Sam Heath
General Interest and Speculation

A blog about Personal Journals.
About samheath


Member Since:
March 14, 2006
Last Signed In:
October 11, 2008
Profile Views:
10319
Blog Views:
68705
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
The Weedpatch Gazette
The Weedpatch Gazette
The Weedpatch Gazette
The Weedpatch Gazette
The Weedpatch Gazette
The Weedpatch Gazette
The Weedpatch Gazette
The Weedpatch Gazette
The Weedpatch Gazette
The Weedpatch Gazette
Archives
June 06
July 06
August 06
September 06
October 06
November 06
December 06
January 07
February 07
March 07
April 07
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


samheath - > Sam Heath -> The Standards of Beauty
The Standards of Beauty

Beauty as with art is said to be in the eye of the beholder; nevertheless certain standards of beauty have withstood the test of time, and few would dispute these standards apart from the enemies of beauty, those who are envious and jealous of beauty and dedicate themselves to marring or destroying it wherever they can. These are the truly ugly among us, easily distinguished by their lack of civilized good manners and civilized speech, attacking all those who would take a stand for beauty and try to emphasize its standards whether of Mozart, the sonnets of Shakespeare, or those things that once distinguished real ladies and gentlemen.


While being ever so grateful for the Turner Classic Movie Channel, I did take it upon myself a couple of years ago to send a letter to Robert Osborne chiding him for neglecting A Girl of the Limberlost, the film version of Geneva Grace Stratton-Porter’s novel of the same title. As a child my mother took me to see the film at the Nile Theater and it made an indelible impression on me. Of the several memorable scenes in the film even after all these years one stands out.


Elnora, the young girl of the Limberlost finds companionship among the various creatures of the swamp. But a girl where she goes to school becomes envious of the attention being paid Elnora. At one point in the film a beautiful butterfly alights on a curtain, and before Elnora can capture it and set it free outside this other girl runs over and smashes the butterfly.


There are many enemies of beauty, those so ugly in their own minds and lives out of jealousy and envy they are dedicated to the marring or destruction of beauty, a subject I deal with at length in my book Birds With Broken Wings and my novel Donnie and Jean, an angel’s story about two children growing up in WWII Bakersfield. In both books I explore this envy and jealousy of beauty. The Huntington and Getty are not the only places you find a genuine tribute to beauty; it can be found in Kern County as well if you know where to look.


My generation of WWII antecedent to TV was not forced to read books; we were born to read, we were readers, and books were a natural and quite normal way of life to us. I was fortunate to be born into a family of avid readers, therefore from earliest memory I was surrounded by and immersed in good books and magazines, an encyclopedia and dictionary, newspapers, and like little Scout in To Kill A Mockingbird who in Jem’s words to Dill was “readin’ ever since she was born,” and notwithstanding Jem’s hyperbole so it seemed with me. And there was radio with a multiplicity of programming; that like good books and before the advent of TV required the constant exercising of ones imagination as well as the intellect.


Among the books of my childhood were the novels not only of those like Scott, Cooper, Clemens and so many others, but those by women as well. One of my favorite woman authors was Geneva Grace Stratton-Porter. She wrote her first novel The Song of the Cardinal in 1903. The next story, Freckles, written 1904 is about an orphan who gets a job as a timber guard in the Limberlost, a forested swamp in Indiana. Due to an accident Freckles has only one hand; however, he falls in love with a young girl, the beautiful “Swamp Angel.” Believing he is impoverished, his mysterious, noble past is finally made known; he is the nephew of “Lord O’More.” The book was made into a film in 1935 followed by a remake in 1960.


A Girl of the Limberlost
written in 1911, and also made into the film I mentioned, is about a poor girl, Elnora Comstock, who grows up on the edge of the Limberlost swamp. Her father had died tragically, and when her mother is withdrawn and cold toward her she finds companionship with the Limberlost. There she discovers how Limberlost can teach her in ways no formal education could.


Sharing a like love of nature, Geneva’s life at the Limberlost from which she drew so much of her writing had much in common with that of Henry’s at Walden. In many ways Geneva’s writing prepared me for my life as a boy in the Sequoia National Forest, and for the later friendship and kinship I would find with Henry.


Of all her several novels and writing, Freckles and A Girl of the Limberlost continue to be most vivid in my memory. There are two incidents remarked of the young forester that made a great impression on me when I first read the book; the first being his coming across a footprint in the forest made by his Swamp Angel. After pressing his lips to her imprint, the young man uses a piece of bark from a tree to carefully cover and protect this precious evidence of “his angel.” The second incident occurs when the young man is abed recovering from wounds received from rescuing the angel. She declares her love for him at this time, and says “he shall have his angel” notwithstanding his seeming poverty, his ancestry not then known, and his being crippled.


Elnora was the girl counterpart of me as a boy. Her evident love of nature, her courage, and sense of exploration and adventure made us soul mates from the moment I started reading the book. It was not so much Sheena of the Jungle with whom I related, but Elnora of the Limberlost. Tom Sawyer had Becky Thatcher; I had Elnora Comstock to whom I wanted to be a hero just like the young forester to his angel.


Life has a cruel way at times making cynics of people, and the universities and Hollywood substituting their versions of “reality” for good books and the exercising of ones imagination, trading the coarse and profane “literature” of those who obviously could never relate to Scott, Cooper, and Geneva, had they even known of them, those who never realized or cared what was being betrayed our young people were deprived of the very best humankind had to offer by way of civilized thought and manners, cheated and betrayed of the real progress of civilization. As a result, the Angel, Elnora, and the young forester have been cheated and betrayed as well, as have I.


Somehow, the sop to women on the part of the committee adding Austen, Cather, Elliot, and Woolf to the Great Books does not go nearly far enough. Honoring the “compatibility of differences” is not seen at the United Nations, nor is it seen in America. Perhaps it can only be seen and understood by those like Elnora, the young forester and his angel, by those who can understand them and enter into the kind of relationship that honors and dignifies the compatibility of differences.


Few today could read either Emerson or Thoreau without yawning or becoming glassy-eyed, few today could read Geneva without thinking her writing altruistic, simplistic, or at the best “quaint.” But we seek in vain for any marked advance of civilized good manners and morality that has supplanted these works of the past and the standards of beauty they championed.

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by samheath on Saturday, August 26, 2006 at 08:36 AM
Report a Violation
Viewed 322 times
17 comments from 7 users

1

posted by tchudilowsky on Aug 26, 2006 at 09:57 AM
I thought beauty was in the eye of the beer holder.....? hummm
posted by tonyh on Aug 26, 2006 at 10:04 AM
I've read writings from both, Emerson and Thoreau. They lived in, and experienced a different world than the one around us today. Better or worse is purely ones own perspective. Even then, Thoreau was horribly tortured by his own demons and prefered to seek refuge and take comfort in a more simplistic existence.


I think that there is a certain nostalgia felt for by-gone times in general, because we're familiar with the past. With familiarity, comes comfort. Since we haven't jet experienced the future, human nature is to feel discomfort for the unknown. It is healthy and rejuvenating to periodically retreat to the comfort of familiarity. 


People need to do more of this..............
posted by tonyh on Aug 26, 2006 at 10:11 AM
tchudilowsky

I guess you're not a Liturature Buff............Sorry......... 

Perspective from different Authors certainly spark deep thought. It even effects the way you look at things in everyday life. True intelligence isn't gauged by what a person knows. It's gauged by what a person is able to understand.
posted by tonyh on Aug 26, 2006 at 10:26 AM
The world is covered in beautiful women. It's just up to us to recognize and admire it in them. Honestly, I've only met 3 women in my entire life who had no reedeming qualities whatsoever. The rest have SOMETHING to appreciate and admire. ;-)

posted by dgrealish on Aug 26, 2006 at 10:40 AM

You've given me several books to add to my already lengthy reading list.  Thank you.  Now for you, a movie you may or may not have seen about pure inner beauty turning outward.  It's The Enchanted Cottage with Robert Young and Dorothy McGuire.  It's always been a favorite of mine.

posted by samheath on Aug 26, 2006 at 11:03 AM
Thanks so much Debra, and yes The Enchanted Cottage is on my list of favorites as well. You summed the film so very nicely and how many an ugly duckling becomes a swan. While it has become a cliche the truth of matter remains: "They don't make them like that anymore."
posted by sagefever on Aug 26, 2006 at 12:13 PM
 Reading something from the "past", be it Shakespeare,or Thoreau, requires one to get out of everyday  speech and  thought patterns.That is hard to do for most folks, but I find ,for myself,thats when I learn..seeing from a perspective not your own either firms up or alters your beliefs.
posted by dgrealish on Aug 26, 2006 at 12:37 PM
I find, when I read Russian literature, I begin to speak and think in those patterns until the book is finished and finally out of my system.
posted by samheath on Aug 26, 2006 at 12:49 PM
That is true sagefever, and if one is to firm or alter beliefs this is best done by the great literature and art by those who offer us the best insights to what is true and beautiful. We may have to know both the diabolical and divine, but how much better for us to submit to the divine and fill our thoughts and actions with the best resulting from this. Unhappily there is a duty on the part of those who appreciate beauty to do battle against its enemies, a battle I would far rather not fight.
posted by samheath on Aug 26, 2006 at 12:52 PM
Oh my, Debra, now you reminded me of the Russian poets who claim America is a nation without a soul.
posted by dgrealish on Aug 26, 2006 at 12:55 PM

Oh please, don't say that.  It's only because I find the speech patterns beautiful.

posted by TomW on Aug 26, 2006 at 12:59 PM
Maxim Gorky is a great playwright, though you have to learn alot about Russian culture to get a lot of the information.  Forms of address (using how much and what parts of each person's name conveys a lot).  As for a country without a soul, many of the Russian poets seem to confuse deep despair with having a soul.  I don't fault them.  If you've been to Russia and not felt some despair, you may not have a soul.
posted by TomW on Aug 26, 2006 at 01:05 PM

dg, it is a lovely language.  The formality of the speech and the music that is present is hard to reflect in English because of the history of our language.  The French takeover of the English court in the 1100s (?) softened our language considerably and while we have had periods where formality was the norm, most of the rigid structure was only in the upper classes.

posted by samheath on Aug 26, 2006 at 01:05 PM
Dear Debra, it was not meant to be a reflection on what you have found in Russian literature. But your acute comment did jar my memory of the accusation made by Russian poets, one that in too many ways is haunting in its perception.

Tom, you are right about Russia and the despair, the kind of despair that comes through clearly in the Russian poets and playwrights.
posted by steveeswenson on Aug 26, 2006 at 08:55 PM
Mocus,
   I have and I will. Thank you for your delightful comment.
posted by tchudilowsky on Aug 27, 2006 at 08:46 PM
Tonyh, take your shots at someone else..It was a joke!
posted by tonyh on Aug 28, 2006 at 06:47 AM
That wasn't a "Shot", it was an explaination of sorts.............
1

Leave a Comment
Ground Rules for posting comments:
  • No profanity or personal attacks.
  • Please comment on the subject of the post itself.
If you do not follow these rules we will remove your comment. Please keep it civil.

To protect users from spam, please enter the text from the image on the left.
   

Our readers recommend: