You must sign in to take advantage of that feature. Enter your user name and password below. No user ID yet? Get one for free.
|
Statement by CARB board member Lies and cover ups tarnish California Air Resources Board Strange encounter ends in arrest PG&E smartmeters WILL be tested Suspcious guy at my door last night Adoption day "magical" Closing courts wrong approach Wars never end for veterans Pet adoption day in Tehachapi Nov. 21 Indian casino OK with me August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08 November 08 December 08 January 09 February 09 March 09 April 09 May 09 June 09 July 09 August 09 September 09 October 09 November 09
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Aloha, start your engines!
So, you want to open an off-road track in Kern County? You must be stubborn or crazy. Best if you’re both. Oh, and a good, strong pair of legs is essential for all the hoop jumping you’ll be doing. Since the state has failed miserably at building new off-road parks (despite an $86 million annual budget and $90 million generated by fuel taxes and green sticker fees paid by off-roaders for, um, new parks), it’s basically up to regular Joes to take up the slack. That’s no easy feat when you consider the byzantine world of CEQA, the California Environmental Quality Act. Even so, Darrell Melton, Darin Layton and Charlie Comfort were crazy enough to wade into that world more than four years ago to open Honolulu Hills Raceway east of Taft. And they’ve been stubborn enough to stick with it over four years of stutter-stepping through paperwork, meetings, reports, studies and countless phone calls. They’ve been operating under a temporary use permit from the county that allows for some races and practice days, but haven’t been able to go full-time without a Fish and Game permit. They should have that golden permit in about three months, I was assured by Fish and Game’s senior environmental specialist, Julie Vance. I was all set to slam Fish and Game for dragging its feet. After all, a safe, legal riding park can only help cut down on illegal riding and actually protect more critters than it harms, I thought. But Vance, curse her common sense ways, agreed that Honolulu Hills is a good project that desperately needed. “One of the reasons we were interested in seeing this happen is that trespassing by OHVs is a big problem, and we recognize that,” she said. “You need a place to relieve the pressure. Our lands are hit with that, too. It’s a constant enforcement issue.” Part of the delay was inexperience on the owners’ parts, she said. And they also weren’t sure whether to apply for a permit for the immediate race track (which is already built and involves 160 acres) or the ultimate vision (640 acres of trails, camping and concessions). Yeah, in hindsight, Melton said, it would probably have been better to hire a Roger McIntosh-type development consultant who can work through permits in his sleep. “I think even he would have had a difficult time with this one though because it was so unique,” Melton said. No one seemed to know what to do with the Honolulu guys and their raceway. Even the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District wasn’t sure what to ask for. Melton said they had a friend who works with oil companies on air mitigation do a report and the district was so pleased with it, they asked if they could use it as a model. Melton, a substitute teacher with a psychology degree, agreed he may have made some missteps along the way. “I’m no dummy, but I’m no genius, either,” he said. “It should really be up to the state to put in more riding parks. They have all the money, they know all the hoops with Fish and Game and all the other agencies. It’s a lot easier for them than a private person.” Actually, Melton and his partners could probably teach the state a few lessons, considering how a state riding park east of Bakersfield proposed a few years ago fell through at the last minute. Vance said that if Melton and his partners talked to Fish and Game first, the permitting probably would have taken much less time. Vance will have the chance to prove that possibly in the near future if all goes as planned for Ron Pierce, who’s scouting for land east of Bakersfield to open a similar off-road race track. He had a permit to hold a handful of events on his own ranch at Breckenridge and Comanche roads, and they were so well received, he’s decided to jump into the pond with the Honolulu guys. Having spent a career as a builder, however, he’s a bit more prepared for the process. “If you’re not stubborn as a mule, you’re not going to get anywhere,” he said. Crazy helps, too. Opinions expressed in this column are those of Lois Henry, not The Bakersfield Californian. Her column appears Wednesdays and Sundays. Comment at people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/noholdsbarred, call her at 395-7373 or e-mail lhenry@bakersfield.com 4 comments from 4 users
1
posted by
airqualityguy
on May 20, 2009 at 04:04 PM
Just so long as they ban recreational riding on bad air days I am all for it. Letting overweight kids and drunk, overweight wannabe kids get their excercise twisting the throttle on private land is a lot better than having them spread dust and noise throughtout the countryside illegally or worse, in the forest. posted by
darenhandy
on May 20, 2009 at 05:06 PM
Wow - you sound like you come straight out from the sierra club, which try to make animals have a better life than humans. We only live once, why do people, like yourself take the fun out of life?? We need a riding area. Since they took the riding away from the hills by hart park that were the stomping grounds since Bakersfield had cars. This is so much needed and with all the fees we have been paying for we need a place to ride, so much land and no where to ride. They all ready closed 85% of the beach riding access at Pismo but we still have to pay our fees... Actually they just doubled last year and we still have not received any land to ride on. I sure wish the state would step up to the plate and work with off roaders, this is getting rediculous. I dont ride on anyones private land but can see why people would start doing it, they pay fees for places to ride and there is none in Bakersfield. "As for poluting the air, I see more cars on the road that polute air than I do see any off road vehicle". posted by
fmlyceo
on May 20, 2009 at 06:27 PM
"Letting overweight kids and drunk, overweight wannabe kids get their excercise twisting the throttle". You know... "airqualityguy"??... that's great! (sarcasm) I have to take exception with your comments though. Your preconceived notion that those of us who enjoy getting together to go riding are drunk and overweight is wrong! The truth is that ever since I was a kid, my family and I made it a weekend ritual to get together with friends and neighbors in the Hart Park area for BBQ's and riding in the hills. Something that can't be done anymore or anywhere else for that matter. Fact is that it would be fantastic to see Kern County have a regulated riding area where all my CHURCH GOING, FIT, NON-DRINKING family and friends could get together and carry on the tradition. (Far enough away so that it wouldn't interfear with your Sierra Club meetings). posted by
JKeyes
on May 24, 2009 at 08:02 AM
Having been on the OHV Stakeholders Roundtable for five years,and working on having new OHV Parks in California; I can tell you that the the environmental caucas owns the OHV Division of State Parks and State Parks as a whole..
I remember the beginning of the planning for the Bakersfield OHV Park; everyone agreed this would be a good project and a solution for the illegal riding in the area; plus relieve the pressure on the small OHV Park in Porterville. Everyone agreed,except one group, and they threw out some non science jargon about a species, and walla, the project was shelved.
OHV Parks are being removed, not built. The latest is the OHV area to be removed is by the Pinnacles north west of Coalinga. After twenty five years of use, a non study brought back the evil word "asbestos". No studies were done just "no more riding" until....
There was supposed to be a OHV Park built by San Bernardino, but this fell through because of environmental pressure that caused years of delay and then of course. the prices became too costly to begin construction.
Groups like the Blue Ribbon Coalition have worked very hard to help State Parks stop the illegal riding. But until State Parks starts thinking of the "user" (who by the way pays to ride) and State Parks quits putting non science species in front of OHV Parks nothing will happen.
I find it interesting that State Parks says one thing and then does another. Ms Daphne Green (State Parks OHV Division) used to be in favor of OHV Parks, but I think her superiors have blocked her at every turn?
OHV Parks help the economy.
1
Advertisement |