larger view

Those who think the fat lady is singing on the presidential eligibility question have another think coming. I figured the judge, if he knew his stuff and took the issues seriously, would realize that he was not the one to decide this matter. But, of course, I wondered if he would take a shoot-from-the-hip approach to this matter like so many other folks have and do something audacious like order the president to hand over his birth certificate and other records. But attorney Leo Donofrio, a smart cookie who challenged the eligibility of Obama, McCain and a minor candidate in the presidential election, has nothing but high praise for the judge, saying he gave the Justice Department's argument that quo warranto cannot be used to challenge Obama's eligibility the smackdown: http://naturalborncitizen.w...

What that means, ladies and gentlemen, is this:

The ruling today affirms that the proper venue for challenging the eligibility of a sitting President is the DC District Court.

This is a very encouraging ruling for those contemplating a quo warranto challenge to President Obama’s eligibility in the DC District Court.

Not to cast aspersions against the judge, but if he hadn't made the proper ruling, I would have thought that it'd rather revealing that one of his law clerks may have ties to the law firm that Obama unloaded tons of Benjamins on to keep his questionable background from prying eyes, and isn't a shameful that Wikipedia has scrubbed the entry about this connection from the judge's page?: http://www.wnd.com/index.ph... and http://www.wnd.com/index.ph...

Phil at the Right Side of Life blog, who has doggedly been following this issue from Day One, offers another thorough analysis of the ruling, agreeing with Leo that a judge should not be the one to remove a sitting president from office: http://www.therightsideofli...

Sooooo, that's NOT all, folks!