A blog about News.
About noholdsbarred


Member Since:
August 03, 2007
Last Signed In:
November 21, 2009
Profile Views:
3856
Blog Views:
102642
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Statement by CARB board member
Lies and cover ups tarnish California Air Resources Board
Strange encounter ends in arrest
PG&E smartmeters WILL be tested
Suspcious guy at my door last night
Adoption day "magical"
Closing courts wrong approach
Wars never end for veterans
Pet adoption day in Tehachapi Nov. 21
Indian casino OK with me
Archives
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
December 08
January 09
February 09
March 09
April 09
May 09
June 09
July 09
August 09
September 09
October 09
November 09
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


noholdsbarred - > No holds barred -> Immigration at the council meeting
Immigration at the council meeting

So far, and it's early, the meeting is much tamer than the last go round.

It started off interestingly with Jess Nieto pegging the whole thing to politics, saying Councilman David Couch is using this issue to burnish his conservative credentials for a run at the Board of Supervisors, for Ray Watson's seat. Watson hasn't said he's retiring but everyone pretty much assumes it.

Couch's resolutions would make Bakersfield a non-sanctuary city, declare English the official language and find which services can be denied to illegal immigrants.

Anyway, then Mayor Harvey Hall lectured everyone in the audience to behave themselves. And, SIGH, so far they are!

Hmmm. Ed Herrera points out that declaring Bako a non-sanctuary city would mean police would have to enforce immigration laws. If that's true, that could be a problem. I mean, don't they have enough to do? What about the FEDS! (The City Attorney says it wouldn't have any affect on local policing.)

Ok wait a minute, one speaker is upset because there haven't been any Latinos on the council and talks about gerrymandering. BUT I happen to know that the most heavily Hispanic parts of Bakersfield have routinely and vociferously refused annexation into the city.

One young gal gets points for speaking up in public, no easy feat, but she loses mega points for not knowing that the resolution's English portion would NOT affect bilingual printings of city material.

Wow, former Supervisor Pete Parra doesn't sound so good. I don't remember his voice being so shaky when I was covering Supes.

You know, regardless of what you think of Couch's resolutions, it got people to get involved. I hope they stay involved!

Couch speaks:

His resolutions are anti-illegal immigration or pro-legal immgration, he says, not anti immigrant.

Symbolism over substance: Couch says the city flags, seals and motto took up council time, why not adopting English as the official language?

What about the feds? Yes, they have ultimate responsibility but that doesn't mean we shouldn't weigh in. We have in the past, such as opposing trucks from Mexico coming through the U.S.

Ooooooooooh, he calls out Councilwoman Sue Benham as having brought the Mexican trucks up...she's the one who's said repeatedly and offered a resolution saying immigration is a federal issuel. He even says it's "intellecutally dishonest" to say this isn't a local issue.

And it's not English only, but just English as our official language, though, as he's said before city publications would still be bilingual. But on the symbolic side, he said, if all cities adopted this, it might get the attention of the feds.

In July, he said, a member of the Delores Huerta Foundaton asked the Council to consider becoming a sanctuary city and that, combined with a question on the Inga Barks radio show, prompted him to bring these resolutions and he's stickin' by em.

Why'd you do this? It's totally under our authority to say English is our official language and if we can declare ourselves a sanctuary city, we can say we're a non-sanctuary city. Was it for political gain? He doesn't actually address his politial aims. It's just an urge to see something done on this issue, he says.

He says he'll support all the resolutions, his and Benham's.

Benham up: She says the Mexican truck resolution Couch mentions is similar to her resolution that the feds need to address this. Intellectual honesty is important to her!

Her proposal is the city calls on the feds to enact real immigration form and to enforce current laws and reimburse local governments for costs of illegal immigration.

Jacquie Sullivan highlights:

We're a country of laws. If it's a law, it's a law. You can't go against the law. We're a country of immigrants. This is certainly not a city issue. This is an issue I have not welcomed. It's not an easy issue. At the same time, it is easy: you're here legally or you're here illegally.

Whew!

Benham's resolution: Six ayes w/Carson no. (Which is weird because she seemed to be against Couch's English-only resolution, which wasn't in Benham's)

English as the official language of Bakersfield: Only Hanson and Couch voted yes.

City of Bakersfield not a sanctuary city: Hanson, Couch and Sullivan vote yes, MOTION FAILS.

So, despite all the attention on Couch beforehand, it turns out to be Benham's night.

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by noholdsbarred on Wednesday, September 26, 2007 at 09:24 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 146 times
0 comments from 0 users

  (You need to be signed in to leave a comment)

Advertisement