A blog about News, Politics, and Religion & Faith.
About paxchristi3


Member Since:
June 22, 2006
Last Signed In:
November 25, 2009
Profile Views:
3507
Blog Views:
25304
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
10 Reasons Why Modernist Christianity Will Die
Oh, the bloodlust
ADL regards Obama's critics as anti-Semites?
U.S. Christians strike back with the "Manhattan Declaration"
Senate OKs motion to debate health care bill
Sodom in America
Triple whammy against gay marriage
*Twas the month before Christmas*
Firefighter catches heat for anti-Obama stickers
Palin right, HuffPost wrong
Archives
November 06
December 06
January 07
February 07
March 07
April 07
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
December 08
January 09
February 09
March 09
April 09
May 09
June 09
July 09
August 09
September 09
October 09
November 09
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


paxchristi3 - > Shining the light of the Catholic faith on the Culture of Death -> Janet Porter: Not just wrong, but downright evil
Janet Porter: Not just wrong, but downright evil

It sends a tingly feeling up my leg to know there are still a few who will not report what our undocumented president and his minions decide, especially those who know evil when they see it:

Posted: October 20, 2009
1:00 am Eastern

© 2009 

 

When Phelim Mcaleer pointed out the inconvenient fact from his documentary "Not Evil, Just Wrong," that there are more polar bears today – not less – contrary to Al Gore's documentary, Gore responded by … cutting off his microphone.

That's what the Obama administration is trying to do to us, and I would make the case that what's going on today isn't just wrong, it's downright evil.

Evil. Like a guy who murders 70 million people. That's pretty evil. I think we could all agree on that. Well, not all of us. White Hous communications director Anita Dunn actually admires a mass murderer. She says Mao Zedong as one of the two people she turns to most. Disagree with him and he'd put a bullet to your head. That's her favorite philosopher.

She told the Dominican government that she and the Obama campaign "absolutely control[ed]" the media. They control what's reported and how. That's why they don't like that @#*!% Fox News.

They reported the story of Obama's czar choice of self-described Communist Van Jones, and revealed the ACORN sting video that exposed Obama's pet organization that was previously best-known for voter fraud. Now they're also know for helping to get government funds for a house of prostitution with under-age, illegal aliens.

They don't like that Fox News standard of: "We report, you decide." No, they want it to be "You report what we decide."

That's why Rahm Emanuel and David Axelrod are making the rounds telling the world that Fox "isn't real news." Unlike NBC, CNN and MSNBC, Fox, they contend, has "a perspective." I just wonder how long it took them to actually say that with a straight face. No, MSNBC doesn't have "a perspective." They have propaganda. I don't watch them because I'm not bulimic; I don't like throwing up.

It's the same way they attacked Rush Limbaugh. Obama started it months ago. But now with made up quotes that Limbaugh never said, they've blocked him from purchasing a football franchise. Welcome to Chicago-style politics.

First they came for Rush Limbaugh, but we didn't speak up because we weren't the highest-rated talk-show host in America. Then they came for Fox news, and we didn't speak up because we were all just watching with our mouths hanging open in disbelief.

Even CNN has recognized the evil. Even they pointed out that we have a president who will talk with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad but not Fox News. No, they want to assault the one television network that won't march in lock step with the rest of Obama's media minions they "absolutely control."

State-controlled media. Aghhh. Diversity czar Mark Lloyd said Hugo Chavez's "incredible" and "dramatic" revolution is something to be admired. Take from the private citizens and give to the government. And now Lloyd in a position to live out his dream.

The state-run media has its glitches: Rush Limbaugh and Fox News. That's why Obama wants a real state-run media. That's right, completely owned and operated by the government, with him at the helm. That's why the "newspaper bailout" is being planned and discussed, so we don't have all those blogs the president dislikes so much.

Oh yes, that's why they want control of the Internet. This isn't just wrong; it's downright evil.

Despite all of this government control of media, Obama is still having difficulty getting through his government takeover of our health and our lives. Most don't want it, despite what 99 percent of the "news" is reporting. The same is true of their thought-crime legislation, phony global warming-inspired control-and-tax legislation and more socialist spending.

I have an idea. Let's release a big silver balloon shaped like a saucer and tell everybody that the health-care bills are in it. Let's throw in the hate-crimes legislation, control-and-tax bill and the rest of their socialist spending. Then count the seconds until it's shot down from the sky by freedom lovers and Second Amendment supporters everywhere.

The only problem is with all the thousands of pages of lethal legislation they want to pass in Congress, our balloon wouldn't be able to fly, even with all the hot air in Washington.

 

Posted in the Politics interest group.
Topics:
posted by paxchristi3 on Tuesday, October 20, 2009 at 05:11 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 60 times
6 comments from 5 users

1

posted by paxchristi3 on Oct 20, 2009 at 10:30 PM

Well, well ... look who's married to our undocumented president's media "controller": http://www.wnd.com/index.ph...

Talk about two peas in a pod.

posted by samheath on Oct 21, 2009 at 07:48 AM

Obama is an empty suit on the Devil's payroll, Pax. As you know, I don't comment on posts where the poster allows personal insults against me to go unchallanged and unreported as a violation of TOS. As I told Jason, such a thing has cost TBC blog many promising posters. And this continues to be the case.

posted by pogo on Oct 21, 2009 at 08:07 AM

Sounds like you have a pretty high opinion of yourself Sam. Also you seem familiar with the Devil. Hmmm, plus you correspond with Pax. 

posted by randomfactor on Oct 21, 2009 at 08:10 AM

Anyone who thinks there actually is a "devil" is about three bubbles off plumb, as the carpenters would say. 

And I certainly wouldn't disagree with experts who use power saws for a living.

posted by samheath on Oct 21, 2009 at 08:38 AM

So long pax; it's been good to know you.

posted by dirtyshirt on Oct 23, 2009 at 04:08 AM

Pax: I really think you should try researching some stories yourself rather than just quote (cut and paste) stories others have written. Not only is it good practice, but also you don't have to put your personal imprimatur on falsehoods that way. Handy.

Take this post for example. In the Gore/Mcaleer incident, Gore didn't have control of the microphones nor did he ask for Mcaleer's to be cut off. The organizers did both - in fact, one of the people who made the decision, Tim Wheeler, was quoted about the incident this way:

"...in the foyer, I spoke to McAleer, wanting to be sure he understood why he'd been cut off. He accused me and SEJ of censoring a journalist, and observed that we were shielding our speaker from tough questions. I responded that he had been free to ask his question and even got a chance to follow it up, but that he didn't have a right to monopolize the Q&A. He said he was simply trying to get Gore to answer his question. I told we gave him a chance to ask it, but we couldn't guarantee an answer to his satisfaction, and with both Gore and him simply repeating themselves, fairness dictated that he yield the mic to others waiting to pose their questions."

http://sej2009.sej.org/2009...

About Anita Dunn's purported love of Mao: Glenn Beck, whose grasp of the truth is as loose as his grasp over his own emotions, started that tall one by truncating some remarks she said in order to horribly twist what she really meant. http://crooksandliars.com/d...

There's much more, but to nut-shell the fact finding, try these:

Van Jones isn't a communist http://blogs.creativeloafin...

ACORN best known for voter fraud? Depends, I suppose on your faith in the Faux News' effectiveness in delivering misinformation. ACORN has been doing charitable work since the 1970s. According to this article: ACORN is best known as the "radical cult" that "spearheads" the attempt to bankrupt the country and thereby create the chaos which will open the door for a socialist takeover (http://cloward-piven.com/).

When Anita Dunn said the Obama campaign 'controlled' the media, she was clearly talking about controlling the timing of their news releases, nothing more. http://www.wnd.com/index.ph...

Van Jones no longer works for the administration because Glenn Beck's character assasination took too much time away from the work of governing; he is not a self-described Communist and wasn't vetted as closely as other Obama appointees because of his low rank in the administration. Beck went hunting for Obama Czars and bagged himself a mini-czar.

The author compares Faux News to MSNBC, as if Olbermann was just the left's version of Beck.

But there are no claims of Olbermann lying. There are no complaints about him even spinning a story overly much. He shares his opinions, true. But he doesn't mix his fantasies with the news. He doesn't confuse his fears with facts. 

This piece couldn't possibly have more factual error in it. 

 

There are more. Mark Lloyd didn't describe Hugo Chavez that way.

Internet... Control over our health and our lives... This balloon fantasy...

My God, pax. Have you finally lost your grip?

1

  (You need to be signed in to leave a comment)

Advertisement