|
Statement by CARB board member Lies and cover ups tarnish California Air Resources Board Strange encounter ends in arrest PG&E smartmeters WILL be tested Suspcious guy at my door last night Adoption day "magical" Closing courts wrong approach Wars never end for veterans Pet adoption day in Tehachapi Nov. 21 Indian casino OK with me August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08 November 08 December 08 January 09 February 09 March 09 April 09 May 09 June 09 July 09 August 09 September 09 October 09 November 09
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
In animal overpopulation, celebrate the small successes
The last time I wrote about Kern’s animal overpopulation problem (back in June) I was frustrated. At that point, things had not improved despite more than two years of meetings by the Animal Control Commission and “urgent” edicts by the Board of Supervisors. We were still killing about 18,000 cats and dogs each year. In fact, our kill rates had gone up after a slight decrease. The commission was mired in arguments over a proposed county ordinance, a county-run, low-income spay/neuter program seemed permanently stalled and in August Supervisors again put off recommendations for more enforcement teams. Well, things still aren’t “great” by any stretch. But there has been progress and, however incremental, it should be celebrated. Yay. (That's me celebrating.) The commission recently OK’d, for the most part, a draft ordinance to send to Supervisors, the low-income spay/neuter program is finally under way and Animal Control has revamped its enforcement recommendations, which it plans to take back to the board on Dec. 16. Most importantly, our kill rates have actually declined slightly despite more animals being dumped and abandoned as the economy worsens. Animal intake at the shelter from Jan. 1-Nov. 24, 2007, was 26,512. In the same time period this year, 28,196 animals have come to the shelter. In 2007, we killed 66 percent of the cats and dogs for that time frame. This year, so far, we’ve euthanized 64 percent of cats and dogs at the shelter. “We’ve been able to get more animals transferred, rescued or adopted,” said Guy Shaw, the new director of the Animal Control Department. “We’ve been working really hard.” I applaud those efforts and the results are encouraging. Even more encouraging is that those improvements came without an increase to Animal Control’s $4.6 million budget. They’re moving more animals out of the shelter — alive — by relying on people who’ve been clamoring for years to help. The shelter now has a volunteer-based foster program, works more aggressively with rescue groups, allows volunteers to handle off site adoptions and allows animals to be taken to other shelters, even out of state, that don’t have the same overpopulation problem we do. They’re also doing a lot more marketing, education and outreach. I’m not pointing this out because I think the department doesn’t need more money. Sure, it could use the resources. But it ain’t gonna happen. Considering the looming state cuts, even Resource Management Agency Director David Price III, who oversees Animal Control, didn’t hold out much hope they’d get more money for enforcement. He and Shaw have scaled back their original proposal of funding three two-person enforcement teams at a cost of more than $400,000 to one team at about $100,000 with options to create the team out of existing staff. “Our hope would be to see if we can generate enough money through increased licenses that it would pay the costs for the enforcement teams,” Price said. I’m not sure supervisors will be willing to take that risk even at $100,000, and I’m not sure they should. In a perfect world, increased enforcement would be great. But we’re so far behind the problem, there’s no way that we can enforce our way out of it. We have to stop it at its source — too many unwanted puppies and kittens. The county’s long awaited low-cost spay/neuter program just got started Nov. 10 and has already funded about 70 spay/neuter vouchers, Shaw told me. The program was created using $80,000 from a one-time county grant and Price’s plan is to ask for more when that money runs low. That, along with even more creative volunteer programs, should be Animal Control’s and supervisors’ focus. If there’s no money for a second grant, supervisors should redirect a portion of Animal Control’s budget to keep the low-cost spay/neuter program going. The reason I’m so adamant about it is research shows that’s the only way to really get a handle on the problem. In my last column on this issue, I presented some analysis of Kern’s situation that Peter Marsh, a director of Solutions To Overpopulation of Pets in New Hampshire, did for me. If we took $400,000 a year, or less than 10 percent of the Animal Control budget, and spent it on spay/neuter surgeries, assuming we spent $100 per surgery (vets would have to discount their prices) and families would have a co-pay of $10 for cats, $20 for dogs, we could do 4,000 surgeries a year. That’s 4,000 fewer litters each year. If each litter produced only four animals, that’s 16,000 fewer unwanted dogs and cats each year. And that would definitely be worth celebrating. Opinions expressed in this column are those of Lois Henry, not The Bakersfield Californian. Her column appears Wednesdays and Sundays. Comment at people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/noholdsbarred, call her at 395-7373 or e-mail lhenry@bakersfield.com
Some low cost spay/neuter options
Proposed ordinance from the Animal Control Commission 1 comments from 1 users
1
posted by
Villagemom
on Nov 30, 2008 at 05:56 PM
Lois, THANK YOU for putting out the updated information!!! Even though the improvement is small, it is very good news and the first really promising update we've had in a very long time. I'd like to use this opportunity to emphasize a few animal related issues that are my personal concerns. First, the KCAC foster program is having a bit of a hard time getting off the ground, as the home clearance required by the program is putting potential fosters off. If you are considering fostering, please remember the home clearance is for the safety of you, your animals, and the foster animals. The hope is that any problems discovered in the home check can be corrected, and you can be that great foster mom or dad we need, to some adorable puppies or kittens. Second, Alpha Canine has some great spay/neuter vouchers for dogs too - particularly those for Pit Bulls and Pit Bull mixes. Call Alpha at 391-8212. Third, I know money is the touchiest subject I could bring up right now, but I still hope the BoS decides that animals need some too, on December 16th. I, personally, plan to be there to push for it. I'm not going to start an animal rights rant here, but believe me, there's one inside me, just dying to get out - lol! Fourth, the recent increase in volunteer involvement with off-site adoptions and several other programs is a remarkable step in the right direction. If you would like to volunteer, please contact Maggie at the shelter kalarm@co.kern.ca.us to attend an orientation, and then a training. There are many new programs, in fact, the grooming program really needs dedicated volunteers to clean up the animals in the adoption center (they will train you). The clean and good smelling animals seem to get adopted first! And the next way you can help the shelter is working with the Friend of the Kern County Animal Shelter. They mostly do fund raising to help with special projects (like new washer and dryer when needed), but they are also coordinating the volunteers doing the off-site adoptions. They could use your monetary support. http://www.co.kern.ca.us/ac.... I think that is all I can get away with for now. If you are interested in any more of my rant, let me know. Susan Madigan, Kern County Animal Control Commission
1
Advertisement |