|
Depressing Christmas cards Leading Catholic: Disney has corrupted kids Kid comes before designer jeans Predicting the stock market Judge: Obese fliers should get two airline seats Palin's unfortunate interview backdrop! Record number of pot plants seized in state Safe haven or easy way out? Where's the good gas prices news? McDonald's shines in bad economy June 06 July 06 August 06 September 06 October 06 November 06 December 06 January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08 November 08 December 08 June 06 May 06 April 06 March 06 February 06 January 06 December 05 November 05 October 05 September 05 August 05 July 05 June 05 May 05 April 05 Blog RollAsk The Californian Editorials Entertainment Eye of Bakersfield Faith Forum Fired Up! Inside Sports Neighbors Right Thinking Sound Off Talk of the Town
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Drug sniffing dogs on campus?
Folks appear to really be reacting to today's poll question,"Should drug- and alcohol-sniffing dogs patrol local high schools?"
So far more than 300 people have voted, with most saying yes. Guess all the students are still in classes and haven't gotten around to voting. In case you're just finding this story for the first time, we had a story today about Ken Mettler, a board member with the Kern High School District, suggesting a bunch of changes, including hiring drug sniffing dogs to scour the campuses. Our story says it would cost the district around $20,000 a year to hire a trained dog to come sniff out drugs and alcohol. Honestly that seems pretty cheap to me when you consider all the schools in the district. -- Davin McHenry, web editor 8 comments from 7 users
1
posted by
thetruthhurts
on Jan 8, 2008 at 01:23 PM
"$20,000 a year to hire a trained dog to come sniff out drugs and alcohol." I don't know but this sounds like per dog. Did they count the cost of paying the handler? posted by
steveeswenson
on Jan 8, 2008 at 02:01 PM
posted by
adampayne
on Jan 8, 2008 at 03:31 PM
This is just one more little attempt to morph the United States into a police state where the presumption of innocence, the right to face your accuser and the right of privacy no longer exists for citizens. It is a real bracer seeing so many of the locals having no problem with this further erosion of fundamental rights. I am so grateful my kids never had to attend school here. This Kern High School District Board is a disgrace to any person who actually values education and learning. It is always the big issues, such as what to call the mid-winter and spring breaks, or should we hang a motto on the wall for patriotic inspiration that take all this Board's attention and time. Meanwhile back on the reality front the kids in this district continue to lag behind the rest of the state in virtually every academic category. posted by
randomfactor
on Jan 8, 2008 at 03:39 PM
posted by
bakersfield
on Jan 8, 2008 at 03:52 PM
Pardon me for being a parent dictator, but these are kids, not adults. My kids have no privacy rights in my house (no locked doors, random searches of rooms and backpacks, etc). I do this to protect them from themselves because teen aged boys don't seem to have great decision making skills. I will continue to do this until they leave my home because I would rather them deal with my consequences than letting them run wild so as not to "violate their rights", then they have to deal with the consequences of law enforcement. I can only monitor and observe what goes on in my own house and I would love for the high schools to have drug sniffing dogs. If anything, it might be a deterrent to dealing at school. Do I think it will stop drugs in school? No, but if we can limit it at least a little, I say it's worth it.
posted by
robbwillis
on Jan 8, 2008 at 03:59 PM
posted by
adampayne
on Jan 8, 2008 at 04:35 PM
posted by
checotahgirl
on Jan 9, 2008 at 11:24 AM
"bakersfield", I am in 100% agreement with you. I have a 15 year old daughter at Ridgeview High, a good student, who every couple of days tells me about other kids offering her drugs and when she opts out, they tell her how "lame" she is. I also have a 21-year old daughter who attended Liberty High her sophmore through senior year and she too told me of the drugs (cocaine, marijuana, and meth) that was offered to her and her friends. It is a HUGE problem in schools today and if one drug sniffing dog were to catch ONE individual with drugs in MY childs school, I say go for getting the dogs. I think it highly unlikely that kids are going to walk around rubbing drugs on lockers and then throw it in a teachers lounge. But, if that's the case, drug test the teachers who it was found with. Nothing to worry about if it's not yours, huh? Most of these kids who OFFER drugs, are using the drugs. Just my thoughts....
1
BAKERSFIELD.COM HOT TOPICS:Advertisement |