|
Let's talk about Sarah Palin, from somebody who knows her This town hates tall, skinny, boys! "Seven Questions for Liberals" Having problems getting your children to do chores? News from the Executive Branch ~7/20/07 Bush admits Administration broke the law... Father's day, and lessons he taught me An alternate history of Europe State of the Union blog thread "We don't talk to evil." November 06 December 06 January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Enough talk about Ms. Palin's daughter- leave the families alone. Even the Mafia had enough sense to let the families be. This is a letter about Sarah Palin, and the way she ran Wasilla, Alaska. This was originally posted on another site; written by somebody who lives in Wasilla, and watched Sarah carefully during her term as mayor. The things she says should serve as warning to those who claim Ms. Palin is somehow "experienced" in executive office because of what she did in Wasilla. While many of the things Palin did (or is accused of doing) might qualify her to operate under the current Administration, I don't think America can handle another 4-8 years of this kind of favoritism or abuse of power. This letter reveals a side of Palin that I have only seen glimpses of in the mainstream media so far. Many of the factual claims made against her can be verified by previous reporting, and supports many of the unverified (or unverifiable) claims.
I just spent a frustrating afternoon at that bastion of consumerism, The Mall. My son needed some new pants (because he keeps growing, the little weed), so we went in search of some. First stop was JC Pennys. One pair of 9 Slims in the entire store, and one pair of 10 Slim school pants with adjustable waistbands. Thinking about buying larger pants, and just getting a few belts to hold them on? Hope you like black braided leather, because that's the only style they have in his size. A quick once-through of their "big and tall" section (the largest of any store in town) for myself, and out we go with his two pants. Forget going to Macy's (who hates boys with such a passion their "boys" section is no larger than a bathroom) or Sears (more Husky sized clothing than normal size, so forget being skinny), or The Children's Place (where boys are banished to two small corners of the entire store), the only place left would be Old Navy. Good luck there, because they've moved from the Rule of 2/3rds (2/3rds of the store for female clothing, 1/3 for men) to 3/4ths (where women now control 3/4ths of the entire store). You can't even buy larger than fitting pants there, because they don't have any belts for boys.
I've had to stop shopping at the Mall for myself as well, because of the aforementioned lack of Tall clothing. In general, this town hates children and smart people. Proof? There is no longer a toy store or a book store in the mall. What other mall in America has no book store, and no toy store? Can the Valley Plaza staff answer that one for me?
This is an interesting Op-Ed column by someone who's point of view is decidedly more "conservative" than myself. It touches on several different subjects, all of which have been talked about in various blogs over the past few weeks (and years).
I'd like to toss it out there for people to read, answer, and discuss. I'm interested in all points of view, so defending the author's questions is encouraged. 2) Over the course of its existence, our planet has been much colder and much warmer than it is today, having endured periodic ice ages and various cataclysmic natural events. That being the case, why would anyone choose to believe that human beings are responsible for the earth’s most recent, and relatively mild, climatic shift? 3) The Bush doctrine of preemptive warfare would – in all likelihood – have saved tens of millions of lives had it been implemented against Nazi Germany prior to Hitler’s invasion of Poland in 1939. So why do human rights activists today insist that stopping Islamofascists from acquiring nuclear weapons isn’t worth the cost in human life? 4) Monetary transactions between private citizens are what fuel our economy. The government taxes private citizens, thereby removing money from the economy. Since economic growth is dependent upon increased monetary transactions within the private sector, why do Democrat lawmakers routinely propose raising taxes, especially on those citizens who invest the most money in our economy? 5) The word viable – as it applies to human beings – means capable of life or normal growth and development. An unborn human being during every stage of gestation is clearly alive and capable of normal development, unless he or she is genetically predisposed to abnormal growth or is hindered in some way from developing naturally by an external force. That being the case, why do some people argue that unborn human beings are non-viable during the earliest stages of their development, and therefore, appropriate candidates for abortion? 6) The Geneva Conventions’ protocols relative to the treatment of prisoners of war, were created for the purpose of holding the signatories of the various treaties which make up those Conventions to a certain moral standard of behavior during times of war. Any entity, be it a nation, group, or individual, that does not adhere to the standards set forth therein, is not subject to the Conventions’ protections under international law. How then can one justify affording such protections to terrorists, who ignore all of the aforementioned behavioral standards? Oh, and one last thing… 7) If George W. Bush is as stupid as so many liberals claim, how did he manage to steal an election, mastermind 9/11, cover up his administration’s involvement in that event after the fact, con practically every Congressional Democrat into going to war with Iraq just so he could further enrich his cronies in the oil industry, single-handedly destroy every American’s civil rights via the Patriot Act, and then steal a second election on top of all that? And if he’s really an evil genius, which he’d surely have to be to get away with even half of those things, why aren’t his primary political adversaries in prison on trumped-up criminal charges right now… or dead? Would your child(ren) rather play video games than do chores? Getting them to do 15 minutes of chores is somehow an excessive amount of effort to ask of them, but they'll invest hours per day into a game that seems to have no discernable goal, short of draining your bank account and turning them into zombies (filled with useless information and statistics)?
Do I have the thing for you! Chore Wars! Yes, now your child or children can earn valuable "Experience Points" for doing even the most mundane of daily chores! Instead of telling them that chores "build character" (like our parents did), let them play a "game" in which they "build a character", similar to Dungeons & Dragons or World of Warcraft. (If you don't understand either of these references, then most likely you don't have kids that are still living at home.) "Chore Wars lets you claim experience points for household chores. By getting a few people in your house or workplace to sign up, you can assign experience point rewards to individual chores, and see how quickly each of you levels up." In other words, your kids get to "play" the game by doing real world chores. "Characters gain a level for every 200XP they earn. When a character levels up, their strength, dexterity and other statistics are adjusted to reflect the chores that the character has performed - if you've gotten most of your XP from high-constitution vacuuming and gardening, then your character will muscle up and develop a higher constitution value; if you've not done any intellectually-challenging chores, your intelligence will go down, and so on." You can choose to reward your children by determining "prizes" for each level. Perhaps it is pizza for dinner. Perhaps it is a new video game. Perhaps it is a trip to the miniture golf course. You get to design the "game" for your family. To quote the source by which I first learned about this: "After seeing Chore Wars mentioned yesterday, the opportunities for manipulating people seemed... rich. ... When my charge is old enough to manipulate in this way, my crib is going to f@*king sparkle." Give it a look. (Its free!) Try it out. If at least one person's life is made easier by this, I will consider it a success. Before some of these stories completely threadjack other blogs/discussion threads, I'll attempt to post some of the stories coming out from and about the Executive Branch over the past 24-48 hours.
1) The President signed an Executive Order stating that under emergency powers he can sieze a person's properties if they're suspected of aiding and abetting terrorists (so long 4th and 5th Amendments!). 2) Cheney will be President for a Day while The Decider gets a colonoscopy. (Jokes about finding Bush's head, Cheney's hand, or WMDs can, of course, be made.) 3) Someone in the Administration has leaked to the Washington Post that the President believes he has the ability to force US Attorneys to not investigate Executive Branch acts, and to defy Congressional contempt citations. So we no longer have three co-equal branches of government. No more "justice for all". Not yours. 4) Senator Clinton was admonished by someone from the Pentagon (who used to work for Cheney) for asking about withdrawal plans from Iraq. She was told that such questions "aid enemy propaganda". Guess we're back the to "if you're not with us, you're against us" and "unpatriotic" tactics we saw years back. Guess they're getting desperate, and looking for scapegoats. (There was a Special Comment by Olbermann last night.) More stories can and will be added to this list as they come in (and I see them). A suggestion (not a requirement): put the number of the story that you're responding to before your response, so that we can keep the discussion about the various stories separate. For the trolls: THIS IS NOT A "BASH BUSH" THREAD! This blog is intended on serious discussions of the legal, political, philosophical, and literal repercussions caused by the actions of the Executive Branch.
...but it happened more than 24 hours ago, so the statute of limitations currently used against the Administration has expired.
From the AP (as posted on MSNBC): WASHINGTON - President Bush on Thursday acknowledged publicly for the first time that someone in his administration likely leaked the name of a CIA operative, although he also said he hopes the controversy over his decision to spare prison for a former White House aide has "run its course." <<snip>> "I'm aware of the fact that perhaps somebody in the administration did disclose the name of that person," Bush said. "I've often thought about what would have happened if that person had come forth and said, 'I did it.' Would we have had this endless hours of investigation and a lot of money being spent on this matter? But, so, it's been a tough issue for a lot of people in the White House. It's run its course and now we're going to move on."
I've been thinking about fatherly advice today, both received and given. And as appropriate as it would have been to post this blog topic last week, well, men are not known for remembering things like birthdays and anniversaries before the actual date. (And sometimes not until long afterwards.) But I wanted to post this blog (and thread topic) today because quite often we don't remember things like advice (both good and bad) until long after we needed to.
So today, after spending the day with your father, remembering your father, or being a father, please post fatherly advice you've received (and even that which you've given) here. Funny or sad, deep or shallow, all is welcome. Thanks dad, for everything. I know this isn't the typical topic that I post on or about, but I thought I should share this with everyone here.
I was reading through the LA Times yesterday, and came across an article about an art exhibit that they reviewed. The exhibit simply blew me away. Here's the summary from the gallery: "Ecuadorian artist Eduardo Villacis posits an alternative history following the landing of Columbus on the shores of the Americas. Instead of a European conquest of Aztec culture, Villacis envisions Columbus taken prisoner, his navigational tools examined and used to embark on an adventure to subdue and colonize a new world which will be renamed “Amexica.” This installation is a mock historical museum, complete with artworks, artifacts, and historical fragments of a vanquished people who once called their land “U-rop.” With this ambitious project, Villacis reflects on racism and the manipulation of religious beliefs as ideologies of conquest and as tools of deceit."
The artwork blew me away, both in its imagery (the Aztecs had some wicked evil looking writing) and its imagination. "Alternate histories" are a rich vein of fiction writing these days, and one which I enjoy when done well. Here are some of the pieces of art:
Aztec cannonballs The invasion fleet The construction of pyramids over the razed city of RomeFrom the Times article: " "Smoking Mirror" originated as a graphic novel, mimicking the museum exhibit form, with fake historical documents, war weapons and illustrations supposedly by artists of the time, for Villacis' thesis project at Cal State Fullerton, where he was a Fulbright scholar. It was first shown at the Laguna Art Museum in 2001. Villacis is still trying to finish the graphic novel and hopes to publish it in the United States.
To dramatize Columbus' arrest by Aztec authorities on charges of illegal immigration and traveling without proper identification, Villacis' "museum" includes a detention document from that supposed incident, written in a pseudo-Aztec script. In pastel and pencil illustrations, Villacis shows pyramids being constructed over the ruins of the Vatican (circa 1505), the Pope on trial for heresy in an Aztec court (1507) and a shining new Aztec city dwarfing what remains of Paris (1522). Physical "artifacts" also move the Amexican story forward: a priest's vestments in a glass case, pistols and cannonballs decorated with fantastical motifs that Aztec craftsmen supposedly made after studying the weapons brought by Columbus and his crew. (Villacis designed the weapons himself and asked a sculptor collaborator to realize them in clay.) The Aztecs' attempts to understand the European culture they are destroying are as comically uninformed as were those of the conquistadors in Latin America. Because the examples — Shakespeare, Michelangelo, Christ on the cross — are intimately familiar to western viewers, the ridiculousness of the conquerors' interpretations is all the more apparent. One caption speculates that the European natives worshipped a god named Henry, due to the inscription "INRI" above the crucified Jesus. Another notes that the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel must have depicted an orgiastic bacchanal: "The two masculine hands about to touch each other thus would be part of a larger homosexual scene." So, what do you think?
Since it appears nobody else has posted this yet, I'll open this blog up to comments from everybody. Share your impressions of the speech, or the Democratic response, or whatever you can think of related to the SOTU.
According to this news piece, Iran offered to end support of terrorism, and make it's nuclear program more transparent. In 2003. The US response was "we don't talk to evil." Thanks Cheney. If we don't talk to evil, why are people still talking to him?
Washington 'snubbed Iran offer'Iran offered the US a package of concessions in 2003, but it was rejected, a senior former US official has told the BBC's Newsnight programme.
Tehran proposed ending support for Lebanese and Palestinian militant groups and helping to stabilise Iraq following the US-led invasion. Offers, including making its nuclear programme more transparent, were conditional on the US ending hostility. But Vice-President Dick Cheney's office rejected the plan, the official said. The offers came in a letter, seen by Newsnight, which was unsigned but which the US state department apparently believed to have been approved by the highest authorities. In return for its concessions, Tehran asked Washington to end its hostility, to end sanctions, and to disband the Iranian rebel group the Mujahedeen-e-Khalq and repatriate its members. Former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein had allowed the rebel group to base itself in Iraq, putting it under US power after the invasion. One of the then Secretary of State Colin Powell's top aides told the BBC the state department was keen on the plan - but was over-ruled. "We thought it was a very propitious moment to do that," Lawrence Wilkerson told Newsnight. "But as soon as it got to the White House, and as soon as it got to the Vice-President's office, the old mantra of 'We don't talk to evil'... reasserted itself." Observers say the Iranian offer as outlined nearly four years ago corresponds pretty closely to what Washington is demanding from Tehran now. Since that time, Lebanese guerrilla group Hezbollah inflicted significant military losses on the major US ally in the region, Israel, in the 2006 conflict and is now claiming increased political power in Lebanon. Palestinian militant group Hamas won power in parliamentary elections a year ago, opening a new chapter of conflict in Gaza and the West Bank. The UN Security Council has imposed sanctions on Iran following its refusal to suspend its uranium enrichment programme. Iran denies US accusations that its nuclear programme is designed to produce weapons. |