About insidesports


Member Since:
June 22, 2006
Last Signed In:
August 08, 2007
Profile Views:
1997
Blog Views:
22656
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Barry Bonds sets home run record
Paper: Joey Porter fight wasn't one-on-one
Cut the chatter on the ball field, prevent crybabies
David Carr is waived
This big guy is a wuss in the Joey Porter fight
Where will Joey Porter go?
Soccer star David Beckham leaping over the pond to LA
High-priced punks
Bakersfield Jam wins first game
Mark McGwire, hall of fame or hall of shame?
Archives
June 06
July 06
August 06
September 06
October 06
November 06
December 06
January 07
February 07
March 07
April 07
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
More Archives
June 06
May 06
April 06
March 06
February 06
January 06
December 05
November 05
October 05
September 05
August 05
July 05
June 05
May 05
April 05
March 05

Blog Roll


Ask The Californian

Editorials
Entertainment
Eye of Bakersfield
Faith Forum
Fired Up!
Inside Sports
Neighbors
Right Thinking
Sound Off
Talk of the Town
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


insidesports - > Inside Sports -> Whatever happened to sportsmanship?
Whatever happened to sportsmanship?
When I played sports as a kid, I was taught that whether I won or lost, I was to conduct myself with the utmost class.

It's funny how, on the grandest stages in sports, the sportsmanship kids are taught at the lower levels suddenly get thrown out the window.

The incident I'm specifically referring to is French soccer star Zinedine Zidane's head-butt on defender Marco Materazzi in France's 6-4 loss to Italy on penalty kicks in Sunday's World Cup final in Berlin.

The match was in overtime, and the situation was understandably emotional — to the rest of the world, the World Cup is the Super Bowl times a million in terms of magnitude. It's understandable that, in the heat of the moment, some nasty words were exchanged, as Zidane and Materazzi appeared to be doing at the time.

But there is no excuse — none — for what Zidane did to Materazzi. I don't care if Materazzi made insinuations about Zidane's mother, insulted his nationality or questioned his manhood. None of that warranted Zidane walking up to Materazzi and slamming his head into Materazzi's chest.

Zidane — France's captain, which means he of all people should have been setting an example by being level-headed — was red-carded. For those who aren't soccer-savvy, that means he was ejected and France was forced to play a man down for the rest of the match— at a crucial juncture when his team needed his leadership most, I might add.

To make matters worse, it was Zidane's last match before retirement. Could there have possibly been a more disgraceful way for Zidane to go out? Whether he wants to or not, he'll be remembered more for that head-butt than for leading an underdog French team farther into the tournament than it was ever expected to go.

What do you think, Bakersfield? Is losing your cool on the field of play and physically attacking an opponent ever justified? Is it OK for athletes to have a little anger burning under the surface if it gives them an edge?

 — Ray Hacke
Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by insidesports on Monday, July 10, 2006 at 03:07 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 1013 times
14 comments from 8 users

1

posted by sagefever on Jul 10, 2006 at 03:26 PM
No it is not justified.Anger under the surface? yes if it's kept there.To me this is a small part of a larger problem.People want things easy,fast and do not be to concerned about how they get them.All I know is that what ever character or decent thing about me I have managed to develop came just when things were tough or hard. At the moment I chose not to react~or head butt~ thats the moment when I became part of somthing bigger than myself,and became better.Personal honnor~I can hear the laughter now~ is indeed the most precious thing on the planet. It is a sad truth that the head butt will mark this persons lifeand for what? If he had chosen the other path he would have a much more special place in history.
posted by ProgressivePete2 on Jul 10, 2006 at 03:31 PM
The game never have even gone to overtime. France was erroniously awarded a penalty shot in the early part of the game which resulted in a goal. The penalty was awarded because the french player dove and the ref got the call wrong. The important thing is that the right team won.

Please don't make this a forum for bashing the French. It's even less classy than the headbutt to the chest.
posted by robbwillis on Jul 10, 2006 at 03:38 PM

I was glad Italy won after the incident.

Sure would like to know what Materazzi said.

posted by motopoet on Jul 10, 2006 at 06:00 PM

Trash talking and fights are a part of all physical and highly charged sports. Who's to say if it's right or wrong? It really doesn't matter. It's going to happen. It's more noticeable in soccer becaue there are no pads or helmets. Stadiums erupt in a frenzy when the benches clear at a baseball game or a couple of football players are ejected for fighting at a football game. The most replayed NASCAR moment in recent memory is Jeff Gordon shoving Matt Kenseth after the Bristol race. Most fans love a fight, a great hit or a crash as long as nobody is seriously hurt. I don't know anything about the names in soccer, but I am sure Materazzi has made his share of illegal whacks in his time. It has nothing to do witrh sportsmanship and everything to do with gamesmanship. If you can get the other guy flustered, you have the edge. Sports at that level are not like high school. These guys are not being payed to be good sports. They are payed to win. Show me a good loser and I will show you a loser.

posted by dmchenry on Jul 10, 2006 at 06:08 PM
posted by anonymous on Jul 10, 2006 at 07:11 PM
No big deal!  The Italians and the soccer world is responding like the military brass in Iraq. Shocking, shocking that violence is going on!

The old scene from the movie Casa Blanca is played out one more time.
posted by anonymous on Jul 11, 2006 at 12:55 PM
Were you people watching the same match I was? How do you figure that Italy "deserved" to win? Win what? I couldn't tell if I was watching a soccer match or Olympic Diving. That was the most disappointing thing to me. France was by far playing better, and more professionally. These are seasoned athletes who have been playing for most of their lives. My 7 year old could take a bump better than most of the Italian players were...   The best quote I saw was: The messages for each country- France: "You mess with the bull, you get the horns." Italy- You won.   Nothing can excuse what was done, but the article that dmchenry links to does offer an explanation. This is a professional athlete at the end of his carrer. He has heard decades of trash talking, so what was said had to have been really bad. And I know that they were after him all match. He did the crime, he did the time, his team paid the price. As far as I'm concerned, this case is closed.
posted by ProgressivePete2 on Jul 11, 2006 at 01:16 PM
Are you saying that france wasn't diving too? How about that penalty kick in the beginning? The french player flew through the air like Charles Woodson in the snow. I saw so much diving  by all teams in this world cup. It was disgusting. Some of the games looked like there was a sniper in the stands. This is why I watch hockey (not that they don't dive, but they do get called on it). They take a puck to the face, get stitches and get back out there when the bleeding is contained. A soccer player gets bumped and the carry him out on a stretcher.
posted by anonymous on Jul 12, 2006 at 11:32 AM

Zidane was driving towards the goal, and the defender was a step behind him. His right leg was clipped behind his left, causing him to fall (don't tell me you never did the same thing in grade school to someone and watch them stumble...). What would have happened if it was hockey? Correct answer: a penalty shot. I'm not saying that some of the French players weren't diving as well; I'm saying that the Italians were known for their acting skills even before the tourney:

posted by anonymous on Jul 12, 2006 at 11:33 AM
Let's try this link again:   http://www.youtube.com/watc...
posted by ProgressivePete2 on Jul 12, 2006 at 12:11 PM
Actually you're wrong. Tripping in Professional Hockey warrants a 2 minute minor. A penalty shot is only awarded if the player with the puck is on a clear cut breakaway and is tripped (or interfered with) without the defenseman touching the puck but only if the player is robbed of a scoring attempt in the process. A penalty shot is awarded if a defending player other than the goalie covers the puck in the crease (the blue area in front of the goal). Penalty shots in hockey are rare and exciting. Both the shooter and goalie are fairly equal, with the goalie holding a slight edge in advantage. Penalty shots in soccer are not the same. The shooter has a tremendous advantage over the goalie. A soccer goalie has to be lucky and guess which way the shooter is going to be able to react fast enough. You may think that the french player didn't dive, but don't you think there was a reason the real penalty in the box later in the game wasn't called? It sure looked like a makeup non-call If I've ever seen one. Both teams were trying to draw penalties (diving) the whole game, and in fact all the games that I watched were full of divers. It's hard for me to say that any one team was doing it more than another. Frankly I'm looking forward to the NFL season. The only diving that goes on there is over the goal line.
posted by anonymous on Jul 12, 2006 at 03:37 PM
Watch the replay of the penalty again. Zidane was on a "breakaway", the defender was behind him, and clipped his legs. Keep your eyes on his feet, and how the defender clipped his lower leg so that he got crossed up. The defender was nowhere near going for the ball. The "non-call"s (there were several) looked to be an attempt by the refs to let the players play the game (so I'm not sure which specific "non-call" you're referring to), but occured too late in the game to make much of a difference. I would agree in the statement that the two sports are night and day comparisons (in penalty shots), and that both teams had people that were taking dives, but you cannot say that the French were on par with the Italians in either the number or absurdity of the dives.
posted by anonymous on Jul 31, 2006 at 11:08 AM
Anger in my opinion does not give an edge.  It clouds judgment and affects a player's skills.  Anger makes it personal rather than keeping a player working with his/her team mates.  There is no room for anger on a playing field. 
posted by anonymous on Oct 8, 2006 at 06:19 PM
What part of he's French did you not understand
1

Leave a Comment
Ground Rules for posting comments:
  • No profanity or personal attacks.
  • Please comment on the subject of the post itself.
If you do not follow these rules we will remove your comment. Please keep it civil.

To protect users from spam, please enter the text from the image on the left.
   

Our readers recommend: