MARK'S WORLD
I'll be blogging about my life, my opinions and the world as I see it.

A blog about News and Politics.
About motopoet


Gender:
male
Member Since:
March 14, 2006
Last Signed In:
September 06, 2008
Profile Views:
7994
Blog Views:
29307
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Who's Watching the Watchers?
At least I don't get headaches!
What's left to say?
Selective Complaining
Selective Complaining
It ain't so bad
Ludricrous reall IS ludricrous
Dark Skies ROCK!
The calm during the commute
Shiny Objects II
Archives
June 06
July 06
August 06
September 06
October 06
November 06
December 06
January 07
February 07
March 07
April 07
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


I have really miised posting, arguing and just reading stuff on the site, but a couple of weeks involving many 12-15 hour days(Thanks mostly to the worthless copper thieves), competing with my daughters for puter time, Ryans football games, a camping trip and a few days battling a mild case of vertigo have conspired to keep me away from the puter for more than just a few minutes at a time over the last couple of weeks. I miss sharing and yakking on here but will return as soon as conditions permit...In the meantime, I hope everyone else is safe, well and happy.....Mark
Posted in these Groups:
Topics: blogging
posted by motopoet on Wednesday, October 31, 2007 at 01:56 PM
Permalink - Comments [3] - Leave a Comment - Report a Violation
Viewed 34 times

An aide for the Hillary campaign has stated that, according to internal campaign polls, up to 25% of republican females will vote for Hillary Clinton simply because she is a she. I don't know how accurate that number is but I do know that a significant number will do just that and it is no surprise. Anyone remember the 20%+ number of women who voted for Bill Clinton because he was good looking but couldn't cite any of his campaign platforms? Women are emotional creatures and even the polls showed the women would vote based on "the emotional factor" rather than their political views. Kind of a "sisterhood" thing, I suppose. Lte's hold hands, band together and watch the country go down the tubes in the name of sufferage. It's sad to think that otherwise intelligent, rational women would make such a dire choice, one with such far reaching implications and effects, based on emotions and injustices, real or perceived, but they are not alone in their biased balloting.

Also in todays paper was a column by Leonel Martinez about his reasons for wishing to see Bill Richardson in the White House. He says it's because of his vast political experience(because none of the other candidates have that having served as Representatives, Congressmen, Goverenors, etc), but having been an avid, and mostly disagreeing reader of his for years, I know where his loyalties lie no matter what he says and he is not alone in biased views. He is joined by huge numbers of Hispanics who would vote for an Hispanic candidate no matter their actual qualifications just as scads of black voters were ready to toss America under the bus when Jesse jackson ran and are now on the Barak Obama(I WILL say Barak is a FAR superior man in every way to the Reverend) bandwagon. Leonel made the statement that whites could be criticized for the same bias in white candidates, and to some extent he is probably correct. I have stated in prior posts that America's top posts are still reserved, primarily for white gentlemans club members. Be that right or wrong it is simply a fact. I have also stated that many male democrats would vote, secretly, for a conservative male candidate before they would vote for Hillary and I still believe that.

My family is like a box of crayons. We have just about every color going on and certainly many women, so you may say I vote white male because that's what I am, but you'd be wrong. I am a conservative and I am always going to vote that way. Just as in hiring and college admittance practices, I believe the best qualified person should get the spot and that is who I will support. Let's face it. Most major minority or female political candidates are liberals. They won't get my vote based on that fact and not that their skin is a different color than mine or that they are outfitted with different plumbing. I would vote for Condie Rice(were she running)before I voted for a white male liberal(or most white male conservatives for that matter). I just want what I believe is in the best interests of America's long term health to come to pass and I will vote for the person I believe is best qualified to carry out the task of seeing to that.

As a man with such a diverse family and a job in which I am constantly in contact with people of different races I see the biases and double standards of racism at work in many ways and many times the people involved don't even realize they are doing it. There is nothing wrong with being proud of your heritage or your gender, but a person should never make major decisions based solely on either or both. If you truly believe the candidate you support is the best person for the job, stand firm and cast your vote, but if you are doing it for any other reason it is time to check yourself. It is much more important that you vote as an American than as a person of race or gender. We need to elect leaders based on character, foresight, love of country and determination, not on race or gender.

Posted in these Groups:
Topics: Politics, Hillary Clinton, News, Voting, race, racism
posted by motopoet on Friday, October 19, 2007 at 11:05 AM
Permalink - Comments [10] - Leave a Comment - Report a Violation
Viewed 70 times

DATELINE: Los Angeles County Raceway, Palmdale, California. May 29th 2000.

Bakersfield Man Injured at Gran Prix Race.

A Bakersfield man was injured Monday morning at LACR during the JB Memorial Gran Prix/Motocross charity event. Mark McGowan, 40, sustained a broken femur, separated shoulder and concussion when he failed to clear the big double jump in muddy conditions. He is currently in serious condition at Antelope Valley Medical Center after undergoing surgery to pin his femur yesterday evening......

OK..That was never in any paper(that I know of), but it would have made pretty good copy! Motorcycles, serious injuries, hospitals..the stuff of interesting stories. Only it wasn't very interesting to me. It sucked..It sucked really bad! It ruined my summer. The summer I was to defend my So Cal AMA Vet class championship(the class for racers between 30 and 39 which I won at 39) while chasing the Senior Class(40-49)title at the same time. It ruined a new pair of Pro Taper Bars, a new pair of FOX pants and a new FOX jersey. It also ruined, as it turned out, my racing career, even if it was only a sportsman career. I haven't raced since.

I was told I would be down 10 to 12 weeks, but the rod that was placed in my femur at AVMC turned out to be too small in diameter and wasn't allowing my bone to knit properly due to movement, so in January 2001 I had it replaced with a 2mm larger diameter rod. It felt better and began healing quickly but it was another two months, ten months from my injury, before I was able to take my YZ to a track and take some laps. It just wasn't the same. I wasn't afraid, I was in pain. Major pain. Everytime I would put my foot down I seemed to catch a hole. Landing big jumps killed my hip and thigh. I had also sustained a lot of soft tissue damage that took years to fully heal. I took those laps at the Tulare Raceway, loaded up the Bill's Pipes/Boyesen/RG3/ Bakersfield Yamaha sponsored machine and never took another lap on it.

In September of 2001 I ordered my Harley Davidson, got it in January of 2002 and sold the YZ a month later. The guy got a hell of a deal! I still kick myself for dumping the YZ. Yeah..it was a two stroke 250cc machine, but I'm not Ricky Carmichael and I could have still competed at my level with no real problems, I just didn't think I was ever going to feel good on a dirtbike again. I didn't think my leg and hips were ever going to loosen up and feel better..But they did. It took about five years, but I felt great and everytime I saw a pic of me racing I would get nostalgic and remorseful. That bike was paid for and new ones run a cool seven grand by the time you outfit them with necessary accoutriments, another grand for a tuned suspension...you get the picture. On top of that I had given all my gear away to my grandson(the superstar prep and now star college football player), Ryan.

The better I felt, the crappier I would feel about not having a bike. Oh, I could afford one if I REALLY wanted to do it, but the Harley is an expensive and time consuming mistress as it is so I just settled for getting all teary eyed when I watched a race on TV or saw a pickup load of muddy bikes heading home from some track. I walk down sidewalks and hallways pretending I am hitting a set of whoops pinned in fourth gear or hitting that dreaded double at LACR with a vengance. When making left turns from a light I grab the holeshot and pretend I am charging into a first turn, pushing everyone wide and running away with a moto!

I think about motocross all the time. I have since I saw my first motocross race on TV in 1972. I am obsessed with it and I don't care. I know everything about it from it's history to how to go fast on a bike and what makes modern suspensions work. I remember like it was yesterday how it felt when the green flag(this was before starting gates at the local level)dropped on my first race at Dos Rios Raceway outside of Arvin, Cal. I miss it. I miss it terribly. I have never done anything(and that includes sex)so excititing or satisfying. I have played other sports, but there is nothing like the feeling of accomplishment when you win a race knowing it was all YOU and not twenty other guys. Of course you have nobody to blame but yourself when you don't win, but that's what drives you to ride harder and take chances. There is nothing like the adrenaline rush of almost crashing at speed, but pulling off the pass anyway! I want another dirtbike!

Enter my grandson, Ryan, and his new college career on a full ride at Fresno State. What, you may ask, does that have to do with dirtbikes? Just this. Ryan has a 2006 Kawasaki KX250F and there is no way his Mom or his coaches are going to let him ride a dirtbike while he is playing football. They will not allow him to jeopardize his deal by getting nuts on a bike, and there is no way you cannot go nuts on a nice dirtbike. So, there was this beautiful KX250F sitting in the garage just waiting for someone to pay some attention to it.

Enter ME! I asked Ryan if I could ride it, and possibly, buy it if I like it. I went over and loaded it up today. It was still filthy from his last ride and in desperate need of some care and repairs. I brought it home and unloaded it in the driveway, broke out the hose, Saf-Sol 20 and some rags and cleaned it all up. I took inventory of what it needs partswise and what was loose(almost everything..Ryan isn't much on upkeep obviously!)and rolled it into the garage next to the Harley..well not so close that it might fall on it, but still next to it.

It will be nearly seven years since I swung a leg over a dirtbike when I get it all ready to go and boot it over. It is a four stroke and I have never ridden one of the 250Fs. I wonder what it will be like. I was too big for the old two stroke 125cc bikes, but I am told these 250Fs are something else! It is sleek and beautiful and looks like it's hauling ass when it's just sitting there and I can't wait to try it out. Bev has warned me to take it easy, but she knows it won't be long till I am seeing just what it, and I, can do. I have butterflies already and I haven't even SAT on it. I can't wait!

Posted in these Groups:
Topics: motocross, motorcycles
posted by motopoet on Tuesday, October 16, 2007 at 09:25 PM
Permalink - Comments [3] - Leave a Comment - Report a Violation
Viewed 87 times

When I was in my twenties I felt differently about a great many things than I do today at 48. While I was never a liberal and never voted for a democrat, I did have some liberal ways of looking at things.

I thought the government was responsible for the drastic rise in oil prices in the late seventies when gas cracked a dollar a gallon when I was 19. Twice it's price from 1977 when I worked at the Arco in Tehachapi. Can you imagine a modern liberal blaming Jimmy Carter for manipulating oil prices? BLASPHEMY! No, I was proven wrong when a friend's Dad explained to me the way a free market economy works and how events in far away places can spur speculation on Wall Street and drive the price of just about anything up. In this case it was the Iranian Hostage Crisis, which was certainly not Carters fault even if he handled the whole thing poorly, that was causing speculation in the oil markets that OPEC would react harshly to any action they THOUGHT we may take. My liberal view of the governments ability to corner markets was forever changed.

I thought all corporations were evil and were trying to ruin our country by raising prices even in the face of lower inflation and interest rates. I even worked for one of the heartless entities. How callous and unfeeling they must be to expect us to live on the wages we received. Then I figured out that labor unions, once noble defenders of the rights of workers, had become no more than bloated, overbearing businesses intent on higher dues and bigger membership(I was president of my local for six years)making many unreasonable wage demands and forgetting who it was they were supposed to be working for(I still believe that union contract ballots are stuffed) that were having a huge effect on the prices of nearly everything made in America and driving even me to purchase a better made, more reliable, better looking and FAR cheaper car than I could get on the Ford, Chevy, etc lot. No..Corporations are not evil, they are simply businesses in a free market economy trying to make money, which is exactly what they are supposed to do. It's not their job to see to and pay for the health and welfare of the masses and it's their job to mollycoddle their employees, it's only their job to pay them for what they do at work and how well they do it. Unions have seen to it that things like incentive pay and bonuses for more productive employees are a thing of the past where they represent people. Quality is not as important as seniority. It doesn't matter if you stink at your job, as long as you have the hair to hold the job, you are safe.

I thought pot should be legalized because I was a regular toker. I had no concern for cancer patients or those suffering from glaucoma! I just wanted to get high without being hassled. It was no more dangerous than booze, I thought. It was organic so there must not be a problem with it. It didn't matter that I could also clearly and specifically remember telling myself that the only drug I would ever use was pot as I sat in my locked dope room in Tehachapi thinking of the coke, peyote, psilocybin(sp?) and barbiturates I had done in abundance before finally settling on meth as my drug of choice. There are a few more things I had a more liberal slant on, but as I matured I saw the selfish, shortsightedness of those views and opinions. They suited ME well, but were not in the interests of the vast majority of Americans.

I began to see that free market economies will have fluctuations, sometimes drastic, based on the fact that most consumers are as panicky and unpredictable as a herd of sheep in a thunder storm. They are a basically uninformed herd that will follow a leader over a cliff no matter the cost in getting there then complain about the  price once they are there, the fact there was no sign in place to tell them not to jump and about the price to fix their self inflicted owies.

I saw that legalizing pot would open a door that should remain closed. Despite what the NORML(National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws)crowd would like the uninformed and/or inexperienced folks to believe, pot is a stepping stone to more dangerous drugs to ninety percent of those who use it. I smoked pot for fifteen years. I dealt it for most of that time and I knew dozens of and met hundreds, possibly thousands, of heads over the years and not one of them used it for medicinal reasons. We all just wanted to get high..Just like the hootin' an' hollerin' potheads are doing today.

Those are just a few examples of the way my views have evolved over the years. Times change and I changed with them, Thank God! It's perfectly normal to have views that change over time. Winston Churchill once said " If you aren't a liberal at twenty, you don't have a heart. If you aren't a conservative at forty, you don't have a brain." Some people see it the opposite way, I suppose, and that too is fine, but the statement speaks to the heart of the matter, which is that we all change over time in one way or another. Those who do not will continue to rev their engines loudly while stuck in neutral or spin their wheels in the same rut forever.

Now enter political office chasers and vote mongering candidates with no real base other than the windsock of weekly polls that prompt them to decide where they stand at any given time. The classic "flip-floppers".  They may have one issue they always keep straight, but everything else is up for grabs, often going top the  highest bidder or latest crowd shouting that they're mad as hell and they're not going to take it anymore(I'm risking copyright infringement here, but it's worth it).over the cause du jour. Their views do not evolve, they change overnight, or at least over the course of a campaign for office or a bill they opposed a year ago.

Candidates on both sides do it with alarming regularity and it concerns me because as it continues too many members of the herd become desensitized to it until, at some point(like the last ten years)they simply ignore, and in many cases, defend such indefensible actions

I understand that as times change people also change. It's a necessity, but where politics is concerned the long term effects and the good of the country rather than the individual should always be the prime factor in a stance or decision, not whatever burr is under the saddle of the vocal minority or a special interest group during a particular week.

Flip-flopping is a dangerous game in any area, but especially dangerous in politics where the effects of that action can be long lasting and detrimental to the country as a whole because so many people just don't understand how important it is to stand firm even in the face of adversity. Our leaders need to take a stand and then stand by it because the panicky public herd is generally incapable of staying the course on virtually any issue. Policy should not be based on the indecision of the masses, but it often is and that makes us, as a nation, look weak, divided and undecided to the rest of the world. It is not our actions that that keep us looking foolish, it is our lack of will, which is an affliction from which our enemies do not suffer, and that lack of will comes from the flip-floppers who's mealy mouthed rhetoric breed indecision.

Politicians have become flimsy corn stalks blowing this way and that instead of showing leadership, strength and resolve and creating stable boundaries that, like children with strong, firm parents, the people actually want. They want to know someone is in charge because it makes them feel safe and creates trust, even if their views differ. They want leaders who will listen but still do the right thing; who will take a stand based on what the true majority. Who will grease all the wheels and not just the squeaky ones. Ones who can withstand the onslaught of the vocal minority and special interests and are able to withstand a strong wind in any direction.

Bush seemed to be that type of strong, firm leader, but over the last few years has begun to capitulate to the crowd as they grow restless. It shows weakness and that draws the political sharks who smell the blood of that weakness. His devotion to the party line has muddled his formerly solid conservative stance and we, the American people, are going to pay the price.

Margaret Thatcher said that "Compromise is the absence of leadership", which gets right back to flip-flopping. Either you believe in something or you don't. You can't have it both ways as it suits you every time the going gets tough, and at my age, I am firm in my stands and beliefs and no amount of shouting or namecalling is going to change that. I say that it is high time our leaders started doing the same.

Posted in these Groups:
Topics: Politics
posted by motopoet on Friday, October 5, 2007 at 12:23 PM
Permalink - Comments [8] - Leave a Comment - Report a Violation
Viewed 82 times