A blog about News.
  partisans of Don Carlos (1788–1855) and his successors, who claimed the Spanish throne under the Salic law of succession, introduced (1713) by Philip V. The law (forced on Philip by the War of the Spanish Succession to avoid a union of the French and Spanish crowns) was abrogated by Ferdinand VII in favor of his daughter, who succeeded him (1833) as Isabella II. Ferdinand’s brother, Don Carlos, refused to recognize Isabella and claimed the throne. A civil war followed (First Carlist War, 1833–40), and in the hope of autonomy, most of the Basque Provs. and much of Catalonia supported Carlos. The Carlists’ conservative and clericalist tendencies gave the dynastic conflict a political character, since the upper middle classes profited from the sale of church lands and supported Isabella. The Carlists enjoyed many early successes, especially under their great general, Tomas Zumalacarregui. After he was killed (1835) in battle, the greater strength of the Isabelline forces gradually made itself felt. In 1839 the Carlist commander Rafael Maroto yielded, but in Catalonia the Carlists under Ramón Cabrera continued the struggle until 1840. Don Carlos’s son, Don Carlos, conde de Montemolín (1818–61), made an unsuccessful attempt at a new uprising in 1860. Montemolín’s claims were revived by his nephew, Don Carlos, duque de Madrid (1848–1909), after the deposition (1868) of Isabella. Two insurrections (1869, 1872) failed, but after the abdication (1873) of King Amadeus and the proclamation of the first republic, the Carlists seized most of the Basque Provs. and parts of Catalonia, Aragón, and Valencia. The ensuing chaos and brutal warfare of this Second Carlist War ended in 1876, over a year after Alfonso XII, son of Isabella, was proclaimed king. Don Carlos escaped to France. In the next half century many defected from Carlist ranks, and several rival groups formed. Pressure against the church by the second republic (1931–39) helped revive Carlism, and the Carlists embraced the Nationalist cause in the Spanish civil war (1936–39). Under the Franco regime Carlism was for many years an obstacle to plans for restoring the main branch of the Bourbon dynasty, but in 1969, Franco overrode Carlist objections and named the Bourbon prince Juan Carlos as his successor.
1

  (You need to be signed in to leave a comment)

Advertisement

About tkozy


Real Name:
Buster Buster
Date of Birth:
June 23, 1909
Member Since:
March 14, 2006
Last Signed In:
November 03, 2009
Profile Views:
10225
Blog Views:
50996
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
If Ralph Bailey has another show about Carter and Race.
Those who oppose health reform. Your all on your own.
If your holding onto your High Dollar petro stocks. You want to read this.
Nancy, The hypocrisy is overwhelming.
Nancy, Threatening to block someone does not work.
Sex
Those who oppose health reform. Your all on your own.
A strange Wednesday night
Okay, Let’s agree not to continue to Blame Jr.
Laura Bush praises Obama, bemoans excessive partisanship
Archives
September 06
October 06
November 06
December 06
January 07
February 07
March 07
April 07
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
December 08
January 09
February 09
March 09
April 09
May 09
June 09
July 09
August 09
September 09
October 09
November 09
"Facts are stupid things." - Ronald Regan
"Ideas are more dangerous than guns. We don't let our people have guns. Why should we let them have ideas?" --Josef Stalin
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


tkozy - > There is a Chance -> Bush stop talking migration..
Bush stop talking migration..

Bush stop talking migration..

People are not Ducks. And America is not a bird sanctuary..

Get on with securing America’s borders. Enforce laws that discourage illegal immigration.

Protect American jobs first.

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by tkozy on Friday, March 16, 2007 at 01:20 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 213 times
14 comments from 4 users

1

posted by tkozy on Mar 16, 2007 at 01:23 PM

President Bush and President Calderón of Mexico Exchange Luncheon Toasts


President George W. Bush; President Felipe Calderón of Mexico
Hacienda Temozón
Mérida, Mexico
March 13, 2007

Released by the White House Office of the Press Secretary

12:45 P.M. (Local)

PRESIDENT CALDERÓN: President George Bush, President of the United States of America; distinguished Laura Bush; distinguished members of the delegation accompanying President and Mrs. Bush. For the people in government of Mexico, it is a great satisfaction to have the presence of the President of the United States and his distinguished wife in Yucat n. A proud Mexico, proud of its culture, its roots and history, receives you.

You are also in a modern country, a country which is ever more interrelated and interdependent. Mexico is a nation with a sound past, but also with a sound future; a nation which modernizes in order to face the 21st century. A democratic nation which shares with the United States values -- values of freedom, of democracy, of respect to rule of law and individual rights, and the defense of human rights. Mexico, then, is a freer, safer, and more democratic country.

I have believe, as you do, Mr. President, that our work as leaders takes us to have a better world for our people and for North America. And we hope that we, together, can thrust, within the framework of equality, a future of development and well-being in our region.

I am certain that if we continue to work together we will be able to face the many challenges of our agenda; issues such as migration, combat poverty, the environment, organized crime, and regional trade.

And if you allow me, I would like to toast the health and well-being of President Bush and his wife, and the prosperity and happiness of our peoples in the United States and Mexico. Cheers.

(A toast is offered.)

PRESIDENT BUSH: Señor Presidente, thank you very much for your gracious hospitality. I think you picked a perfect place to invite Laura and me and our delegation. It's a beautiful land. It is a spectacular day. And our meetings were constructive. Thank you, First Lady, for your hospitality, as well.

Relations between Mexico and the United States are muy importante. We've got a great history. We've got a strong tradition of working together. And my job, Mr. President, is to do all I can to work with you to advance progress on both sides of the border.

There are issues, of course, issues that we discussed today and will continue to discuss in a manner of respect and dignity. Perhaps the biggest issue concerning your country is the issue of migration. America is a country of law, we'll respect law, but America is also a hospitable country, a country that recognizes the value of each human being. And as the President of your grand country, I know you're deeply concerned about how your citizens are treated within our country. And my pledge to you and the people of Mexico is they'll be treated with respect and dignity.

The best way to do that is to pass a migration law that upholds the values of America, and at the same time, allows us to respect the rule of law. As I told you in private, as you expressed your deep concerns about whether or not America can pass such a law, that I will use all the efforts I can, working with both Republicans and Democrats, to pass such a piece of legislation.

We spent a lot of time talking about Mexico's important role in the world, and I thank you for your leadership, Mr. President. You're President of a great country. You will use your influence to foster social justice and prosperity and peace. I look forward to your leadership on such issues -- I look forward to helping you as best I can, as best as you request to do so.

And I, too, would like to offer a toast. I'd like to offer a toast to the great people of a great country, nuestro amigo, México, and to your salud, Mr. President.

(A toast is offered.) (Applause.)

END 12:51 P.M. (Local)


 


Released on March 13, 2007

posted by tkozy on Mar 16, 2007 at 01:26 PM

President Bush, President Fox Discuss Migration, Trade, World Affairs
Remarks by the President and Mexican President Vicente Fox in Photo Opportunity
Los Cabos, Mexico

 

     Fact sheet Policy In Focus International Trade

11:00 A.M. (L)

PRESIDENT FOX: (Speaking Spanish.)

PRESIDENT BUSH: Vicente, thank you for inviting us here. This is a very beautiful part of the world, and we're so honored you're hosting this convention.

We did have a very good discussion, but I'm not surprised, after all, we're close friends. We discussed trade, we discussed commerce. We did discuss migration. Ever since I have been the President and Vicente has been the President, we have had a mutual desire to deal with the migration issue in a way that recognizes reality, and in a way that treats the Mexican citizens who are in the United States with respect. And we will continue to work on this issue.

And we did talk about world peace, and Iraq. Mexico is a member of the Security Council. We discussed how to keep the world peaceful, how to hold people to account, how to make sure the United Nations is effective. And I appreciate so very much the President and the Foreign Minister's desire to consult closely with the United States as we move forward to making the world more peaceful.

So we're -- it's an honor to be here. It's going to be a very important conference, being held in a beautiful spot and hosted by a good friend. Mr. President.

We'll take a couple of questions.

Q President Bush, we know that -- we understand President Fox was going to talk to you about the impact that your subsidies would eventually have on Mexican illegal migration to the U.S. Did you have an answer for him?

PRESIDENT BUSH: Ask the question again -- agricultural subsidies?

Q Migration --

PRESIDENT BUSH: Oh, yes. Well, here's the answer. The answer is, the long-term answer for the migration issue is to work a way that encourages commerce on both sides of the border, so people can find jobs here in Mexico, for starters. That's the long-term solution.

And the short-term solution, we've got to recognize that wage differentials are going to cause people to want to come to the United States. And when they come to the United States, we've got to work to make sure they're treated with respect. And the issue is how do we recognize the reality of two societies with a wage differential the way they are. Here on the border, the wage differential is narrowing -- or on the border, wage differential is narrowing, so the migration pressure tends to come from interior of Mexico and the south of Mexico.

And one of the things that the President and I have discussed in the past is how best to develop industry together in the midst of Mexico, in the south of Mexico, so that people are more likely to find work at home.

Heidi. Oh, sorry.

Q A senior administration official told us this morning that the goal with North Korea is to isolate them. What is your strategy for doing that without winding up in the same position that we were in, in 1994, with a failed agreement?

PRESIDENT BUSH: Well, I'm glad you asked a senior administrative official. Our goal is to work with our friends in the region to convince Kim Chong-il to disarm. I made a positive step yesterday in Crawford when the President of China made a public declaration that he said, like the United States, we share the desire to make sure the Korean Peninsula is nuclear weapons free.

Right after this meeting with President Fox, I'll be meeting with the leaders of Japan and South Korea, where we'll continue this dialogue. So the strategy is to make sure that our close friends and our allies and people with whom we've got relations work in concert to convince Mr. Kim Chong-il that a nuclear weapons free peninsula is in his interests, it's in South Korea's interests and it is in the world's interests.

Q (Asked in Spanish.)

PRESIDENT FOX: (Answered in Spanish.)

PRESIDENT BUSH: (Speaking Spanish.)

Q For President Fox -- it's the same question, basically. For President Fox, are you prepared to support the U.S. position at the U.N. and vote for a resolution authorizing force?

And for President Bush, are there any consequences for nations that don't support our position at the U.N.?

PRESIDENT BUSH: The only consequence, of course, is with Saddam Hussein. And if the U.N. does not pass a resolution which holds him to account, and that has consequences, then as I have said in speech after speech after speech, if the U.N. won't act, if Saddam Hussein won't disarm, we will lead a coalition to disarm him.

Q President Fox?

PRESIDENT FOX: (Answered in Spanish.)

END 11:18 A.M. (L)

posted by tkozy on Mar 16, 2007 at 01:40 PM

Link Follows

Calderon offered an impassioned and personal defense of the more than 10 million Mexicans working north of the border, including some of his extended family.

Responding to a question during a joint news conference, Calderon confirmed that he had relatives working in vegetable fields in the United States, adding, ``They probably handle what you eat.'' But he said he didn't know their legal status.

``What I can tell you is that they work and pay their taxes to the government'' of the United States, Calderon said. ``These are people who respect the United States. These are people who have children, who want these children to be educated with respect for the land where they live and for Mexico.''

http://www.registerguard.co...

posted by woofwoof on Mar 16, 2007 at 05:28 PM

Gee why don't we make Mexico a state???? WOOF!  And i am so KIDDING!  We haven't acquired land since 1959......Who wants to be govenor of Mexico????  I'll take some land by ocean, ok?.

And isn't a hoot when we do hear Bush speak Spanish  

posted by tkozy on Mar 16, 2007 at 08:45 PM
posted by DoctorMason on Mar 17, 2007 at 08:48 PM
Re: Bush stop talking migration..
Seems that Calif and the S.W. are returning to normal, like it was before the US took the land from the Mexicans in the 1st place. Instead of  spending money on waging wars and then "reconstructing" the war zones, why don't they spend the money in America?
Some experts say we have plenty of oil reserves and certainly enough American intelligence to make electric powered cars, hydrogen motors, and even anti-gravity vehicles. Who can prove that we are not being misled by corporate interests?

ps... I can't think of the name of the one who said that El Presidente Bush he no speakey the Espanol bastante and that many people say Yankee go home or vas a sus casa. Something like that.
posted by anonymous on Mar 17, 2007 at 10:42 PM

Perhaps California and the S.W. could become even more normal if the Mexicans would give it back to the Spanish, then the Spanish could make it even better by giving it back to the Indians, then the Indians could out-do everyone by giving it back to whomever they took it from.....etc. etc. ad naseum. The first Eurocentric people to settle in California in the late 18th century were Spaniards and they were not all white, a substantial portion were black or mulatto. During this time period, If you called yourself "Mexican" it was understood that you hailed from Mexico City. Those living in California called themselves "Californios" and because the province of California was so far from the seat of government and so sparsely populated the Californios tended to be highly independent to the point of appointing their own governmental leadership. The revolts against Spanish rule began throughout the four vice-regalities that comprised the Spanish Empire in America during in the early 1800's. The revolts heated up when Napoleon forced King Charles IV of Spain to abdicate and Prince Ferdinand to renounce his rights to the throne in 1807.  Napoleon then placed his own brother, Joseph, on the Spanish throne. The revolts in Spanish America spread to Mexico when a revolt led by a Creole Catholic priest, named Miguel Hidalgo, broke out in 1810 and lasted ten years. During this time, Prince Ferdinand regained his rights to the Spanish throne and became King Ferdinand VII. Mexico, however, was not created by revolution but by counter-revolution. For this, we have to delve into the marriage of Ferdinand to the Liberal minded Princess Maria Cristina of Naples who persuaded him to accept her daughter, Isabel, as successor to him as Queen, and the resulting conflict between her and Ferdinand's reactionary brother, Don Carlos, who refused to accept her as Queen of Spain when Ferdinand died.  This flared-up into a vicious civil war in Spain between the Isabelinos and the Carlists. The Isabelinos eventually won. The generals and Conservatives in Mexico who were fighting against the succession of revolutionary priests forced a coup against the Liberals representing Spanish interests in America and simply announced Mexico's independence. General Agustine de Iturbide became Emperor Agustine I of Mexico in 1820 since he was the leader of the coup. About a year later, one of his top men, General Antonio Lopez de Santa Ana conspired with the Liberals to overthrow Iturbide and when that was accomplished he then double-crossed the Liberals and became dictator. Do you want me to continue with this history lesson on how Mexico became a cesspool of corruption and how we really don't want California and the Southwest to become "normal" like Mexico again, or has everyone fallen asleep by now?

Annon 42

 

posted by tkozy on Mar 17, 2007 at 11:22 PM

Annoy says:

double-crossed the Liberals

 

TK says:

Darn Neo Cons, like

Santa Ana El Neo, are still double crossing the liberals today. Funny how history repeats itself.. ;)
posted by anonymous on Mar 18, 2007 at 12:35 AM

Sorry to all,

I got a bit ahead of myself with all the drama between the Isabelinos and the Carlists which actually occurred after 1829. The Liberal government that took power in Spain in 1820 which subsequently resulted in the coup in Mexico by Iturbide was the result of a successful military coup by an army officer, Rafail del Riego Nunez, who had been converted to liberalism while he was a P.O.W. of the French during the Napoleonic Wars. As a result of this coup King Ferdinand was obliged to accept the Liberal politicians in Madrid as his government and reinstate the Constitution of 1812. King Ferdinand proclaimed, "Let us advance frankly, myself leading the way, along the constitutional path". But, the despot did not mean a word of it. As soon as the Liberals began to quarrel among themselves, as they are prone to do, their solidarity fell apart and King Ferdinand was restored to absolute monarch by the intervention of Louis XVIII of France and the Holy Alliance which was comprised of the monarchies of Russia, Austria, and Prussia. I hope this is all becoming crystal clear now!

Annon 42

posted by tkozy on Mar 18, 2007 at 06:20 AM
posted by anonymous on Mar 18, 2007 at 02:23 PM

Tomas de Zumalacarregui was a very resourceful man and he paid for his abilities with his life. It is the nature of despots such as Don Carlos to eliminate those who could possibly pose a threat to their absolutism. Antonio Lopez de Santa Ana, the Napoleon of the West, was also involved in numerous intrigues and betrayals of his own making to secure his dictatorial power and self aggrandizement.

Annon 42

posted by tkozy on Mar 18, 2007 at 05:00 PM

Don Carlos of Spain (1545-1568) was deformed from birth; hunchbacked and pigeon-breasted with shoulders of uneven height and his right leg considerably shorter than the left. The crippled child was also retarded and slow in both his physical and mental development. He was sickly and often had fevers. He spoke in a high-pitched, girlish voice, and stuttered badly. Don Carlos may have suffered a brain dysfunction at birth, which can cause indiscriminately aggressive and impulsively violent behaviour. There also seems to have been a recurring streak of madness in the Portuguese Royal Family. Both Don Carlos' mother and grandmother were Portuguese Princesses. In addition, Don Carlos' parents were double first cousins. Due to the incestuous marriages of his immediate ancestors, Don Carlos had only 4 great-grandparents, instead of the usual 8, and two of them were sisters1: Juana "the Mad" and Maria of Castile.

http://www.xs4all.nl/~kvenj...

 

posted by anonymous on Mar 18, 2007 at 05:57 PM

TK, the Don Carlos that you speak of must be an earlier one than the one that I referenced. The one you speak of lived from 1545-1568, the one of Carlist fame lived from 1785-1855.

Annon 42

posted by tkozy on Mar 18, 2007 at 10:06 PM