montfreds blog

A blog about Politics.
About montfred


Member Since:
May 22, 2006
Last Signed In:
November 26, 2008
Profile Views:
2952
Blog Views:
6973
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Obama's new campaign commerical and more
Convention's 2.0
Obama v McCain 5pm (pst), internet connection
Congressman McCarthy's voting record for 2007-08
Pro-abortion, anti-gun's, Moderate, Kevin McCarthy ???
Saakashvili, $cheunemann, McCain and Russia
What do you Obama supporters think, is it Wes Clark for VP?
Iowa already looks out of reach for McCain, this won't help.
Fan of FiveThirtyEight blog?
Ron Suskind's "The Way of the World"
Archives
July 06
August 06
September 06
October 06
November 06
December 06
January 07
February 07
March 07
April 07
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
December 08
Links

U. S. Constitution
Bill of Rights
Register to Vote

Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


montfred - > montfreds blog -> House panel: Miers wrong to miss hearing
House panel: Miers wrong to miss hearing
WASHINGTON - A House panel cleared the way Thursday for contempt proceedings against former White House counsel Harriet Miers after she obeyed President Bush and skipped a hearing on the firings of federal prosecutors.

The House Judiciary subcommittee that Sanchez chairs voted 7-5 to sustain her ruling. The next step would be for the full Judiciary Committee to issue a finding that Miers, Bush‘s longtime friend and former Supreme Court nominee, was in contempt. Ultimately, the full House would have to vote on any contempt citation.

The White House showed no signs of backing down, pointing out that Bush was willing to make Miers and other administration officials available for interviews, but only behind closed doors and without a transcript. Democrats have rejected the offer.

The question grew more pressing when Bush ordered Miers to defy the committee‘s subpoena, unlike a lower-ranking former White House aide, Sara Taylor, who took a different approach Wednesday.

Saying nothing is the strategy that Miers, on Bush‘s orders, adopted Thursday.


The full story

By MATT APUZZO, Associated Press Writer 12 minutes ago
see also: Primer on Contempt Congress posted by MSN

 

Posted in these Groups:
Topics: White House counsel, Harriet Miers, contempt of congress, impeach bush, bush
posted by montfred on Thursday, July 12, 2007 at 12:50 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 29 times
6 comments from 4 users

1

posted by GrpThink on Jul 12, 2007 at 01:31 PM

 

If this was the 1970s or 1980s, I'd say that Miers is in a world of hurt.

But with the Supreme Court stacked with rightwing idologists, we all know how they will rule on Bush's claims of executive privilege.

posted by montfred on Jul 12, 2007 at 01:42 PM
The Supreme Court said as early as 1821 that without the power to hold people in contempt of Congress, the legislative branch would be "exposed to every indignity and interruption that rudeness, caprice, or even conspiracy, may mediate against it."
source from MSNBC Primer on Contempt Congress posted by MSNBC
posted by randomfactor on Jul 12, 2007 at 02:21 PM

It was "wrong" of her to miss the hearing in the sense that it's "wrong" to rob convenience stores, or "wrong" to fail to pay your income tax.  That is, a violation of law.

.

Even executive privilege doesn't exempt you from showing up to *CLAIM* executive privilege.  As a lawyer, she must be a real mamzer if they don't even trust her to say "no comment" satisfactorily. 

posted by montfred on Jul 12, 2007 at 03:22 PM
House Passes Iraq Pullout Timetable
War Funding Bill Approved 218-212; Bush Vows Veto

By Jonathan Weisman Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, March 24, 2007; Page A01

A sharply divided House voted yesterday to bring U.S. troops home from Iraq by next summer, attaching a timetable for withdrawal to the billions of dollars in war funding President Bush has demanded to prosecute an increasingly unpopular war.

Within minutes of passage, Bush denounced the bill as "an act of political theater" and an abdication of responsibility, sternly repeating his pledge to veto it.

.....one of the toughest antiwar measures ever to pass a house of Congress during combat operations. Just two Republicans, Reps. Wayne T. Gilchrest (Md.) and Walter B. Jones (N.C.), voted in favor...

Washington Post (more)

let's take a poll
vote yes, if you think the Californian will cover this story in editorial section.
posted by randomfactor on Jul 12, 2007 at 03:26 PM
And yet the Senate voted 97-0 yesterday to let Bush do whatever the hell he feels like doing, up to and including dropping the Bomb on Iran.
posted by mattloch on Jul 12, 2007 at 03:47 PM
Which bill was that Random? Or do you just believe that every vote that isn't impeachment as allowing him to continue doing whatever the hell he wants to? Because that's the way that I'm starting to look at things......
1

  (You need to be signed in to leave a comment)

BAKERSFIELD.COM HOT TOPICS:

Advertisement