MARK'S WORLD
I'll be blogging about my life, my opinions and the world as I see it.

A blog about News and Politics.
About motopoet


Gender:
male
Member Since:
March 14, 2006
Last Signed In:
November 20, 2008
Profile Views:
8063
Blog Views:
30599
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
It's MY turn!
Oh, Marie
Poor Rob's Almanac
You can't open a door that is already open
Will the REAL will please stand?
Reality check
Life is for the living
I'll relent..Just a little
It could be worse!
Forward or Back? It's up to us!
Archives
June 06
July 06
August 06
September 06
October 06
November 06
December 06
January 07
February 07
March 07
April 07
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
December 08
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


I have always said that the lines of racism will never go away until people like Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and Louis Farrkahn stop pointing at them. Now I am going to have to add Jim Brown to that list. I guess I have really always known he was a racist(that's right, people of color can be racists too)and I have certainly always known he was a disgruntled and miserable man. I honestly can't remember him ever being upbeat or positive in any interview and I can't ever remember seeing him laugh or even smile. I have never heard him be gracious or magnanamous toward another player in the NFL. I have only seen him being grumpy and it's really getting old.

When his rushing records(which he would never have set in todays NFL) were broken he had the audacity to make light of Walter Peyton's accomplishment because Peyton had missed a couple of games in his career. The article that got my briefs in a bunch made the statement that Brown is "widely hailed as the greatest player in NFL history". Really? Hey, the guy was definately a stud, but the greatest player in history? Come now! I hated O.J. Simpson before the general public jumped on that bandwagon, but "The Juice" was as good as, if not better, than Brown. Walter "Sweetness" Peyton was twice the football player(and twice the human being) Brown was and Brown knew it. Brown had no moves, all he did was plow down the field against linemen who, in many cases, weighed less than he did. Today he would make a decent full back and I think that is one reason he is miserable.

Then there was his failed attempt at an acting career. Well..The guy couldn't act. He was just his ever pleasant self onscreen and people obviously didn't care to listen to him mumbling and grumbling his way through films that were bad enough to begin with. I mean seriously, can anyone name one of his cinematic roles. Well, there WAS his stellar performance in Mars Attacks! It didn't matter if it were an interview or a role in a film, his demeanor never changed. That's not acting. The guy had the disposition of a billy goat and he seemed to think that was good enough. It served him so well in the NFL...Guess he was wrong. Another possible reason for his misery.

I don't remember exactly when he began to show his racist side, but it was prior to his dissing of Walter Peyton. I think it was around the time he started dressing in the African heritage fashion, with which I have no issues, I just think that was another way to show his disdain for anything not African American. There have been a few times I heard him make off color comments(no pun intended)about high profile blacks being "lackeys" or "whiter than their black heritage" because they refused to take a position, or just outright disagreed with him on certain issues or incidents, which brings me to the point that got me to writing today.

Last week, golf analyst Kelly Tilghman made the statement that the only way to beat Woods today would be to "take him to a back alley and lynch him". Admittedly a poor choice of words based only on its pretext of violence, but racist? A lynching is a hanging without the benifit of trial. A summary execution. The civil rights movement made the nation aware of its use in the south against blacks, but lynchings were very common throughout the history of America. Chineese, Jews, even Irishmen were commonly lynched during Americas tumultuous growing pains of the 19th and early 20th century. It just depended on where you lived as to which group of people you chose to see as unworthy. I could go into the very common practice of lynching alleged criminals, some certainly not guilty during that time, but I digress.

Brown's gripe is that Woods should have spoken up in outrage at the comment, demanded Tilghman's head on a platter, or at least get her fired, but Woods did none of that. He saw the comment for what it was. An oratory mis-step. He didn't even ask for an apology and considered the whole thing a non event. Kelly Tighman is obviously not a racist. She wasn't trying to get in some snied, underhanded racist comment in hoping no one would notice. What she was doing was saying that Tiger Woods is so good you'll have to kill him to beat him. There isn't a person in the world who golfs that doesn't realize the stellar player Tiger Woods is. He truly is the greatest player in PGA History and he is still young and he is that good because he is that good, not because he is African- American..Let's not not forget the Asian blood he has too!

Brown and others who feel Woods is being too P.C. about it all say he is afraid of losing endorsement money should he take a stand and make an issue of it all. Well, he DID take a stand. He stood up and said, "I wasn't offended by the comment and I have nothing else to say about it". And even had he taken a stand on the other side sponsers don't drop catches like Woods, arguably one of the most popular men in America, not just the sports world, for standing their ground. No, it is highly unlikely anyone would have backed away from him had he been upset.

I'm no fan of golf at all, and although I admire his accomplishments, no big fan of Tiger Woods, or any other golfer for that matter. It's just not my game. But this incident has made me admire him as a man of true character. In my opinion he took the higher ground in this issue, realizing that we shouldn't have to worry about ruining our lives by using the english language. He chose not to stir the racial pot and not to point at the lines at which people like Jim Brown spend so much of their time and energy pointing out.

I'm not dogging Brown as a "bad guy". He has done many good deeds with his money and fame and I admire that. What I can't and won't admire is the way he seems to want to create racial unrest rather than racial equality. If he was offended by the remarks that Tilghman made he is certainly allowed to say so. Tilghman apologized for her poor choice of words, but that didn't seem to asuage Browns vengeful nature. He couldn't get Tilghman fired so now he is going after Woods? Brown got to stand up and voice his opinion and that is his right. Isn't it Tigers right NOT to be upset about it all? I say the bigger person here is Tiger, even though Brown outweighs him by 150 pounds!

Posted in these Groups:
Topics: SPORTS, racism, News
posted by motopoet on Thursday, January 24, 2008 at 05:26 PM
Permalink - Comments [3] - Leave a Comment - Report a Violation
Viewed 46 times

I read an article the other day about the Beret and how it is making a fashion comeback. I have always thought that berets looked silly, especially on men, unless they had been earned with an elite military unit such as the Rangers or Green Berets. I have noticed that over the last ten years, many old styles have made comebacks with big sunglasses and afros being a couple of the notable reruns. I guess the fashion industry runs out of ideas every generation or so and tosses those reruns back into the mix hoping that no one notices and if they do that they won't mind dropping a C-note at a high end retailer on something they used to get out of the Ward's catalog for $9.95.

Politics is much the same. Every generation thinks they are on to something new, that their ideas are fresh and that the public will have forgotten about the last time their "progressive ideas" were run through the mill. Does anyone remember the "New Deal", "The Great Society or "The War On Poverty"? The details today may be slightly different due to priority rotation, but the sales pitch is the same. WWII had more to do with the economic resurgence of America than did the New Deal. The war unified the country and helped fire up the country's industrial machine. The New Deal just gave Americans some confidence in themselves and their country again.

Social Security was aimed at helping retirees with(not providing them with)security in their Golden Years. Kind of like what Bush tried to do recently, but people missed the point this time because they are so used to demanding the government provide for them, which is a manifestation of the liberal credo that people aren't smart or responsible enough to provide for themselves and now the Baby Boomers are paying the price for misunderstanding what FDR was trying to do. SSI has been a dismal failure and it's not going to get better.

The Great Society was a noble cause. Social equality for all. Yeah..That's worked out well. It was doomed from the beginning. The country was, and still is, divided along so many lines that any plan having to do with solving such problems is a lost cause. Things just aren't that much different today, even though we like to pretend they are. Oh, women and minorities have it easier at the top of the pile and everyone nod their head in self absorbed back-patting and mindless, useless self appreciation and self centered congratulations whenever a woman or a minority becomes the CEO of some corporation or is elected or appointed to some lofty office in government, but the rank and file are still pretty much where they were in 1965.

Every president and congress since Warren Harding has been regurgitating the same social drivel, they just try and word it so it sounds "fresh" and "progressive" hoping no one notices the foul stench of the diseased and dying animal they parade in front of a public desparate for change.

Society seems to hear more often that they listen, and as long as the politicians continue to dispense their new solutions downwind, the public seems content to believe them because they are hearing what they want to hear rather than listening to what they should be listening to. Hmm..Sound familiar? The democratic candidates are after society's problems againg with te same promises of solutions that have been in reruns for eighty years. Rushing to the defense and care of a society they have determined are unable to defend or care for themselves, leaving the government to think and act on their behalf.

Today it is Universal Healthcare, and once again, social equality for all. I guess nobody is paying attention to the fact the men who have made themselves mouthpieces for Black America have no intention of ever allowing racial lines to disappear. That would put them, the biggest racists in America, out of a job. There is really little difference between Malcom X and Jesse Jackson. Both despise whites and blame them for all for society's ills and for the apparent lot of Black Americans, Malcom X just had the moxy to say it aloud.

The costs of Universal Healthcare will quickly outpace the cost of any war in which we may find ourselves engaged. The cost of Medicare in 2006 alone was over two TRILLION dollars! Can you imagine the cost of Universal Healthcare? Well, you don't have to. John Kerry's OWN numbers for it over a 10 year period was over seven trillion dollars. Somebody has to pay for that and that someone is the tax payer, most of whom won't qualify for it's benefits!

Social Security is a failure people didn't listen. All they heard was "We will creat a program to help....". They didn't hear the part that said"...you help yourself by adding to the savings YOU create yourself".

Affirmative Action failed because people heard the same thing, but failed to hear the pat that said "...you further your education and ability to enter the workplace when you are on equal footing'. Suddenly sub par students and workers were demanding, and getting those positions, in direct conflict with the dream of Martin Luther King, creating problems that plagued society for thirty years in the form of high college dropout rates, poor workplace output and quality all of which fomented social resentment for those who DID listen.

The people who properly utilized these programs were able to truly reap the benefits they offered because they listened and acted themselves and didn't count on the government to do that for them. Two of todays democratic candidates have utilized and realized the benefits of those programs and ideals. A woman and an a minority. They took advantage of the rights and opportunities society offered them without leaning on the governemnt to "make it happen" and they now vie for the most powerful position in the world and they have done on their own merits.

Let's not be hornswaggled by todays political Berets and Big Glasses. We have seen them before. If you aren't sure, go ask your parents. They should remember. Politics can not afford the retro gimmiks of the fashion industry's recycle bin. It's time for people to listen to what is being said and compare that to what has already been said. It's time to ask the candidates the hard questions and see if they stutter when they answer. We don't get to pick the fashion industry's leaders, but we do get pick our country's leaders. Let's make them accountable for what they are trying to sell us and not just buy it because our neighbors and friends did.

 

 

Posted in these Groups:
Topics: Politics, fashion, News, campaign, candidtates, government
posted by motopoet on Friday, January 18, 2008 at 03:21 PM
Permalink - Comments [11] - Leave a Comment - Report a Violation
Viewed 55 times