|
The Weedpatch Gazette The Weedpatch Gazette The Weedpatch Gazette The Weedpatch Gazette The Weedpatch Gazette The Weedpatch Gazette The Weedpatch Gazette The Weedpatch Gazette The Weedpatch Gazette The Weedpatch Gazette June 06 July 06 August 06 September 06 October 06 November 06 December 06 January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Even brilliant people do stupid things
It takes someone like me given to whimsy and flights of fancy at times to wonder what would happen if Ms. Clinton died, and of course an assassination would be dramatic. Apart from those few that might personally mourn her passing, the political scene would certainly turn dramatically interesting as Democrats could draft Al Gore, appealing to his sense of patriotism to turn away from saving the world to saving America. And of course, an Oscar and Nobel on his resume would certainly lend stature to the presidency, notwithstanding legitimate criticism still nothing to be sneezed at. Perhaps Al Gore’s ego will get the better of him, as it has with so many others. If he was Roman Catholic he might believe sainthood within his reach, but failing that he may settle for the presidency. While I might wish Ms. Clinton would just simply disappear, it remains a curiosity to me that Caesar Bush remains alive despite the many millions that hate him worldwide and wish him dead. Such a thing brought to mind my belief that the Devil makes mistakes. From the accounts in the Bible God is reported to have made mistakes, so why not the Devil? For example, after choosing them David and Solomon both disappointed God, so perhaps Hitler disappointed Satan. The Devil may have had more ambitious plans for Hitler, but Hitler succumbing to his own power may have become “unmanageable,” as so often seems the case with those having great power. My good friend Byron, the Episcopal priest, stopped by yesterday and we were discussing various issues of the day when the conversation turned to some of the stupid things even brilliant people do. He knows my writing; and given to metaphysical speculation as I am, he knows I speculate about the possible errors God made in the Creation, this being characteristic of all those possessed of artistic and scientific creativity. So when I began to speculate Satan had made errors as well, it came as no surprise to him. The basis of such metaphysical speculation on my part has to do with the assumption that both God and Satan have to work with the material at hand in the case of human beings. While the Bible records instances of the Holy Spirit coming upon individuals, even indwelling some, so the Bible records instances of Satan and demonic spirits entering some. Satan entered Judas, and while he got Judas to betray Jesus, the outcome wasn’t what Satan anticipated according to the Bible. So, it seems Satan erred in his choice of how to get the job done. But if we are to give any credence to the Bible, we must allow both God and Satan are limited by their choices of the human material they have to work with. And as with earthly parents, there are no guarantees concerning their children. Some will be saints, and some will be devils. But we may never know at any given time which we are dealing with, or what will be the outcome. I speculate no matter how good the person may be, very few can be trusted with power and riches. The old story of power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely remains all too true. Satan may grant power and riches to those that do his bidding, but as with all tyrants he has no one he can trust. Eventually his servants, given enough power, will begin to disappoint the Evil One. As they begin to think more like their master, they begin to assume their own power and authority and use it to their own purposes. But whether any credit there being a God or Satan or not, here in America we are suffering under a leadership that has proven it feels no obligation to We the People. These leaders have the power and the authority, and it has corrupted them. Because of this if Caesar Bush decides to go out in a blaze of glory by bombing Iran with the probability of truly starting WWIII in nuclear earnest there is virtually no one to stand in his way. Those that might be disposed to oppose him are too corrupt themselves to thwart Caesar’s purpose; and aside from that many good people believe the circumstances already set in motion are leading to no other viable option. We read and hear Iraqi militants are feeding on corruption; and why not since they have those like Cheney and Halliburton as role models. Cook the books and lose a billion here, a billion there and it makes no difference whether in Iraq or our own Congress. Michael Corleone was correct in calling Kay naive to think the Mafia operated any differently than the government. However, since I am more than a little inclined to believe both God and Satan must rely on human instrumentality, and humans being both fallible and unpredictable in too many cases, it might explain why otherwise very intelligent people do really stupid things. Much like the sheer stupidity, to be charitable, of Nancy Pelosi and her sponsors regarding the Armenian genocide debacle and the majority in the MSM turning illegal aliens into “immigrants,” J. K. Rowling has forfeited her chance at literary greatness. “Just when you thought it was safe to immerse kids in books about witchcraft, J.K. Rowling has to succumb to political correctness and ‘out’ Hogwarts Headmaster Albus Dumbledore...” As a literary person and one well qualified academically, a writer and author of books it is my place to judge other writers and authors. While I have commended the genius of Rowling providing children so much to fire their imaginations, I really don’t believe she caved to political correctness. Many talented people, even those of rare genius are capable of doing really stupid things. I believe this is what happened to Rowling; a moment of temporary insanity if you will. Unfortunately, it is not something she can recover from. She has made the declaration and there is no going back from it. Some mistakes remain forever beyond correcting. The word “perversion” remains in dictionaries, and no amount of fame and fortune will change the dictionary definition of perversion. Rowling has allowed a pervert to subvert her work to her detriment and that of millions of readers; and this at a time when so much media attention is finally being given to the perverts preying on children, the target audience of Ms. Rowling; the children who have made her so successful. No one doubts Ms. Pelosi is a very intelligent and well educated person, but the sheer stupidity of her espousing a genocide declaration against Turkey when that nation’s cooperation is sorely needed by America defies reason. Such things left those like Emerson, Thoreau, Lincoln and many others wondering whether many seemingly good works were of God or the Devil. And in how many instances has even the best of intentions of some been turned to evil because of unintended consequences; which gives me pause to wonder if either God or Satan fully understands the consequences of their actions and choices. At least the Greeks were willing to accord their gods and goddesses the frailties and uncertainties common to humankind. So yes, as long as I have already been consigned to the outer reaches of perdition beyond redemption by orthodox believers of every kind I admit I can imagine both God and Satan slapping their heads and saying as I have done so many times myself, “How could I have done something that dumb!” But when it comes to mythology, for me looking back it seems the America I was born into and grew up in was a fairytale, and had I not lived it I understand how it seems a fairytale now to many who never knew such an America, and when my generation is gone it may pass into legend creating its own mythology with the passing of time. But for there to be any future America at all presumes a leadership that will put the interests of our nation before that of its own, a leadership that will cease nationalizing debt while privatizing profits which at present seems only a fairytale wish. 31 comments from 11 users
1
posted by
robbwillis
on Oct 26, 2007 at 04:18 PM
posted by
ghostriter
on Oct 26, 2007 at 04:30 PM
As much as I love the Harry Potter series, I was apalled and soundly disappointed by Ms. Rowling's "declaration". The woman is richer than the queen; did she HAVE to do something so drastic and detrimental to the character of her work just to sell more books? Because that is what I think the objective behind this action boils down to. And I thoroughly agree re: the fact that the US dictator is still alive. Kennedy got killed for much less; why has no one attempted to rid the world of Bush? posted by
samheath
on Oct 26, 2007 at 04:58 PM
Hey Robb, excellent point. Ghost, such things remain an utter enigma. posted by
medlock
on Oct 26, 2007 at 05:09 PM
First of all, Rowling stated that she already knew of Dumbledore's sexuality since she started writing his character over 15 years ago. Although she never directly "outed" him in the books, there are some very vague clues about it that even I didn't pick up on. Her confirmation made his character much more clear to me. Second, Rowling created all of the HP characters and HP worlds, and she has every right to say whatever she wants about them. She was asked a direct question about Dumbledore, and she gave an honest, direct answer. She was already aware that many close-minded people condem the books because they are under the illusion that it teaches witchcraft, and that this will just give them one more thing to "pick on." She was sure right about that one. Rowling doesn't have to try to sell more books. They are going to sell no matter what. Rowling also stated that by "outing" Dumbledore, she would be doing her small part to promote diversity and tolerance in the world. Unfortunately, in many societies, especially in America, homosexuality is still frowned upon, mainly by religious zealots. Rowling is obviously educated enough to not be so close-minded about such things, nor does she let religion limit her thinking, as so much religion does these days. posted by
samheath
on Oct 26, 2007 at 05:21 PM
Bush doesn't need the money, as with Rowling it's his legacy he should be concerned with.
posted by
sfinboston52
on Oct 26, 2007 at 05:56 PM
posted by
samheath
on Oct 26, 2007 at 06:03 PM
That is the sane and rational view. Unfortunately there are many people neither sane nor rational and too often a civilized society pays the price of such people.
posted by
sagefever
on Oct 26, 2007 at 07:35 PM
posted by
ChicoEsquela
on Oct 26, 2007 at 07:51 PM
Sam, the peeps who dislike arbusto are not good shots. Most don't even fancy firearms or any long range methods of "removal with even relatively extreme prejudice".......... They are more the up close and personal types with edged weapons in a fit of rage. Doesn't lend itself to taking out a POTUS. Now, HRC OTOH might require lexan bubble boy existance which sadly, it looks like we will get a chance to see......... moops live on....... posted by
samheath
on Oct 27, 2007 at 05:20 AM
Yeah Chico, it's that fumble-thumbed knothead John Wayne warned about in "The Shootist."
posted by
sagefever
on Oct 27, 2007 at 11:57 AM
posted by
samheath
on Oct 27, 2007 at 12:04 PM
Rowling has confused a lot of children and their parents. It's a kind of betrayal of what her legacy to children could have been. As time passes, she will be remembered for this rather than her contribution to literature. posted by
AudreyB
on Oct 27, 2007 at 01:35 PM
posted by
samheath
on Oct 27, 2007 at 01:47 PM
This is one reason I used the phrase "temporary insanity." Despite Rowling's caveats it strikes me as a really dumb thing for her to do.
posted by
AudreyB
on Oct 27, 2007 at 01:59 PM
posted by
ChicoEsquela
on Oct 27, 2007 at 02:07 PM
posted by
samheath
on Oct 27, 2007 at 02:08 PM
I hope it doesn't come to that Audrey, but it does present a real problem for parents and others that have come to rely on the Harry Potter series. The sense of being betrayed is going to be there no matter what.
posted by
sagefever
on Oct 27, 2007 at 02:30 PM
posted by
samheath
on Oct 27, 2007 at 02:38 PM
True enough sagefever; but in Rowling's case it will still come down to "innocence betrayed."
posted by
ghostriter
on Oct 28, 2007 at 01:17 AM
The point is that these were meant to be for children, and sexuality, homo- or hetero-, has no place in a novel targeting children under ten. "Unfortunately, in many societies, especially in America, homosexuality is still frowned upon, mainly by religious zealots. " I am not a religious zealot; I am an atheist, actually. Although many who frown on "the gay lifestyle" do so because of religion, there are those of us who object to the fact that gay seems to be "in style" these days and do not like having it thrown into our faces every ten minutes, and it has nothing to do with religion(or education, for that matter). I still say that it has no place in children's books or classrooms. Controversial sexual topics belong in the home, especially where children are concerned. posted by
samheath
on Oct 28, 2007 at 04:30 AM
I agree with you Ghost, especially concerning children. No matter what the spin sexually normal people should not have to defend the normal revulsion we feel for sexual perversion. The fact is propagandists for perverts have forced the word "homophobia" on us to advance their cause when in fact the truth is "heterophobia" since a phobia is an irrational fear. And no sexually normal person has an irrational fear of homosexuals, a patently silly idea on the face of it.
posted by
NancyII
on Oct 28, 2007 at 07:13 AM
Sam..good call on the irrationality of calling people who oppose teaching about homosexuality "homophobic." I neither fear, nor am repulsed, by homosexuals and my opinion is not religion based. As for Harry Potter. I've never read the books nor seen any of the films but in a childrens book someone who wears a pointy hat and a robe with no female affiliation should be just that and not necessarily considered homosexual. Asexual might be a better explanation for it if one is needed at all. I have serious doubts about Ms. Rowlings explanation of her reason for "outing" the character. posted by
samheath
on Oct 28, 2007 at 07:58 AM
Thanks Nancy; voices of reason in the midst of the chaos are needed and most welcome.
posted by
nooneisabovethelaw
on Oct 30, 2007 at 05:06 PM
The "back story" on Dumbledore isn't a part of the books. But Rowling was asked a direct question, and she answered it truthfully and honestly. Nobody asked her if Harry is heterosexual...not that it matters. Sexuality isn't a part of these books. Okay, maybe Harry's coming of age (falling in love and dealing with it) is a part of it, but Dumbledore is a mentor to Harry, nothing more. And, oddly enough, a hetero male can have a homosexual mentor who isn't interested in him. Particularly since he's a child, and a student, and off-limits to any true professional, ethical individual. But, I would add as well, these books are not written for ten-year-olds, either. I would also add that George W. Bush still being alive is proof there is no God. Otherwise...well, just leave it up to your imagination. posted by
samheath
on Oct 30, 2007 at 05:13 PM
And perhaps George Bush being alive is proof there is a Devil. But I'm careful enough to say "perhaps."
posted by
samheath
on Oct 30, 2007 at 05:35 PM
For what it's worth from someone with a Ph. D. in Human Behavior homosexuality has not been removed from the definition of sexual perversion. And my concern remains for the children whose innocence has been betrayed by Rowling. But enough, those wanting to advocate the homosexual agenda will have to write their own post rather than doing it here.
posted by
sagefever
on Oct 30, 2007 at 06:26 PM
posted by
Baylee
on Oct 30, 2007 at 06:32 PM
Innocence betrayed? Wow, dramatic much.
posted by
samheath
on Oct 30, 2007 at 06:34 PM
Not a bit sagefever, we all have our opinions and lists of scholars will be found on both sides of this issue. I will continue to stand by mine, but I won't allow my post to be hijacked to accommodate homosexuals or those favoring homosexuality.
posted by
samheath
on Oct 31, 2007 at 02:18 AM
Thanks murphy, beautiful pic of one of my favorite characters for my favorite holiday.
posted by
sagefever
on Oct 31, 2007 at 09:07 AM
1
Our readers recommend: |