A blog about News.
About noholdsbarred


Member Since:
August 03, 2007
Last Signed In:
November 21, 2009
Profile Views:
3871
Blog Views:
103284
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Statement by CARB board member
Lies and cover ups tarnish California Air Resources Board
Strange encounter ends in arrest
PG&E smartmeters WILL be tested
Suspcious guy at my door last night
Adoption day "magical"
Closing courts wrong approach
Wars never end for veterans
Pet adoption day in Tehachapi Nov. 21
Indian casino OK with me
Archives
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
December 08
January 09
February 09
March 09
April 09
May 09
June 09
July 09
August 09
September 09
October 09
November 09
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


noholdsbarred - > No holds barred -> Toothless watchdog not much help
Toothless watchdog not much help

If the Governor and Legislature are still taking ideas for which parts of state government to lop off, I have one!

Can the Regional Water Quality Control Board. (You thought I was going to say cut former Assemblywoman Nicole Parra and her do-nothing-$128,000-a-year salary, didn’t you? Come on now, you know it.)

OK, maybe the board shouldn’t be eliminated all together, but I think it’s ripe for some drastic changes. 

Just looking at the section of the board that affects us most directly, Region 5, here are the stats:

It stretches from Modoc County in Northern California to the valley portion of Kern County.

It has three branches, in Redding, Sacramento and Fresno, employs about 260 people with a budget of $38 million a year and has a wide range of duties including inspecting everything from corner gas stations to major waste water treatment plants as well as jumping on major leaks and spills.

That last part is where I think we can do much better given the board’s recent actions — or inactions.

In three high-profile cases of water contamination, board regulators have sat on their hands, saying they weren’t staffed well enough, didn’t think there was reason to do more, or just haven’t responded.

This is the safety of our groundwater we’re talking about. The stuff we put in our bodies on a daily basis.  Kind of important.

In the most highly publicized incident, the board didn’t even know the effort to clean up 20 years’ worth of spills and leaks at Big West Refinery had stopped until The Californian broke the story in the summer of 2007.

Regulators had been sending Shell Oil letters asking the former refinery owner to please, really PLEASE! clean up its mess — but nothing else until our story ran. The  board finally sent Shell and new owner Flying J an abatement order telling both entities to get busy — or else.

Lonnie Wass, a supervising engineer with the water board, told me Tuesday that even through Flying J’s bankruptcy, the work continues.

Then there’s Hondo Chemical. Matt Constantine, director of Kern’s Environmental Health Department, tells me he’s begged the water board to look into whether Hondo has  been dumping “leachate,” (the scum that leaks out from the bottom of landfills) on property right over the Kern River Water Bank, but can’t even get a response.

Wass acknowledged he didn’t know much about Hondo but thought Kern was handling it.

And just last week, the owners of Starrh and Starrh Cotton Growers in Lost Hills again won a lawsuit accusing Aera Energy of letting toxic waste water from their Belridge Oil Field seep into groundwater used for irrigation on the Starrh land. The oil waste water had been dumped into unlined sumps for years until farmer Larry Starrh sued after discovering it was tainting his aquifer. He also tried to get the water board to intervene, to no avail.

Wass said it was his understanding that Aera was now injecting that waste water deep underground where it wouldn’t affect the groundwater. An Aera spokesperson confirmed the waste water is now being recycled as steam and used in waterflood operations or is being injected, all of which was done by Aera with no urging from the water board.
Aera wouldn’t comment much further; Starrh may appeal to the 5th District seeking higher damages.

Starrh’s attorney, Ralph Wegis, contends the bigger issue is that Aera dumped so much polluted water over the years, the ground is saturated and still leaking into Starrh’s groundwater supply.

“Aera’s own testimony was that it would continue to drain into the water basin at the same rate for the next 30 to 40 years,” Wegis said. Right now, it’s only affecting Starrh, but Wegis says in time the plume will destroy far more than the water below one grower’s land.

And the water board stood by and let it happen, he said.

“They react by drawing 1,000 lines in the sand...and then drawing another line.”

Hmm. Sounds familiar.

In previous stories, water board officials told us they were doing as much as they can with severe understaffing. And I was told that again by Assistant Executive Officer  Richard Loncarovich of the board’s Sacramento office.

“There was a report to the Legislature a few years back that looked at what we regulate and our resources and showed we’re understaffed by 30 percent,” he said.
It’s probably true. I mean, how many times has the state mandated programs at the local level and not paid for them?

But maybe the answer isn’t to throw more money at the board.

Why not look at the programs it runs and see A) if they’re all absolutely needed and B) which could be taken over by another agency that does the same stuff anyway, like perhaps county environmental health agencies?

I asked Constantine if he thought his 50 employees could handle that. He’d need more resources, but the short answer was “yes.”

His people have the expertise, knowledge and contacts to make it work. Besides, they’re no strangers to taking over state work. The state used to inspect above-ground storage facilities, but gave that function to the counties.  Constantine said it was the same story:They took the fees, but didn’t do much else.

Constantine’s people keep up with all the inspections necessary to manage 12,000 permits. They take complaints on a wide array of topics, which they post on the web so the public can see their response times. And Constantine is directly accountable to the Board of Supervisors, which is accountable to us.

Beyond all that, I like the idea he’s here drinking the same water as the rest of us.

Opinions expressed in this column are those of Lois Henry, not The Bakersfield Californian. Her  column appears Wednesdays and Sundays. Comment at people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/noholdsbarred, call her at 395-7373 or e-mail lhenry@bakersfield.com

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by noholdsbarred on Tuesday, June 9, 2009 at 06:05 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 582 times
7 comments from 6 users

1

posted by airqualityguy on Jun 10, 2009 at 08:00 PM

I know for a fact, that a huge plume of water just under the surface is migrating away and downslope from the huge complex of waste water ponds about a mile southwest and upslope of the Buttonwillow toxic waste dump.  I would hate to see it reach the dump with its 150 feet deep pits filled with dangerous substances.  Just beyond and slightly further downslope is the California Aqueduct.   Slightly beyond that are the farms of the valley that depend on fresh groundwater.  No waste water should be allowed to migrate offsite from these ponds.  Mr Wass needs to make this a priority of the Regional Water Board and end the practice of unlined and virtually unregulated waste water ponds.


posted by Rambo10 on Jun 10, 2009 at 07:31 PM

To Mr. ----Phelps,

No K-12 superintendent In Kern County makes monthly trips to Mammoth. And certianly no superintendent (there is only one) within KCSOS. The community college district does have a campus in Mammoth, but not any of the K-12 superintendents or KCSOS. Just thought you'd want the real facts. Thanks.

posted by lwass on Jun 10, 2009 at 04:05 PM

Ms. Henry failed to report a few salient facts about the Regional Water Board’s enforcement actions:   The Big West refinery was formerly owned and operated by Shell Oil. I told Ms. Henry that our Cleanup and Abatement Order directs both companies to investigate and cleanup the site. If either company cannot pay its share, we order the other company to complete  the cleanup.   Ms. Henry did not report what I told her about the Water Board-ordered cleanup at the refinery. Because of our Cleanup and Abatement Order, contractors are pumping and treating air from the contaminated areas to remove petroleum residue. The two responsible parties have applied to the Air District for a permit to expand the treatment to 14,000 cubic feet per minute. At other locations, fresh air is pumped into contaminated zones to provide the oxygen necessary to allow natural organisms to “eat” hydrocarbons. Under our order, contractors search for areas at the refinery that contain excessive contaminants in the soil. When they are found, the soil is removed. If it is not possible to remove it, the area is capped to isolate it from the rest of the environment. Wells are also pumped to remove petroleum-related product and prevent it from migrating.    Ms. Henry knows that the groundwater contamination is well isolated from the municipal supply wells and the public welfare is protected. The groundwater contamination is found mostly under the refinery but, after 77 years of operation, extends about 500 feet beyond the property to the northwest. Under Water Board orders, that contamination is being tracked until it can be thoroughly cleaned up.   The refinery has operated at its location for decades. The entire United States (and California is no exception) has inherited legacy pollution from decades of activities when environmental concerns and laws were far weaker than they are now. While it would be nice to be able to wave a magic wand and make it all disappear, the real world is far more complicated. We must set priorities and then oversee cleanups that may take decades to complete. In the interim, we must isolate contamination from the people it might affect. The agencies must work together and assure this occurs, without duplicating each other’s efforts. That is the goal of the Central Valley Water Board in these projects and what it is doing.   Lonnie Wass, Supervising Engineer, Central Valley Water Board
posted by noholdsbarred on Jun 10, 2009 at 02:22 PM

AdamPayne:

I wouldn't be so quick to say the local guys would do worse...I mean the state guys have proved to be pretty darn lame. If nothing else, at least a portion of that $38 million they're costing us just in our region alone wouldn't be wasted.

Either way, the issue with the judgment on that Aera case wasn't the fault of the regulating agencies, it was jury instructions, according to Wegis and gets really complicated so I didn't put it in this column. They're going to appeal and are seeking $1.1 billion.

 

Air Quality Guy:

The problem is knowing which ponds are creating hazards to USEABLE acquifers. Part of Aera's argument, and the water quality control board's initial argument for not getting involved, is the groundwater on that side of Kern is really dicey as far as salts and naturally occuring arsenic and other nasty stuff.

 

posted by adampayne on Jun 10, 2009 at 08:49 AM

Nothing ever happens to these large corporations. Even in the extreme cases where a litigant wins a lawsuit, the delays from appeals over the years invariably mean those originally injured never see an award.

So, we have an oversight board with no clout and not enough funding. Eliminate it to have local agencies with no clout and limited funding make it right? You bet. Sounds just like what big business dreams about at night to make sure everything goes according to their plans. Use up all resources for quick huge profits, and after this area is totally scavenged move on to another area and destroy it. Big business at its finest.

posted by airqualityguy on Jun 10, 2009 at 07:30 AM

Does the Bakersfield Californian need a guide to take a reporter and photographer out to the hundreds of acres of unlined oil field waste water evaporation ponds along Hwy 33?  This problem has been ignored for many years and is an air quality issue as well.

pictures of oil field waste water ponds

 

posted by elginphelps on Jun 9, 2009 at 08:37 PM

Oil companies are always polluters. Downtown water smells like oil from the tap, even though Cal Water Service annual reports tell me it is safe. The well is right around the corner from my house.

 

Next item of business? Look into the monthly trips to Mammoth for supes at KCSOS.

1

  (You need to be signed in to leave a comment)

Advertisement