A blog about Kern County, Politics, and Religion & Faith.
About rightthinking


Member Since:
June 21, 2006
Last Signed In:
October 04, 2008
Profile Views:
5879
Blog Views:
46789
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Say yes to Prop. 8 and no to PG&E
Tilted Kilt should stay off the streets
Harvey Milk Day in public schools? No thanks, Governor
Lifesaving marrow donation something we all can do
30 kids in kindergarten? WAY too many.
Cops on cell phones? It's part of their job
McCarthy won't quiet down, luckily
Vegas' plan to run good news all around
The people will decide the same-sex marriage issue
Fireworks lovers are their own worst enemy
Archives
June 06
July 06
August 06
September 06
October 06
November 06
December 06
January 07
February 07
March 07
April 07
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
More archives
June 06
May 06
April 06
March 06

February 06
January 06
December 05
November 05
October 05
September 05
August 05
July 05

Blog Roll


Ask The Californian
Editorials
Entertainment
Eye of Bakersfield
Faith Forum
Fired Up!
Inside Sports
Neighbors
Right Thinking
Sound Off
Talk of the Town
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


rightthinking - > Right Thinking -> Tests, parents share blame for apathy
Tests, parents share blame for apathy

My question two weeks ago to teachers on how to fix apathy in our schools triggered a number of varied and passionate responses, but the teachers who called or wrote have three things in common --they're tired, they're frustrated and they absolutely love teaching our kids.

A total of 45 local educators participated in the survey and each had much to say on the subject of student and teacher apathy. Their passion was so great; in fact, I came to regret not setting a word limit of, say 1,000 words. Lesson learned.

But I digress. I will not keep you in suspense. According to the teachers who participated in my admittedly non-scientific survey, there is no No. 1 reason for apathy in our public schools. There are two.

Those reasons are "tests" and "parents."

It's hard to say which of the two teachers are more frustrated with -- standardized tests that "have created a generation of students who know how to take tests, but who hate school and see no value in learning," or parents who stubbornly refuse to communicate the importance of education to their children.

A few teachers noted other possible causes. Some pointed the finger at their colleagues, suggesting teachers who adopt inflexible, one-size-fits-all teaching methods are sure breeders of student apathy. Other teachers said unrealistic expectations of the No Child Left Behind reform -- that every child in America will reach academic success if teachers would try just a little harder -- discourages teachers and lays the blame for student failure squarely at their feet.

But it's those standardized state tests -- elementary students take as many as three a year and high schoolers take four or five -- that really get teachers' backs up. They say the NCLB goal, to have 100 percent of all U.S. students proficient or better in math by 2014, is commendable, but impossible.

"Nowhere does NCLB say it's possible that some children just aren't capable of being 100 percent proficient," said Karen Sweaney, a 13-year teacher at Laurelglen Elementary School. "NCLB doesn't exclude the English-as-a-second-language learner, the special education child -- it's just supposed to happen and if it doesn't, it's our fault."

Teachers say the pressure of "teaching to the test," is so great that fun activities designed to ignite imaginations and instill a joy of learning, like art, daily physical education or even recess, are falling by the wayside.

Running neck and neck with standardized tests on teacher's frustration meter are parents who fail to set boundaries, check homework or show even a passing interest in their child's education.

Donna Sokanoff, a fifth-grade teacher at Golden Hills Elementary School in Tehachapi, said the lack of parent-child interaction among some of her students has proven to be her biggest obstacle in 25 years of teaching.

"If there are healthy, interactive parents at home, it shows in their child's effort, interest and conduct at school," she said. "If not, it is up to me to make school interesting and fun to these apathetic students. I must become something larger than the video games they play, the movies they see or the television they watch."

Despite that, Sokanoff said, she loves teaching and considers her job "the best in the world."

"I would not change the life I have led as a teacher," she said. "As I tell my students on a regular basis, 'I get to go to school every day and learn from what I do. I learn from my students.'"

Coming Tuesday: Teachers share practical suggestions on how to solve the apathy problem.

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by rightthinking on Sunday, January 28, 2007 at 07:55 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 189 times
5 comments from 4 users

1

posted by anonymous on Jan 29, 2007 at 07:48 AM
3080.
posted by adampayne on Jan 29, 2007 at 08:33 AM
Thank you for sharing some of the feedback you received from your modest survey. Today's total emphasis placed on standardized test results, and the growing number of  these quantifiers students are forced to take, have obviously not done the job in providing a better education to our students or in bringing any sort of real community involvement to the schools.

We are all aware of the couple of evenings per year that parents and teachers can meet with one another at the schools. Classes fill with a lot of folks milling about and enough time for maybe a question or two.  Not really a get to know one another setting, more like a fund raising atmosphere.  There is always the one instructor trying to answer the  crowd.  There can be the parent-teacher conference in the tight little office space on a campus designed to figure out how to reach a particular student, but the teacher does have thirty other special cases just like that one to deal with every day. 

There are the various PTAs for parents and schools that now operate almost exclusively as fund raising mechanisms today rather than for any real learning involvement. As parents go through the years with their kids and their allotted schools, a feeling of resignation and growing isolation from the process occurs. It very seldom is about learning participation and educational growth. It always is about fund raising. A lot parents become alienated and isolated from the schools as a result of this approach.    

Time, of course, is the other big factor regarding parental involvement. As commutes and hours on the job have expanded for working parents over the years, businesses as a general rule have not allowed their employees the opportunity to take the necessary hours and become invested in the educational process. In our plugged in world of today people are never off the job clock. Lap-tops and cellular phones have become ropes that bind the soul to the job without a break.

Too few instructors per class, standardized tests, non-stop fund raisers and no time off the job-clock are all about weeding out the undesirables and the have-nots, while rewarding  a special few.  These practices do not lift the whole.  This is survival of the fittest and the most affluent. These current practices create barriers and indifference from the multitude, which fosters entire generations of failure and mistrust toward public education. Is this what we want out of public education?

  
posted by ProgressivePete2 on Jan 29, 2007 at 09:05 AM
Why can't we use those same standardized tests to determine where the children need more work rather than using it against schools and teachers. It seems like if a school performs poorly for whatever reason, people are satisfied by just blaming the teachers and withholding funds from the schools that desperately need them. Hopefully our new congress will tackle this flawed educational program that does nothing more than leave children behind.
posted by randomfactor on Jan 29, 2007 at 09:42 AM

For those interested in education policy, a great resource is

http://www.dailyhowler.com  (when Somersby isn't chiding the media for being incredibly bad at their jobs, he has a special fondness for education issues--check out the archives.)

posted by anonymous on Jan 30, 2007 at 11:42 PM
One of the problems in the American educational system that few people seem to cite is the fact that we are failing our children by treating every one of them as if they were college bound and preparing them exculsively to meet that one goal.  The truth is that not all children will --- or should --- go to college.  Our society would collapse without plumbers, electricians, auto repair techs, carpenters, etc.  High school test scores in European countries are higher than scores here because the students ours get compared to are Europe's college-bound children.  They test students early, at around 7th or 8th grade and only those with college aptitude go on to high schools devoted to preparing students to enter college.  The rest of the students go into vocational high schools to learn the trades that are the backbone of society.  Our system assumes every child will go to college and prepares them for nothing else.  We do have a few students who attend ROC and learn a trade, but enrollment is limited to just a few hundred students out of the 28,000+ enrolled in the KHSD, when there are many thousands more who could use vocational training.  This is a travesty and leaves thousands of students in Kern County alone who graduate from high school unprepared to earn a living afterwards. 
1

Leave a Comment
Ground Rules for posting comments:
  • No profanity or personal attacks.
  • Please comment on the subject of the post itself.
If you do not follow these rules we will remove your comment. Please keep it civil.

To protect users from spam, please enter the text from the image on the left.
   

Our readers recommend: