A blog about News.
About talkofthetown


Member Since:
June 21, 2006
Last Signed In:
December 02, 2008
Profile Views:
10752
Blog Views:
147890
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Depressing Christmas cards
Leading Catholic: Disney has corrupted kids
Kid comes before designer jeans
Predicting the stock market
Judge: Obese fliers should get two airline seats
Palin's unfortunate interview backdrop!
Record number of pot plants seized in state
Safe haven or easy way out?
Where's the good gas prices news?
McDonald's shines in bad economy
Archives
June 06
July 06
August 06
September 06
October 06
November 06
December 06
January 07
February 07
March 07
April 07
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
December 08
More Archives
June 06
May 06
April 06
March 06
February 06
January 06
December 05
November 05
October 05
September 05
August 05
July 05
June 05
May 05
April 05

Blog Roll


Ask The Californian
Editorials
Entertainment
Eye of Bakersfield
Faith Forum
Fired Up!
Inside Sports
Neighbors
Right Thinking
Sound Off
Talk of the Town
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


talkofthetown - > Talk of the Town -> "In God We Trust" in all KHSD classrooms?
"In God We Trust" in all KHSD classrooms?

Kern High School District Trustee Chad Vegas wants “In God We Trust” to be posted in every classroom in the district.

Vegas said he plans to discuss his proposal at Monday night's Board of Trustees meeting. The board member said he strongly supports teaching government and history in schools.

Vegas said Bakersfield City Councilwoman Jacquie Sullivan’s non-profit organization “In God We Trust -- America, Inc.” will donate all the posters.

The Board of Trustees meets at 7 p.m. at the KHSD Administrative and Support Services Office, 5801 Sundale Ave.

What do you think?
Posted in these Groups:
Topics: bakersfield, Schools, KHSD, government
posted by talkofthetown on Sunday, September 30, 2007 at 05:45 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 1241 times
259 comments from 68 users

1 2 3 4 5 6

posted by woofwoof on Sep 30, 2007 at 08:15 PM
Church is for church.  The classroom is supposed to be a separation of church and state.....why is this always an issue that gets disregarded?
posted by theColorNine on Sep 30, 2007 at 08:26 PM

 

I am a Christian, and I oppose this proposal. 

   1)  Where is the extra money that Mr. Vegas thinks the school district has in order to defend the lawsuits that would be brought (and lost) should this proposal pass?

   2)  Require posters like this to be placed in every classroom, and I believe you would have to allow posters representing other religious beliefs (or non-beliefs). 

What an unmitigated mess this would be and a tremendous waste of resourses.

  

posted by Bakodude10 on Sep 30, 2007 at 09:03 PM
I don't know much about Mr. Vegas except that he's much more concerned about the God then he is about the education of our children.  He ought to stick to his pulpit and leave governing to people that understand the difference between church and state.
posted by drilnliftcrude on Sep 30, 2007 at 09:22 PM
In God We Trust posters in the classroom? Ohh noo, no,no. Those poor children. They'll be scarred for life.  And what about their lunch money?  Everytime they pull the money out of their pockets to get a little nourishment in their poor bellies, those four words are jumping out at them like some vampire to suck the soul's right out of them.
posted by linfestyp on Sep 30, 2007 at 10:16 PM

Good point, crude.   Teaching children to put trust in a deity who would order a tribe to smash the skulls of the babies of their enemy, as the judeo-Christian Bible does, would surely leave a scar on these kids for life. 

As far as Mr. Vegas goes, he knows this will never fly with the full board (at least one can hope).  Therefore, he is just trying to show off that he is defending his faith angainst a soulless society.  Whether it gets implemented or not is not the point.

posted by possummomma on Sep 30, 2007 at 10:27 PM

If this is allowed, I will personally sue the Kern HIgh School District for breaking the establishment clause.  If I wanted any reference to a deity to be permanantly affixed to my child's environment, I'd have sent them to private school.  It's bad enough that I have to carry money with a declaration that I consider divisive and imprudent. It's bad enough that my children have to recite a 19th century marketing tool at 8:00am, every morning, which declares this nation to be under God (but only since 1954).  If a sign goes up saying, "In God We Trust", then I will rally the troops for equal time and opportunity and place signs up that say "In logic and rationality we trust." 

posted by creepycat on Sep 30, 2007 at 10:41 PM

Why stop at "In God We Trust?" I think every classroom should also have the Ten Commandmants, the Sermon on the Mount, the Lord's Prayer, and the Boy Scout Motto. Each class should also have prayer before the bell rings, followed by the class singing "Yes, Jesus Loves Me."

Good grief, we have a President forcing his religion on us. That's why Americans are going to China and Mexico (yes, Mexico) for stem cell therapy.

If Mr. Vegas believes in teaching history & government, then he should realize that there is a reason for the separation of church and state. Suggesting the posters is bad enough. I'm not comfortable that a non-profit organization is lined-up to donate them. My child goes to school to get an education, not to get her soul saved. My misspent tax dollars go to maintain a school, not some religious agenda. Whatever needs to be said about the motto should be in the school history and government textbooks. 

posted by andrewrosenstein on Sep 30, 2007 at 10:55 PM
Can I initiate proceedings to get the Koran posted in his office?  The non-profit organization "Chad Vegas is a douchebag.org" will donate the Koran.

And Possummomma, I will be first in line behind you.
posted by sfinboston52 on Sep 30, 2007 at 11:21 PM
he efforts would be better spent on working to improve the education of the children rather than pushing his personal religious beliefs? how many millions will be spent on this due to lawsuits?
posted by tonyh on Sep 30, 2007 at 11:41 PM

Why is it such a "Big Dot Deal" for you people anyway?

If you don't believe that there's anything to the whole Religion Thing anyway, why are you getting all worked up about it? Public schools stopped using the Bible as a Text Book a long time ago.

Those Christians (not just Catholic) who Want their kids to be taught from the Bible get together and start private Christian Schools affiliated with their Churches.

If you want your kids to be taught Atheism, get together and form a private Atheist School and send them there..........Tit-for-Tat.

I see signs up all over the place (public schools included) that say "Have a Nice Day". I personally resent someone telling me what kind of day to have. Maybe I want to have a crummy day. It should be my choice. Rather than jumping up and down and pounding my chest about it, I just ignore those signs.

posted by possummomma on Oct 1, 2007 at 12:27 AM

Tony,

I get worked up about it, because - without my express consent - my four year old was instructed to say the Pledge of Allegiance with the phrase "under God".  So, essentially, without my permission she was subjected to instruction in the belief that there is a God.  Not only that, but she was asked to swear an allegiance (are four year olds capable of understanding what a pledge is?) to a nation "under" that deity.  How would you feel if you walked into a public school classroom and a teacher told your child that they had to swear an allegiance to Zeus?  I tolerate the pledge because I don't wish to make my four year old an example.  Unlike Michael Newdow, I can set my ideology aside for the safety of my child.  Hanging a sign that says "in god we trust" in a classroom violates the establishment clause.  Would you be okay with Vegas hanging signs that say, "In Buddha we trust.", "In Allah we place our allegiance.", "In Vishnu We  Trust", or "In reason we trust!"?  If your answer is "no", then you're close to understanding why some of us do not support this.

My son is in Boy Scouts.  He follows the rules of the BSA because he CHOSE to be a Scout.  I made it very clear to him that he would have to play by their rules.  But, school is mandatory for every child.  Every child in this nation is entitled to a public education in which their civil rights are not violated.  Children are not entitled, by the feds, to a religious education.  That has been, and will continue to be, the responsibility of the parents.   Part of that social contract means that each religion will be respected or none at all.  Frankly, the Bible wasn't used in many schools --- that's why the Catholic Church funded parochial education in America.  Keeping schools secular is the historical norm, not a modern construct.

The problem with "just ignoring" the signs is that they will not be ignored and they serve as a divisive marker.  Look at the Pledge...the kids who choose not to say "under God" are often the victims of social violence and hazing.  Ignoring the offense makes it easier to slip into the curriculum because no one is complaining. 

Do you support the installation of foot baths in our schools and extra recess time for Islamic children?

Do you support the rights of a Sikh child to carry a kirpan (a small sword/dagger) to school?

Would you support me if I wanted to hang up a sign in every classroom that said "In Reason and Science we trust."?  What about "In brotherhood we trust"? 

Do you support a sign that says "In dharma we trust."?

How about a sign that reads "We place our trust in the Latter Day Prophet."?

If not, then you are a hypocrite of epic proportions.

You're okay with the promotion and inclusion of your religious beliefs because they are yours.  Just wait until someone tries to promote Fundamental Mormonism or Islam in a Bakersfield classroom...

posted by loadtoed on Oct 1, 2007 at 12:59 AM
Fortunately even if this "proposal" were approved, someone would sue and ultimately the courts would order this ridiculous "proposal" to be taken down.  (I really don't think it would ever make it to the Supreme Court level)  But really, I hope Vegas is enjoying his time because even in conservative Bakersfield, I think the voters have had enough of his religious propaganda.  He has turned out to be a real pain in the....
posted by myxlnt1 on Oct 1, 2007 at 01:15 AM
I guess the answer is,  They are so in love with  " the lord "  THEY want to share with the rest of us.  THEY  don't  really mean any   harm.  THEY  thought electing the school board trustees, and city councilperson They could save us all.  THEY don't mean any harm. If we only pay attention we could become as dedicated as THEY are.
posted by sfinboston52 on Oct 1, 2007 at 06:11 AM

why are we so focused on forcing religion on others? We should be focusing on how to improve schools and improve the way our young people are learning. Having a motto "In God We Trust" in every class room does not address the issue of children learning.

Also, this is a total waste of our tax money.

posted by blognroll on Oct 1, 2007 at 06:41 AM
I think it's time for some honesty, and a healthy dose of reality in the classroom.  How about posting something like this?:  "In God we used to trust.  What the hell has happened?"

(This comment was posted before I had a change of heart). 
posted by andrewrosenstein on Oct 1, 2007 at 07:10 AM
What the hell has happened?  I'll tell you what happened:  We moved beyond the dark ages.  We realized that science has more answers than magic.  We realized that it was wrong to kill people because we thought they floated, or weighed as much as a duck, or were Jewish.  You want God in the classroom?  Take your kid to Garces, or Iran.  Or the 13th century.
posted by blognroll on Oct 1, 2007 at 07:17 AM
Are we better off, as a society because of science?  Are we better at loving one another?  Are couples better equipped to love one another for a lifetime, and are families better at living together harmoniously?  Is there less hate in the world because of all of the wonderful discoveries of science?  The Apostle Paul once said something to this effect: "If I have the gift of knowledge, and have not love, I am nothing.  I am a sounding brass, and a tingling symbol."  Science has made our heads bigger, but it has done absolutely nothing for our hearts. 
posted by CheshireCat on Oct 1, 2007 at 07:33 AM

Chad Vega is a prime example of the ignorant past of Bako:

From Rolling Stone circa 2005:  

What you will find is a bleak moonscape of oil fields; a chorus of radio-talk-show hosts ranting about illegal immigrants and welfare moms; a store called Second Amendment Sports, which does a brisk business; and, along the highway that leads into town, a billboard of a radiant Jesus that urges be an organ donor. give your heart to the lord. The downtown streets feel frozen in the 1950s: the family shoe stores, the swivel-stooled burger joint, the coffee shop where the waitresses call all their customers "hon." Merle Haggard was raised in a boxcar in a section of town called Oildale, where residents post beware of dog signs on their cracked windows, and Buck Owens made his mark here singing about thwarted love in honky-tonks with corrugated tin walls. Teen births and high school dropout rates around Bakersfield are among the highest in the state.

posted by blognroll on Oct 1, 2007 at 07:53 AM
I would suggest inviting Chad Vega out for a cup of coffee before judging him.  Also, Rolling Stone has never walked the Streets of Bakersfield.  Let him who has never called a waitress "hon" throw the first Rolling Stone. 
posted by sfinboston52 on Oct 1, 2007 at 07:55 AM
I grew up in Bakersfield...and the rolling stone's has it pretty much on the mark.
posted by dbiker on Oct 1, 2007 at 08:03 AM

After reading most of the posts... I really see the need for "In God we Trust" to be posted in schools and everywhere else. 

posted by blognroll on Oct 1, 2007 at 08:04 AM
For the most part, sfinboston, that's true.  Much of Bakersfield does tend to suck much of the time.  Believe me, there are other places where I'd rather live.  But the way it is in Bakersfield also depends on what side of the street, or which street, you're walking on.  If all you see is negative, then if something positive comes along, you're going to miss it. 

posted by ChicoEsquela on Oct 1, 2007 at 08:05 AM

TonyH, you might ask the person who thinks "rolling stone" pretty much has it "on the mark" why such a big deal is being made of something that a relatively small % of the populace is against.

Its called the "tail wagging the dog" and there are certain vocal minorities in this country that are trying to do just that!

posted by blognroll on Oct 1, 2007 at 08:08 AM
Good point, Chico.  And also, one must keep in mind that Rolling Stone is heavily invested in reinforcing a negative stereotype involving the association between "conservative" and "backwards, stupid and ignorant."  They are politically biased and politically motivated to attack conservatives.  As such, they cannot be relied upon for accuracy or truth. 
posted by ChicoEsquela on Oct 1, 2007 at 08:09 AM

I've lived in a whole lot of places blognroll and I like it in Bako just fine (warts and all).

You know, come to think of it, those damn warts give the place character.

But then, I'm a Catholic and we are taught to self flagellate! <ha> <reveling here>

(revel in our depravity)

posted by blognroll on Oct 1, 2007 at 08:15 AM
LOL.  I'll catch up with all of you a bit later.  I'm going to Starbucks to caffeine up so that maybe in my altered state, Bakersfield will look a little brighter : )
posted by saberhagen on Oct 1, 2007 at 08:17 AM

In his religious zeal, Vegas has apparently neglected to think through to the potential results of his proposal.

The sadder thing is that he was elected to his school board position by a significant plurality of popular vote.

That speaks volumes about the large segment of the local voting populace that embraces his views about sectarian dogma that should be offered our children. 

saber

posted by TomW on Oct 1, 2007 at 08:18 AM
As for me, I'd be interested in seeing what clever stuff the kids have in mind for the posters.  Since they are donated, my only condition would be that they are never considered "school property".

BTW, how many of you would be willing to pony up for the Pastafarian signs?  I'm thinking the one that says "I was touched by his noodly appendage."
posted by andrewrosenstein on Oct 1, 2007 at 09:00 AM
Blognroll, you wonder what science has done for our hearts?  It has shown us that Jews are not responsible for the Black Death, something that religion thought was the cause.  It has shown us that someone who does not drown when thrown in water is not a witch, again something that religion was convinced of.  It has shown us that someone who does not believe in your religion is not the reason for all evils in the world.  Science has taught us not to kill people who you believe to be heretics.  Too many people forget that.
posted by robbwillis on Oct 1, 2007 at 09:13 AM

Just goes to show: You let a two-bit politician put 'In God We Trust" plaques on public buildings and a one-bit politician will want them in schools. 

Where's the ACLU when you need them?

posted by bghayes on Oct 1, 2007 at 09:18 AM

Regardless of whether this is a sound idea for education, there has to be acknowledgment that this is a litigious nightmare. The lawsuits alone would cost the city into the potential millions. This also detracts from the focus, the kids. They have enough on their plates with their workload and their lives to be drawn into an issue we are still settling as adults.  Make the school a comfortable safe place, not a place of secular division and elitism.

posted by sfinboston52 on Oct 1, 2007 at 09:24 AM
blognroll - please dont take my view of Bakersfield in the wrong way...there are a lot of good people who live in Bakersfield and I enjoy visiting Bakersfield to see family & Friends. But it is the cultural shock each time, when I hear comments on world issues when the party speaking has an idea of all the ramifications of what they are saying (same could be here in Boston also).
posted by mattloch on Oct 1, 2007 at 09:43 AM
BLT: "Are we better off, as a society because of science? "

...he writes on his computer, under artificial lighting, in a building with climate control, being conveyed to work in a motorized machine, healthy because of modern medicine, etc., etc., etc.

.

Chico: "TonyH, you might ask the person who thinks "rolling stone" pretty much has it "on the mark" why such a big deal is being made of something that a relatively small % of the populace is against."

Funny, I seem to remember something about the Constitution being there to protect the rights of the minority against the excesses and tyrany of the majority. Or am I just making things up again?

.

TomW: "As for me, I'd be interested in seeing what clever stuff the kids have in mind for the posters.  Since they are donated, my only condition would be that they are never considered "school property".

BTW, how many of you would be willing to pony up for the Pastafarian signs?  I'm thinking the one that says "I was touched by his noodly appendage."
"

I would be interested in adding that any group which "donates" posters to school should have those posters put up.

.

Bghayes: "Regardless of whether this is a sound idea for education, there has to be acknowledgment that this is a litigious nightmare. The lawsuits alone would cost the city into the potential millions. "

Which is why I propose that if Ms. Sullivan's group is willing to "donate" the posters, then they should also be responsible for paying the legal fees if/when this thing goes to court. Why should the school's have to spend money on lawyers fees instead of the children? Let's see Ms. Sullivan put her money where her mouth is.
posted by sagefever on Oct 1, 2007 at 09:45 AM
bghaynes~well said! That is it in a nutshell,school is tough enough for most kids adding another layer to navigate is just not going to help with the core issues~reading,writing math, critical thinking, and ~gasp ~ science. Religion may or may not make a rounder person but the subjects I mentioned will help keep jobs and innovation strong in America.
posted by sfinboston52 on Oct 1, 2007 at 09:49 AM
I would not mind and do support the teaching of religion in school, but from a historical perspective and looking at all religions and how they played in the development of civilizations and history. Also, no religion could be promoted or exalt as better than any other religion.
posted by RosemarysAbortionist on Oct 1, 2007 at 09:52 AM
Why not just enlarge a picture of a dollar bill?
posted by AudreyB on Oct 1, 2007 at 10:01 AM

Chad Vegas is inviting trouble from the ACLU. (maybe on purpose)  Does he see himself as some kind of crusader?  I think he using his position  to further his own political aspiritions. 

He's sitting on a board that was set up to oversee the educational lives of the children it serves, not their religious or spiritual lives.

Really, where does he get off?  Does he want to spend educational dollars fighting the ACLU?

Also, Mr. Vegas, stay out of personnel matters.  Leave it to the Superintendent to oversee.  After all, that's why he was hired and he doesn't need you looking over his shoulder. 

Your nose is tooooooooooo long!

 

posted by Souldier77 on Oct 1, 2007 at 10:12 AM

Who's afraid of the ACLU?

It's the people of this nation who bear the responsibility to push for change.  If no one speaks up for God being represented in schools (in a largely Judeo-Christian society no-less), then those who are staunch about the separation of church and state will surely make their opinions known.

I believe it's an excellent call to action for those who believe in God to support him being part of the structure of our children's lives. Fear of a lawsuit should not be a deterrent to support, speak out on, and stand up for what you believe.

posted by sfinboston52 on Oct 1, 2007 at 10:16 AM
I think God is big enough that he doesnt need his followers to assume they can speak on his behalf. And how is having the motto raise test scores etc on school?
posted by mattloch on Oct 1, 2007 at 10:18 AM
Souldier77: "If no one speaks up for God in schools, then those who are staunch about the separation of church and state will surely make their opinions known. I believe it's an excellent call to action for those who believe in God to support him being apart of the structure of our children's lives."

US Constitution, First Amendment: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
posted by andrewrosenstein on Oct 1, 2007 at 10:44 AM
"I believe it's an excellent call to action for those who believe in God to support him being part of the structure of our children's lives."

Fine.  Take them to church.
posted by AudreyB on Oct 1, 2007 at 10:45 AM

Christians are always careful to point out that having the word God in the classroom includes the God of all faiths.   In the next breath, however, they complain that the exclusion of Christian principals in schools has led to the deterioration of America's social structure.  They all want to return to the "good old days" of the 1950's when there wasn't any

  • Murder
  • Abortion
  • Rape
  • Child Molestation
  • Spousal Abuse
  • Theft
  • Alcoholism and drug abuse
  • Loudmouth atheists

 

In all fairness, Christians should be willing to let tax paying atheists have equal time in the classroom explaining why religion is a myth.

posted by bghayes on Oct 1, 2007 at 10:49 AM

It is thoroughly un-American to ignore the Constitution and its adjacent tenants of Amendments.  These were put in place by our forefathers and founders who themselves were fleeing religious persecution, ie forced religion.  It is in everyone's interest to promote American values of freedom, life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, through whichever religious belief that may be.

posted by sfinboston52 on Oct 1, 2007 at 10:49 AM
Our schools should remain secular...if people want to send there children to religious schools the send them to church funded and support schools, but dont use the avg. American's tax dollar to found their religious beliefs.
posted by ProgressivePete2 on Oct 1, 2007 at 10:50 AM
Good luck with that one Chad Vegas. It is NEVER going to happen in yours or anyone else's lifetime. I can't even fathom what made him think this is a good use of school board time. You can't even teach the bible in public schools and this clown wants his personal motto plastered for every kid in the county to see? He's either totally ignorant or is just starved for attention. This will do nothing more than get the schools sued.

Anyone know how many signatures it takes to get someone on the school board fired?
posted by AudreyB on Oct 1, 2007 at 10:53 AM

Get it started Pete and I'll be your first signature!

 

posted by blognroll on Oct 1, 2007 at 11:04 AM

Blognroll, you wonder what science has done for our hearts?  It has shown us that Jews are not responsible for the Black Death, something that religion thought was the cause.  It has shown us that someone who does not drown when thrown in water is not a witch, again something that religion was convinced of.  It has shown us that someone who does not believe in your religion is not the reason for all evils in the world.  Science has taught us not to kill people who you believe to be heretics.  Too many people forget that.

You're grasping at straws.  Is anybody convinced by this that science has the power to change our hearts and to eradicate evil in the world?  If hearts are filled with hate, those hearts will use science to perpetuate hate.  If hearts are filled with love, then the loving individuals whose hearts are warmed by love may be able to find a way to use science to promote love.  But love itself comes from the heart, as does evil. 

posted by Laurah on Oct 1, 2007 at 11:07 AM
I'll be the second signature, Pete.
posted by BakersfieldDoc on Oct 1, 2007 at 11:10 AM
Are we all forgetting that Chad Vegas convinced the board to change Spring Break to Easter Vacation.

In God We Trust is on all of our US currency so why not have it hung up in the classrooms.

Ya gotta trust someone these days so why not God?
posted by sagefever on Oct 1, 2007 at 11:19 AM
Not in schools~ we need to concentrate on the core curriculum~not spend money litigating this~which is exactly what will happen.
1 2 3 4 5 6

  (You need to be signed in to leave a comment)

BAKERSFIELD.COM HOT TOPICS:

Advertisement