A blog about Kern County, Politics, and Religion & Faith.
About rightthinking


Member Since:
June 21, 2006
Last Signed In:
March 25, 2009
Profile Views:
6032
Blog Views:
53445
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
We must learn to live within our means
Absence of newspapers hurts communities
Once again: Harvey Milk Day is a bad idea
Student's freedom quashed in college classroom
Flood of hope
Hold on to at least some library services
Tech ed a big win for students
KHSD belt-tightening riles up parents
One crazy week for this conservative
Why not enforce the smoking laws we already have?
Archives
June 06
July 06
August 06
September 06
October 06
November 06
December 06
January 07
February 07
March 07
April 07
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
December 08
January 09
February 09
March 09
April 09
May 09
June 09
July 09
August 09
September 09
October 09
November 09
More archives
June 06
May 06
April 06
March 06

February 06
January 06
December 05
November 05
October 05
September 05
August 05
July 05

Blog Roll


Ask The Californian
Editorials
Entertainment
Eye of Bakersfield
Faith Forum
Fired Up!
Inside Sports
Neighbors
Right Thinking
Sound Off
Talk of the Town
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


rightthinking - > Right Thinking -> Tech ed a big win for students
Tech ed a big win for students

At last.

Tech Ed is back.

It’s been a long time coming, but career technical education will soon return to many Kern County high schools as a graduation requirement thanks to some progressive thinkers on the Kern High School District board of trustees.

Trustees voted this week to proceed with their Career Technical Education Pathways plan. As a result, those kids thinking of dropping out — those who lack the interest or ability or family support to finish high school — may now have a reason to stay.

Or even go on to college.

The Pathways plan brings back to our schools technical courses some students once took for granted, like wood shop and auto shop — courses that, 30 years ago, fell under the umbrella of “Industrial Arts” as I recall. Depending on the school, students may now also take courses as varied as computer application, welding or architectural design.

The plan was pioneered by trustee Joel Heinrichs, who campaigned and won his board seat on his promise to do just that. In an opinion piece he penned this week, Heinrichs wrote that “extensive educational research” shows that quality CTE is a boon to students across the board.

And so it does.

A study conducted by the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago found that a single year of technically oriented coursework at a community college increased the earnings of men by 14 percent and women by 29 percent. Numerous studies found that students at schools with “highly integrated” quality CTE programs scored higher in reading, mathematics and science than do students at schools with less integrated programs.

The plan requires student to take either a college prep or career prep pathway.

The best part is the plan gives students more areas in which to succeed, including an individualized program that allows highschoolers to take both career prep and college prep.

Another plus? The district already has the “equipment and space available to accomplish phase one of the plan,” trustee Chad Vegas says.

“With phase two we don’t, which is why we didn’t put it in right away,” he says. “By the time we hit phase two, we will.”

It’s a win-win all around, but there was still some grumbling at the Monday night board meeting. Mitch Olsen, president of the Kern High School Teachers Association, said while the union is excited about bringing tech education to the high schools, it’s unhappy with the make-up of the Pathways Committee and thus are taking a “wait-and-see” stance.

“We didn’t feel like the committee included enough of the stakeholders in the district,” Olsen says. “You didn’t have parents, you didn’t have teachers, you didn’t have CTA teachers.”

Considering the board has discussed the plan practically nonstop for two years and a number of stakeholders were included on the plan’s subcommittees, it’s a pretty tiny nit to pick. But I guess somebody has to.

We’ve fretted for years over our dropout numbers. We’ve been on the KHSD for years to do something about it. Now they have.

The Pathways plan may not be the magic cure for all that ails our schools, but it’s sure a promising start.

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by rightthinking on Saturday, February 7, 2009 at 06:41 AM
Report a Violation
Viewed 96 times
9 comments from 7 users

1

posted by tkozy on Feb 7, 2009 at 07:15 AM

One auto shop will support at most:

3  classes/day. Less than 30 kids per class.  That’s 90 kids per shop/Semester. And one semester isn’t enough to amount to a hill of beans.

So where are these shops. How much will it cost to build enough. How much to supply them with the high cost equipment?

I learned a lot from my IA classes at South High. But I was one of the few that got to participate.

We need to think about getting businesses involved in formal apprenticeship training. They need the trained worker. It should be part of there cost of business ownership.

posted by theColorNine on Feb 7, 2009 at 08:32 AM

I find this comment, "Considering the board has discussed the plan practically nonstop for two years..." misleading and inaccurate.  I was at a trustee meeting when KHSD Superintendent Dr. Don Carter all but admitted that PUBLIC discussion of this plan was NOT discussed for "practically two years" despite what Joel Heinrichs and a couple other trustees keep professing (a few months is more like it).  Carter said that Heinrichs started requesting data from his office about two years ago, but that their reason for wanting the data was not disclosed as being for this Pathways program.  In fact, I got the distinct impression from the way Dr. Carter paused and delicately tried to answer the audience member's question that Heinrichs had either told him or given him the impression that the data was for something else. 

It was also revealed at this same trustee meeting that any discussion of developing a Pathways program was done rather quietly and privately among a very small "committee" (I recall about five names being mentioned) with no input for the plan being asked for from teachers, parents, or any other stakeholders until this past December when the subject was brought up at a trustee meeting.  It was clear to me at the meeting I attended in January that this was already a done deal, and that making it public at the end of the process was merely a veiled attempt to make it appear as though others had been included in the process.  To me, this does not constitute the open "...the board has discussed the plan practically nonstop for two years..." that you or they are implying.

 

posted by witterpitters on Feb 7, 2009 at 08:56 AM

It is my understanding that BHS might possibly still have their industrial arts buildings still intact - just unused. I don't know about the other HS's.

The educational system never should have stopped those programs just because THEY thought everybody should go to college. Now all of a sudden, after years of dropouts, they have DISCOVERED this trade school train of thought. a-maz-ing.  This is another aspect of the 50-60's that was better. Every time the "system" tries to "fix it" they just screw it up and in the process screw up the kids. "if it ain't broke...don't fix it"!!!!!

 

posted by NancyII on Feb 7, 2009 at 09:42 AM

It appears that on entering high school a student must declare college prep or  career prep.  I also was told that a child can change later if they choose.  What would concern me is that if they opt for career prep and two year down the road decide to switch to college prep they would have lost a lot of time.

Do most 14 year olds know what they want to be?  And why do they have to choose one or the other?  Why can't they take college prep and and auto body or woodshop class?

Still questions.... but it seems the parents and the public were not in on the decision even though the board was asked to not make a decision without input.

Did I get it right?  If not, please chime in.

posted by Lingtaowoo on Feb 7, 2009 at 10:09 AM

I would have been nice if there was more choices to choose from other than metal/wood shop..auto shop....It would have been cool to have HVAC repair..plumbing..home and industrial electrical...you know--things that are productive trades--good paying trades--careers....Hey--it's food for thought...


posted by VirgilAnderson on Feb 7, 2009 at 10:16 AM

 

 

I agree with colornine,

it would've been nice to have been inlcuded (the public)  in the planning process.

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

 

--virgil

posted by hotandfoggy on Feb 7, 2009 at 11:25 AM

virgil,

thanks for the music video. I don't understand country music. It doesn't have anything to do with working on the range.

posted by witterpitters on Feb 8, 2009 at 03:59 PM

Are there still cooking and sewing classes offered? If not might want to think about that too - chefs and designers - most go away and don't come back as there is not much here in Bako - Well there is up at the college but it would be nice to have some of those classes at the HS level.

posted by theColorNine on Feb 8, 2009 at 09:32 PM

If you go to the KHSD's Career Technical Education Board Presentation and scroll down to page 13, you will see a list of the variety of vocational opportunities currently available at each of the different high schools.  Phase two of the plan is to expand the offerings so that they are available at more of the high schools.

If a student is interested in a field that his/her school does not offer, he/she can request an intra-district transfer to the high school where those classes are offered.  There are some pitfalls to that, however:

   (1)  If the student participates in athletics, he/she will be ineligible for one year after the transfer;

   (2)  Students must find their own transportation to the new school they attend.

 

  

1

  (You need to be signed in to leave a comment)

BAKERSFIELD.COM HOT TOPICS: