A blog about Politics.
About siouxcityranch


Gender:
male
Date of Birth:
October 31, 1953
Member Since:
March 14, 2006
Last Signed In:
November 26, 2009
Profile Views:
3324
Blog Views:
64777
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
The White House's unprecedented use of 'unprecedented'
Oprah betrayed
First Lady Michelle Obama Hates Oprah Winfrey. So Much For That Sense Of Entitlement
MICHELLE OBAMA HATES OPRAH
White House: Obama Afghan decision 'within days'
New Map Bolsters Case for Ancient Ocean on Mars
Obama could lock in Afghanistan decision Monday
Will Minorities Get Enough Out of the Economic Stimulus?
Michelle Stabs Oprah In The Back !
Palin limits crowd interaction at NC's Fort Bragg
Archives
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
December 08
January 09
February 09
March 09
April 09
May 09
June 09
July 09
August 09
September 09
October 09
November 09

 

 
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


siouxcityranch - > -> NKorea threatens to expand nuclear arsenal
NKorea threatens to expand nuclear arsenal

SEOUL, South Korea – North Korea issued a veiled threat Monday to increase its nuclear arsenal if U.S. officials do not quickly agree to the one-on-one talks that the communist regime is demanding.

The regime's impatience came days after No. 2 nuclear negotiator Ri Gun came away from meetings with Washington envoy Sung Kim without an agreement to hold bilateral talks.

"If the U.S. is not ready to sit at a negotiating table with the (North), it will go its own way," the North's Foreign Ministry said in a statement carried by Pyongyang's official Korean Central News Agency.

The statement did not elaborate, but it was widely seen as a warning that the North will bolster its nuclear stockpile — a brinksmanship tactic that the communist nation has often employed.

In September, the North said it was "weaponizing" plutonium, a key ingredient for nuclear bombs, and succeeded in uranium enrichment, which would give the regime a second way to make atomic bombs. That was also seen as a pressure tactic aimed at getting Washington to agree to one-on-one negotiations.

North Korea has mixed such threats with a series of conciliatory moves, such as releasing two detained American journalists, after months of raising tensions with nuclear and missile tests. The North has also quit the six-nation nuclear disarmament talks — which involve China, Japan, Russia, the U.S. and the two Koreas.

North Korea and the U.S. fought on opposite sides of the Korean War of the 1950s and do not have diplomatic relations. Both nations have tanks and troops on guard at the heavily fortified border dividing the two Koreas.

Pyongyang claims it must develop atomic weapons to defend itself against nuclear threats from the U.S. The regime has long sought direct negotiations with Washington saying it was because of U.S. nuclear threats that the country develop nuclear bombs.

Washington has denied it has any intention of attacking the North. But Defense Secretary Robert Gates assured Seoul last month that Washington was prepared to unleash all military capabilities — including its nuclear might — to defend the longtime ally.

Pyongyang's main Rodong Sinmun newspaper blasted Gates' remarks, saying the U.S. is trying to provoke a nuclear war on the Korean peninsula.

The paper said in a commentary carried by KCNA that the North's "nuclear deterrent will be bolstered" if the U.S. refuses to switch its "policy of aggression" toward the North.

On Monday, the North's ministry also said that "meaningful progress" on a nuclear-free Korean peninsula is possible — "if the hostile relations between the (North) and the U.S. are settled and confidence is built between them."

Washington has maintained that it is willing to engage North Korea in bilateral talks — if they lead to the resumption of the stalled six-nation disarmament talks.

North Korea's Ri, who was in the U.S. at the invitation of private organizations, said discussions with the U.S. envoy were "useful," South Korea's Yonhap news agency reported. Still, both KCNA and State Department officials in Washington said no decision had been made on holding bilateral talks.

The North agreed in 2007 to disable its nuclear facilities — as a step toward its ultimate dismantlement — in exchange for energy aid and political concessions. Pyongyang halted the process and later abandoned the pact after receiving most of the promised energy aid and concessions.

The standoff led to Pyongyang conducting its second nuclear test and banned missile tests earlier this year.

 

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by siouxcityranch on Monday, November 2, 2009 at 02:11 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 43 times
8 comments from 5 users

1

posted by siouxcityranch on Nov 2, 2009 at 02:25 PM

Ya well they keep it up and i got two more months Witters then im gonna go fart those litte [edit.] of the face of the earth..

posted by jfrancais on Nov 2, 2009 at 02:29 PM

Let me know ahead of time so I can have the MOPP gear ready.

posted by randomfactor on Nov 2, 2009 at 02:30 PM

Sioux is gonna break wind and you need a mop?   

posted by AudreyB on Nov 2, 2009 at 02:53 PM

I don't know Sioux.  North Korea is a pretty tough nut to crack and I think it's going to take more than flatulence to make them put down their nuclear weapons.

posted by jfrancais on Nov 2, 2009 at 02:57 PM

LMAO!!!!

MOPP is the uniform soldiers wear during nuclear or biological warfare.

posted by randomfactor on Nov 2, 2009 at 03:01 PM

Recognize the term, was just funnin' you. :)

posted by donmason on Nov 2, 2009 at 03:12 PM

The statement did not elaborate, but it was widely seen as a warning that the North will bolster its nuclear stockpile — a brinksmanship tactic that the communist nation has often employed.

 

In September, the North said it was "weaponizing" plutonium, a key ingredient for nuclear bombs, and succeeded in uranium enrichment, which would give the regime a second way to make atomic bombs. That was also seen as a pressure tactic aimed at getting Washington to agree to one-on-one negotiations.

 

Don’t sweat it Sioux, NK is just blowing smoke again.

 

Weaponizing Plutonium?  Vague statement at best. NK has a small (by western standards), nuclear reactor and the capability to produce plutonium is very limited. Consider that the best reactors in Hanford have a final output of one half of one percent plutonium from the entire contents of the reactor core once the fuel is exhausted and the reactor becomes unstable.

 

Then the entire pile content must go through some extensive processing to remove the tiny fraction of plutonium. Most of our radioactive hazardous waste problem is the result of plutonium separation from expended uranium.  Over 99% is waste product. Takes months to cook up a single batch for processing.

 

The cost is astronomical. 

 

Once the separated plutonium is purified, it’s still not “weaponized”. 

 

Considering that two tests (with the first an almost complete fizzle) have been done, NK probably used at least half of its plutonium stash already. 

 

The resulting first generation weapons are large, heavy, and not deliverable by any present NK weaponry. Takes a lot of tests to shrink ‘em down.

 

And the “enriched uranium” threat is a joke. Producing 90% enriched U-235 in usable quantities for a basic implosion weapon requires well over 25 pounds. A gun type "Hiroshima" bomb takes over 120 pounds.

 

Back during the early 1950’s, the USA used over 10% of its entire electrical generating capacity  to produce the equivalent of 20 uranium bombs per year, using the 200 billion dollar (today's dollars) separation complex at Oak Ridge Tenn.

 

NK..what a joke. Spend a huge chunk of GNP for nothing but an ego boost for the “fearless leader.”

posted by jfrancais on Nov 2, 2009 at 03:16 PM

My bad, RF.  I speak too much "hooah" sometimes.  Who knows, I still may need a mop.  Never know what tomato beer does to some people.

1

  (You need to be signed in to leave a comment)

Advertisement