A blog about Kern County, Politics, and Religion & Faith.
About rightthinking


Member Since:
June 21, 2006
Last Signed In:
October 04, 2008
Profile Views:
5880
Blog Views:
46808
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Say yes to Prop. 8 and no to PG&E
Tilted Kilt should stay off the streets
Harvey Milk Day in public schools? No thanks, Governor
Lifesaving marrow donation something we all can do
30 kids in kindergarten? WAY too many.
Cops on cell phones? It's part of their job
McCarthy won't quiet down, luckily
Vegas' plan to run good news all around
The people will decide the same-sex marriage issue
Fireworks lovers are their own worst enemy
Archives
June 06
July 06
August 06
September 06
October 06
November 06
December 06
January 07
February 07
March 07
April 07
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
More archives
June 06
May 06
April 06
March 06

February 06
January 06
December 05
November 05
October 05
September 05
August 05
July 05

Blog Roll


Ask The Californian
Editorials
Entertainment
Eye of Bakersfield
Faith Forum
Fired Up!
Inside Sports
Neighbors
Right Thinking
Sound Off
Talk of the Town
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


rightthinking - > Right Thinking -> Fireworks lovers are their own worst enemy
Fireworks lovers are their own worst enemy

On a pleasant July 4th back in 1979, my brother-in-law gathered a fistful of sparklers, bound them with duct tape, stuck the wad into the grass and lit it.

Nearly thirty years later, the ensuing explosion— the blinding white flash, the compression of the blast wave against my chest — remains one of the more vivid memories of my young adulthood.

I'm reminded of that explosion every July, when the annual debate over a fireworks ban in Bakersfield roars to life.

I'm generally opposed to bans, believing most to be intrusive government meddling in decisions we're perfectly capable of making on our own. But this Independence Day, it became clear to me why a fireworks ban is inevitable.

In a word: guys.

Guys and their innate and uncontrollable urge to tweak and toy with fireworks. To turn a satisfactory blast into one that shatters windows; to modify a “safe and sane” firework to the degree its detonation will cause small children to shriek and pets to run for cover. Not to mention guys' hankering for fireworks of the illegal variety.

I can hear you guys now. “Well of COURSE we like 'em loud,” you're saying. “The bigger the bang, the better. And those “safe and sane” fireworks? About as thrilling as lighting candles on a birthday cake.”

True. But that relentless tinkering and those illegal fireworks have brought us to the brink of a ban. When it comes to fireworks, we as a community — including those of us gals who applaud the guys' efforts — are our own worst enemy.

Local elected officials have long resisted declaring a ban on fireworks, but flagrant disregard for laws governing their use and the cost to enforce them, may finally force their hand. Maybe it should.

There's no maybe about it, says City Fire Battalion Chief Garth Milam, who, thinks allowing personal fireworks in the city and county is “foolishness.”

“It's lawless behavior and we've winked at it,” Milam says. “This year we had to add about 30 additional staff just to enforce the law and deal with the consequences of the fireworks.”

The city charges fireworks vendors $200 over and above their usual fees to help off set extra costs, but that amount doesn't touch the cost of consequences like the “home lost on Lomita Drive,” several smaller property fires and a number of injuries, Milam says. Alcohol, of course, was a factor in a number of the incidents, including one where a partyer threw a bucket of water on uniformed police officers.

“We even had one person launch a bottle rocket that went right through the window of a neighbor's home, hitting and burning a woman inside,” he says. At the City's Animal Control office, staff saw an increase of 10 to15 lost and frightened animals per day the week of the Fourth, says Resource Management Director David Price.

“This fireworks thing is a problem,” Price says. “Whether this is something the community is willing to sustain in order to keep the practice is the question.”

It's a good question.

The most obvious, cost effective, animal-loving, house-saving answer is, of course, a ban. A ban on personal fireworks in the city and county. A ban that, hopefully, will act as a catalyst for public, professional fireworks shows.

Shows that beat safe-and-lame fireworks any day.

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by rightthinking on Saturday, July 12, 2008 at 02:38 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 143 times
16 comments from 12 users

1

posted by FloridaStateGrad on Jul 12, 2008 at 02:48 PM

I find this article to be not only sexist, but rather unfair to the many people who every year are able to enjoy personal fireworks safely and without any potential problems.  There are plenty of us who use proper protocol when handling such things.

posted by TomW on Jul 12, 2008 at 03:20 PM

Can we still fire our guns in the air?


posted by nine18kk on Jul 12, 2008 at 03:40 PM

It does't matter if you ban fireworks or not because the problem will still continue.  People are going to find them somewhere.  Drugs, automatic weapons and other things that are "banned" are still around and people still use them.  People misuse vehicles all the time by speeding or driving drunk.  Are you going to ban vehicles too?  The Fourth of July only happens once a year and I don't have much sympathy for the fire department when other public safety departments have to deal with stupidity every day.

There is no cure for stupidity and there is no pill for common sense.

posted by witterpitters on Jul 12, 2008 at 04:06 PM

NINE:  if fireworks are banned then whoever shoots them off at home is going to be seen immediately!!!!!  duhhh!

What makes you think the fire dept. doesn't have to deal with stupid every day?  Kids with matches, kids drowning in home pools, people shooting off fireworks catching someones home on fire (and it isn't just the 4th!!), someone having a heart attack/stroke, house fires deliberate or accidental.  I think the cops have a better chance dodging bullets then the firemen do dodging a roof falling in on them all on fire.

posted by bryanjackson on Jul 12, 2008 at 04:32 PM

I can't agree with a total ban on fireworks.  I enjoy lighting fireworks in a "safe and sane" manner.  Plus, there's those charities that use fireworks sales as a fundraiser.  You don't think they won't want some of that Kern County money (yeah, I mean a lawsuit) if fireworks are banned?  As for the tweaking of fireworks, those rules will never be able to be fully enforced due to lack of manpower in the fire and police departments.  As for the illegal fireworks, such as bottle rockets, all the state needs to do is stop every vehicle that comes across each border crossing into California (including the Mexican border-well ok I guess that's the Feds' responsibility) and search for illegal fireworks and anything else that is illegal and take the contraband away.  I believe they have checkpoints at all (or at least most) highway border crossings already. 
 

posted by Shwaine on Jul 12, 2008 at 04:52 PM

I've lived in a county where fireworks were banned due to wildfire risk. I can't say the 4th was any less enjoyable because of it. The city threw a day-long party in the park followed by fireworks. The show was quite impressive given that it was a city of only about 50,000 people. You also had several larger cities within driving distance if you wanted a larger show. Nonprofits had to raise their money in other ways, but they seemed to make do.

All-in-all, it was actually far less stressful because I didn't have to putter around the yard for the week beforehand finding any dead greenery that needed to be cleaned up and soak down the yard in the early evening of the 4th like I have to do here. I just had to get myself over to the park or a nearby parking garage to watch the city's display.

posted by sagefever on Jul 12, 2008 at 05:46 PM

sagefever on Jul 6, 2008 at 01:13 PM <Edit><Delete>

 

This is just 2 min. of the Macy's show  http://www.youtube.com/watc...

 

I watched the Capitol show,then this and then the Boston show....they make fireworks that look like 3-D boxes,stars..pretty amazing stuff. For a ban to work we need bigger and better shows,with more venues available. Riverwalks seems like a great spot for public fireworks. Come up with a decent alternative,besides being the "enemy of fun" (LOL) and you might get more folks on board.

P.S. I watched,I think it was channel 23,asking folks why we celebrate the 4th as they were buying safe and sane fireworks~ all 3 got it wrong.Really wrong. "

I posted this weeks ago on Lois's blog about the subject,scary ! An out right ban will never work,but a really good show might help.Seven Oaks would have to step it up a notch or 3.

Witters~ by my house for the last 30+ years 3 separate individuals have shot the fairly big burst type of fireworks into the air. No one has been caught in all that time.

posted by witterpitters on Jul 12, 2008 at 07:09 PM

BRYAN:  Believe it or not there are check points - but when I have come through on my way back from San Diego, there is very rarely any officers even there - AM or PM!!! When there have been officers there, they just wave everybody through!  About the only people/vehicles they check are the truckers. Bloody hell! they can't stope the illegals from crossing how are they going to stop anything else!!!

posted by witterpitters on Jul 12, 2008 at 07:12 PM

SAGE:  That is probably because: 1) they aren't the only ones; 2) nobody has the guts to turn them in and/or take pictures.  I have turned in the people behind me 2-3 times as they tend to shoot off stuff ALL YEAR ROUND! The cops have come out and have spoken to them - they lay low for quite awhile then try again - I call again!! They don't do it so much anymore!!!

posted by catpaw on Jul 12, 2008 at 08:32 PM

Marylee: It's probably too late but if you had a social conscience and wanted to help make a better world, you should have begged your brother in law to please, please, not reproduce himself.

posted by johnburnssucks on Jul 12, 2008 at 09:18 PM

Guys and their innate and uncontrollable urge to tweak and toy with fireworks.

You need a cosmetic surgeon to tweak and toy with that mug of yours.

.

 

posted by possummomma on Jul 13, 2008 at 12:12 AM

Banning fireworks is not going to solve the problem.  Ventura tried it and what ended up happening was neighborhoods chipping in to send someone to Mexico or here to buy fireworks.  People who break the law now aren't going to be influenced by yet another law.  If passing legislation worked, then you wouldn't have illegal fireworks that find their way into Kern County.  Furthermore, why should lawful, careful people be punished for the acts of people who will continue to break the law no matter how many restrictions you place on fireworks?

 

posted by adampayne on Jul 13, 2008 at 09:49 AM

I very seldom disagree with you, possummomma, but in this instance I must take exception. Legislation for a variety of public health standards and policies has been successful in making a marked difference in behavior on the population. People who ride motorcycles were infuriated at legislation which forced them to wear helmets in an effort to cut down on head injuries suffered in accidents. The law worked. I can point to other safety measures introduced to modify behavior, like seat and shoulder belts that must be worn, or infant car seats that are also now required to be used whenever a child is driven in a motor vehicle. These laws have worked to cut down on needless injuries when accidents occur. That there are still knuckleheaded individuals who refuse to comply with these laws does not mean that these laws did not work.

I am surprised that you ignore the repeated comments from local fire and police who always note that legal fireworks make the job of pinpointing illegal fireworks in a neighborhood so much more difficult. Yes, I'm sure that there will always be a few individuals who mistakenly believe that explosive devices are their God given right  to ignite at any place and at any time, but the vast majority of people will obey the law and find better ways to celebrate our Independence Day with friends and family.

You argument that there should be no laws because people who break them are not going to be influenced by them is  a ridiculous position to take if you really stop and think about it. I have always appreciated your reasoning capacity on these blog topics, but in this instance I think your emotional attachment to this fiery ritual has clouded your logical thought process.

I really appreciate the column Marylee Shrider wrote regarding this issue. She nailed the Tim "The-Tool-Guy" Allen's make-up in so many men who like to tinker with the gun powder.  Home Improvement was a  laugh riot characterizing the pratfalls of a normal male's tendency to make ill-thought changes on acceptable standard products with predictable but outrageous results. The results of explosive tinkering in real life are not so humorous when it affects people and critters you are near and dear to.

 

 

posted by TomW on Jul 13, 2008 at 09:55 AM

Actually, I hear that Rosedale is great place to watch illegal fireworks since a lot of cops live there.  Just sayin...


posted by possummomma on Jul 13, 2008 at 03:01 PM

 I am surprised that you ignore the repeated comments from local fire and police who always note that legal fireworks make the job of pinpointing illegal fireworks in a neighborhood so much more difficult

Because, frankly, I don't think it's as difficult as they're letting on.  As I said in another post, there have been people we've called in because of illegal fireworks.  We've left an address.  They do it every year. And, every year...no cops drop by.  Every year, the fireman don't stop.  And, I'm talking fireworks that are undeniably illegal because they go up in the air with a thump and burst into sparkles and showers.  It's not hard to compare fireworks that stay on the ground and won't clear a fence (in height) to illegal fireworks.  If one can't tell the difference, then there is someting wrong.  And, as Tom says...the worst pyros are firemen and cops. 

You argument that there should be no laws because people who break them are not going to be influenced by them is  a ridiculous position to take if you really stop and think about it... I think your emotional attachment to this fiery ritual has clouded your logical thought process.

My "emotional attachment" of four sentences? :)  There are people with far more damaging rituals than fireworks, Adam.  You know that.  Does that mean we can start banning swimming in the river because a few people are idiotic and take stupid risks?  Does it mean we take driving entirely out of the picture because some people don't use car seats or seat belts?  Should we ban motorcycles because some don't where the helmet?  Those are the logically implied steps that come from your proposition.  Banning an activity is a lot different than hanging safety requirements on those same activities. 

posted by avantichamp on Jul 15, 2008 at 09:43 PM

Playing with fireworks is one of those "by God we have a right to do it" type things no matter how stupid it may be. Back in the 1970s I had never given much thought to the subject until I was on a railroad yard switch crew and working on the fourth we were supposed to pull a cut of cars out of a track and switch (sort them into different tracks) them out. The foreman saw a beautiful dalmation cowering under one of the cars scared out of her wits by all the fireworks popping and screeming nearby.

The job got delayed while the yardmaster kept calling to see what was taking us so long while we worked at coaxing the dog out from under those cars. Aside from the stink of all the smoke that left me with the impression this is something we could do without. Notions about people's "rights" not withstanding.

1

Leave a Comment
Ground Rules for posting comments:
  • No profanity or personal attacks.
  • Please comment on the subject of the post itself.
If you do not follow these rules we will remove your comment. Please keep it civil.

To protect users from spam, please enter the text from the image on the left.
   

Our readers recommend: