A blog about News.
About talkofthetown


Member Since:
June 21, 2006
Last Signed In:
December 02, 2008
Profile Views:
10752
Blog Views:
147886
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Depressing Christmas cards
Leading Catholic: Disney has corrupted kids
Kid comes before designer jeans
Predicting the stock market
Judge: Obese fliers should get two airline seats
Palin's unfortunate interview backdrop!
Record number of pot plants seized in state
Safe haven or easy way out?
Where's the good gas prices news?
McDonald's shines in bad economy
Archives
June 06
July 06
August 06
September 06
October 06
November 06
December 06
January 07
February 07
March 07
April 07
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
December 08
More Archives
June 06
May 06
April 06
March 06
February 06
January 06
December 05
November 05
October 05
September 05
August 05
July 05
June 05
May 05
April 05

Blog Roll


Ask The Californian
Editorials
Entertainment
Eye of Bakersfield
Faith Forum
Fired Up!
Inside Sports
Neighbors
Right Thinking
Sound Off
Talk of the Town
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


talkofthetown - > Talk of the Town -> Are high school kids bad for business?
Are high school kids bad for business?
Rowdy teen behavior at the La Mina on H Street (directly opposite BHS) has forced the owners to ban kids from going there during certain hours without adult supervision.
I drive by there every now and then on my lunch hour and it always looks a bit crazy.
Do you think the owners are out of line for imposing strict restrictions on these kids, or are they simply exercising their right to refuse service to anyone they chose?

— Andrew Mockett
Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by talkofthetown on Monday, October 22, 2007 at 04:15 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 785 times
67 comments from 30 users

1 2

posted by adampayne on Oct 22, 2007 at 05:12 PM
The owners are not out of line. No business wants to limit customers. But, when youngsters swarm and fail to purchase much at the location while making other patrons uncomfortable, or driving them away,  a business should be able to take prudent steps to protect its viability.
posted by OldBlue56 on Oct 22, 2007 at 05:42 PM

Most of the little punks who cause problems for businesses around high schools are usually the losers anyway. This has been going on for decades. I like the tacos at La Mina on H St., but would never stop there at lunchtime during the school week. That goes for most fast food restaurants near high schools.

posted by tonyh on Oct 22, 2007 at 06:48 PM

If they were hanging out and actually buying food, and not running off other paying customers, this wouldn't have happened.

This establishment clearly, doesn't want to be "Gang Territory".

posted by Baylee on Oct 22, 2007 at 07:01 PM
It seems as though with today's youth ,whenever there is a group of kids together it brings out the worst in them(not all kids but) they start getting mouthy and disrespectful trying to show off .I don't blame the owners some people like to eat without juvenile confrontation.Or any confrontation for that matter.
posted by NancyII on Oct 22, 2007 at 07:07 PM

In the early 90's I had a little corner Mom and Pop Market in Rexland Acres.  I had the "3 students at a time" rule and enforced it strictly.  If not, they would come in and gang up while others stole the place blind.  I converted a back room to a rec room where we had a pool table to give the kids a place to hang out.  My thanks for that little gesture was profanity, sodas on tha table and sometimes, defiance.  I banned two of the boys for their behavior and later they stuffed a roll of toilet paper in a block retaining wall and set it on fire.  They denied it of course even though they were seen, the father basically threatened us and took his sons side and we lost a couple of families business because of it.  The rec room was closed down and I had had enough...I sold the store and now it's just a bad memory.

The store owners have every right to protect themselves from theft, vandalism, and disruption of business.  Those folks don't make a lot of money per item and can't afford to have business driven off by rowdy kids.

posted by sagefever on Oct 22, 2007 at 07:12 PM
Nancy~ That was wonderful of you to do, no "small gesture". Guess we can figure out where the little darlings learned their behavior. I must be getting old but here goes "Kids today!"
posted by NancyII on Oct 22, 2007 at 07:13 PM

Baylee..I agree about the kids.  Remembering the way I was as a kid, shy and not a lot of self confidence, it was easier to appear brave, tough and smart if I had an audience of peers.  We never did anything bad...we just thought we were sooo cool.  The kids now seem to believe there's strength in numbers and the scary part is that some have weapons.  If there were gangs when I was growing up I don't think any of us were aware of it.

Quickies was the place to eat at BHS in my youth...and there was no ganging up except to get a 15 cent hamburger.  (Lord only knows what kind of meat went in those paper thin patties.)  Times definetly have changed.

posted by NancyII on Oct 22, 2007 at 07:17 PM

Sage...those stores give new meaning to the expression "nickle and dime operation."    Do you know how many pieces of 5 cent bubble gum it takes to pay the rent?  LOL

This was before food stamps were put on a card and people would come in, buy a nickle gum with a dollar food stamp, get the change, and after a couple of times had enough cash money to buy  a quart of beer or a pack of cigarettes.  It was an eye opener I can tell you.  When I called the welfare people to complain they told me what the customers was doing was legal and my only recourse was to stop taking food stamps.

posted by Griffon64 on Oct 22, 2007 at 07:18 PM
I actively avoid the Marketplace when it is in teen sesson, taking my business to one of the other Vons or Coldstone's, getting my sushi somewhere else, going to Borders instead of Russo's Books, going to the mall for a movie, and so on. Eventually it will probably become a habit to just avoid the Marketplace and be done with it.
posted by mildmannered1 on Oct 22, 2007 at 08:27 PM
I work in a public place and it's nicer when the roaming bands of teenagers aren't here.  If you call them on their behavior, you're called every dirty name in the book.   Can you imagine a 10-year old calling an adult stranger a dirty name?  Where do they get the audacity?  They're the lowest rung on the social ladder and will always stay there with those social skills.
posted by Baylee on Oct 23, 2007 at 06:18 AM
How about when a group of kids are crossing the street (not in a cross walk) and they just stroll along and take their time all the while staring at you to see if your going to say something.That has happened to a few times.
posted by drugfighter on Oct 23, 2007 at 07:33 AM
I think that high schools should not have an open campus. As a parent, when I send my student to school, that is where I expect to find her, until the end of the school day. Additionally, there must be some sort of assumed responsibility that the school takes, while our children are in their care. It would be impossible to monitor the behavior of students if they are off campus and unsupervised. I think that it is unfortunate that LaMina has to resort to this to protect their business and investment. I'm sure that it represents a loss of revenue for them. I am a LaMina customer, and will now feel more comfortable frequenting the restaurant even more at lunch. Great salads!!!
posted by BakersfieldDoc on Oct 23, 2007 at 07:34 AM


Are you aware that a new strip mall is going up across from Stockdale High?  This should prove very interesting since one of the stores will be selling alcohol.

At a recent planning commission meeting there were not any representatives from the high school in attendance. Perhaps there are some business interests among the staff there? Hmmmmmmmmmmmm
posted by AudreyB on Oct 23, 2007 at 08:16 AM

I grew up in Shafter where the campus was closed for high school students.  You had to get a signed permit to go home for lunch.  A kid playing hooky stood out like a red flag. 

Now days when I go to Wal-Mart during school hours  I can hardly get through the aisles  for all the school aged kids shopping with their parents.  It makes me wonder,  why aren't they in school?

I agree with Sage, kids follow their parents example.  If school isn't important to parents, it won't be important to their children.

posted by bghayes on Oct 23, 2007 at 08:33 AM

This latest example of bad behavior is reinforcement for the seclusionary attitude the educated and cultured tend to take. The Via Arte display at the Marketplace was vandalized by bikes. Graffiti is decorates all parts of town. Things of beauty and grace have to be protected and isolated, otherwise it seems the violence of the general populace destroys it.

This goes even further to the rapidly expanding lower classes and the shrinking of the middle class. Eventually the minute educated will be facing a vast unemployed mob who may not hold the sensibilities of doing what is right and just.  Where do we go then? Police state?

posted by jfrancais on Oct 23, 2007 at 08:48 AM
I think the owners are reluctantly excercising their rigth to refuse service. High School kids can just be rowdy at times. When I was a freshman in High School there was an old builing in that same spot of a closed down pizza joint (Stephane's Pizza). All of the smokers would hang out over there and there would be fights on occasion. When that restaurant first opened up (1994?), it was fairly tame but I guess times have changed.
posted by Lingtaowoo on Oct 23, 2007 at 08:55 AM

I think the owners right to refuse service to anyone is a right one..this is their way of saying that they have had enough..years ago,BHS was a closed campus.I only wish that their parents could see how their children act in public..then maybe they wouldn't be so quick to say that their child doesn't do no wrong

 

posted by jfrancais on Oct 23, 2007 at 09:03 AM
The students have forced the owner's hand.
posted by rntolent on Oct 23, 2007 at 09:25 AM

Hopefully this won't hurt La Mina's business, but I know for a fact that the landlord is happy with certain people not hanging around their anymore.  Maybe the lack of kids will attract more downtown patrons.

To an extent I would hold BHS accountable.  Ultimately, they have a say in who gets to leave campus for lunch.  I believe they should have a good behavior system, at all schools.  Not tardy all the time, never getting into fights or having regular detention, go ahead and leave campus for lunch.  They know who the bad eggs are and it would teach that person a lesson that if you behave badly or worse yet, destructively, then you are a liability to others.  There are ways to monitor who leaves and who doesn't. 

Just a thought.

posted by Laurah on Oct 23, 2007 at 12:58 PM
Just went to La Mina on H Street for lunch. Much improved from my last visit, when the BHS students made it impossible to have a nice lunch and visit with my colleagues.
posted by jfrancais on Oct 23, 2007 at 01:11 PM

Mission accomplished

 

posted by learnem on Oct 23, 2007 at 02:31 PM
why is BHS the ONLY school in the district that has an Off campus policy?   all the other schools are closed campus
posted by iLoveLaMina on Oct 23, 2007 at 06:24 PM

I agree fully with the owners' decision to control when the students are allowed to eat at their restaurant but after speaking with the manager, I'm confused as to why everyone is saying the students are "banned." They are welcome after four, and even before that as long as they have a responsible adult with them. "Banned" means that under no circumstances are they allowed in the restaurant and that is certainly not the case.

posted by jasmen on Oct 23, 2007 at 06:32 PM

I have a business by the store and yes students are bad for business.. we have had client not want to come to our office becase they were scared the students were going to fight or do something bad to there vehicles. we don't understand why they can't  make it a closed campus. If they can close it for a on campus lunch a day this month they can close it for good. These kids are out of controll. They yell profanity at us and throw things at us it isn't good thing. la mina did the right thtng!!!!!!!!!!!

thank you

posted by jfrancais on Oct 23, 2007 at 06:42 PM

"why is BHS the ONLY school in the district that has an Off campus policy?   all the other schools are closed campus "

Traditions die hard. Are they really the only school with an open campus policy in the district?

posted by NancyII on Oct 23, 2007 at 09:39 PM

"Are you aware that a new strip mall is going up across from Stockdale High?  This should prove very interesting since one of the stores will be selling alcohol."

What happened to the law that stated you had to be a given amount of feet from a school to sell alcohol.  How far "across the street" is this new establsihment?

posted by hriley11 on Oct 23, 2007 at 10:54 PM

Please fence it in! I'm sure this would improve problems with students cutting classes and tardiness after lunch. Students need to show respect towards property, traffic laws, and rights of their fellow man. 

posted by NancyII on Oct 24, 2007 at 08:04 AM

I don't know what the size of the student body is at BHS these days but it used to have the largest student body in Kern County.  It used to have two lunch periods to feed all the kids and even then it was so crowded that lunch time was chaos.  Closing the campus might be still be a serious problem when it comes to lunch time.  I'm out of the loop on rules and such with schools now so I'm not much help in that area.

Back in the dark ages, when I went there, the freshman class alone had over 1000 kids in it and that didn't even account for the other 3 grades.   I imagine having all the new high schools has relieved that pressure somewhat.  On the other hand..all we had was the cafeteria and the Student Store snack bar.  Not only did we not have the fast food outlets at school..we didn't have them on the outside either.  LOL. 

I still support the owners of La Mina.  Kids don't have a right to ruin your business.

posted by ChicoEsquela on Oct 24, 2007 at 08:07 AM
Last night on TV principal said 2800
posted by ChicoEsquela on Oct 24, 2007 at 08:11 AM

ONe of grand kids went to BHS

They shouldn't have "open campus" anyway IMO.

They showed North High last night (closed campus for last 7 years) and then said "but it is enclosed campus"

As if there is no way that can be overcome relevant to BHS!

Yeah, lets just give up and let the little darlings come and go as they please and do whatever it is they feel like!

See how liberal I've become?

(that principal should be fired!)

posted by jfrancais on Oct 24, 2007 at 09:04 AM
The principal at BHS is awesome! He's way better than old Dr. Bruce. But BHS is no longer the overcrowded school it once was.
posted by slush18 on Oct 24, 2007 at 09:14 AM
I am one of two sons of the owners of La Mina and I want to thank all of you for supporting my parents and family in this situation. I also want to thank the Bakersfield Californian for their support.  I am surprised, but pleased, that nearly every post on this site (if not every single post) is in favor of La Mina.  I thought it was kind of messed up how Fox  (i think it was fox) did a story on La mina and they interviewed everyone, (the principal, students, conveneince store owner) EXCEPT for my parents and uncle who run La Mina.  We had no say in defending ourselves in that piece.  But o well, i guess i already knew thats just the way the media is.  And for the people who think its going to hurt my parents revenues, its not.  They've already had a lot of adults who don't usually come during lunch, stop by because kids aren't swarming the place.  When I first heard that my dad was planning to do this, first question that came to mind was "Don't the kids provide a lot of business?"  He told me that they don't buy all that much, just a little bit here and there and alot of them just hang out, taking up tables.  So I totally understand why he did it, and I know that most adults appreciate it also.
posted by sfinboston52 on Oct 24, 2007 at 09:19 AM

I can understand that. I know my friends and I when we were high school students where just being teenagers and sometimes were rowdy and noise at places we went to lunch. I fully support the owners limiting students during certain hours who dont have thier parents or grown up w/ them.

This is just common sense.

posted by gina33 on Oct 24, 2007 at 09:20 AM
Ok, as a mother to student at BHS I disagree with all of you! My son came home and told me about the store closeing during thier lunch time, I thought it was unfair. I send my son to school everyday with his lunch money and the only reason he started going to La Mina's is because there was never food left at school. they only get a 30 min lunch and to stand in line to get up there and find out they ran out of food! I have complained to the school and nothing hasw been done. On top of that they took out the snack bar so now the students can't even try to eat fast. I understand that it is not La Mina's problem, but I am just saying that this is the reason that all the students go there. When my son told me about it he was upset because of a group of bad kids have messed it up for everyother kid out there. Not every kid is a bad kid as most of you people think. My son knows that when he is out thier he needs to respect others, mainly adults.
posted by slush18 on Oct 24, 2007 at 09:28 AM

gina33, i understand what ur saying.  I was also like your son in highschool.  But you have to look at it through La mina's eyes.  Of course not ALL kids are trouble.  But you know what would happen if we only let certain kids in and not others? O WOW now that would cause some problems.  I think the blame is to be put on the school.  here's a quote from one of the previous posts:

posted by rntolent on Oct 23, 2007 at 09:25 AM Hopefully this won't hurt La Mina's business, but I know for a fact that the landlord is happy with certain people not hanging around their anymore.  Maybe the lack of kids will attract more downtown patrons. To an extent I would hold BHS accountable.  Ultimately, they have a say in who gets to leave campus for lunch.  I believe they should have a good behavior system, at all schools.  Not tardy all the time, never getting into fights or having regular detention, go ahead and leave campus for lunch.  They know who the bad eggs are and it would teach that person a lesson that if you behave badly or worse yet, destructively, then you are a liability to others.  There are ways to monitor who leaves and who doesn't.  If a system like this was implemented, only children like yours would come to La Mina and then there wouldn't be a problem.
posted by username420 on Oct 24, 2007 at 09:58 AM
i don't know what the worry is..... they GOT CRAPPY FOOD AND THE WORST SERVICE I EVERED HAD!!!!! i guess if you LIKE CAT FOR food its ok .....
posted by AudreyB on Oct 24, 2007 at 10:04 AM
And you go there, why?
posted by ChicoEsquela on Oct 24, 2007 at 10:07 AM

I like your name tag 420

I thik that answers Audrey's question BTW

posted by ChicoEsquela on Oct 24, 2007 at 10:10 AM

Dr. Bruce was a good guy jfrancis

I don't know about this guy. He sounds like just a "throw your hands up and give up" guy to me!

(but I'm sure the kids like him)

posted by OldBlue56 on Oct 24, 2007 at 10:11 AM
gina33, do you help your son with his English homework?
posted by jscarlson on Oct 24, 2007 at 10:16 AM
gina33, you sound like most of the parents today who are in denial about how their children act when they are not with them. we all want to believe our wonderful children act like angles when mom and dad aren't around but that isn't the case. "not my child" is all we ever hear in the school system.
posted by ChicoEsquela on Oct 24, 2007 at 10:22 AM
posted by OldBlue56 on Oct 24, 2007 at 10:11 AM gina33, do you help your son with his English homework?

:rotflmao:

posted by jfrancais on Oct 24, 2007 at 10:43 AM
Chico, I can't say that Dr. Bruce was horrible, but I definitely feel that Mr. Reese is more interactive with the students and relates more to the diverse demographics (i.e. inner city kids, foreign exchange students, kids from priviledged backgrounds, etc.) and getting them involved in extra curricular activities. 
posted by ynoma74 on Oct 24, 2007 at 10:51 AM

At the risk of throwing myself to the wolves, I feel I have to comment.  I am the parent of a BHS student, but he is a freshman and not allowed "open" lunch.  I also feel that a few BAD kids, ruined this for everyone.  I also believe the restaurant has a right to do whatever they want as well.  What upsets me, is that this was NOT taken to the principalof BHS, David Reese, before action was taken.  The principal was not given an opportunity to correct the situation.  The disruptive teens were not called out, and made to be responsibile.  It went straight to the media and I believe it should have gone straight to the source (BHS) first.  Our Principal is amazing and works with teachers, parents, students and the downtown community for better cooperation and understanding.  I just don't see why he wasn't given that opportunity in this case.

Now, with that being said, I am also a parent that takes my teen to the marketplace, the mall, the movies, etc.  The difference is I don't leave.  I don't hold his hand, but he knows I am there, SOMEWHERE.  This evokes responsible behavior, not because he is an angel, but because he knows at any given moment I am watching him.  I tell him to act as if I am standing next to you, if you wouldn't do it with me there (and I probably am) then DON't do it.  I think blame needs to be placed squarely at the feet of the parents, they learn from you.  If you allow them the freedom to be hoodlums, they will be.  Maybe I am overprotective, don't let him do what "all the other kids are doing", but I have a well mannered respectible young man.  If he chooses not to be well mannered and respective of others, there are consequences.  What happened to good old fashioned parenting?

posted by AudreyB on Oct 24, 2007 at 10:58 AM

Do you seriously think the HS should use their resources to follow kids around at lunch to make sure they don't cause trouble for businesses.

Maybe a parent patrol would be more effective.

posted by ynoma74 on Oct 24, 2007 at 11:03 AM
I wasn't suggesting the HS follow around the students.  But, the principal is responsible for the students during school hours.  All I am saying is it should have gone to him first.
posted by OldBlue56 on Oct 24, 2007 at 11:04 AM

Unfortunately ynoma74, most teenagers don't have a parent like you. If they did, this blog probably wouldn't even exist.

However, the owners of La Mina have no obligation to go to the principal if they chose to restrict students from their privately owned restaurant. These rowdy kids have been causing problems in the area for at least 30 years that I am aware of. The school district knows this; it's nothing new. That is why the officer from the Kern High School Police and school security patrol all around there. But there is only one peace officer assigned to each high school, so they can't do much, especially when the campus is open and kids come and go from all directions. Ask the residents who live in the few blocks south of BHS if they are impacted by kids loitering, smoking marijuana, committing thefts, ect, during the school hours.

posted by AudreyB on Oct 24, 2007 at 11:05 AM
How do you know they didn't go to him first?
posted by jscarlson on Oct 24, 2007 at 11:08 AM
ynoma74 you are not over protective just a responsible parent! there is not such thing these days as "responsible parenting". Parents don't want to do their jobs with their kids, the parents are more interested in being their childs friend instead of parent.
posted by ChicoEsquela on Oct 24, 2007 at 11:10 AM

ynoma74

If we had more parents like you, we not only wouldn't be having this conversation, we wouldn't have gang task forces, Drug rehab centers, Prop 36's, etc.

We wouldn't need them

1 2

  (You need to be signed in to leave a comment)

BAKERSFIELD.COM HOT TOPICS:

Advertisement