|
Religion or Spam? Free Rose Garden With New Home Purchase or Refi! True Salvation From Rising Gas Prices! It Was Blood for Oil, Now it's Blood for Cookies!!! The Honeybee-Let's Bomb Iran connection. My irrigation letter to Ashburn The Ugly Truth About US, or "Damn it feels good to be a gangsta." Time To March! Avoiding Iran Judging Teachers August 06 September 06 October 06 November 06 December 06 January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08 November 08
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
The Ugly Truth About US, or "Damn it feels good to be a gangsta."
The Ugly Truth About US, or "Damn it feels good to be a gangsta." Did you know that Americans comprise less than 5% of the world's population, but consume about a quarter of the world's resources? (This statistic is a rough approximation–the actual percentages vary by specific category, e.g. energy, food, & etc.) 6 comments from 6 users
1
posted by
Quest
on Jun 7, 2007 at 04:13 AM
I'd make a longer reply, but I'm too busy indulging in a heaping dish of caviar. After that I'm going to sleep in one of my 15 master bedrooms in my castle. Later I'll drop some cluster bombs and napalm on a few unfortunates to make room for my private resort and game preserve. Life is good, and I'm bangin'. Cheers! posted by
jasonsperber
on Jun 7, 2007 at 08:15 AM
I guess we know that school's out for the summer, 'cause you're back, Marsh! Welcome back. :) Have you seen the work of photographer Chris Jordan? I think I remember someone here posting a link before, but anyway, his work focuses on American consumerism and mass consumption, really interesting stuff. posted by
Griffon64
on Jun 7, 2007 at 08:58 AM
Hmmm wait, hang on. It doesn't have to be "all or nothing". Yay!
Hypothetically: Despite popular belief, it would not hurt the average American much to trim the fat by about say, oh, 40% ( a completely fictitious number! ). How do you chop off 40%? You dump the SUV, the new car every three years, the twice-weekly takeout, the individually wrapped, overprocessed consumer goods, the cheap plastic toys with the Happy Meal, the steak hanging over the edges of your plate and by extension your waistline hanging over the edge of your pants. You recycle your household waste, turn off the lights in rooms you are not in, run the AC at "comfortable" instead of "habit", plan your shopping trips to not go "house-shop-house-shop-house-shop-house-shop" but instead "house-shop-shop-shop-shop-shop-house". You didn't take a pay cut, either. You just reduced your footprint, the amount you consume. And you just discovered, to your surprise, that you are happier without that excess than you were thinking you were with it. Sadly though, there is still a deficit for America as a whole. Taking 40% off that 20% extra America consumes still leaves 60% to be handled. However! To get the numbers to match, you don't just need to consume less. You can also produce more. Bring back the jobs outsourced to India and China in the name of "More! Cheaper! More!". Bring back the dollars buying cheap ( and sometimes tainted ) foodstuffs from China. Bring back the dollars buying cheap produce from squeezed third world countries. Put the money back into American enterprises. Let us produce some of our stuff ourselves. More jobs. Stronger economy. Less interference in the rest of the world. ( comes with some cons too, like more expensive goods, but see above ) Producing more won't bridge that whole 60% gap, but say we cover half or it. That leaves only 30% of the original 20% excess, or about 7%, that we consume more than we produce. That is a whole lot less grabbing from the poor to feed our rich. And it didn't cost us our whole lifestyle. posted by
marsh
on Jun 7, 2007 at 09:05 AM
In time Griffon, as worldwide economic pressures wrought by population increases and diminishing enviromental returns, it will happen. In the meantime, increases in our GDP and world production as well as advances in technology will prop up this way of life and help many in the world to survive, and even enjoy some of our prosperity before we eventually outstrip everything and descend into a malthusian correction . . . posted by
adampayne
on Jun 7, 2007 at 09:06 AM
posted by
anonymous
on Jun 7, 2007 at 09:24 AM
You miss the point entirely Marsh, it is not the people, it is the system. As a free enter prise market system we count on there being wineries and losers.
We praise the winners and cull the losers to their proper place. In everything from medicine to housing , to education and quality of life, there are those who will live in opulence and those who live in poverty, both are acceptable in our system of government. Under our free market system, a friend in need is a pest. and whatever wrongs we see in the country are our burden like it or not. You see money position and connections do not make any American better than another!! Paris Hilton 2007
1
BAKERSFIELD.COM HOT TOPICS:Advertisement |