A blog about News.
About noholdsbarred


Member Since:
August 03, 2007
Last Signed In:
November 21, 2009
Profile Views:
3873
Blog Views:
103364
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Statement by CARB board member
Lies and cover ups tarnish California Air Resources Board
Strange encounter ends in arrest
PG&E smartmeters WILL be tested
Suspcious guy at my door last night
Adoption day "magical"
Closing courts wrong approach
Wars never end for veterans
Pet adoption day in Tehachapi Nov. 21
Indian casino OK with me
Archives
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
December 08
January 09
February 09
March 09
April 09
May 09
June 09
July 09
August 09
September 09
October 09
November 09
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


noholdsbarred - > No holds barred -> Head of PG&E in Bako tomorrow!
Head of PG&E in Bako tomorrow!

Peter Darby the head of PG&E will be in Bakersfield TOMMORROW (Thursday) to meet with employees. (Gosh, I hope it's not too hot for him, cause, as we've been told by PG&E, "Well, it's hot in Bakersfield" as explanation for bills that tripled and quadrupled this summer!)

He'll be at the service center at White Lane and Wible Road, but I don't know the time.

It's not a publicly announced meeting and even most employees won't be in the meeting.

I asked for an "audience" and never got a response. Gee, wonder why?

I just thought the timing was interesting after Sen. Dean Florez' hearing on Monday night which showed PG&E representatives ill-prepared to answer even basic questions about SmartMeters, rate hikes and more.

Also, don't know if you knew but Florez had a meeting with California Public Utilities Commission President Michael Peevy today in San Francisco.

Peevy couldn't be bothered to come to Bakersfield Monday so he sent two reps who, much like PG&E's guys, couldn't answer basic questions about CPUC decisions.

Little FYI for ya...

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by noholdsbarred on Wednesday, October 7, 2009 at 08:17 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 667 times
33 comments from 14 users

1

posted by Shwaine on Oct 8, 2009 at 12:22 AM

Perhaps someone can go and ask him why the residential rates for Tiers 3-5 just went up again this month. It's a fraction of a cent increase for each tier. Perhaps someone should also tell Florez about this in case he didn't know. Really, people should stop worrying about the red herring of SmartMeters and start worrying about the obvious problems with PG&E's tiered pricing scheme: namely the paultry baseline and the extreme rates for the upper tiers.

www.pge.com/tariffs/electric.shtml#RESELEC

posted by jfrancais on Oct 8, 2009 at 07:42 AM

Anyone ever see Mars Attacks?

PG&E rep:  We are you're friends.  We come in peace (as he zaps everyone with his laser)

posted by Lingtaowoo on Oct 8, 2009 at 08:08 AM

Zaps everyone with a laser....more like bends them over and says..." TA-DOW....How do you like me now...."


posted by ApolloDawn on Oct 8, 2009 at 08:22 AM

Shwaine, I agree that the Smart Meters are a scapegoat for what is in fact a punitive, capricious rate hike.  There are a few defective Smart Meters, but there are always a few defective anything.

Baseline quantities should be realistically attainable by most responsible and scrupulous users of energy, rather than an offensively low limbo rod that can be met only in a Motel 6 room in Santa Maria.  (I think I read somewhere that baseline quantites are made deliberately unachievable, but maybe you can confirm or correct that.)

By the time you get to Tier 4 or 5, it's cheaper to leave the grid and run off a gas generator. 

Energy conservation is important, and I have written myself on several occasions that our current energy demands are unsustainable.  But if we want people to work toward goals of lower energy usage, goals need to be realistic.

The so-called baseline is a taunt, not a realistic goal.  People are taking all of the simpler steps, like switching to compact fluorescents and adjusting thermostats.  Yet the baseline is almost as out of reach to them as ever.

Smart Meters have the potential to set realistic goals that users can hope to achieve.  Tiers could be defined less by arbitrary monthly consumption rates and more by a floating formula based on Degree Days.  A floating formula that takes Degree Days into consideration would separate the truly profligate wasters of energy from the mass rate victimization that results from a summer heat wave or a freezing, sunless January.

It's Management 101 to encourage behavior modification through the creation of attainable goals.  Currently, PG&E is not doing that.

 

posted by Lingtaowoo on Oct 8, 2009 at 08:55 AM

The person we need to see is the head of the Public Utilities Commison...not the person that's selling his product....any good salesman will tell you exactly what you want to hear, and then do what they damn well please...

The PUC should put this issue on the front burner--NOW.....AFTER they figure out how MANY of our elected officals have been SWAYED by the utilities lobbyists with sex and other ' goodies ' over what's best for the people of California....

It's like fixing the jury---and it's legal if you don't get caught by your wife....

posted by ApolloDawn on Oct 8, 2009 at 09:21 AM

I found the page that led me to believe that baseline quantities were intentionally made unattainable:

http://www.pge.com/myhome/c...#

"The PU code specifically requires that baseline quanties fall between 50 and 60 percent of average use for basic-electric customers in both the summer and winter and for all-electric and gas customer in the summer. The PU code also requires that baseline quantities fall between 60 to 70 percent of average use for all-electric and gas customers in the winter."

"Average use" would seem to lump one-bedroom apartments together with three-bedroom detached homes, meaning that the baseline is, by design, perhaps 40% of a typical single-family home's usage.

Doing the math, it becomes virtually impossible to avoid stepping into the punitive tiers during summer if you live in anything larger than a Motel 6 room.  Look at the link that Shwaine provided, and see what has been done to Tier 3 over the months and years.

People are conserving, yet their rates soar anyway, sending the message that there is no benefit to conserving.

Attainable goals, peeps, attainable goals.

 

posted by koztarr on Oct 8, 2009 at 10:17 AM

Apollo,  I have solar panels/digital meter and a

kill a Watt

device.  I have almost two years of daily records 'cause I'm wierd that way.  I am never over baseline because of the solar.  The last several days I have used 13 KW/day gross and a net of of minus 7 KW/day.  The gross would be over baseline in the winter w/o the solar.  No a/c, no ceiling fans, etc during this cool weather.  PG&E's baseline is not realistic IF it is suposed to be a target anyone can achieve.  I would like PG&E , or Lois, to explain to one and all just what the baseline is suppose to represent.

 

posted by SwallowThatGum on Oct 8, 2009 at 10:57 AM

PGE has union bennies to pay. With pensions at 55, they are in the same boat as CalPERS. The more we cut back, the more they'll soak us on what we DO use.

posted by bloodyroots on Oct 8, 2009 at 12:18 PM

lets gather the mob..run after him with our Tiki Torches and hang him from a bridge...in classic 08er fashion

posted by learnem on Oct 8, 2009 at 12:19 PM

were getting screwed on our gas baseline too.   we have the same baseline in the winter months and downtown los Angeles...who is a good 15-20 degrees warmer in the winter at night than we are


posted by Shwaine on Oct 8, 2009 at 12:57 PM

The most telling sign that PG&E knows its tiered pricing is a financial burden is to look at the CARE rate schedule. The CARE program is for low-income folks. They only have Tier 1 and Tier 2 rates. Anything over baseline, regardless of how far over baseline, is charged the same flat rate. If the tiered rate structure were solely for encouraging conservation, why would they exempt CARE customers from it? This points to the likelihood that the tiered rate structure is solely meant to make a profit in combination with the pittiance of a baseline allowance.

posted by Lingtaowoo on Oct 8, 2009 at 01:08 PM

~Bloodyroots~.....YOU just made my Christmas list,amigo...I like the way you think....


posted by ApolloDawn on Oct 8, 2009 at 02:39 PM

The CARE rates can be found in the link that Shwaine gave in the first comment.

If I were to play spelling cop, I would say that the spelling is "pittance," but "pittiance" makes for such a perfect neologism.  I might purloin it and send it to the Washington Post.  ;)

posted by NancyII on Oct 8, 2009 at 03:31 PM

When you sign up for CARE you are signed up for PG&E and The Gas Co.  It's a 20% discount on gas.

posted by breene on Oct 8, 2009 at 04:08 PM

Is this just in Bakersfield? Or is it a problem with all PG&E?

posted by Lingtaowoo on Oct 8, 2009 at 04:21 PM

Now THAT'S is a darn good question----


posted by NancyII on Oct 8, 2009 at 04:38 PM

I believe it's a government program but you should be able to find out on line.  CARE is the program where they installed the energy efficient swamp cooler, replaced a cracked window, replaced the light fixtures including porch lights with energy efficient ones (light sensors on the outdoor lights) all light bulbs, weather stripping, and had it needed it, would have insulated the attic.

And I live in a rental...they said it didn't matter.  My electric bill never went over 45 bucks this summer since I only ran the a/c at night long enough to cool the west facing bedroom.  Mind you the cooler wasn't strong enough  to force it's way through the rear rooms (br's) but I used fans to help move the cool air along.  If you qualify it saves a lot of money.

posted by NancyII on Oct 8, 2009 at 04:39 PM

I mentioned above that it covers So Cal Gas (The Gas  Company) as well.  It's not just PG&E.

posted by Infowar on Oct 8, 2009 at 06:24 PM

 Really, people should stop worrying about the red herring of SmartMeters

 

 

The smart meter is not a red herring issue. It should be taken seriously. It's big brother all the way. It's all part of the smart grid technology. All of you should conduct some research. Find out how controlling & intrusive smart grid technology is. 

 

posted by breene on Oct 8, 2009 at 10:26 PM

This is from an article posted today

PG&E wants rate hikes in spite of recent outcries

 

For customers who complain about the price they pay for power, and say they have no other company to get it from, Boyles said they do have a choice.

"You do have a choice actually," Boyles said, adding that people can reduce power usage.
 

First I guess his power is paid by someone else.  Mr. Boyles, just how much futher do WE need to cut back? Not much of a choice!

posted by breene on Oct 8, 2009 at 11:10 PM

HAHAHA, Mr Boyles was on the 11 news explaining why some farmer's electric bill for a silo tingy (not in working order) was over $11,000 dollars. The smart meter malfunctioned..  HAHAHA

posted by lanabuford on Oct 8, 2009 at 11:36 PM

I say we go with Bloodyroots Idea!....I can't even leave a decent enough comment.......way to many Delete her butt words I want to use.  

Boyles said, adding that people can reduce power usage.
I guess to save I'll have to cut  all power to my house....Jerk!..

posted by jfrancais on Oct 9, 2009 at 05:26 AM

This is PG&E new policy of holding the state hostage.  the public has been led to believe that they have to have these Smartmeters.  PG&E has no credibility and I can't understand why they are still in business.  They are a part of the reason for CA economic woes.  They were willing to harm the people of Hinkley just to make a buck.

How are they benefitting the public?  They are no red herring.  They are the enemy, in the most simple terms.

Gives the words owe my soul to the company store a more realistic meaning.

posted by Lingtaowoo on Oct 9, 2009 at 06:05 AM

Well..~Lois~ had a pretty good article in this mornings paper---check it out.....


posted by Shwaine on Oct 9, 2009 at 11:24 AM

The meters are a red herring for one very simple and obvious reason: they distract people from the REAL problems with PG&E. If people keep complaining that the meters are wrong and it's shown the meters are NOT wrong, then the complaints are nulled. But if people complain about the rate structure and the baseline allowance, those issues cannot be so easily sidestepped. Focus on the real serious, long-reaching problems with PG&E.

posted by jfrancais on Oct 9, 2009 at 11:28 AM

PG&E had a blatant disregard for life by tainting the city of Hinkley's water supply.  Their lust for money and even bigger profits takes precedence over the economic health of the state which was shown when they damn near bankrupted the state in the late 90's.  What stronger evidence do you need?  Dead people?  CEOs lighting their cigars with $100 bills or on tape admitting they don't care for human life?

posted by dragoon on Nov 15, 2009 at 10:23 AM

I had high PGE bills just like everyone else this past summer in the range of $300.00 at its peak. My latest bill is only $19.24. What gives? I haven't used my air conditioner this past month but that is the only change.

posted by Shwaine on Nov 16, 2009 at 02:17 AM

Check for a credit Dragoon. They're supposed to be issuing credit on either the November or December bills for summer "overbilling". Should show up somewhere on the bill if that's the case.

posted by ApolloDawn on Nov 16, 2009 at 06:32 AM

We just got our first under-$40 PG&E bill in about 18 years.

The credit was there.

posted by dragoon on Nov 16, 2009 at 08:19 AM

Thanks Shwaine and Appollo, it was the credit. It would have helped if I had looked past the first page of my bill. I was just stunned that it was so low.

posted by NancyII on Nov 16, 2009 at 08:33 AM

Now I have to go dig mine out to see if I got a credit.  Now where did I put it???  Oh, it's in the  hat for the drawing for who gets paid this month.

posted by lanabuford on Nov 16, 2009 at 09:38 AM

My bill  was $128.00 with no credit.   

posted by witterpitters on Nov 16, 2009 at 09:40 AM

I just got my bill and there was a $97.00 credit.


1

  (You need to be signed in to leave a comment)

Advertisement