|
The Weedpatch Gazette The Weedpatch Gazette The Weedpatch Gazette The Weedpatch Gazette The Weedpatch Gazette The Weedpatch Gazette The Weedpatch Gazette The Weedpatch Gazette The Weedpatch Gazette The Weedpatch Gazette June 06 July 06 August 06 September 06 October 06 November 06 December 06 January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
“Curse God, and die.”
While “Amadeus” was a beautiful Oscar winning film, and quite deservedly so academics do not credit Salieri actually hating and plotting against Mozart; some antipathy yes, but not hatred. However, the point is well taken, that those like Salieri have a real problem trying to understand why God would gift someone like Mozart with such genius, even causing some to hate those like Mozart who do not fit the mold of those that produce works of such sensitive, beautifully artistic greatness. And this kind of hatred for Mozart as an example portrayed by Shaffer is not overdrawn in some cases; but the fact it can even turn into hatred for God is something else. In “The Apostle” Robert Duvall rails against God and Jesus, and he gave a pretty accurate performance of what some of us have done at times in our lives, especially in view of the ongoing wars and injustices, the monsters preying on women and children, the many things that are not a comforting view of God being in control of things and people, and raising the legitimate question of whether there is a God. For my part I’ve experienced enough of evil in the world to find no fault with atheists, and was it not easier for me to believe than not I could gladly join my atheist friends in their unbelief. As it is, I find the atheist position many times to be more comforting than my beliefs. How can so many things go wrong if there is a God? Well, some years ago I began to entertain the heretical thought that God makes mistakes. The basis for my thinking this was my many failures as a parent. I find one of the most honest statements in the Bible concerning God is in Genesis where we read he was actually sorry for creating humankind, and decided to shuck the whole species; a fairly human response that some parents have experienced when cursed with a poster child in favor of abortion. Then there are the many disappointments God had in his selection of various people throughout the Bible, people like David and Solomon for example. One of the most serious problems with many religions is expecting perfection of their deities, but at least those like the Greeks were not held in bondage to such gods. Greek mythology made room for Mozart, but Christian theology has a problem with him. The ways of the deities seem not always in accord with what many people expect, and it makes no sense why evil should always triumph over good, though this remains the rule rather than the exception throughout the history of our species. Perhaps if I had a mind capable of analyzing some great cosmic purpose to all the suffering and misery of humankind I would be of a different opinion. But like poor Tevye I do not see such a “big picture;” I can only view things from the human perspective. And from my mortal perspective, God makes mistakes. Dreams remain a mystery to me as do the Giza Pyramids, which to me are quite literally alien structures. It is a mystery how some of the ancients appear to have possessed knowledge and technology seemingly not possible for them. The Mayan Calendar, celestial maps made before the invention of the telescope and other such things are genuine mysteries at odds with what we know of ancient people and civilizations; which is one reason I credit the Bible as a source book for knowledge of some mysteries. Sometimes it does seem to me “The Mummy” film of 1999 makes more sense than the science of today, and I find myself almost wishing for things of the supernatural in attempts to make sense of our world. I want a solution as simple as “Rescue the damsel in distress, kill the bad guy, and save the world,” a solution that has the Winston Havelock’s at the ready to do battle against impossible odds because they have heroic natures and will settle for nothing less than going down in flaming glory! But in large part it is the mysteries that keep me going, that keep my mind active trying to find the various pieces of a puzzle that fit in hope the picture will finally begin to emerge and make sense. It is within this context it seems more probable to me God makes mistakes rather than being omniscient, omnipotent, and omnipresent. Perhaps God delegates authority to angels, and maybe these messengers don’t always perform according to instructions and expectations. Whatever the case may be, we do know there are mysteries a’ plenty to challenge the most agile minds, and many of them defy our present science to explain. And some like Mozart might even elicit anger if not downright hatred for God. This, to my mind, is where the Devil might play a key role. It was the Devil telling God that if Job did not enjoy the favor of God he could cause Job to curse God. The Devil may not have won that round, but it might explain a world given over to evil, one where the Devil takes care of his own. And here is an attendant mystery; why is Barack Obama running for President? It was a given he would make himself a target, that some James Earl Ray would quite literally be gunning for him. Can such a bizarre thing make any sense apart from the supernatural? The man surely knew he would be hated and despised by many just for his campaigning for President; he surely knew he wasn’t bulletproof. Then why do it? Even now, who in their right mind would want to expose themselves to the wrath of the Clintons given the many dark acts they may well have perpetrated? It doesn’t make any sense, and that is why I am more than willing to accept there are things of the supernatural at work in the world. On the face of it Obama might not survive the campaign, and if he does what are the odds he would last long as President if elected? Not good. And so, Obama remains a mystery. Adding not a little to the mystery is how those with money supporting his candidacy could ever be persuaded to back him? A possible answer for me is the Devil’s work. Obama’s candidacy provides ample opportunity for the Evil One to do all kinds of damage to America. If ever there was a candidate that could lose by winning, Barack Obama epitomizes such a one. It doesn’t take much imagination to realize what the assassination of Obama as either a candidate or the President would do to America. And who but the Devil (or Dr. Frankenstein) some might say would resurrect Ralph Nader? Well, life and death remain the ultimate mysteries they have ever been. And sometimes even the lesser mysteries take center stage when brilliant people make stupid blunders, and God seems to gift an undeserving Mozart causing some to even entertain the notion of Job’s wife to “curse God, and die” being preferable to some of the suffering this poor old world has seen and continues to be subject to. I admit some of the evil I have experienced in my own life gives me not a little sympathy for the point of view of Job’s wife, and as I have said some appreciation for the point of view held by atheists. But, so long as there remain mysteries so long will I continue to want to make some sense of them though oftentimes the search leads down some dark and threatening alleys of the mind including God not being the “perfect parent,” and like earthly parents perhaps needing the help and cooperation of the child if they are not to bring grief to both themselves and their parents. And I hope you understand my wondering at times if God isn’t asking for our cooperation because he not only wants but actually needs our cooperation. But I go a step further in my heterodoxy by asking God at times if he won’t please speak a little louder so I can hear him.
3 comments from 3 users
1
posted by
witbee
on Feb 25, 2008 at 05:30 PM
When you trace evil deeds back far enough, the source is always human. Why blame God for what a man has done? He never promised a good life, He promised an everlasting one. posted by
randomfactor
on Feb 25, 2008 at 05:35 PM
posted by
Learning
on Feb 25, 2008 at 06:25 PM
no... The problem of evil has been kicking butt in philosophy circles again over the last decade. Long regarded as a low-tech argument that didn't come to much in the end, a new generation of logicians and thinkers has discovered that it is, in fact, a tough little cookie for theists to try to digest. The problem is simply stated: if God is an all-powerful, all-knowing and all-good entity, then why is there evil in the world? Take the following example: a good and pious grandmother, a healthy widow in her 50s, is in her home alone, knitting a shawl for one of her poor cold grandchildren when BLAMMO!!! her hut is pulverized by a meteorite and she is squished. Why did that evil thing happen if God is all-powerful and all-knowing and all-good? She knew it would happen, she could have prevented it with no more than an idle thought, but she let it happen. She knew that the meteorite would strike that very spot when she made the universe and did nothing to alter her design, knowing that an innocent and good person might well be living there. Let's consider the standard answers given by theists. 1. Humans have free will so God cannot be blamed for the consequences of the decisions they make. Well, in this example, it was not other humans that did the evil, it was the world that God made. There is no plausible story that decisions made by grandma or by other people were the cause of the evil event. Furthermore, would this be a convincing defense by a murderer in a court of law? "Hey! You can't pin this on me! The old lady chose to live in the house I blew up?" Of course not. 2. We cannot know the ultimate consequences of things: maybe it is actually GOOD that the good grandmother was squashed by the meteorite!. It is difficult to see any plausible chain of events leading to "good" which could justify this particular "evil." Also, this answer commits one to a consequentialist ethics, a view the vast majority of theists would reject immediately. Finally, think: would this argument convince you to acquit an indicted murderer? "Hey! You can't find me guilty! Maybe by blowing her up in her house, I prevented a worse evil in the future! You don't know everything!" 3. Human morality does not constrain God's actions: those laws only apply to human ethics. This answer begs the question: after all, the theist will tell us they know what is good and what is evil and it is the theist who claims that God is good rather than evil. What does that mean if not "good" the way we understand "good?" Again, imagine a serial killer telling you, the jurist, that you cannot judge him because he is above and beyond your ethics. 4. That was Satan's doing, not God's. God would not send the meteor to hit grandma's hut. This is no answer at all. God could have prevented the evil with but a swish of will, without even lifting a finger. She chooses to allow the meteor to follow its path SMACK! right into the hut. And this answers nothing, because God could have made the world at the beginning to have the meteorite miss the Earth completely. Imagine your horror at hearing a lawyer claim that their client wasn't responsible for the crime because, even though they could have stopped the detonation with no effort, inconvenience, or risk on their part, they chose to do nothing more but watch. 5. This story does not depict "evil" but "nature": "evil" requires an act of will which nature does not possess. Well, but the story does contain acts of will, the acts of will of a God who decides not to prevent this awful thing from happening, who wills to knowingly create a world which randomly destroys persons without warning, a God who watches these horrible things occurring but chooses them to proceed. 6. She is going to a better place. This defense would never be acceptable in a court of law. Every murderer who killed a good and pious person would be absolved because they destroyed lives but therefore sent souls to a better place. So I think RF gives up too much when he argues that humans are capable of accounting for all the evil in the world. If you believe in an all-powerful, all-knowing creator, then only she could be responsible for the evil that occurs because of the world she created but does not prevent from causing great harm.
1
Our readers recommend: |