A blog about News.
About noholdsbarred


Member Since:
August 03, 2007
Last Signed In:
November 21, 2009
Profile Views:
3856
Blog Views:
102628
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Statement by CARB board member
Lies and cover ups tarnish California Air Resources Board
Strange encounter ends in arrest
PG&E smartmeters WILL be tested
Suspcious guy at my door last night
Adoption day "magical"
Closing courts wrong approach
Wars never end for veterans
Pet adoption day in Tehachapi Nov. 21
Indian casino OK with me
Archives
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
December 08
January 09
February 09
March 09
April 09
May 09
June 09
July 09
August 09
September 09
October 09
November 09
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


noholdsbarred - > No holds barred -> Just take a valium with my column, that's the answer!
Just take a valium with my column, that's the answer!

Though this lady takes issue with the part of my column where I list two acts that reduced or eliminated certain banking regulations and led to at least some of the problems we're seeing now, she's incorrect that Clinton signed off on those.

He may have signed off on looser regs for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, but not derivative trading (2000, Sen. Gramm) and bank mergers, which allowed these companies to get so huge that we can't allow them to fail (1999, Sen. Gramm)

Hope her valium hasn't worn off!

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by noholdsbarred on Thursday, September 25, 2008 at 04:24 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 137 times
13 comments from 6 users

1

posted by ActaNonVerba on Sep 25, 2008 at 04:38 PM

Clinton resurrected the Community Reinvestment Act in 1995. The idea was to stop redlining by requiring banks to issue loans to low-income people who previously could not have bought houses due to poor credit ratings. Countrywide and other lenders originally balked at the idea, but were castigated by the Clinton administration for being greedy, and they eventually gave in. 

Xanax works better than Valium. Both come in handy when one exists in this grim and disgusting pit known as the San Joaquin Valley.

posted by sagefever on Sep 25, 2008 at 04:45 PM

I just read or watch some comedy~Eddie Izzard is waiting in the DVD player as I type....pills are too expensive and every week the CDC or the FDA issues a new warning. The caller is an tragic example of where this dangerous road can lead.

Lois, you get the best calls!

posted by sagefever on Sep 25, 2008 at 04:54 PM

Ack!! the deal on the bailout just fell apart...


posted by randomfactor on Sep 25, 2008 at 04:58 PM

It will be all right, sage.  We have drugs.

So, if the partial buyout of WaMu by JPMorganChase fails and it goes under this weekend, taking FDIC down with it, McBush can regale us with his wisdom come Monday morning.

posted by randomfactor on Sep 25, 2008 at 04:59 PM

His proposed solution:  Less regulation.

Oh, and a "blue-ribbon panel."

posted by randomfactor on Sep 25, 2008 at 05:20 PM

China just closed the piggybank.

http://www.reuters.com/arti...

posted by Ray_Harwick on Sep 25, 2008 at 05:22 PM

 His proposed solution:  Less regulation.

Oh, and a "blue-ribbon panel."

And a 4th branch of government.

posted by ActaNonVerba on Sep 25, 2008 at 05:34 PM

...pills are too expensive and every week the CDC or the FDA issues a new warning.

60 Xanax cost $8.00. You can't take them all the time, you have to find alternatives (like immersing yourself in your job).

posted by sagefever on Sep 25, 2008 at 07:33 PM

Acta~ lol. I would not know,just going by my friends perscription....my house is clean enough,hubby feed, and all is well. Thanks for the advice though!

P.S. Where are you getting that price?

 

posted by ActaNonVerba on Sep 25, 2008 at 07:47 PM

At Longs. You can get 90 (they're generic, and work the same) for $12.00, whether you have insurance or not.

posted by sagefever on Sep 25, 2008 at 07:58 PM

Thanks! I'll pass along the info.


posted by adampayne on Sep 25, 2008 at 10:28 PM

RF, I guess folks folks don't realize what it means when America's biggest trading "partner" says no more money to all American banks. I fear this crisis just took a really ugly turn. 

George W. Bush wanted a legacy, and he certainly has one now. Singularly the most abject failure in the history of American politics.

posted by JeffHarbin on Sep 26, 2008 at 06:00 AM

China's ceasing to participate in inter-bank lending with U.S. institutions isn't really that big a deal.  The Fed Lending Window is still wide open for any banks that care to partake.

The real concern will be when China decides to stop buying new U.S. Treasury Notes and starts selling off their $4 trillion dollar supply of them already in the Chinese treasury.  At that point, federal workers will be classified as Volunteers, federal subsidies, such as Social Security, Medicare and just about everything they send to the individual states, will dry up.

I would anticipate a few folks (300 million or so) might get a wee bit upset at that point.

And as Sam has pointed out on more thn one occasion on these blogs:

"The kings of the earth who committed fornication and lived luxuriously  with her will weep and lament for her, when they see the smoke of her burning, standing at a distance for fear of her torment, saying "Alas, alas, the great city of Babylon, that mighty city! In one hour your judgment has come.  And the merchants of the world will weep and mourn over her, for no one buys their merchandise anymore." Revelation 18: 9-11.

1

  (You need to be signed in to leave a comment)

Advertisement