A blog about News.
About talkofthetown


Member Since:
June 21, 2006
Last Signed In:
December 02, 2008
Profile Views:
10752
Blog Views:
147886
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Depressing Christmas cards
Leading Catholic: Disney has corrupted kids
Kid comes before designer jeans
Predicting the stock market
Judge: Obese fliers should get two airline seats
Palin's unfortunate interview backdrop!
Record number of pot plants seized in state
Safe haven or easy way out?
Where's the good gas prices news?
McDonald's shines in bad economy
Archives
June 06
July 06
August 06
September 06
October 06
November 06
December 06
January 07
February 07
March 07
April 07
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
December 08
More Archives
June 06
May 06
April 06
March 06
February 06
January 06
December 05
November 05
October 05
September 05
August 05
July 05
June 05
May 05
April 05

Blog Roll


Ask The Californian
Editorials
Entertainment
Eye of Bakersfield
Faith Forum
Fired Up!
Inside Sports
Neighbors
Right Thinking
Sound Off
Talk of the Town
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


talkofthetown - > Talk of the Town -> Ethics — loose interpretation in Texas
Ethics — loose interpretation in Texas
 One wonders what qualifications it takes to get on the Texas Ethics Commission.

Not sure that being ethical is one of them.

For example, the commission just ruled that if a Texas legislator gets a gift of cash, he has to fill out a form saying he received currency from so and so.

Not how much. Just who it was from.

So, if I gave a Texas legislator a boat load of money, the public would know I gave the elected representative some currency.

You think I'm making this up, don't you. Check out the above link.

And note that the commission has already ruled that if you give a legislator checks, for lets say $500,000, the legislator has to report he's received "checks." 

The Texas legislature will take up these issues in its next session. A yes vote to ratify vague gift descriptions would prompt me to vote no on them in the next election.

And while they are at it, they might want to look at the make up of the ethics commission.
Just a thought.

Posted by Steve E. Swenson

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by talkofthetown on Thursday, November 30, 2006 at 07:07 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 195 times
4 comments from 4 users

1

posted by robbwillis on Dec 1, 2006 at 08:43 AM
Isn't this bribery process known as "lobbying"?
posted by CurtDalton on Dec 1, 2006 at 08:45 AM

Ethics in government?

You've got to be kidding!

That has to be the top oxymoron of all time!

We haven't had ethics in government for a very long time.

posted by mattloch on Dec 1, 2006 at 08:54 AM
Only in Texas, Rob. There, the brown paper bag is still seen as a legitimate lobbying tactic. But for the past decade or two, Texas politics (and criminal law enforcement, often working together) has produced some of the most egregious violations of American political ethics and human morality since the Teapot Dome Scandal. The stories that I've read have actually made this specific issue look tame in comparison.
posted by randomfactor on Dec 1, 2006 at 09:13 AM
The Gods of Irony smile on Texas tonight.  Because of Tom DeLay's redistricting, (partially achieved through perverting the Homeland inSecurity Agency)  they have virtually no Congressional authority anymore.  They're still paying the lobbyists, though...
1

  (You need to be signed in to leave a comment)

BAKERSFIELD.COM HOT TOPICS:

Advertisement