Don't tell me, let me guess: Fox News is objective, unbiased and factual. Its reputation to the contrary is a liberal smear campaign. The National Enquirer  has the same problem. So does Jerry Springer. 

They didn't carry  the Presidents speech on Sept 5th 2009~ I think both sides bear culpability here.

I read the aricle and found it interesting, although a little slanted in favor of Fox. So I decided to go to the humanevents.com website to check it out. Lo and behold, it is described as "the conservative underground". Just the type of non-biased, fair and balanced site I would go to to get a report on the WH and Fox News. Witter, try checking out some of the outrageous things that have been on Fox and gone un-corrected and ask yourself if you would want to use them for information. If you do, that is certainly your privalege, but if you do, I shall in the future all your opinions as suspect.

Witters, I have to agree with Pogo.  It would be to your benefit to consider your sources first.  (You've been improving, really!  hee hee :)

Many of the people who contribute to Human Events would be more than happy to throw me in jail for being a Witch or an uppity liberated woman.

If I would be in such danger, you wouldn't be all too safe, either.  :)

I shall in the future all your opinions as suspect.

My opinions are just that.....................mine. don't like them don't read the blog and certainly don't comment. Kind of like the TV - don't like the program, change the channel.I have watched MSNBC-FOX-CNN and lo' and behold they each have their own agenda - surprise, surprise. I find MSNBC to be just as liberal leaning as you find Fox conservative leaning. sooooo - the point would be what???  Again - don't like it - change the channel or turn it off!  THAT is called 'choice'.

SPAM CODE:  I UZZ U <----WHAT A HOOT!!!!

Witters, I am not commenting on your opinion, just your citation. I usually value your opinion, even though we don't always agree on politics. You are not one of these posters (Pax) who contiually cite some obscure web site as gospel. I was just a little shocked when I checked it out.

I watch Fox sometimes, especially Shep Smith, I believe that I should be informed on both sides of questions. We all tend to watch what we agree with, makes us more comfotable in our skin.

off topic Apollo, have you read the Physick Book of Deliverance Dane? Good mystery on the Salem thing.

What are the facts here?  Has the White House ordered people to stay off Fox news or not?

"a “Fox Summit” between Roger Ailes, chairman of Fox News, and David Axelrod, senior adviser to President Obama, Fox News was told they wouldn’t get to conduct any Obama interviews in the foreseeable future and all members of the administration, from the top down, were ordered to stay off Fox News."
 

Is that true or not?  If both are true, then you can ignore the opinions and the rhetoric but what about the president of the USA unning a blockade on a major news channel?  Is that the "American" way?

Pogo, I have not.  I already have a stack of books to bore through!

Another book to buy now?  Calgon, take me away!  ;)

Nancy, I don't know if it is true or not, I am googling like mad to find out. If it is true, so much for "Transparancy"

This is what I found at first look

Roger Ailes, David Axelrod Have A 'Cordial Conversation' in Manhattan

Politico reports White House senior adviser David Axelrod met with Fox News founder and chairman Roger Ailes when Pres. Obama was in New York during the UN General Assembly two weeks ago.

The two discussed news coverage and the relationship between the organizations. An FNC spokesperson tells POLITICO that Ailes and Axelrod had a "cordial conversation" over coffee...

During the month of September, Fox News passed on carrying certain speeches from the president.

Interestingly, on the Saturday following the Axelrod-Ailes Manhattan chat, Fox News carried Pres. Obama's entire speech at a Congressional Black Caucus event, while MSNBC and CNN did not.

I tried snopes and found nothing yea or nay.

Try, Fox News is not really news, but rhetoric?

 catpaw So does Jerry Springer. 

on that note they left out the huffin post and the other news media sources that were so 'unbiased' during the campaign and after..so much for their recanter witters..dont let em sweat ya..anything they can toss we can catch and throw back twice as hard..

Obama is dumb. As was said the other day, "Don't pick a fight with someone who likes to fight". 

I just know one thing, WP, and that is that blackballing Fox was the best advertisement Fox could get.  To think that you were the one really major news channel not to be graced by the presence of you-know-who.  One might conclude that y-k-w was simply too scared to sit down with someone who didn't get that special tingle up their leg. 

Like any headline-hungry celeb, Fox News is just trying to get its name in the news.

Fox should be proud to be on 0bama's enemy's list.  They earned it with videos of White House Communications Director Anita Dunn saying that Chairman Mao Tse Tung was one of her favorite philosophers while looking like she'd been mainlining crystal meth for days before her speech. 

How many of his own countrymen's deaths was Mao responsible for?   And now he has admirers in the White House. 

driln:  Amen.

catpaw:  I guess they succeeded.  

WP:  Love your new avatar.  Love it!

I agree, neverleft.  For all of the pundits who have said "he is extremely smart', everything he has attempted has shown his lack of intelligence.

Go with it WP! You know I'm on your side when it comes to Obama and Company. Keep up the good work.

From all I have watched of Beck, he proves what he says through videos of the culprit's themselves. Can't get much better proof then the person themselves doing the speaking.  This administration is Ugly!

Good going WP!

I've been to dinner, a staff meeting, a trip to the bank and  I'm still waiting for someone on the left to disprove the article.

When discounting a story because of it's source, be sure the article itself is wrong otherwise it doesn't matter if the source is right wing.

President Obama doesn't need an enemies list, at least not one with anybody on the right. If anything happens to the man it will probably come from within his own ranks. Look at the freakazoids he surrounds himself with: Marxists, radicals, and mad bombers, all of to whom he is indebted. He had better not renege on any promises to that bunch of mobsters.  The latest being Anita Dunn the Chairman Mao lover whose tongue darts out involuntarily and then she begins a chewing action like she had just speared a fly on which to dine!  I didn't want to look at her but I was compelled to out of morbid curiosity. She gave that speech in front of a group of high-schoolers and I'll just bet the front row was mocking that tongue-flicking action of hers.

spam code: WDBUG

Proam, even when Beck provides transcripts he's called a liar.  If the information comes from the right, the left will always saay it's a lie.

honestly, a person has to DIG to find straight to the point unbiased news....and for those of you protecting and making excuses for Obama...it goes on with both sides

even more reason for a powerful 3rd party so we can finally put all this R and D crap to bed once and for all

The Devil loves his own, WP. Obama made the cut with the Evil One and Beck didn't.

AMEN Sam!  Now if people would stop being sheepeople we could get vote out the wolves in sheeps clothing eh!

Gee Nancy, I thought I posted something yesterday that said the meeting was friendly and that Fox immediately covered POTUS. Guess you missed that one. As for the rest of it, I am happy for you on the Right that you have something to congratulate yourselves on. Have fun.

I am in deep, deep mourning over the OU-Texas game, so cannot be bothered with the usual political drival from both sides.

Woe is me for another year. How long Lord, How Long?