|
Cops on cell phones? It's part of their job McCarthy won't quiet down, luckily Vegas' plan to run good news all around The people will decide the same-sex marriage issue Fireworks lovers are their own worst enemy Duck attack horrible, but tragedy is in youths He gave her the White House for celebration Recalls should be last resort, not first Barnett's views shouldn't be fodder for obsessive media High school district admits Bible blunder June 06 July 06 August 06 September 06 October 06 November 06 December 06 January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 June 06 May 06 April 06 March 06 February 06 January 06 December 05 November 05 October 05 September 05 August 05 July 05 Blog RollAsk The Californian Editorials Entertainment Eye of Bakersfield Faith Forum Fired Up! Inside Sports Neighbors Right Thinking Sound Off Talk of the Town
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Your druthers don't mean much if the land isn't yours
A couple of blocks from my home, a mere five-minute walk away, lays an 80-acre parcel of land that will soon fall to residential development. I’m not especially happy about this, as I, my family, my dogs and my neighbors have spent several years jogging, walking, dirt biking and otherwise enjoying the property and its wide open spaces.
If I had my druthers, the land would stay as is. Since I haven’t invested sweat, dollars or my financial future into the land, my druthers don’t count for much. In fact, unless its owners plan to build a feedlot, rendering plant or a county dump on the property, my druthers don’t mean zip, nor should they. Those were my thoughts as I read a recent community response to the draft environmental impact report on The Canyons project, the beleaguered northeast Bakersfield residential development still struggling to find approval. The development’s EIR is now in the public comment stage. Some of those comments are doozies. Take, for example, comments submitted by the Southern Sierra Fat Tire Association,a group of local mountain bike enthusiasts. The Fat Tire folks say they find the EIR “inadequate” because it fails to address the “significant recreational resources” in the area that would be impacted by the development. The cyclists go on to cite “resources” like the annual Kern River Trail Run, the popular Mr. Toad’s Wild Run and the myriad hiking, biking, bird-watching and fossil-collecting opportunities that abound in the hilly area. Problem is the land on which these folks have been hiking, biking and bird-watching isn't theirs and never was. Ownership is apparently irrelevant to the biking and bird-watching bunch, who inexplicably believe that years of trespassing entitles them to some sort of squatters’ rights to the property; to dictate how the property, or at least substantial portions of it, should be used. It’s true the property’s owners have granted permission for some of the aforementioned events to be held on their property, a neighborly act that’s bitten them on their collective hinders. “We always appreciated the fact they came and asked us, so we’ve worked with them since 2005,” says Robert Kapral, The Canyons project engineer. “We even gave money to sponsor some of their events.” Property owners also exceeded expectations in terms of protecting and providing “adequate recreational facilities and parkland,” according to the draft EIR, a point the Fat Tire folks even acknowledge in their submitted comments. It’s just not enough. Nor, apparently, are the two miles of class one bike paths or the nine miles of improved trails that will run through and around The Canyons development. The cyclists want their events, their bike rides, their Mr. Toad’s runs to go on as they always have, on the same hallowed ground. But, hey, they’re reasonable people, as interlopers go. If unlimited access is no longer possible, all they want to know is how property owners plan to make it up to them. When I asked one Fat Tire official how he thought the community impact might be mitigated to his satisfaction, he said it wasn’t his job to make such suggestions, but was sure the loss of recreation land “could be mitigated in a form we can all agree on.” How magnanimous. I’ll be sad when homes start to go up on the property I’ve long used as my own personal playground. But I possess neither the right nor the arrogance to tell the owners what to do with their land. So when the time comes, I’ll pack up my dogs, my bike and my binoculars and find another place in this big wide county to play. I suggest the Fat Tire folks and their friends do the same. 6 comments from 6 users
1
posted by
airqualityguy
on Feb 23, 2008 at 06:08 PM
Where else are you going to play?Let's see. Take a ride out by Buena Vista and check out Green Acres; the LA sludge dump. How about Buttonwillow and the world's biggest toxic waste dump. There are dozens of modern factory dairies in our county to ride by also and watch the happy cows. Sometimes you get to see dead cows. You always get a nice smell and plenty of flies to swat too. Hondo Chemical is nice to ride by. The recycling dump near Arvin is cool. There is the abandoned Brown and Bryant toxic site near downtown Shafter. Oh, I forgot, the Target distribution center is beautiful!! The Kern Wildlife Refuge is great but don't go to the north side because the Honey Pot sludge dump is over there. What is really interesting is riding around the two prisons west of Delano. I don't recommend the oil fields because of the occasional toxic fumes that can overwhelm the unsuspecting. When you think about it, there are not too many places as nice as the bluffs within a reasonable distance. posted by
PatFeelsAngst
on Feb 23, 2008 at 06:29 PM
posted by
sagefever
on Feb 23, 2008 at 06:49 PM
*smiles*~ so true PatFeelsAngst. As my dear Mom used to say"keep your things away,clean and ready to go". Or in this case stay. Hopefully.
posted by
TomW
on Feb 23, 2008 at 07:25 PM
Wow. I'll miss Mr. Toad's. Don't know why someone would want to build a development there now though. Someone is looking for a huge tax loss. posted by
ChicoEsquela
on Feb 23, 2008 at 08:47 PM
You have noticed that everything an Indian does is in a circle, and that is because the Power of the World always works in circles, and everything tries to be round..... The Sky is round, and I have heard that the earth is round like a ball, and so are all the stars. The wind, in its greatest power, whirls. Birds make their nest in circles, for theirs is the same religion as ours.... posted by
slowpOak
on Mar 10, 2008 at 07:25 AM
In a recent editorial, conservative columnist Marylee Shrider focused on a letter submitted to the City of Bakersfield’s Planning Division in regards to the adequacy of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for The Canyons, a proposed housing project in the Northeast. In the letter, the Southern Sierra Fat Tire Association, a local mountain biking group, stated that the DEIR did not adequately quantify impacts to existing recreation resources on the proposed project site and provided conservative estimates of current recreation levels. Shrider criticized the comments on the grounds that “bicycle rides don’t earn property rights,” and characterized our group as arrogant interlopers, facetiously describing our willingness to participate with project planners in finding acceptable mitigations as “magnanimous.” Shrider’s opinions, while not particularly well-informed (she admitted during an interview that she had not read the DEIR), are much appreciated by our group because we believe in the principles of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), passed in 1970 for the purpose of mitigating or avoiding the significant effects on the environment of proposed public and private projects. A key feature of the CEQA process is making the EIR available to the public so that individuals or groups may comment on the adequacy of the report, effectively providing a venue for public discussion and input.
1
Our readers recommend: |