Wow and that's nothing compared to what they do to jay walkers.  Good ol' South Carolina.  A Bush red state, I presume?

Random

I don't think Argentina has that law. Not that I could find anyway.

Do you suppose the adultery or fornication may have happened more than the three trips out of state?

Any man or woman who shall be guilty of the crime of adultery or fornication shall be liable to indictment and, on conviction,

Which is why he went to Argentina to do it.  Duh.   Although I bet they have the silly rule too.

Limbaugh says:

Nobody caught Sanford doing anything.

Keeps gettin' better. 

I don't care was letter they have after their names, guys like this need to pay the piper.

Taxpayers fund Sanford affair

 Earlier today, Mark Sanford told The State he went to Argentina about 18 months ago on a taxpayer-funded Commerce Department trip.

Sanford, in a brief interview in the nation's busiest airport, said he has been to the city twice before, most recently about a year and half ago during a Commerce Department trip.

So he had an affair with a woman from Argentina, and he recently visited there on the taxpayer dime.

According to Sanford's travel reports, he spent $21,488 on a trip to Brazil, Argentina, and China. However much of that can be allocated to his trip to Argentina, it still means taxpayers likely spent thousands on his affair.

Wow.

In addition, Ben Smith notes two taxpayer-funded trips to Argentina made by Sanford in the mid-1990s, though Sanford indicated he met the woman with whom he had the affair eight years ago.

What about fraud and missue of taxpayers money? (see next post)

Any man or woman who shall be guilty of the crime of adultery or fornication shall be liable to indictment and, on conviction, shall be severally punished by a fine of not less than one hundred dollars nor more than five hundred dollars or imprisonment for not less than six months nor more than one year or by both fine and imprisonment