A blog about Kern County, Politics, and Religion & Faith.
About rightthinking


Member Since:
June 21, 2006
Last Signed In:
October 04, 2008
Profile Views:
5880
Blog Views:
46808
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Say yes to Prop. 8 and no to PG&E
Tilted Kilt should stay off the streets
Harvey Milk Day in public schools? No thanks, Governor
Lifesaving marrow donation something we all can do
30 kids in kindergarten? WAY too many.
Cops on cell phones? It's part of their job
McCarthy won't quiet down, luckily
Vegas' plan to run good news all around
The people will decide the same-sex marriage issue
Fireworks lovers are their own worst enemy
Archives
June 06
July 06
August 06
September 06
October 06
November 06
December 06
January 07
February 07
March 07
April 07
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
More archives
June 06
May 06
April 06
March 06

February 06
January 06
December 05
November 05
October 05
September 05
August 05
July 05

Blog Roll


Ask The Californian
Editorials
Entertainment
Eye of Bakersfield
Faith Forum
Fired Up!
Inside Sports
Neighbors
Right Thinking
Sound Off
Talk of the Town
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


rightthinking - > Right Thinking -> Birth control for kids ought to cause a fuss
Birth control for kids ought to cause a fuss

The fuss over a Portland, Maine, school district's decision to offer contraceptives to middle schoolers last month fizzled in the wake of a national Associated Press survey showing the majority of parents -- 67 percent -- are OK with the practice.

That the Portland story made headlines at all must have come as a shock to some folks here in California, where contraceptives for minors are the law of the land.

"Many school-based clinics have been doing that (dispensing contraceptives) for years in places like Los Angeles, San Francisco, Chicago and Atlanta," says Debbie Wood, a registered nurse and coordinator of school health for the Bakersfield City School District. "I was surprised the Maine story made such big news."

In California schools equipped with such clinics, including middle schools, children may get birth control without their parent's permission and may decide for themselves whether to share this information with Mom or Dad.

You know, on the off chance Mom and Dad may not want their seventh-grader having sex.

Birth control for most teens is already easily accessible; on-campus distribution must make it nearly irresistible. I know the prevailing wisdom is that our children are promiscuous, can't-be-stopped sex machines but must we really make it THAT easy?

Fortunately in the Central Valley, where school-based clinics are few, parents haven't fully relinquished responsibility of their sons' and daughters' reproductive rights to the state just yet. And local schools aren't in a big rush to take them.

"Our district policy is to never pass out anything like that," Wood says. "We have grades pre-K through eighth and I've never had a parent ask us about contraceptives for their kids."

John Teves, spokesman for the Kern High School District, says contraceptives are not distributed at any of the district's 16 high schools.

"This is a very conservative community," Teves says. "The idea of distributing condoms would certainly raise a lot of concern, no doubt."

One would hope so. But if parental apathy and rates of sexually transmitted diseases creep much higher, the schools may have no choice but to get even more involved than they already are.

About eight years ago, when my daughter was a high school sophomore, parents were invited to review highlights of the five-hour HIV/AIDS Education Program in which their sophomore students would soon be enrolled. The comprehensive program -- abstinence-based, but not abstinence only -- was tastefully done and highly informative, covering all aspects of HIV/AIDS, including methods of reducing risks and the success/failure rates of condoms.

The problem? I was one of only two parents to show up.

Ron Valenti, then and now the director of the program, says low parental attendance is still par for the course. Parent information nights that are now offered four times a year at four different high schools draw only about 10 to 30 parents a night.

Valenti is generous in his estimations why.

"It could be because it's their second, third or fourth child and they've seen the program already," he says. "Or maybe they have confidence in the schools and what we're doing. There may be some apathy involved, but I hope that's not the case."

Dream on, Ron.

Another new study released this week, by psychologists at the University of Wisconsin in Madison, hits on a few of the reasons some of our children are having sex the minute they hit puberty. Among those cited are a disconnect with parents, low self-esteem and lots and lots of the television shows that send their little libidos into overdrive.

There is a limit to what we should expect of our schools. They can't mandate quality time at home. They can't turn off the TV set. And they shouldn't be handing out condoms and birth control pills.

Parents, our local schools provide the information our children need to make informed, healthy choices. Convenient or not, the rest is up to us.

 

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by rightthinking on Saturday, November 17, 2007 at 07:52 AM
Report a Violation
Viewed 249 times
33 comments from 19 users

1

posted by NumberOfTheFallen on Nov 17, 2007 at 08:42 AM
3867.
posted by RosemarysAbortionist on Nov 17, 2007 at 08:58 AM
Maybe our county keeps hitting the Lotto in teen pregnancy rates because our very conservative community is stuck up about contraceptives in schools.
posted by adampayne on Nov 17, 2007 at 09:19 AM
Thanks for the really informative column this morning. Since chlamydia really only effects women it is good to read that you still support providing the fewest resources and information regarding safe sex practices in educational settings. You are a shining example for your gender, since women can almost never pass along HIV to a male partner, it is very thoughtful of you to discourage condom use, which is the best method preventing the spread of sexually transmitted disease available barring abstinence. It is also refreshing to note that Kern County carries the third highest rate of chlamydia incidence in the state, right behind Fresno and Sacramento. Could this high rate of incidence be attributed to lack of condom use, or just the high rate of sexual activity by our conservative youngsters?

It is also interesting to note that gonorrhea, which rose precipitously throughout America's Viet Nam involvement, and peaked in terms of incidence in 1976, showed dramatic steady declines until  this current "faith-based" Bush Administration came into power. Gonorrhea incidence has risen for the past six years, and once again the main victims of this disease are young females. Kern County also boasts the third highest rate of gonorrhea cases in the state. 

Thanks again for coming to the defense of young women everywhere with your continued championing of ignorance as the answer to this problem . You're the best.
posted by randomfactor on Nov 17, 2007 at 09:34 AM

Texas:  no birth control for kids, highest teen pregnancy rate in nation.   Twenty-four percent of them were *NOT* the first birth for the mother.

http://www.dallasnews.com/s...

Texas' policy is to deny contraceptives without parental consent wherever possible and to push an abstinence-only sex education program in public schools.

Experts, though, are questioning that approach. They note that from 1991 to 2004, the state's teen birth rate dropped by 19 percent, while the U.S. rate dipped by one-third.

By contrast, California, which has seen its teen birth rate drop by 47 percent in the same period, teaches abstinence but also explains contraception at school and has gone to dispensing birth control to teenage boys and girls – for free, no parental consent required – in community clinics and doctors' offices.

posted by mattloch on Nov 17, 2007 at 10:35 AM
"In California schools equipped with such clinics, including middle schools, children may get birth control without their parent's permission and may decide for themselves whether to share this information with Mom or Dad.

You know, on the off chance Mom and Dad may not want their seventh-grader having sex. "

Sure, because everybody know that availability of contraceptives determines whether kids have sex, right? It isn't like a kid has ever decided, "you know what, I may be undertaking a risky behavior without protection, so I guess I won't do it."

It works with wearing helmets while riding bikes, because I've never seen a kid riding a bike without a helmet. It works with kids on rollerbaldes, because I've never seen a kid in rollerblades without wristguards. It works with video games, because I've never seen a kid play video games without a wrist brace to prevent carpal tunnel.

Kids are the safest, most intuitive (since we're removing sex education from them as well) beings on the planet. Why would we want to mess that up?

.

A question to the conservatives on these boards: Why is it that in order to be safe, everybody should own a gun; but in order to keep kids safe we take away contraceptives and education? The big argument is always "well, I'm trained to use my gun safely", but the same doesn't hold true for sex (which by the way, is much more enjoyable than shooting a person, not to mention much more common)?

posted by rightthinking on Nov 17, 2007 at 04:17 PM

We're taking away contraceptives and education? Where, exactly, is that happening? In California, minors have access to birth control and abortions without their parents' consent or even knowlege. The only way we could make getting contraceptives any easier would be to deliver them to their doors.  

I support "the fewest resources" regarding safe sex practices? Why? Because I believe parents should be in on the secret when their 11, 12 and 13-year-old children are having sex? 

There are a lot of ridiculous assumptions here, but what better way to take the focus off topic, which is that our young children - we're not even talking high school  kids here - are becoming sexually active in growing numbers. What I'm reading on this blog is resigned acceptance - where's the shock, the concern, the sadness? There are a lot of reasons these kids are becoming sexually active at such early ages and not one of them is good or healthy - but by all means, let's just apply the contraceptive band-aid. No pregnancies, no problems, right? Perhaps we should next mandate birth control for all girls at the start of their first menstrual cycles or maybe even introduce selective sterilzation at birth.

No, no reason to worry, at least not in California. The state is ever vigilant in protecting the right of our young, vulnerable and emotionally immature children to have sex where ever and whenever  they like - and without their parents' knowledge and guidance.

 

posted by adampayne on Nov 17, 2007 at 04:59 PM
You do support the fewest public resources and education on the subject of sex, and to dispute your own rhetoric is absurd. The problem is that sexual activity has begun for many of these kids who are aged 11-14 years of age. The parents have, unfortunately, not done the job of providing honest information regarding sex for whatever reasons.  It can certainly be argued that the majority of parents have not done much of a job on any subject matter involving their kids education given the state of our test scores, as you in your column insinuated.
Yes there are plenty of reasons kids that kids become sexually active- hormones, boredom, curiosity, desperation for acceptance, desperation to get out of current circumstances, abuse and so many more- but not to provide the best information and easily available  safe guards against pregnancy and disease is reprehensible. The sad statistics of increased disease and pregnancy points to a failure of parents to teach the most basic human information.

The state had to say that kids were not being properly trained to drive by their parents, and classes were eventually mandated to make sure young people took classes on vehicle operation before being permitted to drive. The consequences of sex are every bit as great, if not greater than getting behind the wheel of an automobile, but we cannot agree that all children need rigorous classes educating them honestly about all aspects sex. 
posted by Griffon64 on Nov 17, 2007 at 05:31 PM
Who cares about what "the state" does and doesn't do? Parents can't seem to be bothered to educate their kids properly in this "me first" age. That's a deep root right there. By golly, I never even considered having sex as a teen. The consequences were spelled out to me - sufficiently to get it into even my irresponsible teenage head that this was something I'd Better Not Do.

If the parents do not provide the education and the direction, then sure, next best thing is to do what you can to try and get it so the kids at least don't pop kids of their own. Though sometimes I wonder if that's the best thing to do - it doesn't teach responsibility the way good old fashioned "You made the bed, now you lie in it" does.
posted by sagefever on Nov 17, 2007 at 06:21 PM
I agree Griffon. We never discussed sex at home, ever, and when I became pregnant at 16  my Mom's comment was "I thought you were too smart to do this ,to me!" More education on self worth,sex and it's consequences would have done me a world of good. But I did take this experience,grow up in a hurry and learn.I could never regret having my son~ but a few years latter might have been nice.
posted by sfinboston52 on Nov 18, 2007 at 12:36 PM
I rather young people have protection and birth control than an unwanted pregnancy or STD's
posted by Medic349 on Nov 18, 2007 at 03:44 PM
I want the schools teaching my daughter how to read and write. NOT handing out birth control. I don't know why people can't see a problem when schools can arrange abortions and hand out condoms and birth control without parental consent. Yet they can't put on a  band-aid or give a kid aspirin without their OK.

If we are going to hand out condoms because kids are going to have sex anyway, then maybe we should hand out clean needles and pipes to students as well. After all, most of them end up doing drugs right?

Oh and for the record Mattloch, the reason I own a gun isn't because I'm trained. It's because it's my right as an American citizen to protect myself and my family.
posted by Baylee on Nov 18, 2007 at 04:03 PM

“Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow.” Think about it.

posted by randomfactor on Nov 18, 2007 at 05:21 PM

"Learn from your parents' mistakes:  USE BIRTH CONTROL!"\

.

Medic, it isn't an either/or proposition.  Schools can teach reading, writing and arithmetic *AND* have condoms available for those who need them. 

posted by Medic349 on Nov 18, 2007 at 06:53 PM
It is not the responsibility of the village to raise the child. It is the family's.
posted by randomfactor on Nov 18, 2007 at 06:57 PM
And when the family falls down on the job, thank Zeus the kids don't have to sink or swim on their own.  Others in "the village" can help take up the slack.  So far as I know, neither of mine needed such outside help.  But if they did, I'm glad they got it.
posted by TomW on Nov 18, 2007 at 07:24 PM
"Birth control for most teens is already easily accessible; on-campus distribution must make it nearly irresistible. I know the prevailing wisdom is that our children are promiscuous, can't-be-stopped sex machines but must we really make it THAT easy?"

Um, they aren't handing out genitalia.  If you've got a statistic on how the availability of contraception affects the rates of teen sex, I'd like to see it.

http://www.guttmacher.org/p...

•Sixty percent of teens younger than 18 who use a clinic for sexual health services say their parents know they are there.[18]

•Among those whose parents do not know, 70% would not use the clinic for prescription contraception if the law required that their parents be notified.[19]

•One in five teens whose parents do not know they obtain contraceptive services would continue to have sex but would either rely on withdrawal or not use any contraceptives if the law required that their parents be notified of their visit.[20]

•Only 1% of all minor adolescents who use sexual health services indicate that their only reaction to a law requiring their parents' involvement for prescription contraception would be to stop having sex.[21]

posted by TomW on Nov 18, 2007 at 07:26 PM
On a more snarky note, maybe the best thing we can do is to associate sex with being at school in a young person's mind.
posted by Medic349 on Nov 18, 2007 at 08:26 PM
You have to have a license to drive a car, get married and even to catch a fish. But any idiot can have a child.....and most do.

It is our responsibility as parents to know what is going on in our child's life. Are we going to just give in and say "ah what the hell. Your going to have sex anyway so heres a large pack of condoms. Try to make them last until next Friday will ya?"

While we're at it lets fix our teen drug problem. I think I'm going to rally to start a clean needles for schools program......who's with me!!!??
posted by NumberOfTheFallen on Nov 19, 2007 at 09:52 AM
3871.
posted by randomfactor on Nov 19, 2007 at 09:57 AM

If I thought that was where the clean-needles program would be most effective, I'd join you, Medic.  You have evidence that school-age children are contracting AIDS and hepatitis in significant number through sharing needles? 

.

If that's how you'd hand out condoms to young people, maybe it's best if you leave it to the school nurses.

posted by ProgressivePete2 on Nov 19, 2007 at 01:07 PM
As far as the clean needles program, you probably only need to keep in confined to the weight lifting rooms.

Sagefever, I was informed by my parents about sex, had it at 16 and used a condom. (not to make you feel bad or anything, just a constrast)
posted by Baylee on Nov 19, 2007 at 04:26 PM

I am sorry but I have to laugh when I see statements about how it is the parents responsibility to teach their kids about sex and safe sex and condoms and birth control. I promise you that conversation isn't going to stop them , especially when they think they are  "IN LOVE" . I do agree it is the parents responsibility to teach this at home but lets face it most don't . My mothers explanation of sex to me was this, " a man's body is the ugliest thing you will ever see in your life" end of conversation.(and if you think that didn't peak my curiosity well......) Reality check people what we have been doing  or not doing as parents hasn't been working and isn't working now.

posted by jfrancais on Nov 19, 2007 at 04:30 PM
...well was a man's body the ugliest thing you ever saw? (My curiosity has peaked as well).
posted by Baylee on Nov 19, 2007 at 04:34 PM

no , the ugliest thin I ever saw was .........

posted by jfrancais on Nov 19, 2007 at 04:37 PM
...a shaved cat (a la Mr Bigglesworth)?
posted by indoorfootballfan on Jan 18, 2008 at 05:01 PM

Anyone who gives birth control devices or pills to my underage child will be spitting teeth!  Parents can only parent when they're in control, not the government schools that only screw up everything they touch.  I teach our religious and moral values to my kids -- and I don't send them to government schools to be contradicted or mocked.

posted by ChicaEsquela on Jan 18, 2008 at 05:41 PM
Do those religious and moral values including making people "spit their teeth"?
posted by RosemarysAbortionist on Jan 18, 2008 at 05:52 PM

If his underage child asks for birth control pills, it means that either his religious and moral values failed him, his parenting sucked as far as instilling those religious values, or both. Only a really immature parent would make someone else spit their teeth as a result of his own failure in religious and moral parenting.

posted by RosemarysAbortionist on Jan 18, 2008 at 05:54 PM

PS. Who needs birth control when all you need is the right software?

posted by Baylee on Jan 18, 2008 at 06:03 PM
Spitting teeth? What religion teaches that ?
posted by ChicoEsquela on Jan 18, 2008 at 09:21 PM
Panfilo Fuentesism
posted by NancyII on Jan 18, 2008 at 09:28 PM
Don't learn from your parents..that's where YOU came from and look how that turned out.
posted by anglo1 on Jan 18, 2008 at 09:52 PM
I am fairly conservative and I think children should be taught as much as needed about sex and I believe contraceptives [not abortion] should be available to them so you are wrong Mattloch.  But, I think there should be an age that parental permission is required for both, maybe about 14-15, not sure about age, been too long since I had children to raise.
1

Leave a Comment
Ground Rules for posting comments:
  • No profanity or personal attacks.
  • Please comment on the subject of the post itself.
If you do not follow these rules we will remove your comment. Please keep it civil.

To protect users from spam, please enter the text from the image on the left.
   

Our readers recommend: