|
Say yes to Prop. 8 and no to PG&E Tilted Kilt should stay off the streets Harvey Milk Day in public schools? No thanks, Governor Lifesaving marrow donation something we all can do 30 kids in kindergarten? WAY too many. Cops on cell phones? It's part of their job McCarthy won't quiet down, luckily Vegas' plan to run good news all around The people will decide the same-sex marriage issue Fireworks lovers are their own worst enemy June 06 July 06 August 06 September 06 October 06 November 06 December 06 January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08 June 06 May 06 April 06 March 06 February 06 January 06 December 05 November 05 October 05 September 05 August 05 July 05 Blog RollAsk The Californian Editorials Entertainment Eye of Bakersfield Faith Forum Fired Up! Inside Sports Neighbors Right Thinking Sound Off Talk of the Town
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Birth control for kids ought to cause a fuss
The fuss over a Portland, Maine, school district's decision to offer contraceptives to middle schoolers last month fizzled in the wake of a national Associated Press survey showing the majority of parents -- 67 percent -- are OK with the practice. That the Portland story made headlines at all must have come as a shock to some folks here in California, where contraceptives for minors are the law of the land. "Many school-based clinics have been doing that (dispensing contraceptives) for years in places like Los Angeles, San Francisco, Chicago and Atlanta," says Debbie Wood, a registered nurse and coordinator of school health for the Bakersfield City School District. "I was surprised the Maine story made such big news." In California schools equipped with such clinics, including middle schools, children may get birth control without their parent's permission and may decide for themselves whether to share this information with Mom or Dad. You know, on the off chance Mom and Dad may not want their seventh-grader having sex. Birth control for most teens is already easily accessible; on-campus distribution must make it nearly irresistible. I know the prevailing wisdom is that our children are promiscuous, can't-be-stopped sex machines but must we really make it THAT easy? Fortunately in the Central Valley, where school-based clinics are few, parents haven't fully relinquished responsibility of their sons' and daughters' reproductive rights to the state just yet. And local schools aren't in a big rush to take them. "Our district policy is to never pass out anything like that," Wood says. "We have grades pre-K through eighth and I've never had a parent ask us about contraceptives for their kids." John Teves, spokesman for the Kern High School District, says contraceptives are not distributed at any of the district's 16 high schools. "This is a very conservative community," Teves says. "The idea of distributing condoms would certainly raise a lot of concern, no doubt." One would hope so. But if parental apathy and rates of sexually transmitted diseases creep much higher, the schools may have no choice but to get even more involved than they already are. About eight years ago, when my daughter was a high school sophomore, parents were invited to review highlights of the five-hour HIV/AIDS Education Program in which their sophomore students would soon be enrolled. The comprehensive program -- abstinence-based, but not abstinence only -- was tastefully done and highly informative, covering all aspects of HIV/AIDS, including methods of reducing risks and the success/failure rates of condoms. The problem? I was one of only two parents to show up. Ron Valenti, then and now the director of the program, says low parental attendance is still par for the course. Parent information nights that are now offered four times a year at four different high schools draw only about 10 to 30 parents a night. Valenti is generous in his estimations why. "It could be because it's their second, third or fourth child and they've seen the program already," he says. "Or maybe they have confidence in the schools and what we're doing. There may be some apathy involved, but I hope that's not the case." Dream on, Ron. Another new study released this week, by psychologists at the University of Wisconsin in Madison, hits on a few of the reasons some of our children are having sex the minute they hit puberty. Among those cited are a disconnect with parents, low self-esteem and lots and lots of the television shows that send their little libidos into overdrive. There is a limit to what we should expect of our schools. They can't mandate quality time at home. They can't turn off the TV set. And they shouldn't be handing out condoms and birth control pills. Parents, our local schools provide the information our children need to make informed, healthy choices. Convenient or not, the rest is up to us.
33 comments from 19 users
1
posted by
NumberOfTheFallen
on Nov 17, 2007 at 08:42 AM
3867.
posted by
RosemarysAbortionist
on Nov 17, 2007 at 08:58 AM
Maybe our county keeps hitting the Lotto in teen pregnancy rates because our very conservative community is stuck up about contraceptives in schools.
posted by
adampayne
on Nov 17, 2007 at 09:19 AM
It is also interesting to note that gonorrhea, which rose precipitously throughout America's Viet Nam involvement, and peaked in terms of incidence in 1976, showed dramatic steady declines until this current "faith-based" Bush Administration came into power. Gonorrhea incidence has risen for the past six years, and once again the main victims of this disease are young females. Kern County also boasts the third highest rate of gonorrhea cases in the state. Thanks again for coming to the defense of young women everywhere with your continued championing of ignorance as the answer to this problem . You're the best. posted by
randomfactor
on Nov 17, 2007 at 09:34 AM
Texas: no birth control for kids, highest teen pregnancy rate in nation. Twenty-four percent of them were *NOT* the first birth for the mother. http://www.dallasnews.com/s... Texas' policy is to deny contraceptives without parental consent wherever possible and to push an abstinence-only sex education program in public schools. Experts, though, are questioning that approach. They note that from 1991 to 2004, the state's teen birth rate dropped by 19 percent, while the U.S. rate dipped by one-third. By contrast, California, which has seen its teen birth rate drop by 47 percent in the same period, teaches abstinence but also explains contraception at school and has gone to dispensing birth control to teenage boys and girls – for free, no parental consent required – in community clinics and doctors' offices. posted by
mattloch
on Nov 17, 2007 at 10:35 AM
You know, on the off chance Mom and Dad may not want their seventh-grader having sex. " posted by
rightthinking
on Nov 17, 2007 at 04:17 PM
We're taking away contraceptives and education? Where, exactly, is that happening? In California, minors have access to birth control and abortions without their parents' consent or even knowlege. The only way we could make getting contraceptives any easier would be to deliver them to their doors. I support "the fewest resources" regarding safe sex practices? Why? Because I believe parents should be in on the secret when their 11, 12 and 13-year-old children are having sex? There are a lot of ridiculous assumptions here, but what better way to take the focus off topic, which is that our young children - we're not even talking high school kids here - are becoming sexually active in growing numbers. What I'm reading on this blog is resigned acceptance - where's the shock, the concern, the sadness? There are a lot of reasons these kids are becoming sexually active at such early ages and not one of them is good or healthy - but by all means, let's just apply the contraceptive band-aid. No pregnancies, no problems, right? Perhaps we should next mandate birth control for all girls at the start of their first menstrual cycles or maybe even introduce selective sterilzation at birth. No, no reason to worry, at least not in California. The state is ever vigilant in protecting the right of our young, vulnerable and emotionally immature children to have sex where ever and whenever they like - and without their parents' knowledge and guidance.
posted by
adampayne
on Nov 17, 2007 at 04:59 PM
Yes there are plenty of reasons kids that kids become sexually active- hormones, boredom, curiosity, desperation for acceptance, desperation to get out of current circumstances, abuse and so many more- but not to provide the best information and easily available safe guards against pregnancy and disease is reprehensible. The sad statistics of increased disease and pregnancy points to a failure of parents to teach the most basic human information. The state had to say that kids were not being properly trained to drive by their parents, and classes were eventually mandated to make sure young people took classes on vehicle operation before being permitted to drive. The consequences of sex are every bit as great, if not greater than getting behind the wheel of an automobile, but we cannot agree that all children need rigorous classes educating them honestly about all aspects sex. posted by
Griffon64
on Nov 17, 2007 at 05:31 PM
Who cares about what "the state" does and doesn't do? Parents can't seem to be bothered to educate their kids properly in this "me first" age. That's a deep root right there. By golly, I never even considered having sex as a teen. The consequences were spelled out to me - sufficiently to get it into even my irresponsible teenage head that this was something I'd Better Not Do.
If the parents do not provide the education and the direction, then sure, next best thing is to do what you can to try and get it so the kids at least don't pop kids of their own. Though sometimes I wonder if that's the best thing to do - it doesn't teach responsibility the way good old fashioned "You made the bed, now you lie in it" does. posted by
sagefever
on Nov 17, 2007 at 06:21 PM
posted by
sfinboston52
on Nov 18, 2007 at 12:36 PM
posted by
Medic349
on Nov 18, 2007 at 03:44 PM
I want the schools teaching my daughter how to read and write. NOT handing out birth control. I don't know why people can't see a problem when schools can arrange abortions and hand out condoms and birth control without parental consent. Yet they can't put on a band-aid or give a kid aspirin without their OK.
If we are going to hand out condoms because kids are going to have sex anyway, then maybe we should hand out clean needles and pipes to students as well. After all, most of them end up doing drugs right? Oh and for the record Mattloch, the reason I own a gun isn't because I'm trained. It's because it's my right as an American citizen to protect myself and my family. posted by
Baylee
on Nov 18, 2007 at 04:03 PM
“Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow.” Think about it.posted by
randomfactor
on Nov 18, 2007 at 05:21 PM
"Learn from your parents' mistakes: USE BIRTH CONTROL!"\ . Medic, it isn't an either/or proposition. Schools can teach reading, writing and arithmetic *AND* have condoms available for those who need them. posted by
Medic349
on Nov 18, 2007 at 06:53 PM
It is not the responsibility of the village to raise the child. It is the family's.
posted by
randomfactor
on Nov 18, 2007 at 06:57 PM
posted by
TomW
on Nov 18, 2007 at 07:24 PM
Um, they aren't handing out genitalia. If you've got a statistic on how the availability of contraception affects the rates of teen sex, I'd like to see it. http://www.guttmacher.org/p... •Sixty percent of teens younger than 18 who use a clinic for sexual health services say their parents know they are there.[18] •Among those whose parents do not know, 70% would not use the clinic for prescription contraception if the law required that their parents be notified.[19] •One in five teens whose parents do not know they obtain contraceptive services would continue to have sex but would either rely on withdrawal or not use any contraceptives if the law required that their parents be notified of their visit.[20] •Only 1% of all minor adolescents who use sexual health services indicate that their only reaction to a law requiring their parents' involvement for prescription contraception would be to stop having sex.[21] posted by
TomW
on Nov 18, 2007 at 07:26 PM
posted by
Medic349
on Nov 18, 2007 at 08:26 PM
You have to have a license to drive a car, get married and even to catch a fish. But any idiot can have a child.....and most do.
It is our responsibility as parents to know what is going on in our child's life. Are we going to just give in and say "ah what the hell. Your going to have sex anyway so heres a large pack of condoms. Try to make them last until next Friday will ya?" While we're at it lets fix our teen drug problem. I think I'm going to rally to start a clean needles for schools program......who's with me!!!?? posted by
NumberOfTheFallen
on Nov 19, 2007 at 09:52 AM
3871.
posted by
randomfactor
on Nov 19, 2007 at 09:57 AM
If I thought that was where the clean-needles program would be most effective, I'd join you, Medic. You have evidence that school-age children are contracting AIDS and hepatitis in significant number through sharing needles? . If that's how you'd hand out condoms to young people, maybe it's best if you leave it to the school nurses. posted by
ProgressivePete2
on Nov 19, 2007 at 01:07 PM
Sagefever, I was informed by my parents about sex, had it at 16 and used a condom. (not to make you feel bad or anything, just a constrast) posted by
Baylee
on Nov 19, 2007 at 04:26 PM
I am sorry but I have to laugh when I see statements about how it is the parents responsibility to teach their kids about sex and safe sex and condoms and birth control. I promise you that conversation isn't going to stop them , especially when they think they are "IN LOVE" . I do agree it is the parents responsibility to teach this at home but lets face it most don't . My mothers explanation of sex to me was this, " a man's body is the ugliest thing you will ever see in your life" end of conversation.(and if you think that didn't peak my curiosity well......) Reality check people what we have been doing or not doing as parents hasn't been working and isn't working now. posted by
jfrancais
on Nov 19, 2007 at 04:30 PM
...well was a man's body the ugliest thing you ever saw? (My curiosity has peaked as well).
posted by
Baylee
on Nov 19, 2007 at 04:34 PM
no , the ugliest thin I ever saw was ......... posted by
jfrancais
on Nov 19, 2007 at 04:37 PM
...a shaved cat (a la Mr Bigglesworth)?
posted by
indoorfootballfan
on Jan 18, 2008 at 05:01 PM
Anyone who gives birth control devices or pills to my underage child will be spitting teeth! Parents can only parent when they're in control, not the government schools that only screw up everything they touch. I teach our religious and moral values to my kids -- and I don't send them to government schools to be contradicted or mocked. posted by
ChicaEsquela
on Jan 18, 2008 at 05:41 PM
posted by
RosemarysAbortionist
on Jan 18, 2008 at 05:52 PM
If his underage child asks for birth control pills, it means that either his religious and moral values failed him, his parenting sucked as far as instilling those religious values, or both. Only a really immature parent would make someone else spit their teeth as a result of his own failure in religious and moral parenting. posted by
RosemarysAbortionist
on Jan 18, 2008 at 05:54 PM
PS. Who needs birth control when all you need is the right software? posted by
Baylee
on Jan 18, 2008 at 06:03 PM
Spitting teeth? What religion teaches that ?
posted by
ChicoEsquela
on Jan 18, 2008 at 09:21 PM
posted by
NancyII
on Jan 18, 2008 at 09:28 PM
posted by
anglo1
on Jan 18, 2008 at 09:52 PM
1
Our readers recommend: |