Vita Brevis, Tempus Fugit
Life is Brief, Time Flies. -random musings of the wise fool-
About marsh


Member Since:
April 21, 2006
Last Signed In:
October 20, 2008
Profile Views:
5656
Blog Views:
8162
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Religion or Spam?
Free Rose Garden With New Home Purchase or Refi!
True Salvation From Rising Gas Prices!
It Was Blood for Oil, Now it's Blood for Cookies!!!
The Honeybee-Let's Bomb Iran connection.
My irrigation letter to Ashburn
The Ugly Truth About US, or "Damn it feels good to be a gangsta."
Time To March!
Avoiding Iran
Judging Teachers
Archives
August 06
September 06
October 06
November 06
December 06
January 07
February 07
March 07
April 07
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


marsh - > Vita Brevis, Tempus Fugit -> The Ugly Truth About US, or "Damn it feels good to be a gangsta."
The Ugly Truth About US, or "Damn it feels good to be a gangsta."

The Ugly Truth About US, or "Damn it feels good to be a gangsta."

Did you know that Americans comprise less than 5% of the world's population, but consume about a quarter of the world's resources? (This statistic is a rough approximation–the actual percentages vary by specific category, e.g. energy, food, & etc.)

Most of us do not realize the implications of that statistic.  Furthermore, I daresay you don't want to know the implications, for it can make it hard to sleep at night . . . so stop reading here if you have an active conscience.  

Idealistically, Americans should produce 5% of the world's resources and consume their own 5%,  but we don't.  And we don't want just 5%.  No, we want that all-you-can eat, unlimited gas, central air and heating and 500+ channels on our TV.  We want the game, the car, the house.  Like all humans, we want it all, and thanks to free market capitalism, Ohio class ballistic missile submarines, and a little luck, we have just about all we care to gorge ourselves on.  

You see, in order for us to consume an extra 20% of the world's resources, we have to obtain them.  Traditionally, it's been a simple matter of conquest, but in the modern era, military conquest has to be done very subtly, for televisions freely display the horrors of war, and no person (who thinks themself decent) supports war for long.  So how do we get our extra 20%?  Well, it has to be taken from others.  The strong (US) attack the weak (them) and take our 20%.  No, not always by force, but we take by all means necessary.  Sometimes it means war, and most times it means supporting someone like Saddam Hussein, who we'll give arms and aid and turn a blind eye towards so long as he gives us cheap oil, or whatever else we'd like.  America is on a shopping spree, and if you'll give us a deal, we'll make you the finest tin-pot dictator yet minted!  But God help the poor bastard that refuses to play ball . . .

Now it's easy to take the moral high ground and criticize our nation and its policies.  But consider what it really  means to play fair.  Consider what it would mean to go without our extra 20% . . . For you and I it's easy to imagine.  Pretend you do the same job as now, but your pay has been cut by 80%.  You now only make 1/5 of (5/25 of 100%) your income.  Would you live where you do now?  Drive the same car? Take the same trips or eat at the same places?  Seriously, what would our lives be like without that "I'm an American" premium we get from the rest of the world?

By hook or by crook, it is no lie, we take, gather, and steal all we can to keep our quality of life (QOL, measured by how many of our theoretically unlimited demands we can meet) high.  No wonder every poor sap in the world wants in.  "Better to reign in hell than serve in heaven."

So what is it?  Shall we reduce ourselves to poverty in the name of fairness?  And who's to say if we do, that somebody else won't just take our place?  Trust, we do what we do because we are human, not because we are Americans.  The Asian is as capable as the African who is as capable as the European in this regard.  

So if you believe in fair play, by all means, start donating 80% of your net income to social causes, then I'll grant you the moral high ground from which you may cast upon me all the stones you wish.  Otherwise know, the food you eat, the gas you burn, the resources entire that you consume, are stripped from the hands of the poor, leaving them with less and us with more.  Know this is simply the first law of the jungle; "The weak shall suffer the strong".  Americans are obese for a reason.  "Damn it feels good to be a gangsta . . ."

Enjoy your buffet.

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by marsh on Wednesday, June 6, 2007 at 06:54 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 79 times
6 comments from 6 users

1

posted by Quest on Jun 7, 2007 at 04:13 AM
Why yes, just today I dusted off my collection of Ohio ballistic submarines and went hunting for some cheap oil.

I'd make a longer reply, but I'm too busy indulging in a heaping dish of caviar.  After that I'm going to sleep in one of my 15 master bedrooms in my castle.  Later I'll drop some cluster bombs and napalm on a few unfortunates to make room for my private resort and game preserve.  Life is good, and I'm bangin'.

Cheers!
posted by jasonsperber on Jun 7, 2007 at 08:15 AM

I guess we know that school's out for the summer, 'cause you're back, Marsh!  Welcome back.  :)

Have you seen the work of photographer Chris Jordan?  I think I remember someone here posting a link before, but anyway, his work focuses on American consumerism and mass consumption, really interesting stuff.

posted by Griffon64 on Jun 7, 2007 at 08:58 AM
Hmmm wait, hang on. It doesn't have to be "all or nothing". Yay!

Hypothetically:

Despite popular belief, it would not hurt the average American much to trim the fat by about say, oh, 40% ( a completely fictitious number! ).

How do you chop off 40%? You dump the SUV, the new car every three years, the twice-weekly takeout, the individually wrapped, overprocessed consumer goods, the cheap plastic toys with the Happy Meal, the steak hanging over the edges of your plate and by extension your waistline hanging over the edge of your pants. You recycle your household waste, turn off the lights in rooms you are not in, run the AC at "comfortable" instead of "habit", plan your shopping trips to not go "house-shop-house-shop-house-shop-house-shop" but instead "house-shop-shop-shop-shop-shop-house".

You didn't take a pay cut, either. You just reduced your footprint, the amount you consume. And you just discovered, to your surprise, that you are happier without that excess than you were thinking you were with it.

Sadly though, there is still a deficit for America as a whole. Taking 40% off that 20% extra America consumes still leaves 60% to be handled.

However!

To get the numbers to match, you don't just need to consume less. You can also produce more.

Bring back the jobs outsourced to India and China in the name of "More! Cheaper! More!". Bring back the dollars buying cheap ( and sometimes tainted ) foodstuffs from China. Bring back the dollars buying cheap produce from squeezed third world countries. Put the money back into American enterprises. Let us produce some of our stuff ourselves. More jobs. Stronger economy. Less interference in the rest of the world. ( comes with some cons too, like more expensive goods, but see above )

Producing more won't bridge that whole 60% gap, but say we cover half or it. That leaves only 30% of the original 20% excess, or about 7%, that we consume more than we produce. That is a whole lot less grabbing from the poor to feed our rich. And it didn't cost us our whole lifestyle.
posted by marsh on Jun 7, 2007 at 09:05 AM

In time Griffon, as worldwide economic pressures wrought by population increases and diminishing enviromental returns, it will happen.  In the meantime, increases in our GDP and world production as well as advances in technology will prop up this way of life and help many in the world to survive, and even enjoy some of our prosperity before we eventually outstrip everything and descend into a malthusian correction . . .

posted by adampayne on Jun 7, 2007 at 09:06 AM
Mighty fine post, Marsh!
posted by anonymous on Jun 7, 2007 at 09:24 AM
You miss the point entirely Marsh, it is not the people, it is the system. As a free enter prise market system we count on there being wineries and losers.
We praise the winners and cull the losers to their proper place. In everything from medicine to housing , to education and quality of life, there are those who will live in opulence and those who live in poverty, both are acceptable in our system of government. Under our free market system, a friend in need is a pest. and whatever wrongs we see in the country are our burden like it or not.

You see money position and connections do not make any American better than another!!

Paris Hilton   2007
1

  (You need to be signed in to leave a comment)

BAKERSFIELD.COM HOT TOPICS:

Advertisement