|
The Weedpatch Gazette The Weedpatch Gazette The Weedpatch Gazette The Weedpatch Gazette The Weedpatch Gazette The Weedpatch Gazette The Weedpatch Gazette The Weedpatch Gazette The Weedpatch Gazette The Weedpatch Gazette June 06 July 06 August 06 September 06 October 06 November 06 December 06 January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08 November 08 December 08 January 09 February 09 March 09 April 09 May 09 June 09 July 09 August 09 September 09 October 09 November 09
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Tealeaves and Al Gore
Al Gore: “It isn’t pollution that’s harming the environment. It’s the impurities in our air and water that are doing it.” I’m not about to cast stones when someone is speaking ex tempore and winds up with their foot in their mouth. And while politicians have been known for making disastrous gaffes, Al is easily forgiven for many of his since they are made with sincerity and the best of intentions in most cases. Say what anyone will, credit is being given Al for being a man of sincere conviction. But from the White House on down We the People are confronted by politicians that are not only transparent in a lack of sincerity and conviction but in degrees of stupidity as well. Take this comment by Marion Barry while Mayor of Washington, DC for example: “Outside of the killings, Washington has one of the lowest crime rates in the country.” However, since Oscar Night Al Gore has become the darling of Hollywood; i.e. the far left. And a Nobel Peace Prize for Al? The possibilities boggle the mind! It has pundits abuzz, Obama reaching for his security blanket, and Hillary punching out her husband! Ok, I made that one up but you know what I mean. But think of the possibilities; an American President sporting an Oscar-winning film and a Nobel! Even those that don’t like Al have to admit that brings a lot to the table for the sake of American prestige. And speaking of “tables,” Pat Buchanan might be wrong about Al needing to shed forty pounds; America has a lot of people sympathetic to corpulence, and there have been a number of “full figure” men in the White House; Cal Coolidge was even forgiven fishing for trout with worms. My reading of the tealeaves ever since Gore ran for President and lost to Bush may prove remarkably accurate despite Al’s protestations. I wrote at the time Al had not stopped running for President and would continue to run. As I put it then, you don’t come that close to the gold ring and simply give up trying. I don’t pretend prescience; I certainly did not know how big a hit Al would become in Hollywood let alone a contender for the Nobel. But I did have a sixth sense about Al; there was just something about him that seemed to bring out the Psi factor in me. Gerry Trudeau’s problem with Ronald Reagan was summed up by a strip where Santa is checking his list. When he came to Reagan’s name, Santa was having difficulty. There were all those naughty things Reagan had done, but while Santa was struggling to make a decision saying “But he’s just so…” Seeing Santa’s struggle, Zonker in the role of the elf types in the word “Nice” next to Reagan’s name as Santa breathes a heavy sigh of resignation. Despite all the naughty things Reagan had done, Santa just couldn’t get past nice. Reagan was nice. Many politicians since have ignored the evils of the Reagan Presidency and traded on his being a nice fellow. Reagan had a genuine gift of portraying “nice” and that carried a lot of weight; and continues to do so. In fact, there are those that believe he belongs right there on Mount Rushmore. Well, such people are what I call the “victims of nice,” ignoring things like Iran/Contra and Reagan opening the floodgates to millions of illegal aliens from Mexico and abandoning control of our borders for the sake of profits. But there is no discounting the power of nice. On April 8, 2004 I wrote: Al Gore still gets my vote for one weird but likable guy; at least I still like him. Al reads books; I don’t fault him for the strange twists his mind takes. But hey, I still like Jerry Brown and Al Sharpton… It is one of the reasons besides his reading and writing books I have a genuine liking for Al Gore: His call for the resignation of the architects of the so-called “war on terrorism” beginning with those of the ilk of Rumsfeld, Rice, Wolfowitz, Tenet, et al. is absolutely correct. It would be a real plus to get rid of Paige and Ridge as well. Who in their right mind believes these two should have any authority in respect to education and security for America? Too bad the Democrats appear to be stuck with their scoundrel hypocrite Kerry, the sorry alternative for “Anybody But Bush!” Americans. While Hitler’s underlings “were just following orders,” while Hitler received “credit” as the architect of Nazism, his generals and others faced Nuremberg, the verdict of both that tribunal and that of history. I maintain Caesar Bush and his underlings will yet face a “Nuremberg” in absentia if not in reality though like Speer, Powell may escape the ultimate sentence by the court. Now, what Al needs to do, in my opinion, is point out in addition to the list of crimes on the part of Caesar’s underlings, is Caesar’s own betrayal of America through selling out our nation…with the cooperation of a treasonous Congress refusing to secure our borders and for betraying We the People to a half trillion dollar debt, Globalization, Outsourcing, NAFTA, CAFTA, La Raza, Mexico, and Saudi Arabia, all with the clear intent of making Americans slave labor to benefit the wealthy, ruling elite! Let’s hear more Americans like Al using the word IMPEACH! With the proviso that Caesar take his fellow traitor and co-conspirator Cheney with him. I was delighted to catch Arianna Huffington on Lou Dobbs. Her latest book “Fanatics and Fools” comes down on the side of the fools. Of course, given the title, how could she miss? That is really covering your bases. Much as I despise Kerry, my first thought listening to Arianna was how, by way of contrast, I like Jerry “Moonbeam” Brown. A Gerry Trudeau strip that pretty well summed up Jerry’s politics, when asked why anyone should vote for him, Moonbeam, who was campaigning in his old Plymouth at the time, replies: “Because I’m best qualified to wing it.” It’s that kind of political philosophy that endears Jerry Brown, Al Gore, and Al Sharpton to me. While I read Arianna Huffington’s column among several others pro and con on people and issues, she knows most of us realize Al Gore may be not only the anti-Hillary, but the only viable option we are left with when the dust finally settles of so much corruption throughout both Republican and Democrat parties. And all of us know a number of very significant things can happen between now and the next presidential election, but how many Americans believe anything good will happen. And that is what the think tanks, politicos and pundits really should be burning the midnight oil over. When there is nothing but doomsday scenarios abounding in all directions, when politicians are proven to be corrupt liars and continue to steal and lie to us wholesale We the People have just cause to hold those having the rule over us accountable. Then there is Al Gore who is a very smart fellow, but whether he is correct or not about global warming it is obvious there are a great many “inconvenient truths” facing politicians right now based on stubborn facts not theories. A cautionary word about Al Gore’s crusade over global warming: Folks, bear in mind that while Al Gore has proven himself an ass on more than one occasion it should be remembered as a cautionary caveat to his detractors that Balaam’s ass spoke the truth. (End) For my part, I do not believe humankind is to blame for global warming. But I do believe Al Gore has made a coup that may well sweep him into office should he decide to run again for President. Nice counted for a lot with Reagan, and many people overlooked the naughty for the sake of the nice. And what with the mounting sleaze in government sincerity, right or wrong, may well be the equivalent to nice that puts Al in office should he decide to run. The big question after the total disaster of Bush is whether Republicans will have a candidate that can run against someone who not only projects sincerity and conviction, has an Oscar-winning film to his credit and may also have a Nobel Prize, but also reads books? A further cautionary thought. As improbable as it may be, what if events do result in a war crimes tribunal for Caesar Bush and Company? None of the leaders of Germany or Japan credited any such possibility and look what happened to them. But I ask who better than Al Gore as President if such a thing should happen to lend any credibility to such a tribunal? He may not have thought about this, but it is something I would tell Al he should factor into his decision of whether to run or not. 47 comments from 9 users
1
posted by
dusty1215
on Feb 27, 2007 at 12:32 PM
posted by
samheath
on Feb 27, 2007 at 12:38 PM
Thanks Dusty, and yes I have read it.
posted by
randomfactor
on Feb 27, 2007 at 02:27 PM
I'd support Gore too. He won once, he could do it again. . By the way, Sam, your "pollution" quote in the first paragraph is generally attributed to that mental pygmy J. Danforth Quayle. Except that even *HE* isn't that dumb--it was a made-up quote from Mad Magazine. (Although Quayle said quite a few things nearly as twisted.) posted by
randomfactor
on Feb 27, 2007 at 02:37 PM
posted by
samheath
on Feb 27, 2007 at 02:38 PM
Could be, but even if Al didn't say it let's not go where dumb things are said by even the best and brightest.
posted by
blognroll
on Feb 27, 2007 at 02:38 PM
"He won once, he could do it again." Yeah, he won alright. He won at cherry-picking counties that would deliver the goods, if you know what I mean. BTW, stay tuned to my new song, Warming Up to Al Gore. posted by
samheath
on Feb 27, 2007 at 02:42 PM
Ok Blognroll, I'll be waiting for the tune.
posted by
randomfactor
on Feb 27, 2007 at 02:45 PM
BLT, he won the popular vote outright, and if the recount had been done the way BUSH wanted it, he'd have won the Florida electoral votes. Yeah, I know what you mean, you're just wrong about it. Bush v. Gore will be talked about for decades to come as the Dred Scott decision of our times. . (Happens I'm about 2/3 of the way through a book of essays on the 2000 "Unfinished" election.) posted by
samheath
on Feb 27, 2007 at 02:54 PM
People reading this post will note I have not engaged in the debate about Gore's not exactly being "green" in his own use of energy sources. My reason for not doing so is whether Democrat or Republican there is always enough hypocrisy to go around. Politicans remain politicians.
posted by
randomfactor
on Feb 27, 2007 at 02:56 PM
posted by
samheath
on Feb 27, 2007 at 03:03 PM
That is definitely POV; and the shame remains whatever party.
posted by
blognroll
on Feb 27, 2007 at 03:27 PM
posted by
robbwillis
on Feb 27, 2007 at 03:30 PM
posted by
randomfactor
on Feb 27, 2007 at 03:34 PM
Suits me. There's no way of undefecating the bed at this point anyway. . But I'm not wrong. Gore 51,003,926. Bush 50,460,110. http://www.aei.org/docLib/2... (from that pinko organization the American Enterprise Institute): "Rather than dimples or not-dimples, the deciding factor in the recount was inclusion of all ballots or only a subset of ballots. And the deciding line was very simple--if all of the ballots were counted there were enough potential Al Gore votes to give him victory, but any smaller subset of ballots would retain or even enlarge George W. Bush’s margin." Oddly enough, as I said, if there had been a statewide recount (as Bush argued for) Gore would have won. If there'd been a limited one (as Gore thought was legally supportable) Bush would have won. But the entire Florida election was screwed up in so many different ways that it's a bit like determining the killer in "Murder on the Orient Express." They *ALL* did it. posted by
randomfactor
on Feb 27, 2007 at 03:36 PM
posted by
samheath
on Feb 27, 2007 at 03:37 PM
Love the lavish movie. And that's a good place to leave it.
posted by
motopoet
on Feb 27, 2007 at 03:38 PM
posted by
motopoet
on Feb 27, 2007 at 03:46 PM
posted by
randomfactor
on Feb 27, 2007 at 03:51 PM
"Gore gets a pass?" When did *THIS* happen? . I laugh at Bush's "make the pie higher" statements--but that's not why he's an idiot. And he *IS* an idiot. . Jimmy Carter was, in fact, a naval officer and successful governor before becoming President. His main problem was unfamiliarity with the arcane processes of Washington--and a huge dose of bad luck. posted by
samheath
on Feb 27, 2007 at 03:54 PM
If Carter was a victim of bad luck he has made a profession out of it.
posted by
randomfactor
on Feb 27, 2007 at 03:55 PM
Neither of those "two darlings" will likely wind up as the Democratic candidate. Enjoy the show already. The Iraq war is going to unravel what's left of the Republican Party in 2008. . As for "getting over" Florida 2000, there are lessons to be learned from that history. Unless you'd care to repeat the mistakes. I, for one, would like to see things done better in the future, both in Florida and in Kern County. posted by
samheath
on Feb 27, 2007 at 04:14 PM
Agreed Murphy. Which is why I enjoy the whimsy of thinking and writing about Al.
posted by
randomfactor
on Feb 27, 2007 at 04:15 PM
posted by
robbwillis
on Feb 27, 2007 at 04:44 PM
posted by
dusty1215
on Feb 27, 2007 at 04:46 PM
posted by
samheath
on Feb 27, 2007 at 04:50 PM
I know Dusty. I even wrote a book on the subject of romance; but a lot of women like it.
posted by
dusty1215
on Feb 27, 2007 at 04:54 PM
I assume you've been *HERE*, Dusty: http://www.ipetitions.com/p...
Of course m'dear..all of them. posted by
dusty1215
on Feb 27, 2007 at 05:02 PM
posted by
samheath
on Feb 27, 2007 at 05:07 PM
The "romance" is there in all those motivated to try to achieve something good by their lives.
posted by
dusty1215
on Feb 27, 2007 at 05:19 PM
posted by
samheath
on Feb 27, 2007 at 05:29 PM
Which is what motivated me to write a book on the subject of romance. People aren't simple and neither is romance.
posted by
dusty1215
on Feb 27, 2007 at 05:37 PM
posted by
samheath
on Feb 27, 2007 at 05:46 PM
Thanks Dusty; no offense taken. I simply never know where the muse will take me. Old as I am I haven't lost the sense of adventure.
posted by
dusty1215
on Feb 27, 2007 at 06:03 PM
posted by
samheath
on Feb 27, 2007 at 06:08 PM
There is a good line in "Dances With Wolves:" No man (or woman) can tell another what to do. I long ago came to that same conclusion. My only advantage is being able to live alone with my thoughts.
posted by
dusty1215
on Feb 27, 2007 at 06:22 PM
posted by
samheath
on Feb 27, 2007 at 06:27 PM
We need leadership, but it must be virtuous leadership. In this respect it isn't a matter of telling people what to do but leading that counts. There is a vacuum of leadership at present, and I can only hope someone of virtue will come to the rescue. It may be Al Gore; I don't know.
posted by
dusty1215
on Feb 27, 2007 at 06:33 PM
posted by
samheath
on Feb 27, 2007 at 06:41 PM
That is the pragmatic truth of the matter. Fortunately, or other, Don Quixote still lives in the breasts of a few. Got to sign off but appreciate your thoughts Dusty as well as those of others.
posted by
dusty1215
on Feb 27, 2007 at 06:41 PM
posted by
tonyh
on Feb 27, 2007 at 06:46 PM
Sorry Sam, I gotta' disagree with you on this one. Every Villiage needs and Idiot. Al Gore is an Idiot. He's made up of 40% Stupid, and the rest, water and salt. His Father was a really bright guy though. When you mentioned Jerry Brown, were you talking about "Governer Moonbeam", or his Father? The Son is a certified NUT. His Father was fairly squared away. They're both really good for their entertainment value. I can always use a good laugh. Nice piece though.....................Thanks for writing and sharing it with us. I enjoyed it. P.S. Dan Quayle and Ross Perot falls into the same category as far as I'm concerned. posted by
GordonDelano
on Feb 27, 2007 at 07:17 PM
Sam I really have enjoyed your posts. Especially this one. The main problem as I see it is this. In recent years we haven't had anyone REALLY QUALIFIED to be President. The events of the last two Presidential elections have made me wonder if we will survive the turmoil preceding the one coming up. So far in the lineup of candidates, I don't see anyone I would consider voting for. Not one candidate without a huge load of baggage. As a friend in the Cal. State University system commented: "Regents, Administrators and Politicians, they're all thieves." posted by
tonyh
on Feb 27, 2007 at 07:35 PM
GordonDelano, Unfortunately, your friend is oh, so right, and it's a crying shame. posted by
dusty1215
on Feb 28, 2007 at 12:58 AM
posted by
Katatak
on Feb 28, 2007 at 07:06 AM
I have changed some of my thinking about the 2000 election and now believe there were shenanigans to deny Al Gore the presidency. Bush's subsequent misperformance in office lends credibility to those who believe he stole the office. I don't know which is the significant cause of Global Warming but health has definitely changed. One hundred years ago death by heart attack was rare and now it is commonplace. Is this a cost of doing business with modernization? In Burma, where modernization is a hundred years behind the times, it is rare to die of a heart attack.posted by
GordonDelano
on Feb 28, 2007 at 03:48 PM
dusty1215 Baggage carried by politicians equals misdeeds perpetrated while in office or preceding his or her election. While lack of experience can be a boat anchor tied around a fledgling politician's neck. In Kennedy' case, running against Nixon, hated by many voters, gaining the Presidency was fairly easy. His lack of experience and being a Catholic no doubt was a negative factor. He did prove to be capable. In the case of Obama, inexperience in governing could very well saddle him with a boat anchor, (baggage)." Only time will tell. posted by
randomfactor
on Feb 28, 2007 at 04:00 PM
Another take on Obama's "baggage" and "inexperience." *NATIONAL* inexperience, maybe. *POLITICAL* inexperience, never:
1
Advertisement |