|
ADL regards Obama's critics as anti-Semites? U.S. Christians strike back with the "Manhattan Declaration" Senate OKs motion to debate health care bill Sodom in America Triple whammy against gay marriage *Twas the month before Christmas* Firefighter catches heat for anti-Obama stickers Palin right, HuffPost wrong Trying terrorists--or Bush-Cheney? Why 'Rogue' is a better book than 'Dreams' November 06 December 06 January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08 November 08 December 08 January 09 February 09 March 09 April 09 May 09 June 09 July 09 August 09 September 09 October 09 November 09
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
If not for Obama's mamma choosing life ...
... his supporters wouldn't have been blessed with having the most extreme pro-abortion candidate elected to the White House. Guess he made sure not to be reminded of that discomforting fact by not having any Catholic clergy present during his inauguration. Isn't it just peachy that ol' George Bush had folks like Obama in mind when he proclaimed Jan. 18 a special day as one of his last acts in office? How indeed so fortunate Obama is to be in position to defend the Constitution that declares the "right to life," among other things, having the media as his lap dog and the teeming masses singing his praises, even an old fart as one of my favorite bloggers tells it: Last night while returning from the store I was flipping across the radio dial when I heard a dee jay on an oldies station (the type my parents might listen to) tell the radio listeners that he was so excited about the impending Obama presidency that he couldn't keep quiet any longer. "I hope the Congress does everything he wants and approves everything he ask for." This coming from a guy who sounded as if he was Les Nessman (the old WKRP news anchor.) This is really getting over the top when this sort of thing happens, not on the local alternative station but on the local oldies station! 80 comments from 14 users
posted by
siouxcityranch
on Jan 21, 2009 at 07:14 AM
I appreciate your insight Pax..but there are too many self centerd loons running amuck that will not want to understand what your trying to say. I do agree with abortion in extreme cases..but not as birth control for being careless on a friday night..i prefer mandatory sterilization of unfit parents that have proven time and time again they are just baby machines ..They wont stop taking drugs or support the 4 or 5 they already have..thats a program i would back 100% posted by
VirgilAnderson
on Jan 21, 2009 at 07:50 AM
"If not for Obama's mamma choosing life ... " Shoot ... What do you think would've happened if your mamma opted for an abortion ? She didn't ! What moral joy at her decision. --virgil posted by
AudreyB
on Jan 21, 2009 at 07:52 AM
Pax and Sioux If it weren't for your own mothers choosing life you wouldn't be here worrying what Obama's mother decided. posted by
AudreyB
on Jan 21, 2009 at 07:54 AM
posted by
randomfactor
on Jan 21, 2009 at 07:56 AM
Alternately, if Barbara Bush had just made the right choice we might never have lost 4229 Americans needlessly in Iraq. Lots of possibilities to consider in alternate history. And it does bring up a very good point--Obama being raised "right" in a *SECULAR* household and growing up to be President. There's a reason he specifically mentioned atheists positively in his inauguration speech. He's got first-hand experience.
posted by
AudreyB
on Jan 21, 2009 at 07:58 AM
posted by
VirgilAnderson
on Jan 21, 2009 at 08:00 AM
posted by
siouxcityranch
on Jan 21, 2009 at 08:04 AM
Uh well if it werent for your mamma choosing life you two wouldnt be here either...looks like you just prove the point..thanks...besides some of us were planned and had great parents posted by
TSM
on Jan 21, 2009 at 08:09 AM
Barbara is a supporter of a woman's right to choose So is Laura.
posted by
VirgilAnderson
on Jan 21, 2009 at 08:14 AM
Sioux, I actually did not see a point - I saaw a Tautology. You can't argue tautology - it's a duh statement - it's pointless. --virgil posted by
getalife
on Jan 21, 2009 at 08:14 AM
posted by
AudreyB
on Jan 21, 2009 at 08:22 AM
Sioux What's your point? Obama's mother chose life, so did yours, mine and Pax's. There have also been pregnancies that, if not terminated, may have eventually led to serial killers and child molesters. Does that prove that abortion is the best decision for every pregnancy? Of course not. posted by
randomfactor
on Jan 21, 2009 at 08:26 AM
besides some of us were planned and had great parents And some were planned and had mediocre parents. And some were planned and had hideous parents. The point of "planned" is that you have a choice--and Obama and I will both continue working--admittedly at different levels--to see that women continue to have a choice. posted by
siouxcityranch
on Jan 21, 2009 at 08:28 AM
for those who don't have a way to scroll to the top..here's a recap I appreciate your insight Pax..but there are too many self centered loons running amuck that will not want to understand what your trying to say. I do agree with abortion in extreme cases..but not as birth control for being careless on a Friday night.. if your going to have sex in this day and age with all the preventative measures available..there is no excuse for being irresponsible..lazy yes but a baby shouldn't have to be killed because you suck as a human being.. posted by
randomfactor
on Jan 21, 2009 at 08:31 AM
if your going to have sex in this day and age with all the preventative measures available..there is no excuse for being irresponsible.. Some of those "preventative" measures include after-conception measures. Using them can be and is just as "responsible" as using birth control. Deal with it. posted by
siouxcityranch
on Jan 21, 2009 at 08:44 AM
RF Some of those "preventative" measures include after-conception measures. Using them can be and is just as "responsible" as using birth control. Deal with it. [Photo removed by Admin] spoken from experience no doubt?? do ya feel real responsible now RF?? do you get a rush off being in control of life and death?? due to too many beers instead of using latex you had a innocent babe dislodged from its mothers woom with a spike...and murdered on a stainless steel platter?? whatta man you are.. YOU DEAL WITH IT DADDY!! posted by
AudreyB
on Jan 21, 2009 at 08:47 AM
posted by
siouxcityranch
on Jan 21, 2009 at 08:54 AM
ahh reality is uncalled for?? if he never was involved in an abortion and he had a loving family from the result of choosing life I seriously doubt he would be talking smack..i agreed certain cases abortion was needed but not careless promiscuity..im gettin off this blog.. this type of thinking makes me ill.. posted by
randomfactor
on Jan 21, 2009 at 08:59 AM
ahh reality is uncalled for?? The reality is that safe, legal abortion is every bit as much a good thing as safe, legal open-heart surgery. And I seriously doubt that you have much interaction with "reality," especially on this subject. It is not up to you to define "careless promiscuity," or even to define it as a bad thing for anyone but yourself. The woman and the doctor are the two people to make the decision. Not you, not me, not Pax and *CERTAINLY* not an allegedly celebate man wearing skirts in the Vatican. posted by
siouxcityranch
on Jan 21, 2009 at 09:12 AM
i have as much right to support what i believe in as you do big guy..so you might as well put some steak sauce on those words bubs RF And I seriously doubt that you have much interaction with "reality," especially on this subject And poud of it BUCKO...Im sure you cant say the same if you ever aborted an innocent child....go ahead with your profoundness..your speakin to the hand posted by
randomfactor
on Jan 21, 2009 at 09:13 AM
And I'll oppose you every step of the way, because opposing ignorance is *ALWAYS* the right thing to do. posted by
siouxcityranch
on Jan 21, 2009 at 09:16 AM
must be no mirrors in your house..and if you TRULY opposed ignorance you wouldn't be supporting those that decline to use prevention..your just shooting yourself in the foot here RF posted by
randomfactor
on Jan 21, 2009 at 09:20 AM
posted by
randomfactor
on Jan 21, 2009 at 09:29 AM
if you TRULY opposed ignorance you wouldn't be supporting those that decline to use prevention.. How about those who use prevention but it doesn't work? How about those who are raped? How about those who didn't have contraceptives available because their pharmacist promotes ignorance? Or because their church promotes ignorance? Or their parents? I oppose those who seek to *IMPOSE* ignorance on people. The Roman Catholic Church is one of the major vendors in that area. I'm all for contraceptive education. posted by
siouxcityranch
on Jan 21, 2009 at 09:29 AM
RF The reality is that safe, legal abortion is every bit as much a good thing as safe, legal open-heart surgery. Ya missed the HUGE DIFFERENCE..one is to save a life the other to end one..
posted by
siouxcityranch
on Jan 21, 2009 at 09:35 AM
RF How about those who didn't have contraceptives available because their pharmacist promotes ignorance? hahah are we grasping for straws now?? and i told you some cases required abortion..and i told you some cases required abortion..and i told you some cases required abortion..and i told you some cases required abortion..and i told you some cases required abortion.. NOT IGNORANT IRRESPONSIBLE BUMPIN& nbsp;UGLYS...if they are adult enough to do it they should be adult enough to deal with it...The child shouldn't have to suffer because of the indiscretions of its parents.. posted by
ghostriter
on Jan 21, 2009 at 09:37 AM
im gettin off this blog.. And good riddance, souxsie. Regardless of your opinions, that photograph is uncalled for and you only put it up for shock factor. Don't bother replying. I won't read it anyway. Hopefully I will not be the only one ignoring you from here on. posted by
siouxcityranch
on Jan 21, 2009 at 09:43 AM
the photo is reality..everyone can back this but when they get their noses rubbed in the actual result they want to just turn their head.and close their eyes.. i didnt create that photo..two other responsible adults did..sorry if it offend all the staunch supporters on abortion. incase you havent realized it offends me a million times over..and if your against what im saying then have at it..i cant believe a mother of five would support this..shakin my head on this one and i was gettin off the blog until he hit me with a cheap shot so I had to defend myself. posted by
randomfactor
on Jan 21, 2009 at 09:47 AM
Ya missed the HUGE DIFFERENCE..one is to save a life the other to end one.. Nope. Every late-term abortion is done for medical necessity. And I could post gory, blood-drenched photos of open-heart surgeries. I won't, because my aim is to oppose ignorance, not to celebrate it. incase you havent realized it offends me a million times over.. Deliberate ignorance offends me. posted by
learnem
on Jan 21, 2009 at 09:56 AM
liberals.....ill never understand them.....they will fight to the death to keep the biggest piece of poop on the planet alive (death penalty), but yet not have a problem killing someone that hasnt even proven themselves yet (abortion) posted by
randomfactor
on Jan 21, 2009 at 10:02 AM
liberals.....ill never understand them..... Add education and try again, learnem. But I'll try to resolve your question in short, easy words. I oppose the death penalty because the government should not have that power, even if you personally despise like the convict. I support the right to abortion because the alternatives are worse, and that "someone" is not a person, no matter how much you personally despise the mother. And make no mistake, opposition to abortion is *ALL* about despising the woman involved. Read SCR's posts above and you'll see it. posted by
siouxcityranch
on Jan 21, 2009 at 10:13 AM
dont twist my words to benifit your cause RF..I dont give you that permission....i never used the words despise..what gives you the right to sensationalize on our exchange?? I could care less about the woman..she isnt the one being killed..she'll be out boozin and cruisn by the weekend.. what i despise is you lack of feelings for the innocent on this subject posted by
siouxcityranch
on Jan 21, 2009 at 10:27 AM
RF And I could post gory, blood-drenched photos of open-heart surgeries. I won't, because my aim is to oppose ignorance, not to celebrate it. no you choose to ignore the REALITY of your actions.. posted by
learnem
on Jan 21, 2009 at 10:44 AM
Add education and try again so you are saying that all the education you have has no commons sense attached? what do you say about women that use abortion as a way out of responsibility??? posted by
Ppopgun
on Jan 21, 2009 at 12:12 PM
So an inconvenient truth was censored? Guess that's in keeping with the old saying: "See no evil, hear no evil, say no evil." posted by
randomfactor
on Jan 21, 2009 at 12:17 PM
Actually, it's more like, "you want to play in the Californian's website, don't make messes." . so you are saying that all the education you have has no commons sense attached? No, I'm suggesting that your getting more education might make up for your lack of common sense. As evidenced by your avatar, to name but one item. Spam code censored but it suggests that we can dispense with politeness, in a rather forceful way... posted by
randomfactor
on Jan 21, 2009 at 12:18 PM
dont twist my words to benifit your cause RF..I dont give you that permission.... 1) Don't need your permission, thanks. 2) You wrote that you despise women who become pregnant although you haven't given them permission--you just didn't use the word to do so. posted by
learnem
on Jan 21, 2009 at 12:31 PM
No, I'm suggesting that your getting more education might make up for your lack of common sense. As evidenced by your avatar, to name but one item. Spam code censored but it suggests that we can dispense with politeness, in a rather forceful way... totally dodging the issue, and going on a personal attack........obviously cannot answer the questions posed to you why feel the need to personally attack me ? and attacking me for my avatar....pretty petty.......circling the drain are ya???? posted by
siouxcityranch
on Jan 21, 2009 at 06:08 PM
A) yes you do B) your ranting RF. I wrote what I meant. Im sorry if your brain is in such chaos you cant comprehend my meaning so you feel the need to construct one of your own. not a drain learnem...more like a flush posted by
donmason
on Jan 22, 2009 at 11:17 AM
Back to topic........
“his supporters wouldn't have been blessed with having the most extreme pro-abortion candidate elected to the White House. Guess he made sure not to be reminded of that discomforting fact by not having any Catholic clergy present during his inauguration.”
Last time I checked, the new vice president is a Catholic.
From your link....................
“In fact, that’s exactly what Cardinal Mahony did by raising the issue of abortion in both the homily and the invocation that he delivered to the Democrats who assembled in his city in 2000. “O God, we trust that you will keep us ever committed to protect the life and well-being of all people but especially unborn children, the sick and the elderly, those on skid row and those on death row,” Cardinal Mahoney prayed in the invocation.”
Ironic statement considering how hard Mahoney, and many others, worked to protect and prevent prosecution of pedophiles within the clergy.
Catholics in general are good people, but Mahoney’s statement rings hollow considering his record, and he lacks real moral authority based on his actions.
Public memories are still fresh concerning the Catholic child abuse scandal.
This was probably the primary reason that Catholic clergy wasn’t present. posted by
randomfactor
on Jan 22, 2009 at 11:21 AM
Learnem/Siouxcity, at the heart of the anti-abortion movement is an anti-woman movement. Your denials do nothing to refute that; it shines out in your words. posted by
CassandraMcGowan
on Jan 22, 2009 at 11:25 AM
"Uh well if it werent for your mamma choosing life you two wouldnt be here either...looks like you just prove the point..thanks...besides some of us were planned and had great parents" wtf is that supposed to mean? that was like super rude! just because you don't plan your kid or are a single parent doesn't mean squat! PRO CHOICE ! i'll bet you're one of those horrible people that stand in front of the clinic and hold up awful signs and scream terrible things at the people going inside. how would you feel if your step dad molested you at age 13 and you got pregnant and you were going in to have a procedure done only to have people that knew nothing of your situation telling you you're a wh*re and you're going to hell. I USED TO GET FORCED WHEN I WAS LIKE 10 TO STAND OUT THERE AND PICKET, IT'S THE MOST HORRIBLE AWFUL THING I'VE EVER DONE IN MY LIFE! who are you to judge? what someone does with their life is NONE of your business, be it, a drunken accident, rape, molestation, or just too damn stupid or young to handle the responsibilty, people like you make me SICK. posted by
zapped
on Jan 22, 2009 at 11:27 AM
at the heart of the anti-abortion movement is an anti-woman movement. Is that the feminist version of the race-card? posted by
zapped
on Jan 22, 2009 at 11:32 AM
I support the right to abortion because the alternatives are worse, and that "someone" is not a person,
It's nice to see someone taking up where Douglas left off in the Lincoln-Douglas debates posted by
zapped
on Jan 22, 2009 at 11:46 AM
how would you feel if your step dad molested you at age 13 and you got pregnant and you were going in to have a procedure done This in the world of logic my dear, is called a red herring. Can you cite me a percentage of 13 year old pregnant girls who were knocked up by step-daddy? My guess it wouldn't come close to a majority.
who are you to judge? Um, taxpaying citizens of this country for one. But just imagine if that asinine statement were applied to other great miscarriages of justice throughout history. I mean, who are you to judge the slaveholder for cracking that whip, because at that time blacks were not considered a full person. posted by
randomfactor
on Jan 22, 2009 at 11:50 AM
Is that the feminist version of the race-card? Nope. It's simply the truth. Amazing how often feminism and truth are the same thing, though. posted by
CassandraMcGowan
on Jan 22, 2009 at 12:21 PM
i don't judge. and taxpayers? wtf are you talking about? taxpayers don't pay for abortions, the people having them do. and i didn't live in the time of slavery and it was the way of life back then, but how can you even compare the two? and the step dad analogy was an example. zapped are you even a woman? cause men really don't have any place to say anything, you're not the one who has to live with the decision. and maybe if men were more likely to stick around after they "knocked up" a woman, she's be less likely to abort in the first place. posted by
ApolloDawn
on Jan 22, 2009 at 12:48 PM
I wasn't to give this post attention, but now that we're talking about my very personal rights... :) "Can you cite me a percentage of 13 year old pregnant girls who were knocked up by step-daddy? My guess it wouldn't come close to a majority." It doesn't matter if it happens to only three per year. How do we deal with those three? "This in the world of logic my dear, is called a red herring." No, the argument about the percentage of 13-year old girls was. It doesn't matter if it's one or 10,000. Whomever suffers from the consequences of child sexual abuse needs to be treated fairly and not endure the consequences of someone else's crime unless she chooses to. "Nope. It's simply the truth. Amazing how often feminism and truth are the same thing, though." Yeppers. :) "cause men really don't have any place to say anything, you're not the one who has to live with the decision. and maybe if men were more likely to stick around after they "knocked up" a woman, she's be less likely to abort in the first place." Exactly, and in addition to that, men don't undertake the physical risks of childbearing. We do.
posted by
randomfactor
on Jan 22, 2009 at 01:04 PM
posted by
randomfactor
on Jan 22, 2009 at 01:07 PM
On the 36th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, we are reminded that this decision not only protects women’s health and reproductive freedom, but stands for a broader principle: that government should not intrude on our most private family matters. I remain committed to protecting a woman’s right to choose. While this is a sensitive and often divisive issue, no matter what our views, we are united in our determination to prevent unintended pregnancies, reduce the need for abortion, and support women and families in the choices they make. To accomplish these goals, we must work to find common ground to expand access to affordable contraception, accurate health information, and preventative services. On this anniversary, we must also recommit ourselves more broadly to ensuring that our daughters have the same rights and opportunities as our sons: the chance to attain a world-class education; to have fulfilling careers in any industry; to be treated fairly and paid equally for their work; and to have no limits on their dreams. That is what I want for women everywhere. (White House statement on today's anniversary.) Advertisement |