|
Say yes to Prop. 8 and no to PG&E Tilted Kilt should stay off the streets Harvey Milk Day in public schools? No thanks, Governor Lifesaving marrow donation something we all can do 30 kids in kindergarten? WAY too many. Cops on cell phones? It's part of their job McCarthy won't quiet down, luckily Vegas' plan to run good news all around The people will decide the same-sex marriage issue Fireworks lovers are their own worst enemy June 06 July 06 August 06 September 06 October 06 November 06 December 06 January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08 June 06 May 06 April 06 March 06 February 06 January 06 December 05 November 05 October 05 September 05 August 05 July 05 Blog RollAsk The Californian Editorials Entertainment Eye of Bakersfield Faith Forum Fired Up! Inside Sports Neighbors Right Thinking Sound Off Talk of the Town
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Pay inmates more? They should pay us.
It appears the inmates at some of our many fine correctional institutions here in California are not altogether happy with their current working conditions. Turns out the pay really stinks. The wages are nothing short of scandalous, according to J. Tony Serra, a Bay Area attorney and former inmate of the federal prison camp at Lompoc, who is now suing the U.S. Bureau of Prisons over inmate pay. Serra, who earned 19 cents an hour as an inmate, but is back at work after serving nine months for failing to pay income taxes, believes the 12 to 50 cents per hour inmates earn for prison work is tantamount to "slave labor." Slave labor -- it's a phrase that conjures up visions of rock quarries, chain gangs and rough, sweaty men laboring under a blazing sun and the merciless stare of hard-hearted prison guards. In the suit he filed Tuesday, Serra even invoked the constitutional ban on slavery as part of his argument. Harsh stuff from a guy whose job it was to water the prison lawn. The question is, why are we paying inmates at all? There are about 171,000 inmates in California's prisons and correctional facilities and the cost to feed, clothe and house each is more than $34,000 a year, according to California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation figures. California also is home to 22 of the 114 prisons in the federal system, which has a total inmate population of 195,000. Felicia Ponce, spokeswoman for the federal Bureau of Prisons, declined to talk about the Serra case, but said the cost to support each inmate comes to $64.19 per day. In calculating his wages, Serra apparently neglected to figure in a handsome, taxpayer-funded benefits package that includes medical and dental coverage; bennies that thousands of law-abiding citizens can't afford. Inmates, who work Monday through Friday just like regular folk with weekends off, also may take advantage of the prison's myriad recreational, educational and vocational activities, as well as a host of "prosocial value" programs like drug and alcohol treatment and parenting classes. Another perk Serra seems to have forgotten is that state and federal inmates also get time-off-for-good-behavior credit for the hours they work or go to classes. Not good enough, says the 72-year-old Serra, who believes his fellow law breakers are, at the very least, entitled to the federal minimum wage of $5.15 per hour. Really, he does. Serra condemned the prison industry as a "dirty secret" because inmates aren't paid a real wage for providing prison services and for the products they manufacture and sell to government entities. Naturally he failed to note the rehabilitative opportunities many of these job represent for those inmates waiting in line to get them. In announcing the lawsuit at a news conference at his San Francisco North Beach office, Serra told reporters his suit wasn't about money, but about the plight of the inmate workers; about injustice and basic fairness. Please. If the system were truly fair, inmates and parolees would be working to repay taxypayers the cost of their incarceration. But life is not always fair, an immutable truth for which California lawbreakers should be deeply grateful. 3 comments from 3 users
1
posted by
robbwillis
on Mar 25, 2007 at 12:17 PM
posted by
redkernhero
on Mar 25, 2007 at 12:25 PM
It probably would not be a bad idea to pay inmates minimum wage and hold most of or in account, probably a money market account or a mutual fund. However, if they wanted, they could use their earning to invest on Wall Street, they couldn't’t be less honest than most of the traders now doing business. Letting earn money may well allow these released cons might just prevent them going straight to crime after their release and it would be great Wall Nah, that makes too much sense, besides it might break the cycle of recidivism that new have come to depend on to soothe our sensitivities for law and order. Just playing with your mind, Marylee speaks for us for us when it comes to justice, since many in the prison population are Black, we are sending them back to their roots, and this time neither Lincoln nor MLK will not save them. Marylee expresses most our Red Kern sentiments, these guys are lucky we don’t bring out the chains and whips to rehabilitate them as for anyone paying, it is they who should pay, with their lives. See, Marylee, we are with you, you provide the ammunition and we will shoot them, deal? posted by
anonymous
on Mar 25, 2007 at 03:19 PM
3241.
1
Our readers recommend: |