|
I'll relent..Just a little It could be worse! Forward or Back? It's up to us! Smoke, Mirrors, Democrats and Drilling Dont get giddy just yet My butt is too big, but nobody is bailing IT out! Where is OUR parachute? Who's Watching the Watchers? At least I don't get headaches! What's left to say? June 06 July 06 August 06 September 06 October 06 November 06 December 06 January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Why the wailing and gnashing of teeth?
If I had one question I could ask every liberal I met, it would be "Don't you ever get tired of being mad"? It seems like I never hear anything but pessimism from them, even when they talk about their own side. When thing's don't go as I voted or feel, I don't claim disenfranchisement or cry foul. I don't cry at all, I just move on to whatever is next that will help my agenda next time I vote. Liberals are STILL grousing about the 2000 election! Get over it already! Even if the election was questionable, what good is it going to do to keep shouting your objections right now? The '08' election is just around the corner and you will have the chance to put your best foot forward again and I suggest you spend that time coming up with a better plan than complaining and fingerpointing. It didn't do you any good in '04' and it won't do you any good in '08'. When Clinton was elected in '92' I was very disappointed because I knew what kind of man he really was, but I didn't get mad and I certainly didn't hold on to anger and feed off of it for eight years. I wrote conservative representatives, the RNC. I gave money. I did what I thought was my part to get Republicans back in office. Not just any Republican, but one who was ready to lead America in the direction I felt was the right one. Of course, you disagree with what I think is the right direction, but that is neither here nor there. The point is that I didn't mope in the meantime. I took action to see to it that my views were represented as best as they could be. You should be doing the same, but already you are infighting in congress and the candidacy. I was proven right as to what kind of man Clinton was, but I still never hated him for what I considered to be very poor leadership. I just helped my party vote defeat his progeny and I didn't do it by complaining. We had our chance in 2000 just as you will in 2008. I wonder if one of the things that keeps liberals so angry is the fact that they know they have no honestly electable candidates and no real solutions to the problems they are so quick to point out at every opportunity. To listen to the liberals, you'd think nothing was wrong in America or the world until February 20, 2001. I don't believe the left has the stomach to lead America into, and through what is to come. They accuse the right of keeping their heads buried in the sand, of blind allegiance even as they live in denial of the threat of terrorism here at home. The terrorists aren't going to go away if a democrat wins, or even if we pull out of Iraq. Contrary to what they would have the public believe, Bush didn't piss the madmen off, America did, and THAT is who they are fighting, not the right or the left. It's not about politics or personal vendettas to them, it's about religion and culture. They would have attacked us in 2001 no matter who won. They planned the attack for five years and weren't about to say "OH! Gore won! Let's all go home"! They hate us for what we represent, not for who represents us and that will carry on against whoever is in office.
So, I would say that if the liberals insist on being pissed and bitter all the time, they should aim their venom at the REAL enemy and not a man who, no matter what happens, will be gone in 2008. 33 comments from 9 users
1
posted by
antiextremism
on Feb 9, 2007 at 05:02 PM
Yeah Mark, but they especially hate Bush. Then again who doesn't. Geez, even Jaz McKay said he hated him, and he's two notches right of Sean Hannity. Except Bin Laden who wrote the script. He doesn't hate him because Bush didn't do any ad libbing and followed Osama's plan to the tee. But you are probably right that they hate us regardless of who's running the show. Just wait until Hillary is President...A WOMAN PRESIDENT??????? That'll really piss 'em off. Every President has their failures and foibles, but our current one is the poster boy for ineptness. But I'll try to be more positive by saying, I hope things get better when he's gone. posted by
antiextremism
on Feb 9, 2007 at 05:08 PM
By the way. CSPAN televised the Congressional hearings on global warming last night. I know, I know, CSPAN is usually pretty dull. But if you get the chance to see it, I recommend it. Might change your view somewhat on the subject.
posted by
bakodon
on Feb 9, 2007 at 05:50 PM
Yes they are mad.....just look at the response to my blog "new blood" These people are sick puppies! They truly believe George is their enemy! They simply cannot realize the ones that wear rags do not like us-all of us! Dems or us Republicans. They would just as likely kill any Dem as any ol'e Republican. I listen to all the talk show and can somebody please tell me why they are so mad, and down at the USA! The best example I can give is the US economy-overall doing just fine for the vast majority! Yet if you ask, they will tell you Bush has ruined the economy! Huh???????? posted by
AudreyB
on Feb 9, 2007 at 06:16 PM
Mark Why do you assume all liberals are alike? Do you think you're like all other conservatives? Lumping all liberals together takes away their credibility as original thinkers. Give them the same consideration you expect for yourself. On another blog you pondered why people get angry at you. Think about it. You don't seriously expect them to thank you for assuming that they can't think for themselves. As for myself, I've mulled over most of these blog subjects a lifetime. I came to my own conclusions about most of life's weighier problems without the help of a religious or political leader. What I think may be incorrect, but you be sure that I did my own thinking. By the way, you sound pretty angry yourself. posted by
CassandraMcGowan
on Feb 9, 2007 at 06:20 PM
posted by
AudreyB
on Feb 9, 2007 at 06:40 PM
posted by
CassandraMcGowan
on Feb 9, 2007 at 06:45 PM
touchy touchy, i never said anything about liberals being angry. everyone is entitled to their opinion, don't take everything so personally jeez. and he didn't say EVERY liberal, he said every liberal he's met. BIG difference. :-) posted by
dusty1215
on Feb 9, 2007 at 06:51 PM
posted by
AudreyB
on Feb 9, 2007 at 06:52 PM
Cassandra I was making the point that Mark's entire blog (about liberals being angry) sounded angry. I was going for irony but I guess I missed my target. However, I still stand by my main point that until Mark meets every liberal in America he can hardly say that liberals (the implication being ALL liberals) are angry. posted by
NancyII
on Feb 9, 2007 at 07:10 PM
Unfortunately we all tend to generalize even when we don't mean to. We also tend to lump people into one category because of most of their beliefs when the truth is we proabably all have some leanings the opposite way. We all seem need to put people in a pigeonhole for some reason. Maybe just so we can try to understand them. Who knows? I like what Tom always says. We agree on so many issues but the ones we disagree on get the most responses. As for the anger part...when people type words on a page and their style is strident it doesn't necessarily mean anger..it usually means strong feelings. We can't see facial expressions or hear inflections so a lot of times it comes across in a way we didn't plan. I've been accused of posting in anger when I was sitting here calm as a cucumber. And it's odd that if it's in agreement with someone it gets an "atta boy" or "yeah man" but when it's in disagreement with some beliefs it's called anger. I honestly hope we can all meet for the blog get together one day so you folks will see what I mean. Maybe it will happen at the reception for Ryan...that would be cool. posted by
NancyII
on Feb 9, 2007 at 07:12 PM
posted by
AudreyB
on Feb 9, 2007 at 07:16 PM
Hi Nancy I'm losing my irony touch I guess. Cassandra's doing a good job. She'll be awesome when she gets a few more blogging hours under her belt. posted by
NancyII
on Feb 9, 2007 at 07:19 PM
Audrey..it's that lack of facial expression..and the fact that sometimes I'm just dense. LOL. You're a sharp cookie my friend. posted by
AudreyB
on Feb 9, 2007 at 07:29 PM
Nancy I want to change my picture to a more recent one, but no matter how I focus the camera I still look fat. I guess I can pose with my grandson in front of me again. He's a HUGE 2 1/2 year old. posted by
NancyII
on Feb 9, 2007 at 07:34 PM
Heh Audrey..I didn't mean the facial expression in your picture. I meant the lack of one on the written page. I think that picture is great. How old is the boy now? It's a small picture but from what I can see you look like you did when we met...how long ago was that?
Mark..sorry for hi jacking your blog. posted by
dusty1215
on Feb 9, 2007 at 07:34 PM
posted by
AudreyB
on Feb 9, 2007 at 07:36 PM
posted by
dusty1215
on Feb 9, 2007 at 07:37 PM
posted by
AudreyB
on Feb 9, 2007 at 07:41 PM
posted by
dusty1215
on Feb 9, 2007 at 07:43 PM
posted by
AudreyB
on Feb 9, 2007 at 07:44 PM
posted by
dusty1215
on Feb 9, 2007 at 07:45 PM
posted by
AudreyB
on Feb 9, 2007 at 07:46 PM
posted by
dusty1215
on Feb 9, 2007 at 07:47 PM
posted by
AudreyB
on Feb 9, 2007 at 07:48 PM
My knee is so swollen that every step is an agony. My doctor told me to stay off of it, but that's impossible. I treat it with anti inflamatories and ice packs. When I do go shopping for any length of time, I'm up all night with the pain.
posted by
dusty1215
on Feb 9, 2007 at 07:52 PM
posted by
tonyh
on Feb 9, 2007 at 07:59 PM
posted by
AudreyB
on Feb 9, 2007 at 08:04 PM
posted by
dusty1215
on Feb 9, 2007 at 08:06 PM
posted by
adampayne
on Feb 10, 2007 at 07:08 AM
Apply all the revisionist stuff you want on the 1990s but the fact was that our President actually got a lot of positive things done for our economy that helped lift the living standards of most people. We are not so much angry as dismayed over the prevailing trends of huge health care increases, energy price increases and huge salaries and stock options for a handful of chosen ones at the expense of the common laborer. We argue our points of view to try and effect some change of attitude among our citizenry to promote the general welfare, as opposed to the general warfare now being waged on the average family by giant industrial robber barons. What is so depressing is that many churches and congregations have subscribed to this current pyramid scheme of profit at the expense of their flock by selling salvation with their demand for donation. We are continually alarmed at the Falwells, Dobsons, Robertsons and Crouches comments and hypocrisy of lifestyles while preaching their peculiar faith-brand of capitalism. If you are tired of our point of view and find our voices rising higher to try and quell the attacks on the disenfranchised and enslaved maybe you might want to re-examine some of your positions. Take a drive through the vast areas of blight that make up so much of the American landscape and snap some photographs of our new growth settlements, the shining gorged prison communities, to see our current trend line of prosperity. Yes, Wall Street has done just fine. The Energy giants are doing just fine. Budweiser and Miller are doing just fine. But all those laid off employees from Ford, GM, HP, Intel, Airline Companies, and every other downsized cut-out industry in this country are not faring as well. You can choose to ignore the facts that the greatest concentration of wealth is in the fewest hands today than ever before, and that wages have declined for two straight years and that the nation is in negative savings while spouting that the economy is great. When foreclosures really begin to happen over this year you can extol the virtues of home ownership with your intellectual buddy George Bush and thank him for keeping every body in their proper place, away from the table. posted by
antiextremism
on Feb 10, 2007 at 01:15 PM
Bakodon, let me make an attempt to explain why they hate us. Now please my conservative friends, I'm trying to explain why they hate us, not that they should hate us, or that what the terrorists are doing is by any means noble. The first reason why they hate us is that we represent the figurehead for the west. They started hating the west during the Crusades when Euros came to their land. Then they hated the west when European colonialism hit it's stride. Iraq is a country because Britain drew lines in the sand saying "these are now your borders". Then they hated us because we gave the Jewish people control over what is now called Israel. They continue to hate us because we continue to be on the side of the Israelis. Bin Laden started attacking American interests because we occupy Saudi Arabia, even though the Royalty there is okay with it as long as they can keep importing American western hookers while pretending to follow their religion. Thus Bin Laden hates them too, because they have defiled the land that is most sacred to their religion. Of course, Bin Laden gave the 911 terrorists a free pass from Islamic law when they went to the strip club on Sept. 10th. Hypocrisy rules there as much as here. Arab perception is that all we care about is the oil. Sectarian and tribal strife has been their way of life for millenia, it's how they roll. Unfortuantely, instead of looking to countries like Kuwait as a model, they think of Kuwatis as treasonous lap dogs of the west. That is why it is paramount and to the interest of the American people to come up with alternative energy sources. Then they can keep their oil fields and continue their ways, but with much less money to hurt us. This will probably not occur until the oil companies themselves can profit from it, and the middle eastern violence will continue regardless of what we do. posted by
NancyII
on Feb 10, 2007 at 10:57 PM
posted by
motopoet
on Feb 11, 2007 at 08:35 PM
see..i told you guys Id post something to piss at least half of you off! You are SO easy! As far as people who say they hate Dubya..Anyone who says they hate anyone they don't know or who has done nothing to them parsonally needs to go back to High School where such talk is commonplace. It's attitudes like that which cause the terrorists to have no doubt that they will win this war(not the one in Iraq, but the one that the left want's everyone to forget about). Nothing is going to change my mind on the causes of, or solutions to, Global Warming. Audrey..I don't. I made a post awhile back stating that. I don't hear anyone making the same case for conservatives. I am certainly not of the same mindset as extreme right wing guys like Michael Savage. I am more a Glenn Beck type of guy, but I get no recognition for that, I am simply lumped into the what the left so easily calls "Kool aid" drinkers. I know I'm not, so I don't take offense at the characterazation. The "Kool aid" statement is the lefts way of saying none of us are original thinkers, but I haven't seen anyone from the left side of this board say anything in defense of those who are thinkers. When I read the post of Dusty's about "You might be a conservative"..it lumps us all together and everybody thought that was funny. You may have seen the humor in it, but I'll bet most liberals didn't, even though I was referred to as a hypocrite by you. Oh, maybe not by name, but by association. You can't say it was referring only to "right wingers" because all conservatives are right wing. Some of us just aren't as far out there as others, just like your side of the aisle. There was no differentiation in the post between me and the abortion clinic bombers, which I certainly do NOT support. When I make a comment about the left, it is, as with all groups I refer to, a generalization. If it doesn't describe you, fine, but if the show fits...I am pissed. I haven't had a chance to play poker for two weeks, I haven't been on a decent ride since late October and I am not sleeping well because my shoulder hurts! adam..You don't just voice your opinions..You try and shove them down our throats then when we try and calmy say we disagree, you tell us we ar "intolerant". Well, I don't have to be tolerant. It's my right to see things the way I like, to support what I agree with and disagree with what I like, no matter who's feelings get hurt. I don't shout it from the rooftops, I don't call you names if you disagree with me and I don't casually toss words like "hate" and "stupid" around. I hate(D'OH!) to beat a dead horse here, but again with the generalizations(see what I mean, Audrey?). I have never said I thought Clinton was a terrible president( I HAVE said it about Carter)but he was a man without integrity. I always contended he wasn't a very productive president. He slashed the military by nearly half, raised taxes to their highest levels in decades and rode the "dotcom" boom into a prosperous economy. That economy, like it or not, is still strong and it is due to tax cuts this time. You and I are never going to see eye to eye and that's OK with me. It's like I said in my post. I don't dislike liberals. I just disagree with liberalism and I don't believe I should be called names for it, generally OR specifically.
1
Our readers recommend: |