A blog about News, Politics, and Religion & Faith.
About paxchristi3


Member Since:
June 22, 2006
Last Signed In:
November 26, 2009
Profile Views:
3507
Blog Views:
25346
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Why sin cannot be condoned by state
10 Reasons Why Modernist Christianity Will Die
Oh, the bloodlust
ADL regards Obama's critics as anti-Semites?
U.S. Christians strike back with the "Manhattan Declaration"
Senate OKs motion to debate health care bill
Sodom in America
Triple whammy against gay marriage
*Twas the month before Christmas*
Firefighter catches heat for anti-Obama stickers
Archives
November 06
December 06
January 07
February 07
March 07
April 07
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
December 08
January 09
February 09
March 09
April 09
May 09
June 09
July 09
August 09
September 09
October 09
November 09
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


Remember Matthew Shepard?

If so, then how about Jesse Dirkhising? Yes on the former and no on the latter? I can't blame you. I never heard of Jesse either until I read the following column by World Net Daily's founder, Joseph Farah, on the 10th anniversary of Jesse's death at the hands of a pair of homosexual lovers. Makes you wonder just how far back the mainstream media's double standards when it comes to news coverage go to. Wikipedia takes note of that: http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...

Now for Farah's commentary:

Joseph Farah marks 10 years since brutal homosexual rape, killing of teen
Posted: September 25, 2009
1:00 am Eastern


 

 

By Joseph Farah

 


 

Editor's note: The following column is not appropriate reading material for children. It is not for squeamish adults. It contains graphic details of a heinous crime.

In the news business, you've got to have a strong stomach.

It's like being a cop.

You get to see the darkest side of a dark world. And what you see, hear and read is often unforgettable – and not in a good way.

The case of 13-year-old Jesse Dirkhising continues to haunt me since I first wrote about it 10 years ago – before anyone else in the national press.


Jesse Dirkhising

The details of the crime in Prairie Grove, Ark., Sept. 26, 1999, were chilling enough before I read more than I cared to read in the affidavit filed the next day. This is not an easy story to write nor read about. Be warned.

Joshua Macave Brown and David Don Carpenter were found guilty in the murder and rape of Jesse Dirkhising. The pair were convicted of drugging the boy, raping him repeatedly and killing him by asphyxiation.

If you have the stomach for it, here are the shocking details of what the police investigation found.

About 5 a.m. on Sunday, Sept. 26, two patrolmen from the Rogers, Ark., police department responded to a call to assist an ambulance crew at the home of Brown and Carpenter. When they arrived, they encountered Carpenter, who kept repeating: "He's not breathing!" Brown stood in a hallway, according to police, completely naked, holding a flashlight and a telephone.

The officers observed a young, naked male subject, later identified as Jesse Dirkhising, on the floor in the middle of the room, next to a mattress. His genitals and abdomen were covered with feces. His mouth was blue. He had a weak pulse, but did not appear to be breathing. One of the officers noticed that his right hand was wrapped in duct tape.

When Brown was asked about the tape, he explained that they were just playing a game.

An empty prescription bottle was on the mattress. Some pills and a razor blade were spotted on a mirror at the front entrance. Paramedics took Jesse to the emergency room where he was pronounced dead at 5:30 a.m.

During police questioning, Brown explained that he and Jesse frequently tied each other up, though not for sexual purposes. But on this one occasion, he said, he decided to sneak up on the boy, tie his hands behind his back, shove underwear in his mouth and bind him with duct tape. He then placed a T-shirt over the boy's head, but checked to ensure his nostrils were not blocked. After all, this was only a game.

He placed belts around Jesse's knees and ankles to hold his legs together. He then untied his wrists and secured them to opposite sides of the mattress. He positioned Jesse on his stomach, placing pillows under him before penetrating his anus with various items, including three fingers of his hand, his penis, a cucumber, a sausage and a douche bottle. Brown told police he also prepared and administered an enema for the victim, using his own urine as a liquid.

Brown then positioned a cucumber so that it was slightly penetrating Jesse's anus and secured it with tape. He went to the kitchen where he took a lunch break from his fun and games. When he returned to the bedroom, he found Jesse was not breathing. Brown says he pulled the T-shirt off Jesse's head, cut the tape and a bandana used to secure his gag and removed the underwear from his mouth.

Before calling 911, Carpenter says he attempted to administer CPR.

A search of the premises later turned up numerous small green pills, various forms of prescription medicine, including the controlled substance amitryptilene, a heavy sedative used to treat depression. Two cucumbers, one covered in petroleum jelly, the other in feces were found in the bedroom. A tube-shaped sausage, a crushed banana and a plastic disposable douche bottle with applicator secured in place with duct tape were found among numerous items used in bondage – belts, more duct tape, strapping tape, handcuffs, nylon rope, a rubber jump rope and electrical cord.

In the living room, detectives found a computer and related equipment still running. When the monitor was turned on, a program entitled "Medical Drug Reference 4.0" was running. A note written to "Baby" was found. "Baby," detectives learned, was a term of endearment Carpenter used to refer to Brown, his live-in lover. The note listed three types of prescription pills, advice on forcing someone to take them, positioning pillows beneath a male subject in a certain way and a threat to sexually assault someone for the next 14 hours. The note included a diagram depicting a person on a bed, face down, bound in tape.

And this is where it really gets interesting. It appears Jesse Dirkhising was not the only victim of these fiends.

Another letter describes seeing "Baby's little 10-year-old blond whore" at her bus stop in the morning. The note graphically describes how "Davie" can envision "Baby" engaging in various sexual acts with her. Another handwritten text describes a man giving a 9-year-old girl a glass of milk with a drug mixed in and laughing out loud about it, knowing that, in 20 minutes, the drug would render her helpless. It then describes in detail the man having the girl masturbate and perform oral sex on him.

Brown says when he had sex with Jesse, Carpenter stood in the doorway naked and masturbated.

Just so you don't think you're safe from such monsters outside of Arkansas, consider that the pair previously lived in three other states in the previous two years and that Carpenter lived in 26 different states and boasted of having friends in all 50.

But, fear not. This is just a homosexual rape and murder – not a "hate crime." No. This was just fun and games that got a little out of hand.

I thought perhaps the attention the Jesse Dirkhising story received in 1999 might lead some people to have second thoughts about our nation's embrace of the homosexual lifestyle. I'm sorry to say it did not.

The last decade has witnessed the capitulation of America to the "queer agenda." We're headed for a moral collapse that will make our economic downturn look like a cakewalk by comparison.

Ten years ago, I wrote: "Remember how the nation stood riveted to the details of a hideous murder that took place in Wyoming when a homosexual was tortured to death? Never mind that the crime had little or nothing to do with the victim's sexual proclivities. Uh-uh. That didn't matter. This was a hate crime. New laws were needed. New brainwashing programs must be introduced into the schools. New sensitivity outreach projects were required by all media outlets. Bill Clinton sounded off. Janet Reno chimed in.

"And then there was Jesse Dirkhising. There was no hand wringing, no candlelight marches, no national news coverage for the 13-year-old victim of homosexual rape and murder. No presidential proclamations – even though the heinous crime took place in his home state."

Jesse Dirkhising was brutally raped, tortured and murdered – for fun, for thrills, for the hell of it, because it felt good, maybe even because a certain politically protected lifestyle has been elevated to virtual sainthood.

But that wasn't a "hate crime" – not under the law. Jesse Dirkhising was just a 13-year-old boy, not a member of a politically protected class of Americans. And that's the way so-called "hate crimes" work.

I don't know how many more Jesse Dirkhisings there have been since 1999, but I do know a day doesn't go by any longer that there isn't news of adults having sex with children.

I also know a day hasn't gone by when I haven't thought about the suffering and humiliation that poor boy experienced at the hands of those animals.

Posted in the Politics interest group.
Topics:
posted by paxchristi3 on Friday, September 25, 2009 at 06:29 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 97 times
16 comments from 7 users

1

posted by djembe on Sep 25, 2009 at 06:55 PM

I denounce both killings.  On the other hand, pax, you denounce one and celebrate the other.


posted by paxchristi3 on Sep 25, 2009 at 09:42 PM

Quite the contrary, DJ. I denounce both killings, too. That leaves the mainstream media. What is up with the double standard?

posted by VirgilAnderson on Sep 26, 2009 at 08:03 AM

 

Hey,

You guys hear about the guy here in Btown who came upon a 14 year old who was drunk and passed out. He thought he would teach her a lesson by taking her home to his house and raping her ?

The Freak lectured the young lady about being good and not drinking before dropping her off at the high school nearest to where he lives.

Pax,  condemn that one too, please !

--virgil

posted by Ray_Harwick on Sep 26, 2009 at 08:08 AM

What's up is that the overwhelming majority of these kinds of sexual abuse are perpetrated by parents or close family members (grandparent, uncle, male cousin) who are heterosexual. It makes your anti-gay agenda obvious.  There is not a national crisis of gay people raping and murdering children.  There IS a national crisis of sexual and physical abuse by parents.  That's what!  You have a track record, Pax. You had to beat the bushes to find a case that could reflect negatively on gays yet you NEVER do so with the most common instances of child sexual abuse - those involving (usually) fathers sexually abusing both the female and male children they sire.   I look forward to your exposing those just as carefully.  God, your phoniness is so transparent. Worse is you obvious agenda to exploit the tragedy of this boy to achieve your twisted hateful agenda. No genuine compassion on your part.

posted by paxchristi3 on Sep 26, 2009 at 09:12 AM

All I'm doing is making sure the Old Media is not being selective in where it shines the light. I saw that happen big time with the priest sex abuse scandal, playing that up while sweeping similar -- if not worse -- problems in other sectors of the faith and secular communities such as the public schools under the rug. As you know, such hypocrisy rankles the hell out of me.

posted by Ray_Harwick on Sep 26, 2009 at 09:35 AM

"All I'm doing is..."

Shamelessly exploiting human misery to achieve a political and religious agenda.  I can't do stuff like you do, Pax. Having been abused myself, I easily recognize when someone else's misery is being exploited politically.  If you were truly concerned about sexual abuse you wouldn't be drawing lines between the sexual orientation of the perpetrators.  

posted by Lingtaowoo on Sep 26, 2009 at 10:16 AM

Kinda like The Lords of Bakersfield..naughty-naughty


posted by paxchristi3 on Sep 26, 2009 at 11:25 AM

Or kinda like the homosexual "safe school czar" who'd love nothing more than to politically exploit our kindergartners into singing the praises of the gay agenda: http://www.lifesitenews.com...

posted by defyinggravity on Sep 28, 2009 at 11:22 AM

Pax...  your ignorance has no bounds.  I swear.  So are you saying that these are the actions of all homosexuals?  That all homosexuals should be condemned because of these two mens actions?  Have you not realized that there are some seriously demented people?  On BOTH sides of the fence.   You're using this article as a way to condemn homosexuals but the whole matthew shepherd thing didn't condemn heterosexual people.  It was condemning killing someone for their sexual orientation.  This was two sick people who killed a boy for their sick and twisted games.  

Did you know that no one heard about that boy who's father ate his eyes, other than those in bakersfield.  I thought that would make national news.  But it didn't.  Should all father's be condemned?  I'm so tired of this black and white generalization you give everything.  Most religious people do it.  It's either you're with us or against us.  And of course how would you NOT think that way when either you're going to heaven or hell.  So EVERYTHING has to be black and white. 

Another thing, I'm so exhausted of being lumped in with pedophiles.  You need to do some research beyond your manipulated religious text.  I have never known someone to be so hateful towards other people but preach about how they're one of the "enlightened."  All i can say is, thank God he will be the one judging me after death and not you. 

The thing that frustrates me more than anything, is I know by me telling you this will have done nothing.  You don't care and you never will.

posted by learnem on Sep 28, 2009 at 11:35 AM

I see what pax is trying to do, and for some reason, you others dont see it

I will equate it to hate crimes involving white on black crime, and the lack of hate crimes of black on white crime (which happens much much more frequently)

he is equating both murders, but one was a hate crime, the other wasnt, and he, with me included, is upset about it.

that is all..

this isnt a gay bash...or anti gay agenda....its how our media chooses to gloss over certain things, then scream about the exact same thing, just a different sexuality.

pretty sad, actually

posted by defyinggravity on Sep 28, 2009 at 01:19 PM

Hm... okay.  Then if that was Pax's point why post that article?  Why not just write a blog about it linking the article, among others that maybe aren't anti-gay.  You have to wonder why THIS particular article? We all know the media picks and chooses what it reports.  You'd have to be a moron to not know that.  I mean look at fox news, MSNBC, any of them.  They are in business to sell.  Like any other venue.   The more sensational the story the more papers or air time they sell.  Which brings me back to the point,  i'm curious why the eye story didn't get further... And why THIS article?

Also, lernem, you equate it to black and white crimes but how do you KNOW, for a fact, that there are more? How are you getting this information?  How do you know that it's not one sided?  this article is "Fiends."  That's one of those words to evoke a particular emotion.  Anyway... The thing is you have to treat everything you read with some sort of doubt.  Blind belief is dumb belief. 

posted by defyinggravity on Sep 28, 2009 at 01:22 PM

On another note... getting an article from "wiki" anything should be thrown out immediately.  If wikipedia was a credible source why is it that NO COLLEGE will count that as a source for an essay?  You know why?  Because the information is written by average guys, like you or me, and is easily manipulated. SUPPOSEDLY, the mormon church was banned from their page because they kept changing the information.  Like i said, SUPPOSEDLY.  I don't have a wiki source to back it up.

posted by learnem on Sep 28, 2009 at 01:34 PM

look it up defy....youre on the computer, you have fingers, you know where google is.....its there


posted by defyinggravity on Sep 28, 2009 at 01:39 PM

um... Dude, I was being facetious.

posted by defyinggravity on Sep 28, 2009 at 01:41 PM

Well that was fast.  Here's a link.  It actually was the church of scientology.  But... Ya: scitech.blogs.cnn.com/2009/05/29/wikipedia-bans-c hurch-of-scientology/

 

posted by defyinggravity on Sep 28, 2009 at 04:05 PM

Also!  The article talks about how the guys "partner" wrote a letter about harming a little girl. Two different little girls, by the way. I don't know, it might be different for me, but aren't homosexuals exclusively attracted to males?  And again, god this article is SO one sided.  "queer agenda."  That's offensive.  "gay agenda" makes me mad but at least it doesn't insult me. And if Matthew Shepherd wasn't killed because of his sexual preference,  then why, on God's green earth, did they beat him to a bloody pulp and leave him to die? Are they just disgusting human beings who have no thought of human life? Nevermind the fact that everyone in the small town of wyoming knew that he was gay and HIV positive. Whatever... I don't know why I'm wasting my time. 

1

  (You need to be signed in to leave a comment)

Advertisement