceptable to hate.

OT, but on the plus side it looks good for Proposition R on the San Francisco ballot.

Fortunately, neither Nancy's or anyone else's approval or disapproval of another's homosexual lifestyle or their right to the pursuit of happiness through marriage is significant.

Whether people like it or not, the basic underlying fact remains that discriminatory denial of basic human rights is just plain wrong.

The injustice of discrimination simply will not be tolerated in a humane society.

If passed, the measure will be legally challenged and overturned.

Thoughtful, fair minded people have successfully fought the injustice of discrimination in this nation far too long to allow this measure to stand.

You can deny homosexuals entry into your private churches and your homes, but you cannot deprive another citizen of the United States of America the right to enjoy the same privileges as you based on their color, race, creed, sex or sexual preference.

Maybe in another decade or so, homophobes and evangelistic psuedomoralists will finally get it.

Whatever.  And yes, this is a dismissal of your opinions both RF AND Saber.  I've stated my case and am done arguing with any of you on this issue.  Not one time have I told any of you that I've been discussing this with that you were dead wrong or that you should vote my way  Most of my arguments have been on your name calling and your hatred (God, there's that word again) of anyone who doesn't believe the way you do.  I've posted numerous articles saying people should decide for themselves but didn't attack you personally for your beliefs.  I didn't call gays perverts or deviants  but you, however, have continued to make it personal and now I'm done with you. 

Nancy, I'm not saying you should vote no on proposition 8.  I'm saying that the Christian thing to do is not to vote *YES*.

Again, it's not beliefs that prove hatred, it's actions. 

You didn't call gays perverts or deviants but plenty here have done just that.  When I answered one of those in kind you took it as an attack on you yourself.

I watched one of the newest Yes on 8 commercials last night. The first thing that was said "It interferes with my religious right to choose". How does two consenting adults entering into a LEGAL contract interfere with anyone's religious rights? Marriage is a legal contract, people, not a religious one. The only time religion is called upon in a marriage is if the couple wants their union blessed by the church. NO ON 8.

I'm revolted by sexual perversion. Period. And I'm revolted by perverts attempting to make this a "civil rights" issue. YES ON 8!

I'm revolted by ignorance. YOURS.