A blog about Personal Journals.
About saberhagen


Real Name:
ROBERT SABERHAGEN
Member Since:
March 14, 2006
Last Signed In:
October 10, 2008
Profile Views:
339
Blog Views:
2008
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Pimp My Bill!
Bailout: Deal or No Deal?
What you'd get with McCain
Palin: I was wrong
Palin: Undress For Success
What hypocrisy!
Where Is The Shame?
Cost Of War
AP: Party can't even watch its own cash, much less yours.
What happens to millions of foreclosed homes?
Archives
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


saberhagen - > -> Cost Of War
Cost Of War
Location: Bakersfield, CA 93301

Loading...
Larger Map
Taxpayers in Congressional District 1 (Thompson) have paid $1 billion for the Iraq War thus far. For the same amount of money, the following could have been provided:
412,668 People with Health Care OR
1,786,433 Homes with Renewable Electricity OR
17,912 Public Safety Officers OR
14,164 Music and Arts Teachers OR
150,680 Scholarships for University Students OR
100 New Elementary Schools OR
3,001 Affordable Housing Units OR
374,790 Children with Health Care OR
119,931 Head Start Places for Children OR
14,400 Elementary School Teachers
 
 
Posted in these Groups:
Topics: Cost Of War
posted by saberhagen on Wednesday, April 9, 2008 at 06:38 AM
Report a Violation
Viewed 30 times
5 comments from 5 users

1

posted by Charlie on Apr 9, 2008 at 07:09 AM

 Could have. But would it have. Doubt it.

posted by catpaw on Apr 9, 2008 at 07:23 AM

 The major motivation for disarmanent agreements over missles with the Soviet Union was not world peace but the cost of building and maintaining these weapons. Both sides realized the cost of one missle equaled 5,000 tractors. Unfortunately, with Iraq the US taxpayer is footing the bill without costs or returns from the other side. If Iraq became a strong central government, resolved the internal divisions, secured its border, bringing our troops home would also bring a booming war economy in Iraq to an end.

posted by TSM on Apr 9, 2008 at 07:46 AM

 

The money spent in Iraq could have rebuilt America's crumbling water pipelines.

Two hours north of New York City, a mile-long stream and a marsh the size of a football field have mysteriously formed along a country road. They are such a marvel that people come from miles around to drink the crystal-clear water, believing it is bubbling up from a hidden natural spring. The truth is far less romantic: The water is coming from a cracked 70-year-old tunnel hundreds of feet below ground, scientists say.

The tunnel is leaking up to 36 million gallons a day as it carries drinking water from a reservoir to the big city. It is a powerful warning sign of a larger problem around the country: The infrastructure that delivers water to the nation's cities is badly aging and in need of repairs.

The Environmental Protection Agency says utilities will need to invest more than $277 billion over the next two decades on repairs and improvements to drinking water systems. Water industry engineers put the figure drastically higher, at about $480 billion. Water utilities, largely managed by city governments, have never faced improvements of this magnitude before. And customers will have to bear the majority of the cost through rate increases, according to the American Water Works Association, an industry group.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/...

 

posted by adampayne on Apr 9, 2008 at 11:15 AM

 We are supposedly the government, if "we the people" are still "the people" in this country. All it takes is the will to get it done, and we could direct the tax dollars into projects we need. Wasting hundreds of billions of dollars on military projects should stop.


posted by randomfactor on Apr 9, 2008 at 11:18 AM

"The government" mostly stopped listening to me in January, 2001.  They had a "mandate," remember?

Truth be told, the new Democratic leadership in the House and Senate aren't listening too good either.

1

Leave a Comment
Ground Rules for posting comments:
  • No profanity or personal attacks.
  • Please comment on the subject of the post itself.
If you do not follow these rules we will remove your comment. Please keep it civil.

To protect users from spam, please enter the text from the image on the left.
   

Our readers recommend: