|
Duck attack horrible, but tragedy is in youths He gave her the White House for celebration Recalls should be last resort, not first Barnett's views shouldn't be fodder for obsessive media High school district admits Bible blunder Gay marriage ruling an act of judicial tyranny Theft a wake-up call to give blood Two propositions, two very different promises Film evolves from lack of scientific freedom Weir drama shows we're selective in our outrage June 06 July 06 August 06 September 06 October 06 November 06 December 06 January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 June 06 May 06 April 06 March 06 February 06 January 06 December 05 November 05 October 05 September 05 August 05 July 05 Blog RollAsk The Californian Editorials Entertainment Eye of Bakersfield Faith Forum Fired Up! Inside Sports Neighbors Right Thinking Sound Off Talk of the Town
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
Obama can speak, but he can't unite anymore
You have to hand it to Sen. Barack Obama. The man can really whomp up a speech. The presidential hopeful from Illinois is obviously a brilliant orator whose recent reflections on the racial state of the union left many Americans, including the already infatuated mainstream media, more gaga than ever. But in spite of Obama's spellbinding speaking skills, red flags are still flapping over the racist and incendiary remarks made by the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr., the senator’s longtime pastor, friend and spiritual mentor. By now you've heard the words and seen the spectacle — the reverend at his pulpit, calling on the Almighty to damn America, insisting the “government lied about inventing the HIV virus as a means of genocide against people of color” and declaring America got just what it deserved in the 9/11 attacks. It's not that Obama hasn't denounced the pastor's racist and anti-American rants. He has, albeit belatedly. And it's not that Americans expect Obama to “disown” his friend of 20 years. We're simply trying to comprehend how the man who would be president could sit quietly by as his pastor and his church embraced some of the most virulent racist remarks ever to pass from the pulpit. It's a question Obama himself asked in his eloquent speech, but ultimately failed to answer. True, he did call the reverend's remarks “divisive” and “racially charged” and said he “strongly” disagreed with them. But he then went on to characterize those remarks as merely “controversial,” a disagreement of the sort any of us might have with our own “pastors, priests or rabbis.” Hold on a second. This isn't a debate over hymnals versus overhead projectors. It's not an argument over the number of services or the volume of the worship music. This is about the core faith beliefs we share, the doctrines by which we live and raise our children. Like Obama, I've attended the same church for more than 20 years. Like most of my fellow congregants, I have an abiding respect and affection for my pastors. That being said, if any one of them uttered racist or inflammatory remarks like those shouted from the pulpit by Wright, I would be faced with only two possible conclusions — that the pastor had suddenly taken leave of his senses, requiring immediate psychiatric assistance, or that our philosophical and faith beliefs were no longer in sync. If it were the former, I would support him, if the latter, I would leave. Obama's continued presence at the church is tacit approval of his pastor and his pastor's behavior. His regular attendance over two decades indicates he is either comfortable with Wright's racist worldview or — and here's an even scarier thought — he didn't recognize it as racist when he heard it. Obama believes he has the power to unify this nation, yet the defense of his choices and his subsequent “typical white person” remarks not only fall short, they offend. Whether or not Obama can put this mess behind him remains to be seen. But his claim to the title of “uniter, not a divider,” rings true no more. 123 comments from 26 users
posted by
airqualityguy
on Mar 22, 2008 at 12:25 PM
"The man can really whomp up a speech." Would you say that about a white man? Does being offended by Barack's elequent and unifying words surprise anyone who reads your column on "right thinking"? I think it was a great speech of important ideas for this nation to discuss. Putting it down as nonsense shows your denial that racial problems still exist in this society. I guess you think Bakersfield has solved all it's racial issues. “Senator Barack Obama addressed the issue of race with the eloquence and sincerity and decency and optimism we have come to expect of him,” he said. “He did not seek to evade tough issues or to soothe us with comforting half-truths. Rather, he inspired us by reminding us of the awesome potential residing in our own responsibility.” (quote made by Bill Richardson yesterday) posted by
TomW
on Mar 22, 2008 at 12:49 PM
If I were Marylee, I'd say we need to not dwell on the past or play the blame game, but that's not my style. I think one thing you miss that would make your article more compelling is that you could clarify that Wright didn't say that America got what it deserved on 9/11 but that 9/11 was the result of our actions. It's not the same thing nor is it a distinction without a difference. People like Falwell and Robertson actually said that God was punishing us for our wicked ways and by extension that the people who died in the 9/11 attacks deserved to die. Wright was making a different point. He says that you can't drop bombs around the world and not expect to eventually be attacked yourself. This was not about the individual people in the towers or the Pentagon. He was saying that lots of innocents have died across the world and now innocents in our own country are dying as well. The problem for Wright is that we are so conditioned by "right thinking" (as opposed to right thinking) people in this country who actually do believe that those people in New York got what was coming to them and the people in New Orleans got what was coming to them that we fail to recognize that Wright was saying that the tragic events of September 11th were no more horrifying than a massive attack on Hiroshima or Baghdad or Gaza or in Jakarta, Spain or Northern Ireland. You can agree or disagree with his point, but disagreeing with a position he did not express but is mistakenly ascribed to him because of the abominable speech of the right-wing in this country is unfair. posted by
sagefever
on Mar 22, 2008 at 12:58 PM
Well said both AQG and TomW. I've been listening to folks at this site,political pundits,reading editorials and everything else I can get my hands on about this speech. He gave a thoughtful response to issues that do exist in this country~ he did not to the "politically right thing to do"...he talked to us like we are adults. Those with ears to here and all that. This response ( Ms. Shriders) does not surprise me one bit.
posted by
TomW
on Mar 22, 2008 at 01:22 PM
Sage, one of the issues of the last eight years was that after 9/11, there was a real opportunity for dialogue in this country about our future. Everyone wanted to do something, and we were told to go shopping and go back to sleep and let big government handle things. Obama's presidency will reopen the dialog in this nation. Unfortunately for some, that dialog will change the status quo in a number of areas from race relations to healthcare and poverty issues to energy consumption and generation. It's long overdue that we began to, as you say so clearly, speak to each other as adults who have to begin making decisions for the future of our nation and our planet and stop pretending that government is something "out there" and those people will protect us, watch over us and keep us in warm bottles and clean diapers.
posted by
TomW
on Mar 22, 2008 at 02:11 PM
ETBartley, it's interesting that you feel that way. Maybe having Obama as your president will bring you around. As for things not being equal, you're right. Too bad. Maybe in another 100 or 200 years we'll attain real equity in the system. posted by
sfinboston52
on Mar 22, 2008 at 02:19 PM
posted by
Shsrebel10
on Mar 22, 2008 at 02:40 PM
Because of this situation, I've found one Republican that I have a lot of respect for, Mike Huckabee. Wright's comments were divisive and no doubt disrespectful to America, but the last time I checked Mrs. Marylee Shrider, christianity is suppose to be about "forgiveness", not about hate. At least Huckabee has the class to be able to look at Wright's perspective, be understanding, keep an open mind, and forgive the man for what he said. http://www.youtube.com/watc...
posted by
nooneisabovethelaw
on Mar 22, 2008 at 02:47 PM
Typical shallow Marylee Shrider political analysis, if I can use that term. How about the pass McCain is getting? There's a whole lot more on how the media is "sucking up" to McCain. John Hagee and Rod Parsley Given intense media scrutiny of controversial comments made by a religious leader with ties to Barack Obama, many -- including Media Matters -- have wondered when news organizations will devote the same attention to John McCain's ties to Rod Parsley and John Hagee. In February, shortly before the Ohio primary, John McCain stood with Rod Parsley in Cincinnati, declaring him a "spiritual guide." Parsley returned the compliment with his endorsement of McCain, who he praised as a "strong, true, consistent conservative." Parsley has written that "America was founded, in part, with the intention of seeing this false religion [of Islam] destroyed." As David Corn has explained, "Parsley, who refers to himself as a 'Christocrat,' is no stranger to controversy. In 2007, the grassroots organization he founded, the Center for Moral Clarity, called for prosecuting people who commit adultery. In January, he compared Planned Parenthood to Nazis." He has suggested that the U.S. government was complicit in facilitating black genocide. McCain won another key endorsement in February: John Hagee, founder and senior pastor of Cornerstone Church in San Antonio. Hagee has said of Hurricane Katrina, "[W]hen you violate God's will long enough, the judgment of God comes to you. Katrina is an act of God for a society that is becoming Sodom and Gomorrah reborn." Hagee later defended his comment by saying, "I believe that New Orleans had a level of sin that was offensive to God, and they are -- were recipients of the judgment of God for that. ... there was to be a homosexual parade there on the Monday that the Katrina came. And the promise of that parade was that it was going to reach a level of sexuality never demonstrated before in any of the other Gay Pride parades. ... I believe that the Hurricane Katrina was, in fact, the judgment of God against the city of New Orleans." Hagee has written, "I encourage every person who has biblical beliefs to contact their congressman and their senator on a regular basis and implore them to pass this constitutional amendment recognizing only the marriage between a man and a woman. If we fail to achieve this, the gates of hell will be opened. It will open the door to incest, to polygamy, and every conceivable marriage arrangement demented minds can possibly conceive. If God does not then punish America, He will have to apologize to Sodom and Gomorrah." Hagee once announced plans to hold a "slave sale" to raise money. According to the San Antonio Express-News, "Hagee, pastor of the 16,000-member Cornerstone Church, last week had announced a 'slave sale' to raise funds for high school seniors in his church bulletin ... The item was introduced with the sentence 'Slavery in America is returning to Cornerstone' and ended with 'Make plans to come and go home with a slave.' " And Hagee has written "Do you know the difference between a terrorist and a woman with PMS? You can negotiate with a terrorist" and "only a Spirit-filled woman can submit to her husband's lead. It is the natural desire of a woman to lead through feminine manipulation of the man. ...The man has the God-given role to be the loving leader of the home." According to Hagee, McCain actively sought his endorsement. But despite McCain's embrace of Hagee and Parsley, their controversial views have not drawn the media scrutiny that has been given to Obama's relationship with his pastor. Time's Michael Scherer actually claimed the McCain-Hagee connection has gotten extensive media coverage: "With rare exception, the press errs on the side of making a big deal out of anything that can be considered a 'scandal.' McCain's endorsement by Hagee got lots of negative newspaper, blog and network news coverage." "Lots" of "network news coverage"? The names "Hagee" and "McCain" have been mentioned in the same news report exactly one time on ABC -- in a comment by Democratic strategist Donna Brazile. CBS has covered the matter in two brief reports. NBC has mentioned the endorsement one time, in a report that referred only vaguely to the fact that "some of the televangelist's public remarks have offended Catholics." "Lots" of "negative newspaper" coverage? The New York Times has mentioned Hagee's endorsement of McCain in two articles. Both times, the Hagee mention was buried at the end of an article about another topic; combined, the two passages totaled only 251 words. Neither made any mention of Hagee's comments about Katrina, or gays, or women. The Washington Post has mentioned Hagee's endorsement of McCain in only two brief blurbs, only one of which noted any controversy surrounding the endorsement -- and, like the Times, that one mentioned only Hagee's comments about Catholics. Post columnist E. J. Dionne did briefly criticize McCain for not distancing himself from Hagee -- but he, too, ignored Hagee's comments about Katrina, gays, and women. Scherer's claim that "McCain's endorsement by Hagee got lots of negative newspaper, blog and network news coverage" was simply false; the endorsement has been all but ignored by the three networks and the nation's two most important newspapers. By contrast, a Nexis search for "Obama and Jeremiah Wright" reveals 22 hits ... in The Washington Post alone. And 25 more in The New York Times (22 for "Obama and Jeremiah A. Wright" and three for "Obama and Jeremiah Wright.") And 15 hits in the NBC transcript database -- all since March 14. Fifteen more in the CBS database since March 14. Twenty-two more in the ABC database since March 13. That is "lots of negative coverage." And that is a huge imbalance. While Scherer falsely claimed that McCain's ties to Hagee have gotten "lots" of attention, MSNBC's Joe Scarborough took another approach: claiming that McCain's embrace of Hagee is utterly unremarkable. On the March 19 edition of MSNBC's Race for the White House, Rachel Maddow pointed out the "double standard" in the media's coverage of the situations. Scarborough responded by claiming, "This is not a serious argument. ... This is a ridiculous argument when you consider that Barack Obama is talking about his spiritual adviser for 20 years. Hagee didn't baptize McCain's kids. Hagee didn't marry McCain. John McCain's first book wasn't based on a sermon by Hagee." Scarborough's argument might seem to make sense -- there is no doubt that Obama has closer ties to Jeremiah Wright than John McCain does to John Hagee. But this argument is backwards. Wright is Obama's pastor; their relationship is presumably far more personal than political. Indeed, it may not be political at all. McCain, on the other hand, sought Hagee's support solely for political purposes. His relationship with Hagee is nothing but political. Hagee's political views, therefore, are much more relevant than Jeremiah Wright's, as they are the entire basis for the McCain-Hagee relationship. Put another way: What tells us more about Mary Matalin's political views? The fact that she has a personal relationship with James Carville, or the fact that she aligned herself politically with George Bush and Dick Cheney?
posted by
honch20
on Mar 22, 2008 at 02:48 PM
Osama Obama will never be president his "speach" was whipped up by his campain staff as damage control of this idiot reverands comments. "goddamn America"? goddamn him and anybody who supports him. if he doesent like american so much feel free to leave and never come back. posted by
drilnliftcrude
on Mar 22, 2008 at 02:49 PM
There was opportunity for "dialog" during the last 8 years and after 9-11, but it was repulsed at every turn by the left that vilified everything offered by this administration. Sure, the left wants to talk up "dialog" now. You mean they want to lead and control the dialog. And America is not going to be wanting anything to do with the "we are owed" dialog espoused by Rev. Wright and his congregants. posted by
nooneisabovethelaw
on Mar 22, 2008 at 02:50 PM
posted by
gr8scott
on Mar 22, 2008 at 02:56 PM
There are just a few things worse than a hypocrite. When are you and yours going to castigate McCain for what Hagee said?
posted by
drilnliftcrude
on Mar 22, 2008 at 03:00 PM
Looks like the Obamessiah has got himself a little more unitin' to do in his own party before he goes crowning himself. posted by
Shsrebel10
on Mar 22, 2008 at 03:07 PM
" There was opportunity for "dialog" during the last 8 years and after 9-11, but it was repulsed at every turn by the left that vilified everything offered by this administration. Sure, the left wants to talk up "dialog" now. You mean they want to lead and control the dialog. And America is not going to be wanting anything to do with the "we are owed" dialog espoused by Rev. Wright and his congregants" In case you haven't noticed, the right already controls all the dialog. The right continuously points to "liberal bias" in the media even though none of the news stations accused of "liberal bias" are actually bias, ignore the fact that Faux News is overwhelmingly conservative, talk radio is even more overwhelmingly conservative, and that the same "liberal" news channels are cutting slack for John McCain. Wright's comments came out first on ABC News, one of the so-called "liberal" news channels. Not to mention that the media didn't make a big deal about when one of McCain's supporters during a McCain rally said "Barack Hussein Osama" as a political ploy. And oh yeah, the right thinks that anyone who opposes the Bush administration or the government is anti-american, who happen to censor scientist findings (James Hanson) on Global warming. posted by
ChicoEsquela
on Mar 22, 2008 at 03:10 PM
A guy on the radio brought up what seemed to be a good point. Until I really got to thinking about it! His point was, how many Americans left the Catholic Church just because some priests were molesting young boys? They may not have approved, but most didn't leave their church! I'm a Catholic. This made some introspective sense to me -- at first. Then I realized this is just as lame as all the other apologies made for Obama's preacher. He is just like his gramma, Geraldine Ferraro, McCain and Hagee, on and on it goes -- but one immutable fact remains. None of these examples are similar at all thus they are not even analogous. The Priests and Bishops weren't shouting from the rafter tops that molesting young boys was a good thing to do. That the people in their congregations should run out and do it. It was way wrong and disgusting yes, but they weren't advocating it. Selling CDs with them ranting and raving about it like "reverend" Wright! No, all this is now is damage control, for a man that had his family attend the church of this man for 20 years, was married by him, had his kids baptized by him, and either bought into his message or is brain dead. Don't think he's brain dead. He had a chance for unification of this country. We were ready for it, some of us a little more reluctantly or skeptical than others. Not now though............
posted by
adampayne
on Mar 22, 2008 at 03:27 PM
Here is an excerpt from Anderson Cooper's blog . This excerpt is written by CNN Contributor Roland Martin: "One of the most controversial statements in this sermon was when he mentioned “chickens coming home to roost.” He was actually quoting Edward Peck, former U.S. Ambassador to Iraq and deputy director of President Reagan’s terrorism task force, who was speaking on FOX News. That’s what he told the congregation. He was quoting Peck as saying that America’s foreign policy has put the nation in peril:
He went on to describe seeing the photos of the aftermath of 9/11 because he was in Newark, N.J., when the planes struck. After turning on the TV and seeing the second plane slam into one of the twin towers, he spoke passionately about what if you never got a chance to say hello to your family again. “What is the state of your family?” he asked. And then he told his congregation that he loved them and asked the church to tell each other they loved themselves. His sermon thesis: 1. This is a time for self-examination of ourselves and our families. 2. This is a time for social transformation (then he went on to say they won’t put me on PBS or national cable for what I’m about to say. Talk about prophetic!) “We have got to change the way we have been doing things as a society,” he said. Wright then said we can’t stop messing over people and thinking they can’t touch us. He said we may need to declare war on racism, injustice, and greed, instead of war on other countries." From my perspective, all this uproar from snippets of sound-bites seven years old to an American public too busy, or bored, to research the full text and context of the speech in question, reinforces how dull the public is. People hear what they want to hear to reinforce their own one dimensional thought process and peculiar individual beliefs. It is certainly no surprise to hear that Marylee Shrider does not consider Barack Obama to be a "uniter." It certainly is no surprise Marylee Shrider would never endorse Barack Obama's candidacy. posted by
honch20
on Mar 22, 2008 at 03:41 PM
How can anybody defend what this tool said we need to start defending our country against people like this right or wrong we need to show the world we are united and Barlack Osama is not the one to do it lets all hope and pray that he is defeted along with that piece of human waste Hilliary Clinton. Lets get McCain in there to keep putting pressure on radical islam and make this country and others that choose to be free a great place to live posted by
ChicoEsquela
on Mar 22, 2008 at 03:42 PM
posted by
ChicoEsquela
on Mar 22, 2008 at 03:48 PM
what you allege is done by both sides Adam it is being done to McCain as well (people with snippets from some of his supporters projecting that on to the supportee lock, stock, and bbl) posted by
drilnliftcrude
on Mar 22, 2008 at 03:51 PM
posted by
ChicoEsquela
on Mar 22, 2008 at 04:03 PM
I will admit that the "snippets" from Wright may be being beat to death. If that is what is wanted his writings are a target rich environment: From 'Dreams of My Father', From Dreams of My Father, " I FOUND A SOLACE IN NURSING A PERVASIVE SENSE OF GRIEVANCE AND ANIMOSITY AGAINST MY MOTHER'S RACE".
From 'Dreams of my Father', "The emotion between the races could never be pure..... the THE OTHER RACE (WHITE) WOULD ALWAYS REMAIN JUST THAT: MENACING, ALIEN AND APART" From Dreams Of My Father, "never emulate white men and brown men whose fates didn't speak to my own. IT WAS INTO MY FATHER'S IMAGE , THE BLACK MAN, THE SON OF AFRICA, THAT I'D PACKED ALL THE ATTRIBUTES I SOUGHT IN MYSELF. From Dreams Of My Father: From Dreams Of My Father;
Quote from Barack Obama's book, Dreams Of My Father:
From 'Audacity of Hope: "Lolo (Obama's step father) followed a brand of Islam ...."I looked to Lolo for guidance".
From The Audacity Of Hope, "We are no longer just a Christian nation," "We are also a Jewish nation, a Muslim nation, a Buddhist nation, a Hindu nation, and a nation of nonbelievers." source: posted by
witbee
on Mar 22, 2008 at 04:03 PM
What is all this "dialogue" hokee? Everyone has a right to speak and be heard. The internet is built on wackos living in their mom's basements speaking and arguing as if they are the most brilliant and eloquent thinkers ever to exist. Millions of people subscribe to blogs written by complete idiots and the mentally retarded. I even sit thru expensive commercials telling me smoking is bad (as if it is new info). This is your "dialogue." Say what you want, when you want to. Unfortunately, some people don't belive they are having a dialogue unless thier voice is the loudest. posted by
sagefever
on Mar 22, 2008 at 04:30 PM
posted by
TomW
on Mar 22, 2008 at 06:59 PM
Had to step away for a bit. Let's not rewrite history. Bush had 90 percent support in the country after 9/11. He lost hearts and minds here the same way he lost them in Iraq: indifference and incompetance. If you want to understand why the anger towards this president is so strong with the left, center and traditional Republicans, it's because he betrayed America.
posted by
NancyII
on Mar 22, 2008 at 07:07 PM
It would seem a whole series of posts have disiappeared and I'm not even sure who's blog they were on. Anyone have a clue? Were they take off by staff or the originator of the blog? posted by
johnburnssucks
on Mar 22, 2008 at 07:11 PM
Typical shallow Marylee Shrider political analysis, if I can use that term. You can, but it's in the same league as "Gilligan's posing routine" at a bodybuilding contest. Mentaly retarded? So old school... "Special Ed" is a safe term; it covers many different levels...
posted by
johnburnssucks
on Mar 22, 2008 at 07:15 PM
posted by
drilnliftcrude
on Mar 22, 2008 at 07:22 PM
posted by
NancyII
on Mar 22, 2008 at 07:34 PM
Interesting. I'll try to remember not to post on his blog from now on. I couldn't remember who started it. Oh...LOL..that's what the fuss was about. posted by
drilnliftcrude
on Mar 22, 2008 at 07:40 PM
posted by
FreeCognate
on Mar 22, 2008 at 07:45 PM
lol. well the deletion is a bummer. I actually thought that thread was one of the better of the 10 or so other threads devoted to Obama's race speech. Nancy, if you didn't see my response, thank you and have a great holiday with the family tomorrow. posted by
jfrancais
on Mar 22, 2008 at 07:46 PM
when statistics show black on black violence kills more African Americans every year than all of the years of slavery conmbined Where did you find such a bogus stat? How can one even gauge such a thing? Is this just a case of hyperbole? posted by
TomW
on Mar 22, 2008 at 08:13 PM
ETBartley: fortunately, someone has done just what you're talking about with the electoral votes. Check out http://www.fivethirtyeight.... This is the first time I've seen McCain pull even in that poll and I'm guessing it's due to the Wright scandal. We'll see what happens in the next couple of weeks (though it looks like I'll be writing a blog tomorrow night extolling the wisdom of Publican based on a bet we made last week). posted by
mattloch
on Mar 22, 2008 at 10:07 PM
Wait a second Ms. Shrider. Is this, or is this not, a country who's foreign intelligence service was caught bringing drugs into inner city neighborhoods to finance their own operations? (I'm not just talking about a decade ago- this happened as recently as one month ago.) Was this, or was this not, the country that trained and financed Afghanistan "freedom fighters"? posted by
NancyII
on Mar 22, 2008 at 10:35 PM
Free..off topic for a minute. I didn't see your post but take it you saw the one for you. You have a great Easter too. posted by
ChicoEsquela
on Mar 23, 2008 at 06:18 AM
yeah, Wright is not racist. Some buy into the Sharpton defense that Wright doesn't blame white people, just the govt. riiiight! this is pretty specific, very clear http://www.youtube.com/watc... I know what Wright would call white people who buy Sharton's defense......... USEFUL IDIOTS!
posted by
ChicoEsquela
on Mar 23, 2008 at 06:36 AM
posted by
ChicoEsquela
on Mar 23, 2008 at 06:47 AM
Obama's campaign compares the OJ trial to his campaign We all choose our heroes and role models, don't we? Means nothing? http://www.youtube.com/watc...
posted by
ChicoEsquela
on Mar 23, 2008 at 09:28 AM
From a man who has been discriminated against himself in a most insidious way: http://article.nationalrevi...=
posted by
antiextremism
on Mar 23, 2008 at 10:41 AM
Well Marilee, is the reverend in the election? Tell you what, we won't judge George by his coke dealer, if you don't judge Obama by what someone else says. posted by
mattloch
on Mar 23, 2008 at 11:38 AM
Chico, even you aren't that much of an idiot. Wright is saying that black people are treated differently than white people. Historically, this is beyond debate. He's saying that black people have to put up with things that white people never have. Surely you can see where this (mis)treatment might cause a bit of resentment, on society at large (since it is society treating them this way).
As for your second link to "another Obama role model" (Farrakhan), perhaps you were living under a rock when Obama "rejected and denounced" his endorsement. It was on tv, and in all the papers. But I'll let you claim "ignorance" on that one (as we do so many other things).
posted by
ChicoEsquela
on Mar 23, 2008 at 12:02 PM
I may not be that much of an idiot but i unfortunately cannot give you the same level of largess. You are one of the pseudo-intellectuals who think they are the only ones who really "get" it and as such are better and more enlightened than the rest of us. I can only chalk this up to your own woe full lack of real world life experiences, however this is only exacerbated by your own lack of the ability to rationally analyze things without resorting to calling others idiots. Even if in a backhanded way. Some of us have done things you can have no real comprehension of. But you are so blinded by your own misplaced idealism that you cannot accept any other viewpoints. For this reason you feel the need to resort to veiled insults with no life experience to back it up. Anyone with such experiences you attempt to denigrate. It remains impossible for anyone to have a rational discourse with you due to your bureaucratically engendered "I know everything, I read it in a study" persona. posted by
TomW
on Mar 23, 2008 at 12:45 PM
Chico, it is nice to have a person like you here who never uses insults. Thanks for your always positive contributions. posted by
ChicoEsquela
on Mar 23, 2008 at 12:50 PM
posted by
TomW
on Mar 23, 2008 at 12:54 PM
posted by
Maggiepoo
on Mar 23, 2008 at 01:08 PM
posted by
Maggiepoo
on Mar 23, 2008 at 01:10 PM
Why ObamaFellow Republicans, When deciding which candidate is best to now lead our nation, we ask that you consider supporting Senator Barack Obama. The U.S. faces serious challenges that are not being addressed by our political leaders. Elected officials of both sides have found it easier to appease their parties’ fringes to win elections, and media companies choose to shock, amuse and divide us. In the meantime, the problems we face as a nation grow as they are passed on to future generations. We need a leader who can lay the foundations of another American Century—someone who can get past our partisan and ideological divisions, as we strengthen our standing in the world and tackle the challenges we face at home. We need a leader who understands our differences, but who also knows the importance of finding common ground. While we continue to debate and address many issues on which we all have strong opinions—abortion, gay rights, the relationship between church and state, to name a few—we need a leader who can command the support needed to break our government’s paralysis and meet the growing challenges we face as a nation. Senator Obama is the one candidate who can unite the American majority that wants to move forward and improve the long-term economic well-being and independence of our nation.
posted by
Maggiepoo
on Mar 23, 2008 at 01:27 PM
Hillary's honestyFri, 03/21/2008 - 2:40am — Barbara Gordon Gallup reports Hillary is perceived as far less honest than either Barack Obama or John McCain. Hillary was also weak in the categories "shares my values" and "is someone I would be proud to have as president."
posted by
mattloch
on Mar 23, 2008 at 02:33 PM
Glad to see you can actually "rationally analyze" the facts of the situation instead of resorting to solely name-calling in defense of your position, Chico. You are truly a shining beacon in the darkness for others to follow.
posted by
ChicoEsquela
on Mar 23, 2008 at 03:19 PM
|