THE GRUMPY SKEPTIC
Trying to fight all the illogical whoo whoo in our city, and our nation.

A blog about Personal Journals, Religion & Faith, and Technology.
About thegrumpyskeptic


Member Since:
December 28, 2007
Last Signed In:
September 08, 2009
Profile Views:
188
Blog Views:
5959
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Mr. President Speaks to our Youth
Why so Grumpy?
Funny Pic
Isn't This World Enough
Crazy Email
Funny homeopathic video
Happy Independence Day
2012 the end of the world!!! YAAARRRRG!!!
Big Pharma
So Much Woo So little Time
Archives
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
December 08
January 09
February 09
March 09
April 09
May 09
June 09
July 09
August 09
September 09
October 09
November 09
December 09
January 10
February 10
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


thegrumpyskeptic - > THE GRUMPY SKEPTIC -> PZ Myers dishing out some pain to the ID crowd
PZ Myers dishing out some pain to the ID crowd

No matter how hard we try those ID (Intelligent Design) folks, well just don't get evolution...or is it evil-lution? LOL but check it out, give him some love, ive been much too busy spending time with my family on my days off!! now that i'll be going back to work, im sure i can write some more, lol. enjoy!

 

http://scienceblogs.com/pha...

here's a snippet

Say what? Darwin, trained to be a theologian, admirer of Paley, was philosophically predisposed to dogmatic materialism? That is a bit of a stretch, don't you think?

But I think it's part of the DI's general strategy. Relying on real, physical evidence to make a case is to be declared anathema; True Scientists™ build their case on metaphysical imaginary supernatural "evidence", like the creationist's rationale for a god.

I think their new motto ought to be "Making Stuff Up for Jesus". It's all they've got.

Now why Forbes would willingly act as a mouthpiece for these shills is the real mystery — I've written for Forbes before, and they usually seem sensible. But since they are implicitly endorsing the DI's approach to evidence, I guess I actually don't need to find out — I can just invent an explanation and it's as good as any other. Therefore, I think somebody snuck into the editorial staff's homes late at night and carried out involuntary lobotomies on everyone. And if you try to disagree with me, obviously you are an ideologue with an a priori commitment to the metaphysic of materialism.

As is my style, he's got that grumpy edge give him some love until next time... remember be skeptical!

Posted in these Groups: News, Religion & Faith, Technology
Topics: science, skepticsm, atheist, PZ Myers
posted by thegrumpyskeptic on Friday, February 6, 2009 at 11:29 AM
Report a Violation
Viewed 51 times
13 comments from 7 users

1

posted by catpaw on Feb 6, 2009 at 11:48 AM

The side that can tell me how something came from nothing wins.

posted by randomfactor on Feb 6, 2009 at 12:20 PM

The side that can tell me how something came from nothing wins.

That would be theoretical physics, assuming certain definitions of "nothing."    Particle pair-formation in vacuum, for example.

Of course, the "ex nihilo" question has nothing to do with evolution.

posted by witbee on Feb 6, 2009 at 12:59 PM

 That would be theoretical physics,

Exactly.

posted by catpaw on Feb 6, 2009 at 03:44 PM

Well, before a big bang, there had to be something, and the something--I'd think--had to come from somewhere. Even if it was a diety. Just one of those things I was kicking around to give myself a headache.

posted by mattloch on Feb 6, 2009 at 08:06 PM

Catpaw, you can create a particle of matter and a particle of antimatter. That's two "somethings" from "nothing".
 

Now get someone to tell you where their god came from.

posted by paxchristi3 on Feb 6, 2009 at 11:47 PM

Mattloch, too bad you survived abortion 2,000 years late, otherwise we'd gladly have come up with someone who could tell you where his god came from, a certain Jewish carpenter who said "He who has seen me has seen the father." Plus:

Mark 8: 38 -- "For he that shall be ashamed of me, and of my words, in this adulterous and sinful generation: the Son of man also will be ashamed of him, when he shall come in the glory of his Father with the holy angels."

Do you have any other gaps in your thinking that could use a good dose of intelligently designed spackle?

posted by thegrumpyskeptic on Feb 10, 2009 at 09:39 AM

where did god's god come from? who made god?

posted by randomfactor on Feb 10, 2009 at 09:40 AM

Human beings did.  In their own image and likeness. 

posted by randomfactor on Feb 10, 2009 at 09:44 AM

Do you have any other gaps in your thinking that could use a good dose of intelligently designed spackle?

Spackle doesn't work nearly as well as gray matter.  But your use of it as a replacement explains much.

posted by VirgilAnderson on Feb 10, 2009 at 09:47 AM

 

But,  what about the idea of god or the experience of such.

Where did  (or, does) that come from?

--virgil  

posted by randomfactor on Feb 10, 2009 at 09:53 AM

My personal hypothesis is that it's the human expression of the mammalian "surrender" reflex.  The mammal brain is hard-wired to experience awe; the prefrontal lobe analyzes that as if it's coming from *OUTSIDE* and tries to assign meaning to it.

Lots of "religious experiences" are indistinguishable from temporal lobe epilepsy, too. 

posted by randomfactor on Feb 10, 2009 at 09:57 AM

Well, before a big bang, there had to be something,

Why?  What would cause the something?

posted by VirgilAnderson on Feb 10, 2009 at 10:08 AM

 

" the human expression of the mammalian "surrender" reflex. The mammal brain is hard-wired to experience awe;.."

 

Yeah, I think  about the point of the mammalian evolution of the experience of awe.

--virgil

1

  (You need to be signed in to leave a comment)

Advertisement