|
Barry Bonds sets home run record Paper: Joey Porter fight wasn't one-on-one Cut the chatter on the ball field, prevent crybabies David Carr is waived This big guy is a wuss in the Joey Porter fight Where will Joey Porter go? Soccer star David Beckham leaping over the pond to LA High-priced punks Bakersfield Jam wins first game Mark McGwire, hall of fame or hall of shame? June 06 July 06 August 06 September 06 October 06 November 06 December 06 January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 June 06 May 06 April 06 March 06 February 06 January 06 December 05 November 05 October 05 September 05 August 05 July 05 June 05 May 05 April 05 March 05 Blog RollAsk The Californian Editorials Entertainment Eye of Bakersfield Faith Forum Fired Up! Inside Sports Neighbors Right Thinking Sound Off Talk of the Town
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
Mark McGwire, hall of fame or hall of shame?
Mark McGwire has been nominated for baseball's Hall of Fame.
If it wasn't for that steroid thing, he'd be a shoe in. Just last decade, virtually every American was wrapped up in home run races between McGwire and Sammy Sosa. Bloomberg sports writer Scott Soshnick summed up the dilemma for voting sportswriters this way: Their consternation centers on whether to admit McGwire, who finished his career with 583 home runs, which ranks seventh on MLB's all-time list. Five-hundred home runs, 3,000 hits --both are usually considered automatic entries.
Only McGwire didn't stop there. He meekly uttered the now- famous, ``I'm not here to talk about the past.''
If you were a sports writer, how would you vote on McGwire's nomination? Posted by Steve E. Swenson 10 comments from 5 users
1
posted by
dusty1215
on Nov 30, 2006 at 01:23 PM
I would probably hold him out this year as well. He really shouldn't of shown up at the hearing if he wasn't going to come clean. I think many people would of forgiven him if he had, I know I would. I respect Giambi for admitting his use of 'roids. Barroid Bonds..not so much..if at all. posted by
adampayne
on Nov 30, 2006 at 01:55 PM
My only problem with this steroid supplement thing and asterisking all potential abusers' records is that these items were never illegal in baseball prior to just a couple of years ago. The sport, after the last player's strike, was dead. Nobody cared any longer about really rich stupid guys playing this game that was very boring and took forever to complete. Heck, they don't even play the same game between the two leagues any longer. How stupid is that? The juice woke people up, and guys like McGwire, Sosa, Palmeiro and Bonds made the game exciting again. Are the leagues ready to return all the money they made with the home run frenzy back to us sucker fans who watched and paid for the priviledge? Hell no, that would be the honorable thing to do, but there is no honor among greedy owners of the pastime. Want to know why nobody watched this last year's World Series? It was boring, and at this point most of us have figured out that most players are spoiled addicts anyway and we don't care who is in some league Hall of Fame anyway. posted by
dusty1215
on Nov 30, 2006 at 02:08 PM
Before the steroids and HGH were outlawed everyone turned a blind eye to their use. The Padres GM Kevin Towers..as big a moron has you can find in the game, admitted everyone knew Caminiti did them the year he won the MVP with them. It broke my heart when I heard the truth years later, when Cammi confessed. But he did confess, and he tried to right the ship..sadly it still killed him. posted by
dusty1215
on Nov 30, 2006 at 02:11 PM
But, that said..I am bothered by the payrolls and paychecks of men playing a childs game for profit. posted by
ProgressivePete2
on Nov 30, 2006 at 02:34 PM
For anyone interested here's the story about Doc Ellis who said he was on LSD when he pitched a no-hitter. http://www.gettingit.com/ar... And a great quote from Doc: "If parents need athletes as role models, they're in trouble." --- damn thing cut me off again. posted by
dusty1215
on Nov 30, 2006 at 02:39 PM
posted by
adampayne
on Nov 30, 2006 at 04:25 PM
posted by
Shsrebel10
on Dec 1, 2006 at 10:16 AM
Fox baseball analysis Kevin Kennedy said that he thought the steroids allegations around Mark McGuire shouldn't be counted against him for entering the Hall of Fame because the steroid he took, Androstenedione, was legal and allowed in MLB at the time. I think I agree with this because if your going to allow your players to take it within the rule books, than why should McGuire be punished for something that was legal? posted by
ProgressivePete2
on Dec 1, 2006 at 11:26 AM
I actually don't care who used roids or whatever else for that matter. When it was going on with McGuire, Sosa, Bonds (no wait, he didn't use steroids), etc., It was obvious. Just like how track star Marian Jones suddenly became totally ripped with huge shoulders. It always seemed to me at the time that NLB didn't care. This was right around when they juiced the ball to get more homers. Well, they got them, baseball was exciting for a change. Everyone forgot about the strike. I even watched a few series in those years. Now, I could care less. Baseball is booring again. Yawn. posted by
ford1934
on Dec 5, 2006 at 06:45 PM
If I remember correctly Mark McGuire passed all drug tests that he took. Also I dont think that steroids were on the MLB illeagle drug list at that time. So if Mark committed no rule breaking or laws why would you hold him out of Hall of Fame I say let the first Baseball Writers Association of Americe voter without any sin or wrongdoing in his lifetime cast the first no vote for Mark McGuire. I dont think there would be many no votes it this were the case.
1
Our readers recommend: |