|
Say yes to Prop. 8 and no to PG&E Tilted Kilt should stay off the streets Harvey Milk Day in public schools? No thanks, Governor Lifesaving marrow donation something we all can do 30 kids in kindergarten? WAY too many. Cops on cell phones? It's part of their job McCarthy won't quiet down, luckily Vegas' plan to run good news all around The people will decide the same-sex marriage issue Fireworks lovers are their own worst enemy June 06 July 06 August 06 September 06 October 06 November 06 December 06 January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08 June 06 May 06 April 06 March 06 February 06 January 06 December 05 November 05 October 05 September 05 August 05 July 05 Blog RollAsk The Californian Editorials Entertainment Eye of Bakersfield Faith Forum Fired Up! Inside Sports Neighbors Right Thinking Sound Off Talk of the Town
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Tests, parents share blame for apathy
My question two weeks ago to teachers on how to fix apathy in our schools triggered a number of varied and passionate responses, but the teachers who called or wrote have three things in common --they're tired, they're frustrated and they absolutely love teaching our kids. A total of 45 local educators participated in the survey and each had much to say on the subject of student and teacher apathy. Their passion was so great; in fact, I came to regret not setting a word limit of, say 1,000 words. Lesson learned. But I digress. I will not keep you in suspense. According to the teachers who participated in my admittedly non-scientific survey, there is no No. 1 reason for apathy in our public schools. There are two. Those reasons are "tests" and "parents." It's hard to say which of the two teachers are more frustrated with -- standardized tests that "have created a generation of students who know how to take tests, but who hate school and see no value in learning," or parents who stubbornly refuse to communicate the importance of education to their children. A few teachers noted other possible causes. Some pointed the finger at their colleagues, suggesting teachers who adopt inflexible, one-size-fits-all teaching methods are sure breeders of student apathy. Other teachers said unrealistic expectations of the No Child Left Behind reform -- that every child in America will reach academic success if teachers would try just a little harder -- discourages teachers and lays the blame for student failure squarely at their feet. But it's those standardized state tests -- elementary students take as many as three a year and high schoolers take four or five -- that really get teachers' backs up. They say the NCLB goal, to have 100 percent of all U.S. students proficient or better in math by 2014, is commendable, but impossible. "Nowhere does NCLB say it's possible that some children just aren't capable of being 100 percent proficient," said Karen Sweaney, a 13-year teacher at Laurelglen Elementary School. "NCLB doesn't exclude the English-as-a-second-language learner, the special education child -- it's just supposed to happen and if it doesn't, it's our fault." Teachers say the pressure of "teaching to the test," is so great that fun activities designed to ignite imaginations and instill a joy of learning, like art, daily physical education or even recess, are falling by the wayside. Running neck and neck with standardized tests on teacher's frustration meter are parents who fail to set boundaries, check homework or show even a passing interest in their child's education. Donna Sokanoff, a fifth-grade teacher at Golden Hills Elementary School in Tehachapi, said the lack of parent-child interaction among some of her students has proven to be her biggest obstacle in 25 years of teaching. "If there are healthy, interactive parents at home, it shows in their child's effort, interest and conduct at school," she said. "If not, it is up to me to make school interesting and fun to these apathetic students. I must become something larger than the video games they play, the movies they see or the television they watch." Despite that, Sokanoff said, she loves teaching and considers her job "the best in the world." "I would not change the life I have led as a teacher," she said. "As I tell my students on a regular basis, 'I get to go to school every day and learn from what I do. I learn from my students.'" Coming Tuesday: Teachers share practical suggestions on how to solve the apathy problem. 5 comments from 4 users
1
posted by
anonymous
on Jan 29, 2007 at 07:48 AM
3080.
posted by
adampayne
on Jan 29, 2007 at 08:33 AM
We are all aware of the couple of evenings per year that parents and teachers can meet with one another at the schools. Classes fill with a lot of folks milling about and enough time for maybe a question or two. Not really a get to know one another setting, more like a fund raising atmosphere. There is always the one instructor trying to answer the crowd. There can be the parent-teacher conference in the tight little office space on a campus designed to figure out how to reach a particular student, but the teacher does have thirty other special cases just like that one to deal with every day. There are the various PTAs for parents and schools that now operate almost exclusively as fund raising mechanisms today rather than for any real learning involvement. As parents go through the years with their kids and their allotted schools, a feeling of resignation and growing isolation from the process occurs. It very seldom is about learning participation and educational growth. It always is about fund raising. A lot parents become alienated and isolated from the schools as a result of this approach. Time, of course, is the other big factor regarding parental involvement. As commutes and hours on the job have expanded for working parents over the years, businesses as a general rule have not allowed their employees the opportunity to take the necessary hours and become invested in the educational process. In our plugged in world of today people are never off the job clock. Lap-tops and cellular phones have become ropes that bind the soul to the job without a break. Too few instructors per class, standardized tests, non-stop fund raisers and no time off the job-clock are all about weeding out the undesirables and the have-nots, while rewarding a special few. These practices do not lift the whole. This is survival of the fittest and the most affluent. These current practices create barriers and indifference from the multitude, which fosters entire generations of failure and mistrust toward public education. Is this what we want out of public education? posted by
ProgressivePete2
on Jan 29, 2007 at 09:05 AM
posted by
randomfactor
on Jan 29, 2007 at 09:42 AM
For those interested in education policy, a great resource is http://www.dailyhowler.com (when Somersby isn't chiding the media for being incredibly bad at their jobs, he has a special fondness for education issues--check out the archives.) posted by
anonymous
on Jan 30, 2007 at 11:42 PM
One of the problems in the American educational system that few people seem to cite is the fact that we are failing our children by treating every one of them as if they were college bound and preparing them exculsively to meet that one goal. The truth is that not all children will --- or should --- go to college. Our society would collapse without plumbers, electricians, auto repair techs, carpenters, etc. High school test scores in European countries are higher than scores here because the students ours get compared to are Europe's college-bound children. They test students early, at around 7th or 8th grade and only those with college aptitude go on to high schools devoted to preparing students to enter college. The rest of the students go into vocational high schools to learn the trades that are the backbone of society. Our system assumes every child will go to college and prepares them for nothing else. We do have a few students who attend ROC and learn a trade, but enrollment is limited to just a few hundred students out of the 28,000+ enrolled in the KHSD, when there are many thousands more who could use vocational training. This is a travesty and leaves thousands of students in Kern County alone who graduate from high school unprepared to earn a living afterwards.
1
Our readers recommend: |