A blog about Personal Journals and Animals.
About sys_mom


Gender:
female
Member Since:
March 14, 2006
Last Signed In:
November 22, 2009
Profile Views:
1644
Blog Views:
2113
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Congratulations!!!! Your Daughter's Not Dead-----Yet.
News from the North.
Original content vs Borrowed thoughts
"Homeland Security doesn’t make mistakes"
What questions are you seeking answers for at the town hall style meeting?
Lonesome George to be a New papa at the age of 90 well maybe 100
Has B of A found a new way to bail themselves out?
Found: California dog Microchipped in Saudi Arabia. Anyone missing a Saluki?
Readers Beware the Things You Read on the Internet Just Might Be Untrue.
I hate it when stuff like this happens.
Archives
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
December 08
January 09
February 09
March 09
April 09
May 09
June 09
July 09
August 09
September 09
October 09
November 09

Ben Franklin Quotes

http://www.quotationspage.c...

Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


sys_mom - > You Can Do Better Than That. -> I hate it when stuff like this happens.
I hate it when stuff like this happens.

Nazita Aminpour is suing Chase bank for telling her husband, David Shamash, about her secret account

Posted in May 1st, 2009

A wife, who hid $800,000 of her own money in a New York City bank, is suing the bank for telling her husband about the money.
Nazita Aminpour, a dentist from Long Island, New York, is suing Chase bank for $150,000, the amount she was forced to share with her husband, David Shamash, after a bank employee told him about the secret account.
The forty-three year old woman had a joint account at the bank with her 47-year-old husband, a custodial account for their three children and an account with her name only.
In a lawsuit that was filed in Queens Supreme Court, it alleged that during a cold calling conversation, an unidentified bank employee advised Shamash to move his small fortune from the low-interest bearing account into accounts that could earn him higher interest.
Shamash, who obviously did not know anything about the separate account, started harassing his wife for some money to invest in the stock market.
After being told “no” several times, Shamash then decided to ignore his wife, which caused her to fork over $155,000 to her husband.
In her suit, the dentist said the bank caused her duress, and not only is she asking for money she was forced to give her husband, she is also asking for legal fees.
Posted in the Family & Home interest group.
Topics: money
posted by sys_mom on Friday, May 1, 2009 at 12:38 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 109 times
5 comments from 5 users

1

posted by sys_mom on May 1, 2009 at 12:42 PM

Let this be a lesson to you ladies that want to keep your mad money a secret from your husbands.   Always use a different bank than your husband does.  DUH

posted by tchudilowsky on May 1, 2009 at 12:53 PM

 What a weenie bank! But her husband sounds like the bigger "chapped weenie"!"

No wonder she was hiding it from him. He sounds disgusting!

posted by notatroll on May 1, 2009 at 12:55 PM

Do you suppose these tactics would work at your house?  The husband "decided to ignore his wife, which caused her to fork over $155,000 to her husband."   Be sure to let us know if it works.

 

posted by Lingtaowoo on May 1, 2009 at 01:35 PM

Sounds like a problem between the husband/wife and bank...

posted by Shwaine on May 1, 2009 at 07:17 PM

Regardless of the marital status of the couple, the bank teller should not have released information about an account, not even admitting to its existance, to someone not on the account. What if someone just happened to have the same name as his wife (I know, not likely the case here given the names, but still illustrates the point).... would you want the bank teller letting someone know you banked there just because they shared the same name as yours?

On the flip side, she is the one that gave him the money. It is not as if the teller released funds to a non-authorized person. The bank should be fined in accordance for the leak of personal information, but not reimburse her for something she decided to do.

1

  (You need to be signed in to leave a comment)

Advertisement