|
LPGA demands its players speak English Should a 9-year-old with a fast fastball be banned from pitching? Way too much beach volleyball Who is Michael Phelps dating? Whites no longer U.S. majority in 2042 Are the Chinese cheating? Olympic thoughts: The lip-synching ain't the half of it Paper: The great oil bubble has burst Report: New team ready to take Blaze's spot Miss the Blaze? Maybe a little June 06 July 06 August 06 September 06 October 06 November 06 December 06 January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 June 06 May 06 April 06 March 06 February 06 January 06 December 05 November 05 October 05 September 05 August 05 July 05 June 05 May 05 April 05 Blog RollAsk The Californian Editorials Entertainment Eye of Bakersfield Faith Forum Fired Up! Inside Sports Neighbors Right Thinking Sound Off Talk of the Town
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Time magazine vs. Iwo Jima veterans
Some World War II veterans are up in arms over the latest edition of Time magazine, which depicts the iconic image of Marines raising the American flag over Iwo Jima, with the flag replaced by a tree. “It’s an absolute disgrace,” one Iwo Jima veteran told the online Business Media Institute. “Whoever did it is going to hell. That’s a mortal sin. God forbid he runs into a Marine that was an Iwo Jima survivor.” The cover, meant to illustrate coverage of Earth Day and environmental issues, quickly became fodder for news commentators and talk radio hosts. Time’s editors say they’re sticking by the cover. What do you think? 9 comments from 4 users
1
posted by
samheath
on Apr 19, 2008 at 06:51 AM
Not only in very bad taste to say the very least, trivializing an iconic moment in our history for those of us who lived the events of WWII with so much shedding of blood, but underscores an America in which those of us who understand the significance of the question rightly ask "Is nothing sacred?" posted by
NancyII
on Apr 19, 2008 at 07:43 AM
I think the global warming proponents have plenty of artists who can dream up their own logos and pictures without desecrating one of the most famous of all photos and insulting the soldiers who lost their lives fighting that battle. I also think this one is going to come back and bite time mag. in the butt. Please note the the magazine name was not capitalized. It's not just soldiers who will be insulted by this, it's a time honored symbol of the struggle of our nation at war and we all should be outraged. posted by
catpaw
on Apr 19, 2008 at 08:02 AM
This topic was exhausted yesterday. What do you think? posted by
Maggiepoo
on Apr 19, 2008 at 08:04 AM
posted by
NancyII
on Apr 19, 2008 at 08:07 AM
The topics of a lot of things are exhausted but everyone wants to chime in with their own byline. But wait, isn't this the byline of an employee of the paper? Weren't they scooped on the blog by a blogger thereby screwing up their scheduled topic? posted by
NancyII
on Apr 19, 2008 at 08:10 AM
posted by
samheath
on Apr 19, 2008 at 08:11 AM
I choose to ignore those that attempt to dictate when a subject has been "exhausted." I can choose for myself. posted by
NancyII
on Apr 19, 2008 at 08:23 AM
Good point Sam. The only objection I have to multiple blogs on the same topic is that it gets garbled as to what was said where and by whom. The other that frustrates me is multiple pages on the same thread. Responding on page 4 to something said on page 2 can get really confusing. An off topic remark here. I've taken the weekend paper for years and a couple of weeks ago I got a call from TBS offering me weekday papers in addition at no extra cost. Well, being one who rarely turns down anything free as long as it doesn't inconvenience me, I agreed and dicovered an interesting tidbit. I check the blogs first thing every morning and bring the paper in later. Most of the time, on the blog the day before, the interesting stuff has already been discussed by the bloggers. The paper paper is old news. We are in it, on it, and searching out the future news. posted by
Maggiepoo
on Apr 19, 2008 at 09:16 AM
Attenborough ends nature TV cycle, fears for future
LONDON (Reuters) - David Attenborough has done more than just about anyone to teach us about our planet. As he marks the end of his sweeping natural history television series, seen by hundreds of millions of people over 30 years, the British broadcaster is fearful of what the future holds for the Earth and its inhabitants. "You could say that this is a survey of how the world looked and how it may not look the same in 50 years' time." DEEPLY DEPRESSING" Attenborough, younger brother of film director Richard, agreed with some scientists' prediction that it was too late to reverse the impact of climate change. "Whatever we do now the world is going to change. The question is can we slow down those changes or reduce them? One clutches at straws to try and find something in this bleak picture which is not deeply depressing." http://www.reuters.com/arti...
1
Our readers recommend: |