|
Barry Bonds sets home run record Paper: Joey Porter fight wasn't one-on-one Cut the chatter on the ball field, prevent crybabies David Carr is waived This big guy is a wuss in the Joey Porter fight Where will Joey Porter go? Soccer star David Beckham leaping over the pond to LA High-priced punks Bakersfield Jam wins first game Mark McGwire, hall of fame or hall of shame? June 06 July 06 August 06 September 06 October 06 November 06 December 06 January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 June 06 May 06 April 06 March 06 February 06 January 06 December 05 November 05 October 05 September 05 August 05 July 05 June 05 May 05 April 05 March 05 Blog RollAsk The Californian Editorials Entertainment Eye of Bakersfield Faith Forum Fired Up! Inside Sports Neighbors Right Thinking Sound Off Talk of the Town
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Whatever happened to sportsmanship?
When I played sports as a kid, I was taught that whether I won or lost, I was to conduct myself with the utmost class.
It's funny how, on the grandest stages in sports, the sportsmanship kids are taught at the lower levels suddenly get thrown out the window. The incident I'm specifically referring to is French soccer star Zinedine Zidane's head-butt on defender Marco Materazzi in France's 6-4 loss to Italy on penalty kicks in Sunday's World Cup final in Berlin. The match was in overtime, and the situation was understandably emotional — to the rest of the world, the World Cup is the Super Bowl times a million in terms of magnitude. It's understandable that, in the heat of the moment, some nasty words were exchanged, as Zidane and Materazzi appeared to be doing at the time. But there is no excuse — none — for what Zidane did to Materazzi. I don't care if Materazzi made insinuations about Zidane's mother, insulted his nationality or questioned his manhood. None of that warranted Zidane walking up to Materazzi and slamming his head into Materazzi's chest. Zidane — France's captain, which means he of all people should have been setting an example by being level-headed — was red-carded. For those who aren't soccer-savvy, that means he was ejected and France was forced to play a man down for the rest of the match— at a crucial juncture when his team needed his leadership most, I might add. To make matters worse, it was Zidane's last match before retirement. Could there have possibly been a more disgraceful way for Zidane to go out? Whether he wants to or not, he'll be remembered more for that head-butt than for leading an underdog French team farther into the tournament than it was ever expected to go. What do you think, Bakersfield? Is losing your cool on the field of play and physically attacking an opponent ever justified? Is it OK for athletes to have a little anger burning under the surface if it gives them an edge? — Ray Hacke 14 comments from 8 users
1
posted by
sagefever
on Jul 10, 2006 at 03:26 PM
posted by
ProgressivePete2
on Jul 10, 2006 at 03:31 PM
Please don't make this a forum for bashing the French. It's even less classy than the headbutt to the chest. posted by
robbwillis
on Jul 10, 2006 at 03:38 PM
posted by
motopoet
on Jul 10, 2006 at 06:00 PM
Trash talking and fights are a part of all physical and highly charged sports. Who's to say if it's right or wrong? It really doesn't matter. It's going to happen. It's more noticeable in soccer becaue there are no pads or helmets. Stadiums erupt in a frenzy when the benches clear at a baseball game or a couple of football players are ejected for fighting at a football game. The most replayed NASCAR moment in recent memory is Jeff Gordon shoving Matt Kenseth after the Bristol race. Most fans love a fight, a great hit or a crash as long as nobody is seriously hurt. I don't know anything about the names in soccer, but I am sure Materazzi has made his share of illegal whacks in his time. It has nothing to do witrh sportsmanship and everything to do with gamesmanship. If you can get the other guy flustered, you have the edge. Sports at that level are not like high school. These guys are not being payed to be good sports. They are payed to win. Show me a good loser and I will show you a loser. posted by
dmchenry
on Jul 10, 2006 at 06:08 PM
posted by
anonymous
on Jul 10, 2006 at 07:11 PM
No big deal! The Italians and the soccer world is responding like the military brass in Iraq. Shocking, shocking that violence is going on!
The old scene from the movie Casa Blanca is played out one more time. posted by
anonymous
on Jul 11, 2006 at 12:55 PM
Were you people watching the same match I was? How do you figure that Italy "deserved" to win? Win what? I couldn't tell if I was watching a soccer match or Olympic Diving. That was the most disappointing thing to me. France was by far playing better, and more professionally. These are seasoned athletes who have been playing for most of their lives. My 7 year old could take a bump better than most of the Italian players were...
The best quote I saw was: The messages for each country- France: "You mess with the bull, you get the horns." Italy- You won.
Nothing can excuse what was done, but the article that dmchenry links to does offer an explanation. This is a professional athlete at the end of his carrer. He has heard decades of trash talking, so what was said had to have been really bad. And I know that they were after him all match. He did the crime, he did the time, his team paid the price. As far as I'm concerned, this case is closed.
posted by
ProgressivePete2
on Jul 11, 2006 at 01:16 PM
posted by
anonymous
on Jul 12, 2006 at 11:32 AM
Zidane was driving towards the goal, and the defender was a step behind him. His right leg was clipped behind his left, causing him to fall (don't tell me you never did the same thing in grade school to someone and watch them stumble...). What would have happened if it was hockey? Correct answer: a penalty shot. I'm not saying that some of the French players weren't diving as well; I'm saying that the Italians were known for their acting skills even before the tourney: posted by
anonymous
on Jul 12, 2006 at 11:33 AM
Let's try this link again:
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
posted by
ProgressivePete2
on Jul 12, 2006 at 12:11 PM
posted by
anonymous
on Jul 12, 2006 at 03:37 PM
Watch the replay of the penalty again. Zidane was on a "breakaway", the defender was behind him, and clipped his legs. Keep your eyes on his feet, and how the defender clipped his lower leg so that he got crossed up. The defender was nowhere near going for the ball. The "non-call"s (there were several) looked to be an attempt by the refs to let the players play the game (so I'm not sure which specific "non-call" you're referring to), but occured too late in the game to make much of a difference. I would agree in the statement that the two sports are night and day comparisons (in penalty shots), and that both teams had people that were taking dives, but you cannot say that the French were on par with the Italians in either the number or absurdity of the dives.
posted by
anonymous
on Jul 31, 2006 at 11:08 AM
Anger in my opinion does not give an edge. It clouds judgment and affects a player's skills. Anger makes it personal rather than keeping a player working with his/her team mates. There is no room for anger on a playing field.
posted by
anonymous
on Oct 8, 2006 at 06:19 PM
What part of he's French did you not understand
1
Our readers recommend: |