A blog about News.
About noholdsbarred


Member Since:
August 03, 2007
Last Signed In:
November 21, 2009
Profile Views:
3857
Blog Views:
102754
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Statement by CARB board member
Lies and cover ups tarnish California Air Resources Board
Strange encounter ends in arrest
PG&E smartmeters WILL be tested
Suspcious guy at my door last night
Adoption day "magical"
Closing courts wrong approach
Wars never end for veterans
Pet adoption day in Tehachapi Nov. 21
Indian casino OK with me
Archives
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
December 08
January 09
February 09
March 09
April 09
May 09
June 09
July 09
August 09
September 09
October 09
November 09
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


noholdsbarred - > No holds barred -> Fire, sheriff’s departments need to end turf battles
Fire, sheriff’s departments need to end turf battles

I’ve been hearing rumblings for some time about turf battles between the Kern County Fire and Sheriff’s departments over search and rescue.
 

Huh?


Search and rescue? Hey! That could be me someday. I don’t want the people who are supposed to be haulin’ my behind out of the river or off a mountain squabbling over who’s in charge.


When I asked Chief Dennis Thompson and Sheriff Donny Youngblood, they acknowledged it was true.


But, they both said, they’re working on it. In fact, they’re going to put together a group of their top people to focus on communications between the agencies.


I might find that reassuring — except they already have an agreement about river rescues that spells out exactly who gets called first and who’s in charge.


Still, problems have persisted.


At a drowning in Lake Isabella last summer where the victim had been under water for more than half an hour, the fire department helicopter suddenly arrived. No one from the Sheriff’s department knew it was coming. On occasion, both the Sheriff’s helicopter and Fire’s have been called and neither knew the other was coming. Danger! Danger!


During a river rescue where Fire’s helicopter was called, it hovered unused for more than five hours, even having to refuel once, awaiting instructions while a man clung to a rock in the water. Finally, as the sun was setting, Search and Rescue asked Fire to hoist the victim to safety.


If they don’t figure this out and soon, someone’s going to get hurt, maybe even killed.


Ninety-nine percent of the time, the departments work great together. But not always on search and rescue. (Chief Thompson was quick to point out two searches over President’s Day weekend in which the agencies worked extremely well together, saving a stranded hiker and off-roader in two separate incidents. “That’s the way we want it to work every time,” Thompson said.)

Both Thompson and Youngblood stressed that they have a very strong working relationship.


In general, however, other fire personnel feel the sheriff’s department leaves them out of the loop and needlessly endangers the public by not enlisting their help and  equipment. And they worry the sheriff is angling to take over air operations for the entire county.


Sheriff’s staffers feel Fire is butting in when help isn’t needed, creating confusion and needlessly increasing costs. And they fear Fire is on a quest to take over search and rescue.


Friction over search and rescue isn’t new, but tensions seemed to escalate after the fire department got a new helicopter with hoist and night vision capabilities.


Why not use that resource for river rescues, missing ATV riders or downed planes, many in Fire ask? Makes sense to me. Believe me, if I were in any of those situations I’d want everyone called out — Fire, Sheriff’s, heck, get Mayor Hall out of bed and slap some binoculars in his hands.


Sheriff Youngblood had a slightly more restrained approach.


You can’t just stampede out the door with good intentions.


The Sheriff’s department, he said, needs to plan and coordinate the effort so everyone knows his job, for the safety of the missing person and rescuers. Youngblood has more than 200 volunteers who train in everything from mine rescues to river rescues. His officers work with the Civil Air Patrol, which has night vision capabilities of its own and come July, the department will have its own helicopter with the same bells and whistles as the Fire department.


And, he added, the sheriff’s department does call in Fire — when needed.


“If they can rescue someone before we get there, great,” Youngblood said. “It’s about saving lives.”


Once the sheriff’s department is on scene, though, they are in charge; their responsibility is set by Kern County charter.


Fire staffers I talked to were totally cool with the sheriff being in charge, that’s not their beef. They want to be called more often.


OK, everyone sounds like they want to play nice. So what’s the problem?


I hate to think it’s the usual “Ps” — power, politics and posturing. But people close to the situation tell me those, in fact, are the true culprits.


While Youngblood said he absolutely has no interest in taking over all air operations for Kern (as is the situation in Ventura County), others pointed out the new Huey ordered by the Sheriff will have firefighting capabilities and Youngblood offered to let Fire use it.

That may sound like an olive branch, but it is also being seen by some as a step on the road to consolidation of air operations, which I think would be a bad idea.


I talked with folks in Ventura County where the Sheriff is in charge of air ops and Fire is clearly second on the priority list for helicopter use. We must keep operations separate here so neither agency has to wait for permission to use a helicopter when there’s an emergency.


And while Chief Thompson told me search and rescue absolutely is the purview of the sheriff, people in his own department insist Kern would do better to model Los Angeles or other counties where Fire is a partner in search and rescue.


The two supervisors whose districts are most likely to need search and rescue, Jon McQuiston and Don Maben, both told me they see no reason to change the status quo: Sheriff keeps search and rescue and both agencies keep control over their own aircraft.


I totally agree when it comes to aircraft, though I’m not sure about search and rescue.

That’s something for those with far more expertise to sort out.


But I know this for sure: Someone will get hurt if Fire and the sheriff’s department don’t work this out, and soon.


Lois Henry’s column appears Wednesdays and Sundays. E-mail her at lhenry@bakersfield.com or call her at 395-7373.

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by noholdsbarred on Friday, February 22, 2008 at 01:12 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 213 times
6 comments from 5 users

1

posted by JustcallmeBlood on Feb 23, 2008 at 02:08 PM

Ya know with the pending budget cuts .... and who knows where they will end up ... it seems to me that these kinds of turf battles need to be resolved quickly and once and for all.  These two depts have been vying over this stuff ever since a former Search & Rescue Lieutenant was elected Sheriff (Carl Sparks).  Its time for this petty BS to be put away for good - the BOS wont tell the Sheriff what to do and their Fire Chief is always conniving to come up with ways to justify his boated department  .. so it is incumbent on Youngblood to lead the way out of this predicament.

posted by Oildale93308 on Feb 24, 2008 at 09:54 PM

The Kern County Sheriff's Search & Rescue, as mentioned, consist of over 200 highly trained volunteers, who pay their way at almost no cost to taxpayers.  They have a long, rich tradition of buying their own supplies and equipment at no cost to taxpayers.  They train on their own time at no cost to taxpayers.  Kern County Sheriff SAR are recognized as the finest in California, if not the West Coast.  The California Office of Emergency Services Warning Center regularly requests them to provide mutual aid outside Kern County.  We are extremely fortunate to have such an outstanding group of volunteers.

Because the Fire Service has done such an outstanding job of fire prevention, nearly 95 percent of their responses are non-fire related, such as medical aid, rescue, hazardous material incidents, public service requests and hazardous conditions.  Most of the fires to which they respond are out on arrival.  Fire Fighters are seeking areas for which they can respond, such as search and rescue incidents.

The Sheriff should retain incident command of search and rescue incidents, while the Fire Departments remain in a support role and provide assistance when requested.

Charles Conner, retired Emergency Services Manager, Kern County Office of Emergency Services

posted by skyftr on Feb 25, 2008 at 11:29 AM

Very interesting article Lois. However, this is certainly nothing new.  I am a retired Kern County Fire Department Deputy Chief.  I am a 32 year veteran of the fire department and this situation has existed as long as I can remember.  Nothing has changed.  I will also add that this is not unique to Kern County and Ventura County,  law enforcement topically does not like to work with fire departments, I am sure that there are exceptions but the situation in Kern County is definitely the rule not the exception.  In the position of Deputy Chief, I was responsible for the fire department air operations.  I was tasked with supervision of the build up of the fire department helicopter.  During our first year of operation we were able to generate enough revenue from State and Federal government fire operations within Kern County to purchase a hoist.  The primary purpose for this addition to the helicopter capabilities was for the rescue and transport of injured fire department personnel.  We of course, also recognized the value of this in rescue of members of the public in remote areas and river rescue.  I contacted the Sheriff's Office and advised them that we would be available to assist them any time.  We offered to train their volunteer  search and rescue personnel in helicopter operations.  We felt at the time, this was about eight years ago, that because of the capabilities of the fire department helicopter, in hoisting victims and transport of multiple rescuers this would be in the best interest of public safety.  Our offer was acknowledged but never was taken advantage of during my tenure.  I understand that the helicopter was finally used to rescue a victim from the river this last year.  I truly don't understand why the  Sheriff's is so adverse to utilizing fire department personnel in assisting in search and rescue but it has been the case for as long as I can remember.  My comments are in no way a criticism of the men and women that volunteer for the sheriff's search and rescue, I have the utmost respect and admiration for those individuals.  My criticism is only for law enforcements reluctance to utilize the best tool for the job and the apparent "turf" protection.

David Ward, retired Deputy Chief, Kern County Fire Department

 

posted by noholdsbarred on Feb 27, 2008 at 02:13 PM

Mr. Ward and Mr. Conner,

Thanks for sharing your perspectives on this issue.

I know it's not a new issue, but it does seem to have ramped up in recent years. I wondered if it was because of the addition of new equipment, such as the hoist capabilities of Fire's aircraft.

I did talk to some Fire/Sheriff's personnel in LA County who said they actually get along quite well, now, on search and rescue operations. But they had to draw physical boundaries for each side and time boundaries (such as Fire can respond inside Sheriff boundaries at night and on weekends).

I'm not saying we should do that here. It was just interesting.

posted by JustcallmeBlood on Feb 28, 2008 at 07:27 PM

spoken like atrue former Kern County Fire dispacher!

posted by RQAL on Mar 13, 2008 at 08:37 PM

Why,  I ask should a citizen/victim wait for sheriff's Search & Rescue to respond when there are qualified trained personell on scene first to help mitigate these incidents??? So some volunteer group can justify themselves and feel good about themselves? Should this not  first and foremost be about that victim out there ?  If these two agencies are on scene at the same time shouldn't they have a unified approach to these incidents ?  You say there is an agreement who  gets called first when these incidents occur however I guess it depends on who the dispatcher wishes to dispatch or ignore  or gets the call. There are jurisdictions however these are sometimes ignored for certin agencies.   Who's jursidiction is it within the Bakersfield City Limits or is it a first come first serve situation? Once again who are in this for ?  The Victim or Ourselves as agecies?   Who is going to loose

1

  (You need to be signed in to leave a comment)

Advertisement