A blog about News.
About talkofthetown


Member Since:
June 21, 2006
Last Signed In:
August 27, 2008
Profile Views:
10692
Blog Views:
142669
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
LPGA demands its players speak English
Should a 9-year-old with a fast fastball be banned from pitching?
Way too much beach volleyball
Who is Michael Phelps dating?
Whites no longer U.S. majority in 2042
Are the Chinese cheating?
Olympic thoughts: The lip-synching ain't the half of it
Paper: The great oil bubble has burst
Report: New team ready to take Blaze's spot
Miss the Blaze? Maybe a little
Archives
June 06
July 06
August 06
September 06
October 06
November 06
December 06
January 07
February 07
March 07
April 07
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
More Archives
June 06
May 06
April 06
March 06
February 06
January 06
December 05
November 05
October 05
September 05
August 05
July 05
June 05
May 05
April 05

Blog Roll


Ask The Californian
Editorials
Entertainment
Eye of Bakersfield
Faith Forum
Fired Up!
Inside Sports
Neighbors
Right Thinking
Sound Off
Talk of the Town
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


talkofthetown - > Talk of the Town -> Time magazine vs. Iwo Jima veterans
Time magazine vs. Iwo Jima veterans

Some World War II veterans are up in arms over the latest edition of Time magazine, which depicts the iconic image of Marines raising the American flag over Iwo Jima, with the flag replaced by a tree.

“It’s an absolute disgrace,” one Iwo Jima veteran told the online Business Media Institute. “Whoever did it is going to hell. That’s a mortal sin. God forbid he runs into a Marine that was an Iwo Jima survivor.” 

The cover, meant to illustrate coverage of Earth Day and environmental issues, quickly became fodder for news commentators and talk radio hosts. Time’s editors say they’re sticking by the cover.

What do you think?

Posted in these Groups:
Topics: iwo jima, World War II, Veterans, Photography, journalism, media
posted by talkofthetown on Friday, April 18, 2008 at 05:14 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 75 times
9 comments from 4 users

1

posted by samheath on Apr 19, 2008 at 06:51 AM

 Not only in very bad taste to say the very least, trivializing an iconic moment in our history for those of us who lived the events of WWII with so much shedding of blood, but underscores an America in which those of us who understand the significance of the question rightly ask "Is nothing sacred?"

posted by NancyII on Apr 19, 2008 at 07:43 AM

 I think the global warming proponents have plenty of artists who can dream up their own logos and pictures without desecrating one of the most famous of all photos and insulting the soldiers who lost their lives fighting that battle.  I also think this one is going to come back and bite time mag.  in the butt.  Please note the the magazine name was not capitalized. 

It's not just soldiers who will be insulted by this, it's a time honored symbol of the struggle of our nation at war and we all should be outraged.

posted by catpaw on Apr 19, 2008 at 08:02 AM

 This topic was exhausted yesterday. What do you think?

posted by Maggiepoo on Apr 19, 2008 at 08:04 AM

 Move on, there are more important matters to attend to...

posted by NancyII on Apr 19, 2008 at 08:07 AM

 The topics of a lot of things are exhausted but everyone wants to chime in with their own byline.

But wait, isn't this the byline of an employee of the paper?  Weren't they scooped on the blog by a blogger thereby screwing up their scheduled topic? 

posted by NancyII on Apr 19, 2008 at 08:10 AM

 I disagree maggie..but then, that's nothing new.

 

posted by samheath on Apr 19, 2008 at 08:11 AM

 I choose to ignore those that attempt to dictate when a subject has been "exhausted." I can choose for myself.

posted by NancyII on Apr 19, 2008 at 08:23 AM

 Good point Sam.    The only objection I have to multiple blogs on the same topic is that it gets garbled as to what was said where and by whom.  The other that frustrates me is multiple pages on the same thread.  Responding on page 4 to something said on page 2 can get really confusing.

An off topic remark here.  I've taken the weekend paper for years and a couple of weeks ago I got a call from TBS offering me weekday papers in addition at no extra cost.  Well, being one who rarely turns down anything free as long as it doesn't inconvenience me, I agreed and dicovered an interesting tidbit.  I check the blogs first thing every morning and bring the paper in later.  Most of the time, on the blog the day before, the interesting stuff has already been discussed by the bloggers.  The paper paper is old news.

We are in it, on it, and searching out the future news.

posted by Maggiepoo on Apr 19, 2008 at 09:16 AM

 Attenborough ends nature TV cycle, fears for future

LONDON (Reuters) - David Attenborough has done more than just about anyone to teach us about our planet.

As he marks the end of his sweeping natural history television series, seen by hundreds of millions of people over 30 years, the British broadcaster is fearful of what the future holds for the Earth and its inhabitants.

"You could say that this is a survey of how the world looked and how it may not look the same in 50 years' time."

DEEPLY DEPRESSING"

Attenborough, younger brother of film director Richard, agreed with some scientists' prediction that it was too late to reverse the impact of climate change.

"Whatever we do now the world is going to change. The question is can we slow down those changes or reduce them? One clutches at straws to try and find something in this bleak picture which is not deeply depressing."

http://www.reuters.com/arti...

 

1

Leave a Comment
Ground Rules for posting comments:
  • No profanity or personal attacks.
  • Please comment on the subject of the post itself.
If you do not follow these rules we will remove your comment. Please keep it civil.

To protect users from spam, please enter the text from the image on the left.
   

Our readers recommend: