|
Energy bill blowin' in the wind Scrivner's threat speaks volumes Accountability concerns fuel Ashburn's high speed flip flop Twists of council race make it worth watching Comparing me to cow dung Cows are not public enemy No. 1 Leadership? We don't need no stinkin' leadership! Bear attack details shouldn't be kept secret Poor ranking a way of life for Kern Remember, you heard it HERE first! August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Got oil? No? OK, got solutions?
I got a great email the other day from a reader in the oil biz locally who had some really interesting suggestions for how we can ease the pain of our current oil crunch. He does support more drilling, both coastal and in the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge (I'm not with him on that) but beyond that, his conservation ideas were very intriguing. Got any conservation ideas of your own?
Here's his short list for what we could do if we SERIOUSLY wanted to curtail our oil use:
1. Give State and Federal tax credits for individuals that use public transportation. I don’t care where they are going the users get tax credits. Helps our failing public transportation systems and gets people out of vehicles.
7 comments from 4 users
1
posted by
TomW
on Jun 25, 2008 at 11:02 AM
Some seem a bit draconian, like impounding cars for speeding. The one that seems silly is the tax credit. Are you going to submit your bus receipts every year? Better to just fund public trans and lower the cost. posted by
witbee
on Jun 25, 2008 at 11:06 AM
We definitely need to look at the school buses. Some districts have buses that pick up kids literally across the street from school. Why? It is a busy street/highway and the school worries about the students crossing it and the possible liability. There are no laws saying schools must provide transportation except for special ed students. Open the campuses a little earlier, keep them open a little later and the parents can pick up their own kids in most cases. Or they can walk home (depending on age). posted by
witbee
on Jun 25, 2008 at 11:07 AM
Also, since we will be drilling more, we need to increase the capacity to refine oil. Let's build some super refineries in extremely rural places near some major domestic oil fields (like the Lost Hills area). posted by
randomfactor
on Jun 25, 2008 at 11:12 AM
Open the campuses a little earlier, keep them open a little later You're trading staff costs for fuel costs. posted by
JeffHarbin
on Jun 25, 2008 at 11:15 AM
Didn't Kalifornia have a "spot check" system in place for smog and other safety issues back in the 60's and early 70's? I seem to recall something like that. You got a little square sticker to put on your windshield so if you got caught in other checks, they would let you go with an up-to-date sticker. I know they have a system like this in Japan, and the entire country has to submit their vehicles for a check once a year or face a very hefty fine. Maybe something modeled after their system, which might serve to get a bunch of crappy cars off the road once and for all. posted by
randomfactor
on Jun 25, 2008 at 11:19 AM
More recent than that. It involved IR lasers set along offramps and onramps locally to analyze exhaust-pipe emissions. posted by
witbee
on Jun 25, 2008 at 11:49 AM
You're trading staff costs for fuel costs. Yes. I am. But it may cost less to pay a few teachers and few aides to stay on campus an extra hour than it does to pay for fuel for the buses. It won't pay off for some smaller districts, but it might for the larger ones. And, of course, we reduce the emissions also.
1
Our readers recommend: |