|
LPGA demands its players speak English Should a 9-year-old with a fast fastball be banned from pitching? Way too much beach volleyball Who is Michael Phelps dating? Whites no longer U.S. majority in 2042 Are the Chinese cheating? Olympic thoughts: The lip-synching ain't the half of it Paper: The great oil bubble has burst Report: New team ready to take Blaze's spot Miss the Blaze? Maybe a little June 06 July 06 August 06 September 06 October 06 November 06 December 06 January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 June 06 May 06 April 06 March 06 February 06 January 06 December 05 November 05 October 05 September 05 August 05 July 05 June 05 May 05 April 05 Blog RollAsk The Californian Editorials Entertainment Eye of Bakersfield Faith Forum Fired Up! Inside Sports Neighbors Right Thinking Sound Off Talk of the Town
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
A Titanic story of Jesus
The Titanic was real, so must "The Lost Tomb of Jesus" which includes Jesus, the Biblical Savior of the world; his wife, Mary Magdeline, and their son Judah, also be real?
Where does that question come from? James Cameron, the filmmaker who explored the wreck of the Titanic and directed an Oscar-winning feature film based on its sinking, is the executive producer of a documentary based on the Jesus-was-married-and-had-a-kid theme. The theme is based on six ossuaries, or stone boxes for holding human bonds, found in a tomb unearthed during construction in Jerusalem in 1980. This would come as a shock to millions of people who believe Jesus only borrowed a tomb for three days and then, like a good camper, left it the way he found it. The belief goes that Jesus, son of God, raised himself from the dead and went to heaven, having sacrificed his human life for the sins of all man. But The Discovery Channel had a news conference Monday to promote the documentary produced by Cameron. Turns out leading archaeologists in the United States and Israel say this is all a publicity stunt based on no scientific evidence. A Washington Post article linked above quotes archaeologists as saying the basis of the documentary "nonsense" and "intellectually and scientifically dishonest." That may have nothing to do with whether the documentary makes a lot of money. Posted by Steve E. Swenson 13 comments from 7 users
1
posted by
randomfactor
on Feb 28, 2007 at 02:14 PM
posted by
robbwillis
on Feb 28, 2007 at 02:16 PM
posted by
woofwoof
on Feb 28, 2007 at 02:20 PM
posted by
randomfactor
on Feb 28, 2007 at 02:24 PM
They already had noted bigot William Donohue on Larry King the other day to decry it. "Mary/Miriam" is supposedly the most common female name at that time--which explains some of the confusion in the New Testament as to who's who... . I'll be watching the movie for sure. Nice of Donohue to help with the publicity campaign. posted by
robbwillis
on Feb 28, 2007 at 02:26 PM
posted by
ProgressivePete2
on Feb 28, 2007 at 02:31 PM
posted by
paxchristi3
on Feb 28, 2007 at 02:36 PM
How well Robb knows me. I'll leave it to Ben Witherington to offer an expert analysis on this subject here Yes, praise indeed goes to Donohue for his expose on the late attempt by the secularists to knock down believers in Christ that, interestingly enough, coincides with their moves toward greater government control and globalization of religion. posted by
robbwillis
on Feb 28, 2007 at 02:43 PM
posted by
ProgressivePete2
on Feb 28, 2007 at 02:48 PM
posted by
randomfactor
on Feb 28, 2007 at 02:49 PM
posted by
mattloch
on Feb 28, 2007 at 02:49 PM
posted by
randomfactor
on Feb 28, 2007 at 02:50 PM
posted by
nooneisabovethelaw
on Mar 1, 2007 at 02:03 PM
1
Our readers recommend: |