A blog about News.
About talkofthetown


Member Since:
June 21, 2006
Last Signed In:
December 02, 2008
Profile Views:
10752
Blog Views:
147890
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Depressing Christmas cards
Leading Catholic: Disney has corrupted kids
Kid comes before designer jeans
Predicting the stock market
Judge: Obese fliers should get two airline seats
Palin's unfortunate interview backdrop!
Record number of pot plants seized in state
Safe haven or easy way out?
Where's the good gas prices news?
McDonald's shines in bad economy
Archives
June 06
July 06
August 06
September 06
October 06
November 06
December 06
January 07
February 07
March 07
April 07
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
December 08
More Archives
June 06
May 06
April 06
March 06
February 06
January 06
December 05
November 05
October 05
September 05
August 05
July 05
June 05
May 05
April 05

Blog Roll


Ask The Californian
Editorials
Entertainment
Eye of Bakersfield
Faith Forum
Fired Up!
Inside Sports
Neighbors
Right Thinking
Sound Off
Talk of the Town
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


talkofthetown - > Talk of the Town -> Burying Fido in the vacant field
Burying Fido in the vacant field
Well, apparently for the last 15 years or so, county animal control officers have been burying dead dogs and cats on vacant property.

The practice — some 500-plus burials in the last year — ended last week after county lawyers involved animal control officers that such burials need the permission from a property owner.

That is almost always not practical, so the dead animals — complete with bugs and stink — will be brought to the animal shelter for disposal.

Channel 29 Eyewitness News found out about a burial last Thursday and the issue was brought to a head.

The officers won't be happy about the smell or the possible health hazards of bringing decomposing animals back to the pound.

Residents, however, can bury their own pets on their own property. Lord knows I've buried  hamsters on my back 40.

Do you think it's about time that the county changes its disposal methods for small animals? Or do you think it wasn't a problem until those darn TV cameras raised a stink?

Posted by Steve E. Swenson

 



Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by talkofthetown on Tuesday, October 24, 2006 at 01:08 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 833 times
15 comments from 12 users

1

posted by allRED on Oct 24, 2006 at 01:57 PM
Did they shoot Kit Foxes and then bury them where they layed? If so I have no problem.


Ron.
posted by allRED on Oct 24, 2006 at 04:18 PM
I believe God said the poor will always be here, still looking for the strayed animals thing ing.

Adam it was a joke ok, but i;m alittle tried of these rare beings that seem to hold up constuction and lumber cutting.



Ron.
posted by randomfactor on Oct 24, 2006 at 04:23 PM
Jesus said the poor will always be here...but he didn't seem happy about it, to me.  Sometimes being right is depressing, especially when your followers take it as a suggestion and not a dire prediction.
.
posted by allRED on Oct 24, 2006 at 07:36 PM
Adam I agree, they put in a new dump 20 miles out of town and make you pay for almost everything you take out there. No wonder people dump along the road ways, plus they have banker hours, 8am/4pm. They act like this new dump is a camping ground instead of a frig-in dump.



Ron.
posted by NancyII on Oct 24, 2006 at 09:23 PM

Wouldn't you think some of the money could go for low cost spaying and neutering clinics?

 

Personally, I feel that if you can't afford to take care of your pet, you shouldn't have one.  These people who say they want to give their dog at least one chance to be a mother irritate the crap out of me.  They're equating motherhood of people to motherhood of dogs and that's just nuts.  I got my lab when she was 7 weeks old and when she hit the 6 month mark I made her appointment for spaying.    People who insist on keeping a pet while it has litter after litter aren't doing anyone any favors and their pet doesn't get to keep their precious "child" anyway.  If they leave them in the yard together they'll mate with each other.  How's that for motherly love?  

Pets are Gods gift as far as I'm concerned and when we take on that responsibility we'd better be able to care for them and keep them as safe as possible.

This business of burying so many dogs in vacant lots is irresponsible.  What gives them the right to go digging up someones property to bury an animal?  Day Street?  That's hardly the country. 

When my SissyDog died unexpectedly my grandson asked if I wanted him to bury her out in a field somewhere.  I told him no..I didn't want bulldozers digging her up as the city spread.  He took her to the SPCA where they cremated her.

I adopted a companion for Allie from the pound and she was a wonderul 2-3 year old.  But one day I cam home and she was paralyzed from the mid back down.  $600 later they found her spinal cord had been pinched in the vertebrae and there wasn't anything they could do for her.  I had her put to sleep and cremated.  And no, I couldn't really afford it either but I promised to care for her when I adopted her.

What is wrong with people that they let pets run loose..that they don't spay and neuter?  It overloads our already inefficient shelter system and puts a strain on everyone who cares about pets.

At this time, I wouldn't get a dog from the county shelter.  I don't trust them to quarantine properly or to keep disease from spreading.  I don't trust anything about that shelter come to think of it.

Ahhh..this subject gives me a rash.....

posted by debbscott on Oct 24, 2006 at 10:10 PM

I could not believe this article. I agree--The head of the dept. of animal control should be fired. How can anyone be that stupid and work in such a position. I often walked my dog in what used to be fields around Day St & Airport Dr in Oildale. Now I know why my dog used to stop at so many different places in this burial ground and try to dig! Believe me the workers did not take the time to bury them very deep as Ms. Haynes stated. She says that the burials were never an issue before--that's because no one knew this was happening. Also a few years ago I worked for a very well respected Veterinary office in town. I know that they have a freezer. And a company comes and picks up the deceased animals. I'm sure something like that could be used here. I hope more experienced people speak out on this issue to help with a remedy!!!

posted by rock923 on Oct 24, 2006 at 11:59 PM
I  worked in animal control for over 30 years and never heard of a animal control agency in California burying dead animals in empty lots.  What cities/counties were being referred to with the comment: "Most other animal control agencies bury dead animals, Haynes said."

Alas, again the need for a manager with animal care & control training and experience is shown. 
posted by anonymous on Oct 25, 2006 at 09:03 AM
The reasoning AC used to justify burying animals all over town was ludicrous.  If they don't want the mess and inconvenience in the trucks, hasn't anyone ever heard of using heavy-duty trash bags, biohazard bags, or something similar to keep all the unpleasantness of a dead body contained?  How hard is it to securely enclose a dead animal in a bag and bring it back to AC later in the day? 

The laziness and stupidity of the AC department is frightening.  And this town's backwards attitudes towards pet ownership only help to enable AC's incompetence.

posted by birdmom on Oct 25, 2006 at 09:14 AM
Besides the health issue of having dead animals buried all over the County, I am bothered by one other thing. By not bringing these dead animals back to the shelter, these animals never get scanned for a microchip. I was under the impression that ALL animals brought to AC, dead or alive, were scanned for a chip. If an animal escapes its yard and gets hit by a car, it appears the owner may never know what happened to their pet as it is just unceremoniously buried without being checked. Is it possible to scan through a plastic bag so they don't have to get their hands dirty?
posted by anonymous on Oct 25, 2006 at 09:40 AM
Not much difference in the expertise between Animal Control and Human Services.  Both embarrassments.  Of course the human clients aren't anything to write home about, either.
posted by anonymous on Oct 25, 2006 at 09:44 AM
I checked with ourl ocal animal control agency, both the city and county, neither buries dead animals on private or public property.

From the picture on the news story, that cat didn't look to "nasty" or "decomposed" or crawling with bugs and maggots, it wasn't even buried, it was layed on the ground and covered up with some dirt, probably with the ACO's shoe. Denise Haynes is worried that bugs will infect other animals at the shetler if the dead animals are brough back for disposal, are you kidding me...shouldn't she be a little more concerned about the kennel cough, parvo, distemper, canine nfluenza and panluek that is infecting the animals in her care at the shelter, because of poor cleaning practices ie, no disinfectant on premises not even bleach!

If the dogs we pulled for rescue only had some bugs on them, hell we would consider that great shape! But no, they are sick, injured and starved!

It is time for this community to get involved and demand a change in leadership. God forbid that YOUR pet find it's way into this shelter!
posted by shoneypaws on Oct 25, 2006 at 09:50 AM
How many yards has animal control tainted with Parvo which can live in the ground up to 3 years?  An unsuspecting family moves in and looses their family dogs thanks to Animal Control.   I can not understand how they could possibly not realize this.  It is against the law in Sacramento County and City to bury animals on private property.  How could Bakersfield be so stupid?  Do they not know one thing about the animals they are supposed to serve?  The deceased animals are placed in freezers until properly disposed of.  If they follow proper procedure there is no oder or disease. 
posted by anonymous on Oct 25, 2006 at 12:35 PM
There are a couple of tests I would submit on this topic relative to Denise Haynes who, imho, should be fired... should have never even HAD the job.

1.  Does common sense dictate that you can walk over to your neighbor's home, and bury your dead  dog?  If not, then just how stupid is Haynes?  Why is she still there?

2.  State law requires that animals picked up dead be scanned for a chip.  This is simple stuff.  Wave the scanner over the dead animal and record the chip number.  Then call the company.  They will release, to Animal Control, the chip information.  So.... if they were NOT carrying scanners on their trucks (which they don't) then they are also in violation of state law.

Denise Haynes has NO experience as an Animal Control Director.  None.  The reason this shelter is still in such shambles is, largely, because of her.  The audit of the shelter, ordered by the Board of Supervisors, took her to task, as well.  It is not just the public, it was an audit company that audits animal shelters.

Please write a letter to the BOS asking that she be removed from this position.
 
posted by anonymous on Oct 25, 2006 at 08:43 PM
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Jon McQuiston, District 1 - ph: 661-868-3650, fax: 661-868-3657, district1@co.kern.ca.us
Don Maben, District 2 - ph: 661-868-3660, fax: 661-868-3666, district2@co.kern.ca.us
Barbara Patrick, District 3 - ph: 661-868-3670, fax: 661-868-3677, dist3@co.kern.ca.us
Ray Watson, District 4 - ph: 661-868-3680, fax: 661-868-3688, district4@co.kern.ca.us
Michael Rubio, District 5 - ph: 661-868-3690, fax: 661-868-3645, district5@co.kern.ca.us
posted by anonymous on Oct 25, 2006 at 08:45 PM
Please flood the Board of Supervisors with calls that Denise Haynes be terminated. 

This shelter needs a progressive, pro-active manager right away.
1

  (You need to be signed in to leave a comment)

BAKERSFIELD.COM HOT TOPICS:

Advertisement