|
Sweat Shops right Here in Our Town:Life as it should not be. PolitiFact~ another tool to cool the hot air and get the facts David Hoffman on loss and gain Searching Who to Vote For? Dark Skies Convicted The Silent War~ Women for Women International Amazing Grace~ the life of Wilbur Wilberforce Greater World Gifts Internet Flaw:Black Hat Conference July 06 August 06 September 06 October 06 November 06 December 06 January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 "Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats." Diane Arbus My life seems to operate sideways~ backwards almost~ and I have come to see thats right for me. A rain of snakes,disruption that cause's growth ,the world split in two.Everyone has there own path,mine has been one of thought,mostly of things folks today seem to disregard. Truth, personal integrity,politeness,...not all eschew these things.For me its been the easiest way to be~ any other way leads me to more trouble..and a sense of humor,above all about myself. Laughter keeps a person sane,and I enjoy seeing the coyote in myself~ the eternal trickster
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Blind Spot:Hitlers Secretary and Downfall,a companion Film
Blind Spot:Hitlers Secretary~ Andre Heller and Othmar Schmiderer,documentarians,rolled their cameras and 81 year old Traudl Junge recalls for some 95 minutes her life as Hitlers secretary. We see,through her life and experiences, a unique view of Hitler,the Nazi regime and the German peoples mind set at the time. "I never got the idea he was conscious of pursuing criminal acts.To him they were great ideals,a human life meant nothing in comparison to those lofty goals". The footage is full of both small banal moments and pivotal historic ones. She speaks of his love for his dog,Blondie and she heard the sound of the bullet when he committed suicide. The documentary is compelling in it's bare bones approach,just a woman struggling with her past.Her inability in the end to forgive a 20 year old girl,who in her naivety and ignorance served arguably the worlds greatest criminal. It forces one to consider the blinders we all must put on to live our lives in relative peace. Downfall~ is the Oscar nominated dramatization based on Blind Spot,in it's own right a great film. I recommend both for a full night of historical perspective. 36 comments from 9 users
1
posted by
TSM
on Jun 2, 2008 at 07:15 AM
Blind Spot was a great documentary shot just before the death of Junge. She was honest about her role and gave insight into what it was like living in Hitler's bunker during the last days before Hitler committed suicide. She was unrepentant to the very end. I own Downfall. It's one of my favorite movies. It doesn't take long to believe Bruno Ganz is Hitler as the actor becomes completely engrossed in the role. The movie is in German with English subtitles for those who don't like foreign films.
I watched "The First Amendment Project" this weekend. I highly recommend it. I made the mistake of renting National Treasure I and II. Awful movies. Jon Voight as the father? I was expecting to see Angela Jolie show up as Lara Croft.
posted by
AudreyB
on Jun 2, 2008 at 07:19 AM
I saw a movie based on this woman's last years with Hitler. She was naive but willing to serve a monster. How could she have been ignorant of the extermination of the jews? posted by
sagefever
on Jun 2, 2008 at 07:35 AM
She says she was a personal secretary~ did dictation for personal letters,speeches~ and had "not" realized the "extent" of the destruction. The day this documentary was shown for the first time,she died from cancer.She does say in the film if she could meet Hitler again,she would ask him why. As I said it gives a unique view of the peoples mind set at the time,as for her? I can only imagine what blinders she had to wear to live out her days in some semblance of peace. She did have a nervous breakdown,and devoted much of her time after that to reading for the blind TSM~ I watched National Treasure at the laundry mat~;-) not one of Nicks best,eh?
posted by
TSM
on Jun 2, 2008 at 07:50 AM
How could she have been ignorant of the extermination of the jews? The Nazi party did an excellent job of convincing the German people the Jews were merely being relocated. And her job was to dictate and type up Hilter's mundane documents. Documents relating to the extermination of the Jews was done by Rademacher's staff, as he was in charge of Jewish affairs (and carrying out the Final Solution).
I watched National Treasure at the laundry mat At least you had something else to distract you. It was like watching an Indiana Jones movie made with a fraction of the budget. I thought "King Solomon's Mines" was better, and it was garbage. Cage has been spotty in the few years. The last one I liked of his was "Next". Well, I liked Jennifer Beale a lot more. ;) "Adaptation" was the last Cage movie I liked, and that was 6 years ago.
posted by
sagefever
on Jun 2, 2008 at 08:05 AM
Agreed on Nick's career~ which is sad because he has potential. I found her comments about a Nazi concentration camp guard really revealing: When asked if he did not feel pity for those he so mistreated and killed,he said yes but he had to make a sacrifice for Germany,put aside those feelings for the "great good".....she also said if anything came up along those lines Hitler would say " do not worry I take complete responsibility". She has a long pause and adds "as if anyone could take anothers conscience." There are several more clips at YouTube,just search for Traudl Junge.
posted by
TSM
on Jun 2, 2008 at 08:10 AM
but he had to make a sacrifice for Germany, put aside those feelings for the "great good" The Nazis did a great job with their propaganda convincing the German people they were the master race. Not unlike the Bush administration convincing Americans Iraq was an imminent threat.
posted by
sagefever
on Jun 2, 2008 at 08:19 AM
*Smiles* I did see some comparison there,as well as with the Scott McCellean(sp?) dust up,but I like to leave people room to view art/history and draw their own conclusions,not lead them down the garden trail.
posted by
sfinboston52
on Jun 2, 2008 at 10:14 AM
The Nazi were great at propaganda and controlled every accepted of daily life, but this does not relinquished the guilt the Germans of that generation. I wonder how far we as Americans could go down that path, and who would or wouldn't speak up or resist? posted by
Maggiepoo
on Jun 2, 2008 at 10:19 AM
"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State." posted by
NancyII
on Jun 2, 2008 at 10:23 AM
One difference is that in the Nazi 1930's everything was controlled. Media, what there was of it, was easily controlled by the party. In todays world we have access to world news that is NOT controlled by our country or by the president. We're way past being able to be controlled by one persons maniacal vision. You can rant at Bush all you like and try to compare him to Hitler but that's just downright silly and insulting to the people in this country who make their own decisions. Just because their thoughts don't gee haw with yours doen't make them sheep. TSM, I disagree with you politically but I would guess you read, listen, and then make your decisions based on YOUR beliefs. Too bad you don't extend that same courtesy to others. posted by
Maggiepoo
on Jun 2, 2008 at 10:25 AM
"Of course the people don't want war. But after all, it's the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it's always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger." posted by
Maggiepoo
on Jun 2, 2008 at 10:29 AM
"Not every item of news should be published. Joesph Pual Goebbels posted by
catpaw
on Jun 2, 2008 at 10:30 AM
My first concern is why did someone take so long to interview this person who was on the cusp of world history? But comes the question, would she have been as introspective and insightful decades earlier? I've always maintained that history is much more than events, dates and names of dead people. A passion for history is a passion for truth. I recall in my fuzzy brain the play Devil's Advocate, set during the American Revolution. An aide asks a British general, "What will history say?" The reply: "History will tell lies." The most reliable source for the truth of our past is naturally the people who were there. It's up to us to ask them about it before it's too late. posted by
NancyII
on Jun 2, 2008 at 10:34 AM
The general public was a lot more naive in those days as they certainly were not well informed. After all, they didn't have TV, wide variety of radio, or computers with internet access to the world. Todays Jr. High kids are probably better informed than the adults in the 30's. The wars and atrocities in those days were not fought on television. posted by
sfinboston52
on Jun 2, 2008 at 10:35 AM
Uhm...I wasnt even remotely trying to compare Bush & Co to the Nazi's. I was wondering how far would we as Americans would go down the road that the Germans went down. I personally dont think we are any different from those Germans or anyone else. aWould it another attach by terrorist to push us over the edge? Would we turn a turn away while our government rounded up people? What about torturing those people to regardless if they are innocent or not? Just how far would we go? Who of us (Americans) would speak up and at what cost? Nancy you are right the Nazis controlled the communication, travel, daily life for everyone, they used some Churches to help preach their message. posted by
NancyII
on Jun 2, 2008 at 10:36 AM
Sf..note that comment was to TSM. edited..Also note the reaction of the public to the message sent out by Obama former church. posted by
Maggiepoo
on Jun 2, 2008 at 10:39 AM
"It is the absolute right of the state Joesph Paul Goebbels posted by
Maggiepoo
on Jun 2, 2008 at 10:48 AM
Our propaganda ministry is run by 5 media giants who control content and censorship, If it is not in the interest of profit for the shareholders it doesn`t get aired or it`s manipulated to fit the agenda, Free press is a thing of the past, media is for profit not information, very few unbiased media outlets are available to the mass uninformed public,but they are there and not for entertainment therefor not mainstream The media is not looking out for your interest and can not be trusted to inform...entertain yes.inform.no... you only watch what you agree with and promote that, very few seek answers posted by
Maggiepoo
on Jun 2, 2008 at 10:51 AM
"The efficiency of the truly national leader consists primarily
Adolf Hitler posted by
Maggiepoo
on Jun 2, 2008 at 10:57 AM
"The great masses of the people ... posted by
sagefever
on Jun 2, 2008 at 11:17 AM
For my part there are small parallels,but there is no real comparison of Hitler and Bush .My observation was the comparison of Junge to say Scott McClellan or the like. Thank the God(s) most of us do not have to face these kinds of situations,but it made me,at the least,pause to consider what blinders I wear to live this life. I would also care to remind folks of China and the "Internets" in that country~ theirs is still one very controlled society.
posted by
Maggiepoo
on Jun 2, 2008 at 11:30 AM
"All propaganda must be so popular and on such an intellectual level, posted by
CatherineBaker
on Jun 2, 2008 at 11:35 AM
When I went to Germany to visit my best friend 12 years ago, we were walking around the village of Weisloch when he said "Just over that hill was the insane asylum. That's where they put people with mental disabilities in the '30s. One night the Nazis came and snuck all the patients out and they were never seen or heard from again." Then later, my friend's sister's mother-in-law (Grandma) told me that she had to hide her mentally handicapped daughter from the Nazis during WWII. Later I wondered--WHAT? Was it really brain-washing and hubris on the part of the German people, or was it fear? Or both? posted by
Maggiepoo
on Jun 2, 2008 at 11:42 AM
posted by
randomfactor
on Jun 2, 2008 at 11:47 AM
posted by
CatherineBaker
on Jun 2, 2008 at 11:49 AM
Well, there was the USS Cole. And the original World Trade Center bombing. And you could count the Oklahome City bombing, if you are including domestic terrorists. posted by
sagefever
on Jun 2, 2008 at 11:52 AM
Cat~ those folks were the very ones who "tested" out the "ultimate solution" gas chambers,and started Mengela (so spelled wrong!)"research". Each person had a file,you either got a red line,or a blue line which meant death~ it is a famous disability rights slogan and T-Shirt~"never again". I worked with a woman who lived there at the time~she said for most citizens it started out as love of country and quickly became simple fear,obey or die.Nothing mattered except the goal.
posted by
randomfactor
on Jun 2, 2008 at 11:52 AM
Which of those three caused a fundamental shift in government policy towards one more liked by the terrorists, Cat? Objectives, not tactics. . But you did remind me of something--one prior successful terrorist act in December, 1983. That's probably where bin Laden got the idea he could manipulate US policy. posted by
randomfactor
on Jun 2, 2008 at 11:54 AM
I recently saw a book (didn't check it out, just skimmed a few minutes) which was trying to make the point that Hitler's "Final Solution" could not have been implemented without serious technological help--which they obtained from IBM. Don't forget he had many sympathizers among the Republicans in the US government. posted by
CatherineBaker
on Jun 2, 2008 at 11:59 AM
Well, you have a point there, Random. I just think the usual objective of terrorism is to "blow stuff up real good." posted by
Maggiepoo
on Jun 2, 2008 at 11:59 AM
posted by
AudreyB
on Jun 2, 2008 at 12:02 PM
posted by
sagefever
on Jun 2, 2008 at 12:05 PM
posted by
randomfactor
on Jun 2, 2008 at 12:08 PM
Again, that's tactics, not objectives, Cat. Only Reagan and Shrub capitulated to the terrorists. . We blew stuff up real good in Iraq and even achieved the short-term objective (gas over $4 a gallon). But we're coming in second in the long run. posted by
Maggiepoo
on Jun 2, 2008 at 12:11 PM
Bush Property Seized--Trading with the Enemy In October 1942, ten months after entering World War II, America was preparing its first assault against Nazi military forces. Prescott Bush was managing partner of Brown Brothers Harriman. His 18-year-old son George, the future U.S. President, had just begun training to become a naval pilot. On Oct. 20, 1942, the U.S. government ordered the seizure of Nazi German banking operations in New York City which were being conducted by Prescott Bush. Under the Trading with the Enemy Act, the government took over the Union Banking Corporation, in which Bush was a director. The U.S. Alien Property Custodian seized Union Banking Corp.'s stock shares, all of which were owned by Prescott Bush, E. Roland "Bunny" Harriman, three Nazi executives, and two other associates of Bush.[1] posted by
TSM
on Jun 2, 2008 at 12:14 PM
Just as Maggie said, our media is controlled by a handful of corporations (all leaning right, like GE and Viacom) whose main objective is profit driven. If doesn't bleed, it doesn't lead. If they had their way there wouldn't be any news, just entertainment. The media stories on the run-up to the war is a perfect example of that. Studies show that pro-war stories were run constantly and very few critical voices were heard. Recently media figures are admitting they failed in being objective in their coverage during the run-up to the war. And as far as Bush vs. Hitler, Hitler wishes he had a mouthpiece like Faux News. There were alternative sources of news in Germany just as there are here through the Internet. "See, in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda."
1
Our readers recommend: |